The Man on Every Page

Posted on June 18, 2026 by Luke Ford

The Shalhevet girls run the floor in a gym off Fairfax and the rabbi is on his feet calling the press. He coached this team to back to back national titles. He wears the beard and the kippah, he diagrams a trap defense on the whiteboard, the girls inbound and trap and the other bench calls time. He runs a girls’ varsity team to a national championship and he does not hear the contradiction the rest of us hear. He hears one thing where the rest of us hear two.

Open the Shulhan Arukh and you find his creed printed on the page. Rav Yosef Karo (1488-1575) rules first, in the body of the text, a Sephardic master writing in Safed. Then Rav Moshe Isserles (c. 1530-1572) answers in the gloss, a Polish master setting down the Ashkenazi practice Karo left out. Karo built the table. Isserles laid the cloth. The two never met. They share every page. Ask Rabbi Daniel Bouskila for the best book that holds both Jewish worlds and he names that page. The answer is a creed, not a compromise.

Ernest Becker (1924-1974) argued that men build hero systems to hold off death. A hero system hands you a script for a life that counts, a way to earn a place in something larger that outlasts the body. The soldier earns it by charging. The martyr earns it by burning. The founder earns it by betting the house. The scholar earns it by being right where the others were wrong. Each system answers the one question that frightens us. Did I count. Will I last.

Most systems pay their highest wage to the extreme. The hero goes all the way. He does not hold two truths in one hand. He picks the side and dies on it, and the picking is the glory. Zeal reads as depth. Purity reads as courage. The man who holds both looks, from inside those systems, like a man with no spine.

Bouskila builds a system that runs the other way. In his, the hero is the man who holds both and refuses the cleansing choice. Moderation is the heroism. That is a strange thing to build, because almost every hero system on offer treats the middle as the place cowards hide.

Watch what he does with his working hours and the shape of the system comes clear. He translates dead rabbis so they speak again. Rav Ben-Zion Meir Hai Uziel (1880-1953) was Israel’s first Sephardic Chief Rabbi, a scholar of the first rank, and by Bouskila’s own telling a man most Israelis cannot place. Every Israeli city has a Rav Uziel street. Few who drive it know the name behind the sign. Bouskila reads the man back into the air. He gathers the responsa, the speeches, the letters, and he carries Uziel’s voice into rooms where it had gone quiet. Uziel taught that the split between Ashkenazi and Sephardi was an accident of exile, that no Jew is one or the other underneath, that the work is to unite and not to divide. That voice nearly vanished. Bouskila spends himself keeping it audible.

He does the same with the writer S.Y. Agnon (1888-1970), who sat in a Jerusalem study and built his murdered hometown out of sentences. In Agnon’s story the menorah of Buczacz disappears, and the children melt their lead dreidels to cast a new one, and the new lamp lights the synagogue every year until the killers come and put it out. Agnon writes the town back. Bouskila writes Agnon forward. The pattern holds. The hero beats death by keeping a murdered voice in the air, and the voice he most wants to keep is the moderate one, because the moderate voice is the first the world loses.

So take a word Bouskila treats as holy and watch it change shape as it crosses out of his hero system and into others. Take moderation.

On a parade deck a drill instructor leans into a recruit’s ear at a range of two inches. Moderation, in his system, is the thing that gets the platoon killed. Half effort on the rifle line is a dead Marine. He teaches the recruit to go past what the body wants to give, because the man who holds something back when it counts is the man who breaks. To him the middle is no virtue. The middle is the gap a round goes through.

Across the country a founder pitches a man in a fleece vest across a glass table. The founder says he is all in, mortgaged, no plan B, and the man in the vest writes the check for exactly that. Conviction is the asset. A hedge is a tell. In that system moderation means you do not believe your own thing, and a man who does not believe his own thing cannot be funded and cannot be a hero. The balanced founder is the founder nobody backs.

In a study group a woman who came to faith last year corrects a man who was born to it. She keeps the law to the letter, every stringency, because she remembers the looseness she left and she will not drift back. Moderation, to her, is the lukewarm water she climbed out of. The middle is the country she fled. Her hero is the one who holds the line hardest, and the rabbi who tells her to ease up sounds like a man trying to pull her back under.

In a different room a philosopher in the line of the Greeks teaches that virtue sits between two vices, courage between rashness and cowardice, and that the measured man is the high man. Here moderation is the summit. It is a cold summit, reasoned out, a balance struck by a calm mind for the sake of the good life. The Greek’s middle and Bouskila’s middle wear the same word and come from different fires. One is a conclusion. The other is a rescue.

In a small room a master of an old craft, a cantaor, a maker of one perfect thing, guards a tradition he will not change by a hair. To him tradition is a thing you receive whole and pass on whole, and the man who alters it is the man who breaks it. This is the word that splits Bouskila from him. For Bouskila tradition is a living tongue, not a sealed jar. He takes the tenth of Tevet, an old minor fast, and pours into it the memory of the Holocaust. He takes the four questions of the Seder and writes four new ones for a people that now holds a state. Tradition, in his hands, is a voice that keeps speaking to the room it is in. The craftsman keeps the jar sealed. Bouskila keeps the voice talking.

The same fracture runs through his other holy words. Unity, to a nationalist, means everyone made the same, the melting pot, the single tongue. Unity, to Bouskila, means Karo and Isserles on one page, two customs kept whole under one roof, the Sephardi and the Ashkenazi and the Teimani praying side by side in a Herzliya shul a block from his home, each keeping his own and all of them one. The stranger, to a border officer, is the figure to screen. The stranger, in the verse Bouskila and Uziel lean on, is the one God tells you to love, the ger, tomorrow’s Jew. Same word. Different gods behind it.

Moderation reads as heroism only inside a system with Bouskila’s dead in it. His dead are specific. The Jews expelled from Spain in 1492. The community of Salonika murdered in the war. The town of Buczacz that Agnon had to rebuild in ink. The classic Sephardic voice, balanced, tolerant, at home in both the law and the world, was nearly wiped from the map of living Judaism, squeezed by the zealous on one flank and the assimilated on the other. So when Bouskila holds the middle he is not splitting a difference and he is not hedging a bet and he is not reasoning his way to a calm Greek mean. He is pulling a drowning voice out of the water. His moderation is a war fought for the dead.

The system has a shadow. A hero made of the middle can turn the middle into its own wall. Hold both becomes a test, and the man who will not hold both gets pushed outside the unity in the name of unity. The call to unite can quiet a fight that deserves the open air. The work of keeping old voices audible leans on an audience that still wants to hear them, and some voices the world let go of for reasons of its own. And the moderate hero pays a price the zealot never pays. The maximalists on each side need an enemy to be heroes, and he refuses to be either one’s enemy, so he risks being legible to neither. The man who will not pick a side may find that both sides stop listening. That is the cost of his courage, and he carries it.

Back to the page. Karo in the body, Isserles in the gloss, two men who never met and never agreed and never left, holding their ground on the same sheet for five hundred years. Most hero systems make you choose between them. Bouskila built his life on the refusal. He stands where the body meets the gloss, in the white space between the two rulings, and he calls it home.

Posted in Rabbis | Comments Off on The Man on Every Page

The Afterlife of Coats

Posted on June 18, 2026 by Luke Ford

At 8568 West Pico Boulevard the door opens on a smell of old wool, cardboard, and furniture oil. Coats hang in rows by size. A shelf of holy books leans against one wall, prayer books with cracked spines, a set of the Talmud some father studied and some son did not want. Sheitels sit on foam heads, the wigs married women wear, washed and reset, waiting for a head that fits. Toasters. A bin of women’s undergarments, which the volunteers will tell you they need more than anything else. A cashmere coat with a Beverly Hills label hangs three hangers down from a parka with a broken zipper, and neither one knows the difference now.

In the back alley a woman lifts bags from the trunk of a German car parked with its hazards on. Her mother died in the spring. The closet had to come empty before the lease ran out. She does not want money for the clothes and she will not put them in a dumpster, so she drives them to Pico, where someone takes the bags, says thank you, and means it. The coats begin a second life.

This traffic, the dead handing down to the living through a storefront, runs six days and stops on the seventh. Friday afternoon the gate comes down. Saturday the store sleeps. Global Kindness keeps the Sabbath because the order the store serves outranks the store. Since 2005 the operation has run on volunteers and moved food, clothing, and cash to families across Los Angeles. The sign says kindness. What happens at the register is older and stranger than that word lets on.

