Racists Should Have The Right To Adopt!

There needs to be like a “coming out” movement among racists and it needs to be identitarian.

“I just *am* a racist–I’ve always thought this way. My cousin knew I was a racist when I was 3 years old!” Positive stories.

It’s brave, courageous. To have an opinion that you *know* diminishes your earning potential… because it’s true. You really believe it.

Racists can’t hide no more. We have to come out of the closet to our family and friends because God made us this way. I know I’ve always been a hater, as far back as I remember.

God made me a racist. Love has no labels. God doesn’t make mistakes.

Racists are people too. We just want the right to love and to marry and to live around the only people we are attracted to. You can’t force love. The prospect of making love to a non-racist makes me ill.

No one will hire me. My friends are afraid they’ll “get infected,” I’m not allowed to adopt children, and there’s no where I can go to meet people who are racists like me.

I’m a wonderful, life-affirming, loving, compassionate guy who just happens to be born racist and wants to celebrate my heritage.

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on Racists Should Have The Right To Adopt!

The Providence St. John’s Santa Monica Experience

Luis Pierce provides this Google review: “The only reason I’m not giving it five stars is because I had to walk across dozens of people in the waiting area from the bathroom with my urine sample, which was a bit embarrassing. Other than that, I was treated respectfully, the staff were organized and efficient. They have shelves of condoms and lubricant if you need it. In and out. That’s how it went.”

Posted in Santa Monica | Comments Off on The Providence St. John’s Santa Monica Experience

What’s Happened To America?

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* A lot of savvy young people of the internet generation now know how this stuff is engineered, though — the information is in, we were born in it, and this is why so many young white men are way more to the right than Steve’s commentariate. We know why it’s happening and we know who’s doing it, and we don’t BS around it like a lot of boomers still do. There’s a reason why the same trends were present in Russia up until recently; because the same people who were in charge over there are now in charge over here. This is about people: who is running the show, in charge of crafting the youth culture, and able to promote their policies and agenda. Presently in the US, that is an alien elite who wants to see us destroyed. So we are dying…

Posted in America | Comments Off on What’s Happened To America?


How long will whites put up with this discrimination?

NEWS: NORTH HOLLYWOOD, LOS ANGELES (KABC) — Outrage has grown at Walter Reed Middle School in North Hollywood, as the school faces layoffs and increased class sizes due to a law limiting funds for schools with a higher white student body.

The Los Angeles Unified School District provides more funding for schools where the white population is below 30 percent.

In a letter to parents, the district noted the highly regarded middle school had been above the percentage for the past couple years.

The racial formula was a condition imposed by court decisions dealing with desegregation in the 1970s.

Parents, however, remain frustrated with what the cuts might mean for their children.

“When your class sizes are getting larger and you’re taking resources away from students, I mean ss parents, you do want your kid to go out to college,” one parent, Rosemary Estrada, said.

In an attempt to lessen the budget cuts, the district changed the school’s spending formula to one based on the number of students.

“Thankfully we’re going to keep our librarian. We’re going to keep our nurse, but we may lose a few teachers, but not as many as we once thought,” said Sheila Edmiston, one student’s parent.

Several jobs will still be lost and class sizes could grow. For many parents, the race-based reason of “too many white students” has made the cuts more difficult to swallow.


Why Are American Pundits More Conformist Than British Pundits?

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* I do think the cultural element may the the ur-source for the other differences. I say this because it is not just the pundit class who are less conformist. The British are less deferential to judges than we litigation-whipped Americans are. British are more cynical and dismissive of their politicians than we are, the US having too many secular cultists who cannot distinguish between the political and the religious. In the workplace too, British can be–or used to be–surprisingly candid and irreverent to their supervisors. They weren’t insubordinate, just extremely cheeky by US standards. Perhaps it was sort of safety valve for the class system? Since no one expected the class system to change, verbal fusillades from the inferior class harmlessly told the Establishment of their temperature without creating an obligation to do anything.

* In this country, the side switchers have tended to be people published in low circulation fora who had other income streams or could count on a ready stream of philanthropic funding (extended before or after switching sides). Right to left have included Garry Wills (academic posts), Edward Luttwak (in a way, and, again, academic posts), Michael Lind (misc. philanthropies), David Brock (sorosphere &c), and Damon Linker (whatever crumbs he gets). Left to right have included Irving Kristol (misc. philanthropies), Norman Podhoretz & family (American Jewish Committee), Seymour Martin Lipset (academic positions), James Q. Wilson (academic positions), Charles Murray (misc philanthropies), Richard John Neuhaus (misc. philanthropies, ministerial backstop), and Joseph Epstein (Phi Beta Kappa Society, academic post). Tacking one way and then another over the years have been Nathan Glazer, Robert W. Tucker, and Glenn Loury (f/t academics all).

* An American is his job, so it’s dangerous to be Mickey Kaus because you won’t get hired again by your former friends. The identification of job and status is not as extreme in UK. I remember Toby Young making this point about conformist Americans.

* Brits just like to argue. Debating is a national sport in Britain. Perhaps because their social life revolves around the local pub, where people gather to drink pints and talk for hours.
Another factor could be the great tolerance for individual quirks and excentricities, and for different opinions. Whereas conformity is a virtue in America, in England it’s perceived as a weakness and lack of character. There’s no greater sin than to be boring and conforming. Excentricity is feted and revered, unlike in America.
Of course, PC of late has greatly eroded UK’s freedom of speech and stifled debate.

* The British were a mono-culture until recently, with shared white ancestry. If you’re part of the in-group, you can say what you please among the other in-group members. They’re like your family, and you tolerate more obnoxiousness from your relatives than you would from a stranger. It’s only been recently that out-group members have appeared in Western cultures, and that certain cynical in-group people have been using them as a wedge to divide their own white group against itself.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Why Are American Pundits More Conformist Than British Pundits?