New York Post: OnlyFans model cries after sleeping with 101 men in a day: ‘Sometimes I feel so robotic’

According to the New York Post:

Lily Phillips, 23, had sex with over a hundred men in a day back in October to create some scandalous content for her subscription-based social media page.

But despite previously insisting that she enjoyed the extreme stunt, all that sex didn’t make her feel good.

“Sometimes I feel so robotic,” Phillips admitted in YouTuber Josh Pieters’ documentary titled, “I Slept With 100 Men in One Day.”

The British sex worker fought back tears as she recalled that day.

“I think by the 30th when we’re getting on a bit, I’ve got a routine of how we’re going to do this and sometimes you disassociate and it’s not like normal sex at all,” Phillips said.

Although it was a momentously frisky feat, it wasn’t all that memorable for the young woman, who admitted she didn’t remember much of it…

Phillips shared that it’s not just the physical intimacy of having sex with so many men that made her feel “so bad” but also disappointing them by not being able talk with them, or even being interested in doing so.

She said that conversing with them was also “hard” and recounted how one man complained that they only chatted for about two minutes when she had said beforehand that they would talk for about five minutes…

When asked if she thinks she should feel bad about not talking with each man for a set amount of time, Phillips explained that she felt she had disappointed her supporters.

“I guess when you’ve promised something to people who support you, it’s kinda hard to let them down,” she said.

The sex worker also admitted that she hadn’t yet processed what she did on that day, but said she wouldn’t forget the day of her emotional interview.

I wrote about the porn industry from 1995 to 2007. I found the experience often retarded my thinking. The more time I spent around porn, the dumber I got. Friends would say to me: “I remember when you were smart.” Other people noted how I became more coarse and more socially inappropriate the more time I spent around porners.

There are probably many revelations and many forms of knowledge that are not good for most people. For example, the happily married people I think I know seem to have positively distorted views of their spouse. I wonder if it is possible to love someone and to see them as they are.

I can’t recall examples from history of pornography serving as a stimulus to great intellectual achievement.

What would be the best way for a woman who starred in a 100-man gangbang video to leverage that achievement for success in polite society?

Her ability to disassociate might help her to become a great spy or shock jock.

Would you be proud to introduce this woman to your family and friends as your future bride?

Lily’s mother is her manager.

Posted in Pornography | Comments Off on New York Post: OnlyFans model cries after sleeping with 101 men in a day: ‘Sometimes I feel so robotic’

How do you prevent major mental illness?

“No one has the faintest idea of how to prevent major mental illness,” writes Rael Jean Isaac, coauthor of Madness in the Streets: How Psychiatry and the Law Abandoned the Mentally Ill (2000), in his plug for Insane Consequences: How the Mental Health Industry Fails the Mentally Ill (2017).

I wonder if that is true?

In 2001, Allan V. Horwitz, a sociologist of medicine, published the book Creating Mental Illness. According to the publisher:

…Allan V. Horwitz argues that our current conceptions of mental illness as a disease fit only a small number of serious psychological conditions and that most conditions currently regarded as mental illness are cultural constructions, normal reactions to stressful social circumstances, or simply forms of deviant behavior.

“Horwitz properly identifies the financial incentives that urge therapists and drug companies to proliferate psychiatric diagnostic categories. He correctly identifies the stranglehold that psychiatric diagnosis has on research funding in mental health. Above all, he provides a sorely needed counterpoint to the most strident advocates of disease-model psychiatry.”—Mark Sullivan, Journal of the American Medical Association

Horwitz would agree with Rael’s point for right now, but in the future, things might get better.

Grok says these are the key points of Horwitz’s book:

Critique of Disease Model: Horwitz challenges the widespread acceptance of mental illness as a biological disease, suggesting that this perspective serves financial interests like those of therapists, drug companies, and mental health advocacy groups. He argues that the expansion of psychiatric diagnoses has led to the medicalization of normal human emotions and behaviors.
Historical Context: The book traces the historical development of psychiatric diagnosis, particularly focusing on the transition from the dynamic psychiatry of the mid-20th century to the diagnostic psychiatry introduced with DSM-III in 1980. He discusses how this shift expanded the scope of what is considered mental illness.
Social Construction: Horwitz posits that many conditions labeled as mental disorders are actually shaped by cultural and social expectations. He uses examples like hysteria, multiple personality disorder, and depression to illustrate how societal pressures and norms influence what gets pathologized.
Biological vs. Social Causes: While acknowledging that some mental disorders might have biological underpinnings, Horwitz emphasizes that social factors often play a more significant role in the expression of these conditions. He critiques the overreliance on pharmaceutical treatments when social interventions might be more effective.
Implications for Treatment: The book suggests that by broadening the definition of mental illness, psychiatry might be doing more harm than good by pathologizing normal life experiences. Horwitz advocates for a more nuanced approach where social responses or environmental adjustments could be more beneficial than medical treatments.
Critique of Psychiatric Practices: He discusses how the diagnostic criteria have become overly inclusive, leading to an inflation in the number of people considered mentally ill, which in turn affects research funding, treatment modalities, and public perception of mental health.