Ernest Becker (1924-1974) gave us the tool for seeing it. Man is the animal that knows he will die, and the knowledge would crush him if he looked at it long. So he does not look. In The Denial of Death (1973) Becker argued that culture is the great apparatus of not-looking, a set of hero systems that promise a man his life counts beyond his body. Self-esteem is the feeling that one is a hero inside such a system, a contributor to something that does not rot. Every people builds its own version. The pyramid, the cathedral, the revolution, the corpus of published work, the line of sons who carry the name. Each is a way of buying a portion in what death cannot reach. In Escape from Evil (1975) Becker took the argument one turn further. Evil enters the world when one immortality project meets another, because the second man’s different denial of death exposes the first man’s as a choice rather than a law, and no man can bear to see his eternity reduced to a preference.

Hold that and walk back into the store.

Nouriel and Yaelle Cohen work inside a system that does not call this charity. The word in the building is tzedakah, and tzedakah comes from tzedek, which means justice, not pity. The poor man has a claim. The deed is owed. Maimonides (1138-1204) ranked the giving in eight degrees, and set at the top the gift that ends the need, the loan or the work that lifts a man so he never has to ask again. Below that sits the deed of kindness, gemilut chasadim, which the tradition names as one of the three things the world stands on. In this house the needy family is not a problem the store solves. The needy family is the occasion of the deed that counts before Him. The receiver hands the giver something the giver cannot make alone, a chance to do what the commandment asks. The poor man does more for the rich man than the rich man does for the poor man.

So the store is an engine that runs in two directions at once. It takes the residue of the dead, the coats and the prayer books and the dead woman’s good winter wool, and converts it into the survival of the living. Then it converts that survival into deeds, and the deeds into a portion in the world to come. Nouriel and Yaelle Cohen stand at the hinge. Every coat forwarded is a small refusal of death, theirs and the dead donor’s and the cold man’s who now has a coat. The volunteer who sorts undergarments on a Tuesday morning is building, one item at a time, a thing that outlasts the building.

This makes complete sense, and it makes sense only here. Carry the single word out the door and watch it break apart.

Bring it to the man with the spreadsheet. He runs the numbers on suffering, dollars against lives, the marginal cost of a malaria net, the deworming pill that buys a child a year of school. To him the volunteer hours spent moving a used blender across a counter are waste laid on waste. The dead woman’s coat carries sentiment, and sentiment is the tax the inefficient pay to feel good. Sell the building, he says, wire the cash to the highest-yield intervention on earth, and stop dressing arithmetic as grief. His eternity is the running total of well-being, the sum that survives every particular donor. Kindness to him means the cold sum, and the store fails the sum.

Bring it to Geneva and the heirs of John Calvin (1509-1564). Works save no one. The elect were chosen before the foundation of the world, and no coat handed across a counter moves that ledger by a hair. Yet the saved do good, and the good is a sign, evidence read backward toward a verdict already entered. The Calvinist gives and watches his own giving the way a man watches his pulse, for proof he is among the chosen. The receiver is a mirror held up to the giver’s soul. Kindness here means assurance, and the needy family serves the donor’s anxiety more than its own cold.

Bring it to the Bolshevik organizer in the winter of 1919. He has read his Lenin (1870-1924) and he knows what the thrift store does. It is the bandage on the wound the order needs kept open. Every family fed by private hands is a strike not called, a riot postponed, a year bought for the propertied to sleep behind their gates. Charity launders the guilt of ownership and sells the owner one more night of peace. He looks at the coats moving across the counter and sees the revolution delayed. Kindness to him means delay, and delay is the enemy. His eternity is history’s verdict, the new world his grandchildren will stand in.

Bring it to the Theravada monk with the bowl. The gift thins the self. Dana, the act of giving, loosens the grip of the wanting mind and moves the giver one notch toward release. The monk’s bowl is a field where the layman plants merit, and the merit ripens in the layman, not the monk. The receiver almost disappears in this account. What the gift does, it does inside the man who gives. Kindness here means the subtraction of self, and the dead woman’s coat is an occasion for a stranger to want less.

Bring it to the Roman patrician. He pays for the grain dole, the games, the aqueduct that carries water to a town he will visit twice, and his name goes on the stone in letters a foot high. Anonymous giving would strike him as money thrown into a dark room. The whole purpose is the inscription, the clients who owe him, the dignitas that swells with each public gift and the memory cut in marble that outlives the flesh. Kindness to him means the name that survives the body. Becker might say the patrician understands the game better than the rest, since the patrician admits out loud what the others hide, that the gift buys the giver a piece of forever.

Bring it to the Swedish social democrat. Private charity shames him. A coat handed across a counter by a benefactor marks two failures at once, the failure of the commonwealth that should have clothed the man, and the wound to a man forced to stand before a stranger and accept warmth as a gift. In his world the coat comes as a right, paid by all, owed to all, begged from no one. The thrift store is a monument to what the state left undone, and the gratitude on the receiver’s face is the proof of the injury. Kindness to him means the right, and the right kills the need for kindness.

Bring it, finally, to the reader of Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900). Here the word turns all the way over. Pity drags the strong down to the level of the weak. Charity is the slave’s long revenge, weakness rebranded as virtue, the herd closing around the botched and the failed and calling the closure holy. The thrift store, in this reading, is a temple raised to the morality of the defeated, and the warm feeling in the volunteer’s chest is the feeling of a man helping the species sink. Kindness here names a sickness that has learned to call itself health.

Seven cosmologies, one word, and no shared floor beneath them. The man with the spreadsheet and the woman sorting wigs on Pico do not disagree about a single fact in the world. They count the same coats. They live inside different denials of death, and the coat means a different thing in each because the coat does a different job in each man’s bid for forever. This is Becker’s hard teaching. The arguments people have about charity look like arguments over policy and feel like arguments over morals, and underneath they are arguments over which immortality is the true one. That is why they will not resolve. A man cannot grant the other system its kindness without granting that his own eternity was one option among several, and almost no one can pay that price.

Watch what happens when the systems touch. The effective altruist finds the thrift store sentimental and wasteful. The social democrat finds it degrading. The Bolshevik finds it counterrevolutionary. The Nietzschean finds it morbid. Each reaches for the same verdict, that the kindness on Pico is a kind of error, and each reaches for it because the Cohens’ eternity, working quietly six days a week behind a roll-down gate, makes a silent claim against his own.

At 4:55 on a Thursday the volunteers begin to straighten the racks. The holy books go back on the shelf in their cracked spines. Tomorrow the gate stays up only until the afternoon, and then the store stops, because the Sabbath is the one thing the store will not sell past. The coats wait in their rows through Friday night and all of Saturday, the dead woman’s wool among them, holding the shape of an arm that is gone. On Sunday morning the door opens again on the smell of old wool and oil, and the traffic between the dead and the cold resumes, and somewhere in the back a deed gets done that, in this house, the doer believes God counts.

Posted in Pico/Robertson | Comments Off on The Afterlife of Coats

Learning to Live Forever: Rabbi Jonah Steinmetz and the Hero System of the Page

Posted on June 18, 2026 by Luke Ford

A beis medrash at night does not sound like a library. It roars. Two men lean over one folio and argue about a cow that gored another cow two thousand years ago. A third bangs the table to make a point about a Tosafos. Across the room a teenager chants one line eleven times until the Aramaic stops slipping out of his mouth. The men have a name for the noise. They call it kol Torah, the sound of Torah, and they treat the roar as the goal, not the byproduct. A quiet beis medrash is a failed one.

This is the room Jonah Steinmetz runs in Los Angeles. He came in 2022 to start the Jack and Gitta Nagel YU Community Kollel, nine men learning two long sedorim a day and teaching the neighborhood at night. His title is Silver Family Rosh Kollel. The motto on the wall and on the website is two Hebrew words, Lilmod u’Lilamed, to learn and to teach. Steinmetz grew up in Woodmere. He spent ten years in the shiur of Rav Mayer Twersky at Yeshiva University, graduated as valedictorian, took semicha through the RIETS Honors Program while learning in the kollel of Rav Hershel Schachter (b. 1941), then spent three years in the Wexner Kollel Elyon, the small top room where YU keeps the men it hopes will carry the tradition forward. His wife Shoshana is a pharmacist. They have four children. Before LA he founded Asicha Seminars, a learning program for women back from a year in Israel.

Read that paragraph the way a man at a startup reads a résumé and almost none of it makes sense. Ten years in one teacher’s class, to arrive where you started, at the same texts, having added nothing the law will record under your name. A top program whose prize is the chance to keep doing the thing for free while donors pay your rent. A career that points at no promotion, no patent, no title above Rabbi. To grade this life you need the grammar of the room it comes from, and the room runs on a value system that the men inside it experience as the only true one and that the men outside it cannot read at all.

Ernest Becker (1924-1974) gave us the tool for the reading. In The Denial of Death he argued that man knows he will die and rot like a dog, and cannot bear it, and so every culture hands its members a script for feeling that they will not die in the way the body dies. He called these scripts hero systems. A hero system tells you what counts as a life that mattered, hands you the deeds that earn cosmic credit, and promises that if you do them you join something the grave cannot reach. The deeds differ wildly across cultures. The shape stays fixed. Become a hero in the local drama and you defeat death, not the body’s death, the deeper terror, the fear that you were an animal and that nothing you did left a mark on eternity.

Steinmetz sells the boldest immortality on the market, and he sells it cheap, and he sells it to a neighborhood.

Hold his sacred words up to the light one at a time. The first is Torah, and Torah in his world is not a book. The tradition says the Torah preceded the world, that God looked into it and made creation from it. The man who opens the folio does not study an old text. He steps out of time into the thing that is older than time. The body sits in Valley Village on a Tuesday. The mind enters a conversation that started at a mountain and never stopped. Becker would say the page is the immortality vehicle, the part of the man that the dirt cannot have. Steinmetz would say the page is simply true, and that the truth is what saves you, and both men describe the same wager from opposite ends.

The second word is mesorah, the chain. Steinmetz learned from Twersky, who descends from the Soloveitchik line of Brisk, and from Schachter, the man the YU world treats as its great living decisor. He hands what he received to nine avreichim, who hand it to the teenager at night seder, who will hand it on again. No link claims to have made the chain. Each link claims to have carried it without dropping it. The hero here is the faithful courier. Becker’s animal terror is solved not by what you create but by what you transmit, and a man who fathers four children and teaches a hundred more has woven himself into a rope that runs from Sinai to a date no one can see.

The third word is bittul, and it is the strange one, the word that breaks the modern reader’s instrument. Bittul means self-nullification, the setting aside of your own cleverness before the text and the teacher. Greatness in this system means fidelity, not invention. A young man in shiur produces a sharp original reading of a passage, and the highest praise his rebbe can give is to find the same idea in a commentator from the fifteenth century. Original turns out to be a near insult. It means alone, unsupported, outside the chain. The prize is to discover that you arrived where the Rishonim already stood. The dream is to be scooped by the dead.

The fourth word is ameilus, toil. The sweat over a hard Tosafos is not the cost of learning. It is the learning. A man might hold the same line of Talmud for an hour and the holding is the worship. In a culture that grades by output, an hour spent to understand one sentence you cannot resell looks like waste. In this culture the hour is the offering, and the man who suffers happily over the page has done the central religious act.

Now take a single one of these words and walk it across the street, because Steinmetz’s whole project sits on the claim that the word travels and the meaning does not.

Take learning. His motto is built on it. To learn and to teach.

A machine-learning engineer in San Francisco says she spent the night learning. She means a model adjusted its weights against a loss until the number dropped, and the thing she built knows more than she does and might run after she logs off and after she dies. Her immortality lives in the artifact that escapes her hands. Learning, for her, points away from the maker toward the made.

A historian on the tenure track says she spent the year learning. She means she found one true thing in an archive that no man had written down, and she will write it, and the footnote will sit in the permanent record under her name. Her terror is the email that says someone published it first. Learning, for her, must be new or it is nothing, and the new is the only coin that buys a place in the record.

A Marine recruit at Parris Island says the drill instructor is learning him. He means the Corps is breaking the boy and rebuilding him as a part that fits, until the rifle moves in the dark by memory and the self he brought in dissolves into a body older than any man in it. Learning, for him, erases the individual on purpose, and the deathless thing is the Corps, which buries its men and marches on.

A young trumpeter in the woodshed says he is learning the changes. He means he swallows the whole tradition, every Charlie Parker line, so that one night he can burn the borrowed phrases and play the single thing only he can say, and the elders will nod and place him in the lineage of the greats. Learning, for him, is total imitation that ripens into a voice, and the prize is to be both inside the line and unrepeatable.

A surgical resident says she learned the procedure last night. See one, do one, teach one. She means her hand stopped shaking, and the patient on the table next month walks out because of what passed into her fingers. Learning, for her, is mastery measured in other men’s heartbeats, and the immortality is the years she adds to strangers who never learn her name.

Five rooms, five heavens, one word. The engineer’s learning faces the future and the new. The historian’s learning hunts the unpublished. The Marine’s learning destroys the self. The trumpeter’s learning steals the tradition to escape it. The surgeon’s learning banks itself in living bodies.

Steinmetz’s learning faces none of these directions. He learns what he already knows. A man finishes a tractate and starts it again, and the second pass is holier than the first. He prizes the reading that the dead already gave. He builds no artifact that runs without him, files no footnote under his name, and the highest mark of his success is a fourteen-year-old who will repeat the line exactly as it came down, slipping in nothing of his own. The engineer and the rabbi might pass each other on Pico on a Sunday morning, and each might say, with a full heart, that he spent the night learning, and they share a word and almost nothing else.

Here the essay can go where the ten before it did not, because Steinmetz does not sit cleanly inside one hero system. He stands on a seam, and the seam is his job.

Yeshiva University names the seam in its motto, Torah u’Madda, Torah and worldly knowledge, the wager that one man might hold the yeshiva and the university in the same skull. Steinmetz lives the wager as a profession. He took the secular ladder, valedictorian, the honors track, the language of achievement, and the Brisker chain at the same hour, and he carries both. His teacher’s house produced The Lonely Man of Faith, where Rav Joseph B. Soloveitchik (1903-1993) split the human into two Adams from two accounts of creation, the majestic Adam who builds and conquers and the covenantal Adam who bows and receives. Steinmetz works the gap between the two Adams for a living.

Watch the kollel’s English marketing and you watch the translation happen in real time. The website promises growth and impact and connecting the community, the vocabulary of the engineer and the foundation officer. But growth in the kollel means the opposite of growth at a startup. A startup grows by getting bigger and newer. A man grows in the kollel by getting lower, by deepening his bittul, by fitting more tightly under a standard fixed at a mountain three thousand years back. The donors in the Founders Circle, the Nagel and Silver and Gindi families, write checks in the idiom of return on investment and a stronger community. The avreichim receive the checks in the idiom of kvod haTorah, the old arrangement where laymen support scholars so the chain holds and the merit of the learning flows back to the giver. Same dollar, two heavens. Steinmetz stands at the register and makes the change, and the skill the donors pay for, whether they name it or not, is the translation.

Becker thought every hero system was a necessary fiction, a brave lie a man tells against the dark so he can get out of bed. He did not exempt his own. The frame cannot tell you whether the page is older than the world, whether the chain reaches a mountain or only a story about a mountain. It can show you the shape of the bet. The engineer bets on the model. The historian bets on the footnote. The Marine bets on the Corps. The trumpeter bets on the line of the greats. The surgeon bets on the saved. And the rabbi in Valley Village makes the oldest bet of all, that a text given to men who are now dust outlasts the dust, and he stakes his one life on a roomful of noise and a boy chanting a line in the dark until it stops slipping.

He might be right. The frame does not get a vote. What the frame shows is the candor under the noise. Every man in every one of these rooms is doing the same thing, building a reason that his death will not be the end of him, and the rabbi differs from the engineer only in being honest about how old his answer is, and in teaching it out loud, every night, for free, to anyone on the block who walks in.

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on Learning to Live Forever: Rabbi Jonah Steinmetz and the Hero System of the Page

The Hero System of Rabb Yehuda Moses

Posted on June 18, 2026 by Luke Ford

A young Persian Jew in a slim charcoal suit stands at the open bar of a Beverly Hills banquet hall, holding a vodka soda he has not touched. He is twenty-six. He sells commercial real estate. His mother has told him, more than once, that the girl across the room comes from a good family, and the girl across the room knows this, and so does he. The sushi station glistens under warm light. A DJ keeps the volume low enough for talk. Somewhere near the center of the room a short man with a graying beard and a kind face moves from group to group, learning names, asking after fathers and grandfathers, steering one introduction and then another. He wears a dark suit and a black velvet kippah. His accent is North London, clipped and dry, the vowels of a place few people in this room could find on a map. He is the reason the room exists. His name is Rabbi Yehuda Moses, and the young man at the bar is, to him, a soul that might be saved or lost.