Overall, “Creating Mental Illness” is a critique that calls for a reevaluation of how mental disorders are defined, diagnosed, and treated, advocating for a model that integrates social context more deeply into understanding human distress.

I asked Grok if Allan Horwitz believed we can prevent major mental illness and it said:

…Horwitz does acknowledge that some severe psychological conditions, like schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, might fit traditional disease models, suggesting that for these specific cases, prevention could involve more conventional medical approaches, although he critiques the broad application of disease models to all mental health issues.

In summary, while Horwitz does not outright state that mental illness can be “prevented” in a medical sense for all conditions, his work implies that a significant portion of what is currently diagnosed as mental illness might be mitigated or re-conceptualized through changes in social policy, cultural attitudes, and the environment rather than solely through medical prevention strategies. His perspective encourages a re-evaluation of what we consider as mental illness and how we address it, focusing less on prevention through medicine and more on understanding and addressing the social context.

According to Grok:

Preventing major mental illness involves a combination of lifestyle, environmental, and early intervention strategies. Here are several approaches based on available research and recommendations:

Early Intervention and Awareness:
Recognizing early warning signs such as changes in sleep or appetite, mood swings, or social withdrawal can lead to earlier interventions. This can potentially reduce the severity or even delay the onset of mental illness. Engaging with mental health professionals at the onset of symptoms is crucial.

Lifestyle Modifications:
Physical Activity: Regular exercise has been shown to reduce stress, anxiety, and depression, contributing positively to mental well-being. It can also help in regulating mood and reducing symptoms of mental health disorders.

Nutrition: A balanced diet rich in nutrients supports overall health, including mental health. Specific nutrients like Vitamin D and B12 might play roles in mood regulation.

Sleep: Quality sleep is essential for mental health. Poor sleep habits are linked to an increased risk of mental disorders.

Social and Emotional Support:
Building and maintaining strong social connections can provide emotional support, reduce feelings of loneliness, and act as a buffer against mental health issues. Engaging in activities with others or having supportive relationships can be protective.

Practices like gratitude, meditation, and yoga are suggested for managing stress and enhancing mental resilience.

Mental Health Education and Stigma Reduction:
Public health campaigns and education can promote understanding and reduce stigma, encouraging people to seek help when needed. This forms part of primary prevention by fostering an environment where mental health is openly discussed and addressed.

Parenting and Early Childhood Support:
For children and adolescents, interventions like parenting education, support for children of mentally ill parents, and programs aimed at teaching emotional regulation can be effective in preventing later mental health issues.

Policy and Environmental Changes:
Broader societal changes, such as improving housing, nutrition, education, and economic security, can significantly impact mental health outcomes. Policies that address these social determinants contribute to preventing mental health disorders.

Professional Help:
For those at higher risk or showing early signs, seeking professional help like therapy or counseling can be preventive. This includes strategies tailored to individual needs to manage or mitigate risk factors.

While these strategies can help in prevention, it’s important to acknowledge that not all mental illnesses can be prevented due to genetic, biological, or other complex factors. However, implementing these preventive measures can significantly reduce the likelihood or severity of mental health problems for many individuals.

Posted in Psychiatry | Comments Off on How do you prevent major mental illness?

Everybody wants to change the world

A few years ago, I developed the realization that every form of life wants to transform the world and that these efforts inevitably harm other forms of life, thus creating a war for survival.

When I talked about this with a philosopher of biology, he gave me the term “niche construction.”

According to Grok:

Niche construction in biology refers to the process by which organisms modify their own and sometimes other species’ environments, thereby altering the selection pressures and evolutionary pathways in those environments. Here’s a breakdown of the concept:

Active Modification: Organisms actively change their habitats through behaviors or physical alterations. Examples include:
Beavers building dams, which create pond habitats.
Earthworms improving soil structure through burrowing.
Birds nesting, which modifies local conditions for both themselves and potentially other species.
Passive Modification: This occurs when the mere presence or byproducts of an organism’s life processes change the environment. For example:
Coral reefs creating diverse ecosystems by their existence.
Trees altering microclimates or soil composition through leaf litter.
Evolutionary Feedback: Niche construction can lead to an evolutionary feedback loop where changes in the environment caused by organisms can influence their own evolution, as well as that of other species:
Changes in habitat can lead to new selection pressures, favoring traits that are advantageous in the modified environment.
Over time, this can result in co-evolution between species and their environments.
Ecological Impact: By altering their environment, species can increase their own survival rates, expand their range, or even create new niches for other species to exploit. This can lead to increased biodiversity but can also sometimes result in less obvious ecological consequences.
Contrast with Traditional Natural Selection: While traditional views of natural selection focus on how environments select for certain traits, niche construction emphasizes how organisms can also select or engineer their environments.