To understand what the rabbi sees when he looks across that room, begin with the problem every hero system answers.

Ernest Becker (1924-1974) argued in The Denial of Death that man lives under a sentence no animal carries. He knows he will die. He carries a body that will rot and a mind that imagines forever, and the gap between the two would drive him mad if culture did not hand him a way across it. Culture hands him a hero system. A hero system tells a man what counts, what a life adds up to, how he might purchase a portion of significance that death cannot repossess. Becker called this the immortality project. Some men buy their portion with works, some with children, some with conquest, some with art, some with money piled past any use. The currency changes. The purchase does not. Every man is trying to matter in a way the grave cannot cancel, and the rules for mattering come from the system he was raised inside or the one he later chooses.

Rabbi Moses was raised inside one of the strictest systems on earth.

He grew up in Stamford Hill, the square mile of North London that holds the largest Hasidic and strictly Orthodox community in Europe, some twenty-five thousand people who speak Yiddish on the street, dress as their grandfathers dressed in Hungary and Lithuania, marry in their early twenties to a match their families help arrange, and raise five and six and seven children in narrow Victorian houses with rooms added onto the roofs. A man there does not shake a woman’s hand who is not his wife. The schools teach Talmud and teach little else, and some of them teach so little else that the British state counts the boys as missing. The community grew out of a refusal. After the Holocaust nearly erased it, the survivors and their children built a wall against the modern world and called the wall holy. The point of the wall is continuity. The children carry what the parents carried, the parents carry what the murdered carried, and the chain holds.

From that enclave Rabbi Moses went into the great Lithuanian yeshivas, the engine rooms of Torah study. Sunderland under Rabbi Shami Zahn, of blessed memory. Lakewood East in Jerusalem. The Mir. Then ordination from the Chief Rabbinate of Israel, under the Sephardic Chief Rabbi Eliyahu Bakshi-Doron (1941-2020), a man who could quote ten generations of rabbis and who held that established religion must know its limits. And here the line of the rabbi’s life bends in a way worth watching. A boy formed by the most inward-facing community in the Jewish world enrolled at Ner Le’Elef, a training center for outreach, and studied child development, public speaking, and communication. The wall-builders had raised a door-opener.

In 2002 he came to Los Angeles to lead the young professionals of Nessah, the great Persian synagogue of Beverly Hills, founded by exiles who fled Tehran after 1979 and carried with them a Judaism twenty-five hundred years old and a fierce drive to succeed in the new country. In 2007 he came to Mogen David in Pico-Robertson as senior rabbi and head of the Sephardic minyan. He runs the Shabbat shiur and the morning Megilah and the women’s Parasha class. He teaches grades five through eight at Maimonides Academy. He and his wife Dina have four children, and their names are Eliyahou Binyamin, Shira, Yosef Chaim, and Talia, names that carry kings and patriarchs forward into a fifth-grade classroom in West Los Angeles.

So the man at the singles night is not running a singles night. He is forging links in the chain. Becker would say the rabbi has bought the strongest immortality a man can buy, because his system pays him in two currencies at once. There is the literal portion, the soul that survives the body, the world to come, the resurrection. And there is the symbolic portion, the children with the patriarch names, the students at the academy, the souls he brings back to observance, each one a link he has welded so that the line from Sinai reaches one house further into the future than it might have. When the rabbi steers the real-estate broker toward the girl from the good family, he is trying to build a Jewish home, and a Jewish home is the workshop where the chain gets made. He does not fear that the young man will die. Every man dies. He fears that the young man will die without a link behind him, that the chain will stop in that handsome, well-dressed body, that two and a half millennia will end at an open bar in Beverly Hills.

Now take a single word and watch it break apart in the light.

Take success.

The young broker at the bar already knows what success is. He learned it before he could read. Success is the medical degree or the law degree or the buildings on Wilshire with your family’s name on the management company. Success is the house above Sunset, the daughter married well, the son who does better than the father, the table at the wedding where the important families are seated. The Persian Jews of Los Angeles spent two decades, one observer wrote, living like exiles ready to go home, suitcases half packed, and then their children grew up American and the suitcases stayed in the closet. Their hero system fused two terrors into one defense. There is the old terror, the pogrom, the revolution, the knock at the door, answered by wealth portable and large enough to survive any government. And there is the death terror underneath, answered by the dynasty, the name that outlives the man. For these families success is the proof that the family will not be erased, by Tehran or by time. It is a real immortality project, and it is a good one, and it has saved them more than once.

The rabbi from Stamford Hill looks at the same word and sees something else. Success, for him, is the boy who chooses to lay tefillin on a Monday morning when no one is watching. Success is the couple who keeps a kosher home because they want to, not because a mother is counting. Success is the college student who comes to a Shabbat table at Mogen David and comes back the next week. The buildings on Wilshire do not enter into it, except as a thing that might pull a soul away. Where the family sees the dynasty as the answer, the rabbi sees the dynasty as the danger, because a man can build a perfect dynasty of doctors and lose the one thing that, to the rabbi, makes a Jewish life a Jewish life. Same word. Two deaths, each defeated by a different victory.

Carry the word further out, past the Westside, and it keeps changing shape.

A Trappist monk in a monastery in Kentucky measures success by how completely he disappears. He takes a vow of stability and means to die in the same set of buildings he entered as a young man, and he rises at three in the morning to chant psalms that no audience hears, and the whole architecture of his life is built to wear the self down to nothing so that God might fill the space left behind. To him the rabbi’s four children and the broker’s buildings belong to the same illusion, the frantic human need to leave a mark. Success is the erasure of the mark. The man who wants to be remembered has, by the monk’s lights, already failed.

A founder in Menlo Park measures success by scale and exit. He wants the company to reach a hundred million users and then a billion, he wants the acquisition or the public offering, and underneath the metrics he wants what Becker said all the strivers want, a dent in the world deep enough that the world cannot close over it after he is gone. He keeps a mattress near the office. Home is where he recovers between sprints. He would find the monk’s vow of stability incomprehensible and the rabbi’s chain too slow, a four-thousand-year product with terrible growth.

A Marine gunnery sergeant measures success by the mission and the men. He brings everyone home. The unit is the immortality project, the Corps older than any Marine in it and certain to outlast them all, and the worst death is not his own but the man left behind, the link in that chain broken on his watch. He and the rabbi would understand each other faster than either expects, because both serve a line that runs through them and past them, and both think a man proves his life by what he refuses to abandon.

A hospice nurse measures success by a death that goes well. No cure, no rescue, no dynasty. She counts a life complete when a man dies without pain and without fear, his hand held, his accounts with the people he loves settled. To her the founder’s hunger looks like a sickness she has watched a hundred dying men finally put down, and the rabbi’s certainty about the world to come is a comfort she has seen do real work in a quiet room at two in the morning, whether or not she shares it.

A woman running her hundredth mile through the Sierra at night measures success by what her body will bear. The finish is the proof. The suffering is the point, the voluntary suffering that says, against the suffering she did not choose and the death she cannot refuse, that she is the one who decides what her flesh means. She would look at the rabbi’s open bar and his matchmaking and feel nothing, and the rabbi would look at her solitary hundred miles and ask the question he asks about every immortality project that ends with the runner, what link does it leave behind.

Six men and women, six meanings, one word. This is what Becker saw and what makes the comparison something more than a parlor trick. The meanings do not differ because the people are confused about what success means. They differ because each lives inside a different answer to the same sentence of death, and the word takes its content from the answer. Strip the hero system away and success is an empty syllable. Pour a hero system into it and it fills with children, or buildings, or silence, or a finish line, or a flag-draped box carried by men who kept their word.

Each hero system needs the others to be wrong. If the founder is right that the dent in the world is what counts, then the monk has wasted his life on his knees. If the monk is right that the self must vanish, then the dynasty on Wilshire is a monument to vanity. The systems cannot all be true, and a man’s whole defense against the terror depends on his being right, and so the mere existence of someone living well by another scheme is a quiet accusation. Becker thought this the root of human evil, in Escape from Evil, the need to discredit the other man’s path so that one’s own holds. Most men handle it by not looking. They stay inside the wall.

The rabbi from Stamford Hill cannot stay inside the wall, and that is what makes him worth an essay. His own community built the wall and he was raised behind it, and then he was trained to walk out the door and stand in rooms full of people whose idea of a life well spent threatens his at the root. The Beverly Hills family that measures success in degrees and buildings is, in Becker’s cold accounting, a standing argument that the rabbi has it wrong. He answers the argument not by attacking it but by trying to fold it inside his own. Keep the buildings, he tells the broker, in effect. Keep the success your mother taught you. Only let me add the link. Marry the girl, build the home, raise the child who carries the name. He is trying to make his hero system the one that contains all the others, the frame inside which a man can be a Beverly Hills success and a link in the chain at the same time.

Whether he can is the open question of his life, and he will not learn the answer, because the answer arrives in a generation he will not fully see. The chain reveals itself only in the keeping. A man welds his link and dies and only the grandchildren show whether the weld held.

The singles night ends near midnight. The DJ packs his gear. The sushi station goes cold. The broker has the girl’s number in his phone and does not yet know what he will do with it. The rabbi stands at the door, tired, shaking hands, in his accent from the square mile of piety four thousand miles away, telling the young people to come for Shabbat, to come learn, to come back. Tomorrow he teaches the fifth grade. The boys are ten and eleven. They carry names as old as the names of his own children. He stands in front of them in the morning, a man who walked out of the most closed world in Judaism to spend his life holding doors open, and he hands them the chain, and he hopes, the way every man inside every hero system hopes, that the thing he gives away outlives the hand that gives it.

Posted in Mogen David | Comments Off on The Hero System of Rabb Yehuda Moses

The Accountant

Posted on June 18, 2026 by Luke Ford

Ron Galperin sits at the head of a city that spends ten billion dollars a year, and he puts the checkbook on the internet. He builds the data portal. He publishes the audits, the police overtime, the bond money left unspent, the contracts no one read. He calls himself the watchdog. The word he reaches for, again and again, is accountability. He means two plain things. The books must reconcile, and the public must see them.
Hold there, on the word. To know the man, follow what the word does for him, because the word is the door into his hero system.
Ernest Becker (1924-1974) argued in The Denial of Death that every culture is a hero system, a set of roles and beliefs that lets a man feel he counts inside a scheme larger than his own body, and so holds off, for a span, the animal fact that he dies. The hero system tells him how to earn a place that outlasts the grave. Becker named the wager symbolic immortality. A man pours himself into something he trusts will not die: a god, a nation, a child, a book, a company, a name. The thing he serves hands him his sacred words and tells him what they mean. Accountability, honor, freedom, duty, family. The same word names different gods.
Galperin’s account runs double, and the doubling is the originality of the man.
The first account is the controller’s ledger. Honest government. Nothing hidden. The taxpayer sees where the dollar goes. This is American civic virtue in its Progressive key, the faith that the audited city is the just city, that a government watched is a government tamed.
The second account is older and harder. Galperin’s father survived the Holocaust and became a rabbi. His mother carried a rifle for the Haganah and fought in the war of 1948. He comes from a long line of rabbis. He learned Hebrew and Yiddish at the kitchen table. He took an Orthodox education, sang twenty years as a cantor in a Conservative congregation, and made his home in the Reform movement. He sits on the board of the Holocaust museum.
In that world the account names something the city auditor never files. It is the count of the dead. Six million names. Yad Vashem, a place and a name, built so the murdered are not subtracted to zero and lost. The survivor’s son carries an obligation older than any oath of office: keep the count, say the names, refuse the erasure. To audit, in this register, denies the oven its last victory, which is to be forgotten.
So when Galperin says the books must be open and nothing hidden, two faiths speak in one sentence. The civic faith says transparency makes a government just. The other faith says counting is how a people that nearly fell to zero adds itself back up. Transparency becomes the secular grammar of never again. The watchman who tallies a city’s dollars is the grandson of men who kept the ledger of a covenant and the son of people who kept the ledger of the dead.
That is the hero system. Now watch the same word in other hands, because the word means nothing apart from the god it serves.
Take the Carthusian in the Grande Chartreuse. He keeps no books any man will read. His account is the soul’s reckoning, rendered to God at the hour of death, and He alone reads it. Transparency to the public means nothing to the monk. He has erased his own name on purpose. He sought the cell and fled the record so the world would not remember him at all. His immortality is the soul saved. A novice asks the prior who will ever know what he did in this cell, and the prior says, One, and He keeps better books than Rome. For Galperin erasure is the enemy. For the monk erasure from the world is the road home. The same need to be counted, the opposite ledger.
Take the founder, a man of thirty-four in a glass office south of Market Street. He answers to the board, the cap table, the burn rate. What gets measured gets managed. His account is the dashboard, refreshing by the minute. His immortality is the company that survives him and the product that bends a billion days into a new shape. He wants the obituary to read that he built the thing. Show me the numbers, he says, and I will tell you if we are still alive. His books point forward. He audits to grow. Galperin audits to guard, and his books point back as much as ahead.
Take the eldest son in Seoul who bows at the rite for his grandfather, pours the cup, lays out the food, reads the names from the lineage tablet. His account runs to the dead fathers and the sons not yet born. To stand accountable is to honor the line, to carry the surname forward, to tend the grave so the ancestors are served and the name does not end. His audit is the rite performed without error. He and Galperin both serve the dead by keeping a count. The Korean son keeps the line of one family. Galperin keeps the line of a whole people and the books of a city, and he does it as a man whose own line takes a shape the rite never scripted.
Take the man of the old honor code in a Calabrian town who knows to the hour who owes him and whom he owes. His account is the ledger of respect, of favors given and slights unpaid, settled sometimes in blood. His immortality is the name spoken with respect at the bar long after he dies. The auditor’s open books horrify him. A man who shows everyone his ledger has no honor and no leverage left. He keeps his books closed until death. Galperin publishes the ledger and calls the publishing a virtue. The man of honor calls the same act a surrender.
Now turn back to Galperin and to what Becker called the causa sui project, the work of becoming one’s own father, of authoring a self the given world never handed you. He inherits a line of rabbis and does not become a rabbi. He inherits soldiers and survivors and never carries a rifle. He becomes a guardian of another kind, a watchman with a spreadsheet and a city seal. He marries a rabbi, Zachary Shapiro, and brings the pulpit into the home through a side door the tradition did not draw. They raise twins, Maya Ruth and Eli Noah, names that carry a matriarch and the weight of the dead. A gay man fathers a Jewish future the old lineage could not have written, and names the children for what came before. The literal immortality, the children, and the symbolic immortality, the people, meet at the table where Hebrew is still spoken.
Most men serve one god and keep one account. Galperin fuses three: the city’s books, the people’s count, and a family the tradition did not anticipate. He makes them one ledger and calls it accountability, and the word holds all three because he has made it hold them.
Becker did not let the hero rest there. He showed in Escape from Evil that every immortality project costs something, that each one is a wager against death no man wins, only serves, and that one project crushes another when they meet, since the heroism that builds is the same heroism that burns. Galperin’s account carries its own lie, and it is the dignified kind. The watchman believes the count can be kept. He believes erasure can be refused by writing the names down, reconciling the books, putting the checkbook online for any citizen to read. The dead do not return when you name them. The city he audits comes out seen, and seen is not the same as just. The faith holds anyway. The alternative is to let the number fall to zero, and the men he came from refused that, and so does he.
He keeps the count. That is the place he has earned in the scheme of things, and the meaning of his sacred word.

Posted in Accounting | Comments Off on The Accountant

The Candle and the Name

Posted on June 18, 2026 by Luke Ford

On a Friday afternoon in west Los Angeles, in a home a few blocks off Pico, a folding table goes up in a living room that already has a dining table. Women arrive. One carries a foil pan of kugel. One carries a baby on her hip and a diaper bag that cost more than the table. They set down salads and a tray of cut melon and a bakery box tied with string. The host has been doing this for thirty years.

Chana Heller directs the Jewish Women’s Initiative at Aish Los Angeles. She holds a master’s in social work, studied two years at Neve Yerushalayim in Jerusalem, married a psychotherapist named Rabbi Dov Heller, and raised five children who now have children, nineteen grandchildren, most of them in Israel. Her work brings Jewish mothers, many of them raised with almost nothing of the tradition, into its practice. The brochures lean on three words. Love. Warmth. Home.

A newcomer stands at the kitchen island. A friend asked her to come, and the email said dinner, and so she came. She runs a small business. She has a Peloton, a therapist, and a calendar app that color-codes her children’s swim meets. She thinks she is here to learn something, or to get a free meal, or to be a good friend, and she has not settled on which.

“You light two candles,” Chana says, to the room more than to her. “Some add one for each child. Your great-grandmother lit them. Your daughter will light them after you.”