Niche construction broadens our understanding of evolutionary biology by acknowledging that organisms are not just passive recipients of environmental pressures but active participants in shaping their ecological niches. This concept has implications for conservation biology, ecological restoration, and understanding complex ecosystems.

Posted in Biology | Comments Off on Everybody wants to change the world

Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers (1986)

According to Grok:

Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers” by Richard E. Neustadt and Ernest R. May is a seminal work that explores how historical understanding can improve decision-making processes in both government and business. Here’s a summary of the key points:

Main Thesis:
The authors argue that understanding history is crucial for decision-makers because it provides context, patterns, and analogies that can guide current and future actions. By thinking in time, leaders can avoid repeating past mistakes and capitalize on historical successes.

Key Concepts:

Historical Analogy:
Decision-makers often rely on analogies from history to understand current problems. However, the book cautions against simplistic or misleading analogies, advocating for a deeper analysis to ensure the parallels are relevant and accurate.
Time Horizons:
The authors discuss the importance of considering both short-term and long-term implications of decisions. They critique the tendency to focus on immediate outcomes at the expense of future considerations.
Framing Questions:
They suggest that decision-makers should frame their questions historically: What past events are relevant? How have similar situations been resolved before? What were the outcomes of those resolutions?
Bias and Perspective:
Neustadt and May highlight how biases can distort the use of history. They encourage decision-makers to recognize their own biases and those inherent in historical accounts they use.
Case Studies:
The book uses several case studies, including the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Vietnam War decisions, and domestic policy issues to illustrate how history was either well or poorly applied in real-world scenarios.
Cuban Missile Crisis: A positive example where President Kennedy’s administration used historical lessons to navigate the crisis, considering precedents like the Bay of Pigs invasion.
Vietnam War: A cautionary tale where historical analogies (like the Munich agreement) were misapplied, leading to escalation.
Practical Advice:
They recommend practical steps like setting up “devil’s advocate” roles in decision-making teams to challenge assumptions, encouraging a culture of questioning and learning from history.
Learning from History:
The book isn’t just about using history but learning from it in an ongoing manner. They advocate for a continuous process where each decision becomes a lesson for future decisions.

Conclusion:
“Thinking in Time” concludes by reinforcing that historical knowledge isn’t just about memorizing events but about understanding the dynamic interplay of events over time. It’s an essential read for anyone in a decision-making role, emphasizing that history is not just a record of the past but a toolkit for the present and future.

This work is particularly recommended for leaders, strategists, and policy-makers who wish to enhance their decision-making with a more nuanced understanding of history.

Posted in History | Comments Off on Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers (1986)

Insane Consequences: How the Mental Health Industry Fails the Mentally Ill (2017)

Grok summarizes this book by DJ Jaffe:

Core Argument: Jaffe argues that the mental health industry has largely abandoned the most seriously mentally ill in favor of promoting “mental wellness” among a much larger, less symptomatic population. This shift, he claims, has led to dire consequences for those with severe mental illnesses like schizophrenia and severe bipolar disorder.
Statistics and Consequences: Despite an annual expenditure of $147 billion, Jaffe highlights that approximately 140,000 seriously mentally ill individuals are homeless, and 390,000 are incarcerated. This situation arises because psychiatric hospitals have been closed, and criteria for involuntary commitment have become so narrow that preventive measures are often overlooked, leading to increased public endangerment and suffering among the mentally ill and their families.
Criticism of Policies: Jaffe criticizes policies driven by the mental health industry and government for focusing on less severe mental health issues while neglecting those with serious mental illness. He uses various documents, scientific journals, and personal advocacy experiences spanning thirty years to illustrate how these policies have led to negative outcomes like increased homelessness, incarceration, and violence.
Proposed Reforms: The book suggests a series of reforms aimed at prioritizing treatment for the most seriously ill, advocating for smarter, more compassionate, and affordable approaches that would redirect resources from mental “health” initiatives to mental “illness” treatment. These include better use of existing funds, more appropriate commitment laws, and focusing on those who are most in need rather than the general population.

Posted in Psychiatry | Comments Off on Insane Consequences: How the Mental Health Industry Fails the Mentally Ill (2017)