The newcomer thinks, that is a lovely idea, and reaches for a cracker. She has heard the sentence. She has not heard what was said.

Ernest Becker (1924-1974) spent his last books on a single claim. A man knows he will die, and the knowledge is unbearable, and so he builds his life as a defense against it. In The Denial of Death and then in Escape from Evil, Becker argues that culture supplies the defense. Every culture hands its members a hero system, a scheme that tells a man what counts as a life worth having lived, what counts as significance, what part of him might outlast the grave. The hero system answers the terror. It says: do these things, become this kind of man, and you will not have been nobody. You will have mattered against the dark.

The scheme differs from place to place and people to people. A Viking earns his name in battle and drinks in a hall after death. A Mandarin earns it through the examination and the ancestral tablet. A Silicon Valley founder earns it by building a thing that did not exist and seeing his name in the press. Each scheme is a separate bet on how to beat death, and each draws a man toward a separate picture of the good life. Becker’s point cuts deeper than tolerance or taste. The hero systems do not merely prize different things. They load the same words with different cargo. A word like freedom, a word like home, a word like strength, points at one structure inside one scheme and at another structure inside another, and the men who use the word rarely notice they are not talking about the same thing.

This is the room the newcomer has walked into. Chana Heller hands her words she already owns. Home. Freedom. The hidden. The newcomer hears them in the only scheme she has, and assumes she has understood.

Take home first.

For the newcomer, home is the place she returns to after the part of life where things happen. The office is where she is judged. The gym is where she improves. The home is the soft interior, the recovery room, the set for the photographs she posts. It holds her. She does not expect it to mean much beyond her own span. When she is gone the house will sell.

For Chana Heller, home is the engine. The Hebrew calls the woman akeret habayit, the foundation of the home, and the phrase carries no scent of the recovery room. The home she describes produces the next link in a chain that runs back through every grandmother to Sinai and forward past her own death through grandchildren she watches grow up over video calls from a suburb of Jerusalem. The candles, the table, the bread, the rhythm of the week, these are not comforts laid on top of life. They are the place where the people of Israel renew themselves once every seven days, in ten thousand kitchens at once, and have done so under emperors and commissars who are now dust. The home is where the dead stay alive and the unborn arrive. A woman who keeps it well has reached past her own grave with both hands.

Now hand the word to other men and watch it change shape again.

Give it to a venture founder in Santa Monica. Home, for him, is a base of operations, an address, an asset class, the thing the second liquidity event pays for. His hero system locates his value in what he ships and what the market says it is worth. Home is overhead. The good life is the cap table.

Give it to a French chef who holds three stars. Home is the dining room he built and the kitchen behind it, and the lineage is real to him, the mother sauces, the masters he trained under, the cooks he sends out who open rooms of their own. His chain runs through technique. The chef and the rebbetzin both speak of a line that outlasts the man, and both mean it, and the lines do not touch. His passes through the plate. Hers passes through the womb and the covenant.

Give it to a long-distance sailor who crossed two oceans alone. Home is the boat, forty feet of teak and Kevlar, and beyond it the open water, which he calls the only place he feels at home, by which he means the only place no one can reach him. For him the word points away from people. For Chana Heller it points at nothing but people, generations of them, stacked.

One word. Four schemes. Four bets on what a man does with the years before the dark, and the word bends to the bet every time.

Take freedom.

The newcomer prizes it above almost everything, though she would struggle to say what she means. She means options. She means the right to leave, to choose, to revise. Her hero system, the one the culture issued her, makes the unencumbered self the hero, and freedom is the self with the fewest cords on it. A constraint is a small defeat. A vow frightens her. She kept her maiden name and her own bank account and a clause about the dog.

Chana Heller will spend a class on Shabbos, and what she offers the newcomer under the name of freedom looks at first like the opposite. For one day in seven, no phone. No car. No buying, no selling, no fixing, no scrolling, no work of any kind. To the newcomer this is a list of things taken away. Then the rebbetzin says the word the newcomer thought she owned. This, she says, is the freedom. One day a week the market cannot reach you and the self that must always produce is sent out of the room. You stop being a worker and a brand and a set of metrics. You sit at a table with people who knew you before any of that and will love you after it. The cords the newcomer guards against turn out, in this scheme, to be the thing that frees her from a harder master, the one who lives in her phone and counts.

Now run freedom through other men.

A Marine gunnery sergeant means something near the rebbetzin and far from the founder. He earned his freedom, he will tell a recruit, by giving it up, by submitting to the unit until the submission became a kind of power, and the recruit who guards his autonomy hardest is the one who will get men killed. Freedom, in his scheme, lives on the far side of discipline, not in its absence.

A dissident poet who wrote in a Soviet kitchen and passed his pages hand to hand means freedom as the uncensored line, the sentence the state could not make him unsay. His hero system stakes everything on the word that survives the regime, and the regime did fall, and some of the lines are still read. For him, to keep silent for safety is the one death that counts. Tell him that one day a week he should put down the pen and the argument and rest, and he hears a betrayal of the only immortality he trusts.

Set the poet beside the rebbetzin and the gap opens wide. He bets his deathlessness on the named work, the line with his name under it, the monument of language that points back at the man who made it. She bets hers on the opposite move, and here the essay reaches the thing worth saying.

Take the hidden.

Chana Heller teaches tzniut, usually rendered modesty, and the rendering misleads. The newcomer hears modesty and thinks of hemlines and a slightly punitive committee. What the rebbetzin describes is a claim about where the real lives. The holiest objects in the tradition sit behind a curtain. The most intimate parts of a life are guarded, not posted. A diamond is not left on the sidewalk. The teaching holds that what a man keeps hidden he treats as precious, and what he displays he cheapens, and that the interior life, unseen, is the weightier one. The unseen is the more real.

Set that against the scheme the newcomer arrived with, where visibility is the asset and the unseen barely exists. Her hero system runs on the post, the profile, the brand, the metric, the public mark. To be unseen is to be nobody. The founder agrees. The poet agrees, for his own reasons, the witness who keeps quiet has failed. Three schemes, and all three locate the hero in the seen, the named, the recorded.

Now Becker’s whole argument turns over.

Every hero system answers death, and almost every one the newcomer knows answers it by making the self large. Leave a mark. Build the thing. Sign the work. Be remembered. The founder’s name on the building, the poet’s name under the line, the athlete’s record in the book, the influencer’s archive of a thousand posted days. The bet is that if enough of me is recorded and seen, some of me will not die. It is a brave bet and a fragile one. The building gets a new name. The record falls. The archive scrolls off the feed. The man who staked his deathlessness on being remembered has staked it on the one thing he cannot control, the memory of strangers, which is short.

Chana Heller’s scheme makes the opposite bet, and the strangeness of it is easy to miss because she is so warm and the kugel is so good. Her hero system reaches for the same prize, a life that outlasts the grave, and reaches for it by making the self small on purpose. The candle she lights is the same flame her great-grandmother lit, and the point is that it is the same flame and not a new one. She does not sign it. She adds no improvement. She wants her name to vanish into the chain so completely that her granddaughter in Jerusalem, lighting the same two candles in fifty years, will feel no seam where Chana Heller used to be. The erasure of her name is not the price of her immortality. It is the method.

This inverts the founder’s bet at the root. He needs to be remembered, and so his project dies the day the last person forgets him, which is soon. She needs only the chain to continue, and the chain does not need to recall any single link by name to carry the flame past her. Her scheme survives the thing that destroys his, the forgetting of the individual, because it never asked the individual to be remembered. She trades a personal immortality, brittle and loud, for a shared one, durable and quiet. A Trappist monk who took a vow of silence and lies in an unmarked grave made a cousin of this trade, gave up his name to disappear into something that does not die, and the cousin marks the difference too, because the monk has no children and the line he joins runs through the cloister and the liturgy rather than through the womb. The rebbetzin’s chain is made of bodies. Hers continues in flesh that calls her Bubbe.

Becker thought the religious solution was the boldest of the hero systems, because it does not pretend the self is enough and does not flinch from the size of the problem. He admired it without being able to take it. Watching Chana Heller is watching a version of that solution worked out by a woman in a kitchen, in real time, on a mother who came for the food. The mother guards her name, her brand, her options, her visibility, all the deathless-making goods her own scheme prizes, and the rebbetzin is teaching her, gently, over kugel, to want the opposite goods, the hidden, the bound, the unsigned, the merely continued. Neither of them states it as a contest between two schemes for beating death. They use the same warm words and assume the words agree.

Late in the evening the newcomer helps carry plates to the sink. She has eaten well. She has laughed. Something has reached her that she cannot name, and on the drive home, alone with the phone she did not touch for four hours, she notices the quiet and does not reach for it.

“You’ll come back?” Chana asked at the door, holding both her hands.

“I think I will,” the newcomer said, and meant it, and still did not know what she had agreed to, which is that she had been offered a different way to not die, and had liked the taste of it before she understood the terms.

The candle burns down. No one wrote her name on it. That is the whole idea.

Posted in Aish HaTorah | Comments Off on The Candle and the Name

Gates of Hope: The Hero System of Rabbi Yael Aranoff

Posted on June 18, 2026 by Luke Ford

The room fills at a quarter past nine on a Sunday. Ventura Boulevard runs flat and bright outside, Encino in its weekend hush, the synagogue set back behind its own lot at 15739. Inside, the light runs softer than a classroom’s. Someone has thought about the light. The chairs sit in a loose circle, and the noise floor stays low, and a boy comes in with his mother’s hand on his shoulder. He does not want the hand there. She keeps it a beat longer than he wants. Then she lets go. A teacher trained in special education drops to his height and says good morning by name. A second adult stands near the door, ready, doing nothing yet. The count of grown-ups to children runs high here, and that is the point.

Rabbi Yael Aranoff directs this program. She spent a decade on stages before she stood at an ark, an actor and singer and director out of U.C. Berkeley who led High Holiday services at UCLA Hillel for fifteen years and took ordination at the Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies in May 2024. She knows what a performance is. She knows the lights, the marks on the floor, the held breath of a room waiting to see whether the person at the center will deliver the thing they came to watch. She now runs a room built for children who will never perform on those terms, and that turn, from the stage to the soft-lit circle, sits near the center of what she does.

The program carries a name in Hebrew, Shaare Tikva, the gates of hope. It is the inclusive arm of a large Conservative synagogue, founded in 1982, open to any neurodivergent child from three to eighteen, no membership required, no fee required of a family that cannot pay. The children learn the prayers, the holidays, the acts of repair the tradition calls tikkun olam. Some of them prepare, over years and at their own pace, to stand before the Torah as a bar or bat mitzvah. To understand what Aranoff guards, and why it runs against the grain of almost every other gate a person can stand before, it helps to borrow a single instrument and use nothing else.

Ernest Becker (1924-1974) argued in The Denial of Death and in its posthumous sequel Escape from Evil that the human animal lives with a knowledge no other animal carries, that it will die, and that culture exists to manage the terror of that knowledge. Every society hands its members a script for being a person who counts. Becker called these scripts hero systems. A hero system tells you what a worthy life looks like, what you must do to earn the feeling that you are an object of primary value in a scheme larger than your own body, and therefore larger than your own death. Self-esteem, in this reading, is the private sense that you have qualified. You have done the things your people honor. You will be remembered, or absorbed into something that outlasts you, or counted among the saved. The terror recedes by the width of your standing.

Now notice what every hero system shares. Each one has a gate, and each gate has an exam. The script that confers significance also withholds it. There are people who pass and people who do not, and the people who do not become a problem the system would rather not look at, because they are the living reminder that the whole arrangement is provisional, that the gate can close, that significance can be revoked. Becker’s harder book, the one about evil, follows this thread to its end. Communities purchase their own sense of immortality, and they often pay for it with someone else’s exclusion. The surplus person, the one who fails the exam, carries the death the rest agree not to see.

The standard rite of Jewish adulthood is, among the things it is, a performance test. A child reads from the scroll in an old language, chants a portion to a fixed melody, stands and speaks before the assembled. A boy with a developmental difference, a girl who cannot hold the cantillation or the crowd, fails that exam as it is ordinarily set. In an achievement culture she becomes the surplus child. The mother feels it in the supermarket, in the cousins’ milestones, in the photographs of other people’s simchas. The gate she expected for her child has a sign on it her child cannot read.

Aranoff’s sacred values gather around a single word the program itself uses without flinching. Belonging. Set beside it the older Hebrew claim that a person is made b’tzelem Elohim, in the image of God, and a second claim that the covenant binds the whole people and not only its capable members. Hold those together and you get her working creed. The child belongs before he demonstrates anything. The image of God in him is not a prize for the fluent. The community is the thing that must bend.

That word, belonging, sounds like a soft word, a greeting-card word. It is nothing of the kind. It is the most contested currency in any hero system, and it means a different thing at every gate. Walk the gates and listen.

A drill instructor stands on the line at Parris Island in the wet heat. To belong to the Corps a recruit pays in the only coin the Corps accepts, shared suffering carried to the far side of a crucible most men cannot finish. The instructor’s voice does not soften, and the softness would be an insult, because the belonging on offer is precious in proportion to its cost. A recruit who cannot carry the pack washes out, and the washing out is not cruelty. It guards the meaning of the thing. Here belonging is earned at the body’s limit, and it can be lost, and its worth comes from the men it turns away.

A founder runs a stand-up meeting in a glass room above a parking structure in Mountain View. The cap table on the screen lists who belongs and by how much, measured in points of equity, in commits shipped, in the velocity the venture partners watch. “We move or we die,” he says, and he means it the way a Marine means the pack. Belonging here is contingent and quarterly. A man who slows the build belongs less by Friday than he did on Monday, and everyone in the room knows the arithmetic, and the arithmetic is the meaning.

A monk rises at the Grande Chartreuse before the world is light, in a silence held for nine hundred years. He belongs to God and to a community that has renounced the very currencies the founder lives by. He owns nothing, ships nothing, performs for no one. His belonging comes through subtraction, through the long erasure of the self that wants applause, and a novice who cannot bear the silence leaves, and the leaving costs the house nothing, because the gate guards a thing that crowds would only spoil.

A Pashtun elder sits in a jirga in the hills and speaks the unwritten code his people call Pashtunwali. To belong is to be of the lineage and to keep its honor, to offer melmastia to the stranger at the door and to answer an insult with badal so the name stays clean. A man cast out of this belonging suffers a death the body survives. Here the currency is honor and blood, and the gate has stood longer than any state that tried to close it.

A coach watches a small girl chalk her hands at a national training center, the scoreboard the only god in the room. The pipeline belongs to the ones who land it, and the body that grows wrong or breaks at fourteen is cut without malice, the way you retire a tool. The flag, the podium, the record book confer a kind of immortality, and the girls who do not reach them vanish from the story the sport tells about itself.

Five gates, five meanings of one word, each of them coherent inside its own house, each of them guarding something real. The Marine guards courage. The founder guards the future he is trying to build. The monk guards God. The elder guards the name. The coach guards excellence. None of them is a villain, and a person could spend a life honoring any one of them. But every one of these belongings is a wage. You belong because of what you can do, and you stop belonging when you can no longer do it, and the surplus person stands outside the gate holding the death the insiders agree not to look at.

This is the grain that Aranoff’s small Sunday room runs against. She has detached belonging from the exam. In her hero system the covenant comes first and the capacity comes after, or never, and the order does not change the standing. The child belongs because he was made in the image, and the image is not graded. The work, then, falls on the community rather than the child. The lights get softened. The ratio of adults gets raised. The melody gets simplified, the portion shortened, the years of preparation stretched to whatever length the child needs, and the boy who cannot chant says his blessing in the words he has, and the room receives it as a man’s full entry into his people. The exam has not been failed. The exam has been moved.

A skeptic could call this a lowering of the bar, and the skeptic would be standing at one of the other gates when he said it. Inside her house the claim runs the other way. The bar was always in the wrong place. A people that counts a man only when he performs has confused the wage with the worth, and the tradition she serves holds, at its root, that the worth comes first. She is not softening the rite. She is making an argument about what the rite was always for, and she is making it on a Sunday morning in Encino where almost no one will see it.

The parents sit in their own room down the hall, in a circle the program calls Coffee ‘N’ Chat, and Becker has something exact to say about them. A child is often a parent’s own bid against death, the vessel that carries the name forward, the achievement that proves the parent’s life added up. The neurodivergent child threatens that bid at the root. He might not carry the name in the expected way. He might not vindicate. And so the parents arrive carrying a grief they have learned not to name in public, the grief for the immortality project that will not run as planned. What Aranoff offers them is not a cure and not a consolation prize. She offers a different and older immortality. The child belongs to a people that has outlasted every empire that tried to end it, a covenant far older than achievement and indifferent to it, and the child’s place in that covenant is as secure as any prodigy’s. The parent who takes that in stops measuring the child against the gate and starts seeing him inside the circle. That shift, accomplished over weeks in a room that smells of coffee, may be the heaviest work the program does.

Aranoff comes to all of this from inside the lineage and from inside the theater both. Her grandparents, Rabbi Paul and Esther Dubin, belonged to this synagogue, so she stands in a kinship the building remembers. The synagogue itself was shaped across decades by Harold Schulweis (1925-2014), who taught that the congregation exists as a moral community, a place that organizes care, and that the holy shows itself in the acts people perform toward one another. The inclusive program fits that inheritance the way a hand fits a glove worn smooth. And the actor in her, the woman who knows the cost of the lights, has chosen to spend her gift standing at a gate that asks the child for no performance at all. She rehearses children who will never need to be flawless. She directs a production whose only review that counts is the look on a mother’s face.

Come back to the morning the boy stands at the Torah. The scroll lies open. The tallit sits new on his shoulders, and he is thirteen, and the room is full of people who decided, in advance and on purpose, to honor whatever he can give. He says his words. They might be few. The congregation answers amen as if a king had spoken, and for the length of that morning the entire room agrees to believe a thing the founder’s glass office and the coach’s scoreboard would file under sentiment. They agree that this life counts at full value, that it was always counted, that no exam stood between this boy and his place among his people.

A hero system is whatever a community will agree to honor as significant. That is its whole power and its whole frailty. Most communities agree to honor the strong, the fluent, the productive, and they pay for that agreement with the surplus people left at the gate. Aranoff has built a small room where a community agrees to honor a child the other gates would turn away, and the agreement holds, week after week, with almost no one watching and nothing at stake but a soul. Print the whole of it on the front page tomorrow and there is nothing to take back. The gates of hope, it turns out, are the ones with no exam at the door.

Posted in Rabbis | Comments Off on Gates of Hope: The Hero System of Rabbi Yael Aranoff

The Corner of the Field

Posted on June 18, 2026 by Luke Ford

A boy named Hillel lived around the corner from the Rav-Noy home. This was the 1970s, and Hillel had Down syndrome. He talked different and he looked different, and the neighborhood and the era kept such children where they kept them then, at the edge of the street and the edge of sight, and the word people used for him is a word we have since retired. Michy Rav-Noy was a boy himself. He looked at Hillel and saw a full set of emotions housed in a body the world had marked down. The memory held. He took a degree in special education at Cal State Northridge. He became a rabbi. He joined the Chabad movement as a shliach with Miriam, and the two of them built an organization around the thing he saw on that street.
The Friendship Circle of Los Angeles runs out of an office on South Robertson Boulevard, in the stretch of Pico-Robertson thick with kosher markets and shtiebels. Michy Rav-Noy is co-founder and executive director. Miriam Rav-Noy is co-founder and program director. He teaches a class for the boy volunteers called Wings and Wisdom. They study Torah and eat chicken wings, and the rabbi keeps up a running search for the kosher kitchen that fries the best ones. He tells the boys they cannot order from KFC. Before the pandemic the Circle drew almost six hundred volunteers from seventy schools, Jewish and public, and matched them with children and adults whom the rest of the city would rather not picture.
Ernest Becker (1924-1974) gives us a way to read this. In The Denial of Death and Escape from Evil, Becker argues that man is the animal who knows he will die and rot, and that he cannot bear the knowledge. So he builds. Every culture is a hero system, a scheme of worth that lets a man feel he counts beyond his body and outlasts it. The scheme tells him what heroism is and how to earn it, and in the earning he buys a stake in something that does not die. Religion, career, nation, art, the ledger of good deeds, the follower count: each is a way of refusing the worm.
The disabled child sits at the pressure point of every such scheme. He is the body that will not pretend. He cannot be optimized, cannot be hidden behind achievement, cannot perform the denial the rest of us perform without noticing. He returns the onlooker to the creature, to the flesh that breaks and fades. The 1970s answer was the institution. Put the reminder out of the house. A hero system under threat hides its threat.
The Rebbe, Menachem Mendel Schneerson (1902-1994), gave a different answer, and the answer was a name. In the 1970s a group of disabled Israeli veterans came to him, known then as the handicapped of Zahal. He told them the name was wrong. Call them the special ones of Zahal. To rename is to move a person from one scheme of worth into another. In Chabad’s scheme every Jew carries a soul that is a portion of the divine, a spark, and the body’s condition does not reach the spark. A disabled child might carry a higher soul than the rabbi who teaches him. Worth comes before capacity and stands apart from it. Heroism is the revealing of a hidden spark, the doing of a commandment that hastens Moshiach and the repair of the world. The teen who gives his Sunday to a child does a deed that ripples toward redemption and toward the resurrection of the dead, which Chabad holds as a literal promise. The scheme denies death by a stake in a cosmic story whose last chapter is life returning to the body.
So friendship in this scheme is not the helper above and the helped below. The Circle is a circle. Two souls complete a circuit. The child receives a companion. The teen receives a hero’s task. The parent receives a Sunday to breathe. The rabbi receives a soldier for the work of redemption. One hour of board games and song, four stakes in permanence braided together.
The rabbi reaches for the Mishnah. The Torah tells the farmer to leave the corner of his field for the poor, and the man who cannot walk well takes first, or he takes nothing. ADA compliance from the time of the Mishnah, the rabbi says. The line is a joke and a claim. The claim is that his scheme ranked the broken body high long before the state wrote it into law.
His words travel badly. Carry them across a border and they change meaning, because each system mints its own coin and stamps familiar faces on different metal.
Set the rabbi beside a young man who measures the good in units. He funds the interventions that buy the most welfare per dollar, and he can show you the math. To him help means the largest reduction of suffering a budget can purchase, and a teenager spending a Sunday afternoon with one child fails the test, because the hour does not scale and the child’s tally of healthy years runs low. He might move the money to bed nets in countries he will never see. His scheme denies death by the sum. He leaves the world with less pain than he found in it, and the figure stands after him. The word special names a softness he has trained himself to distrust.
Set the rabbi beside a woman who has spent her life on access and law. To her inclusion means the curb cut, the ramp, the statute, the clearing of barriers an unthinking society built around bodies like her brother’s. Love makes her wary, because love bends easily into pity, and pity seats the child below the table while calling it kindness. She wants power for him, not affection. Her scheme denies death through justice. She bends the law so it honors these bodies after she is gone. The word special lands on her ear as an old insult in soft clothes, a way to set the child apart from the common claim of equals.
Set the rabbi beside a Reformed pastor who reads the child inside the secret counsel of a sovereign God. The condition is not a problem awaiting a fix. It is a providence to be borne, a weight that drives the soul off its own strength and onto grace. Friendship to him means walking beside a brother under the same hard mercy. He and the rabbi stand closer to each other than either stands to the man with the spreadsheet, and still they part at the engine. The rabbi piles up deeds to hasten the appointed day. The pastor distrusts the deed as a lever on God, who saves by grace alone and moves on no man’s schedule. The same hospital visit, two cosmologies.
Set the rabbi beside a Theravada monk. The monk sees the child inside a long chain of births, and he answers with compassion, and he holds no eternal soul to rescue. Where the rabbi reveals a spark, the monk loosens a knot. The word special dissolves for him, because the separate self is the illusion he works to release. He offers presence and lets go of the result, since the grip on an outcome breeds the suffering he came to end. He sits with the child and wants nothing from the hour.
Set the rabbi beside a young woman whose worth runs through the feed. The unfilmed act did not occur. Help that no one sees earns nothing in her ledger, because her scheme denies death through the scroll, the self turned into a property that might outlast the body and keep earning. The Circle’s quiet weekly labor, the kind that rarely reaches a headline, reads to her as waste left on the floor. She might film the child. The rabbi does not.
The disabled child is the figure Becker’s whole argument points toward and rarely names. He is creatureliness with the costume off. Every hero system must say what he is worth and why, and the answer it gives is the shape of its denial. The optimizer cannot make him pay. The activist cannot let him be pitied. The pastor folds him into providence. The monk dissolves the self that suffers. The Rebbe renames him and seats his soul above the rabbi’s own. Michy and Miriam Rav-Noy built a circle on that renaming, and they fill it every week with teenagers who will carry the meaning of the word friend for the rest of their lives without knowing they learned a theology with it. The work rarely reaches the front page. The Rebbe taught that the front page is the wrong measure. The measure is the soul in the room, and whether anyone came to sit with it.

Posted in Chabad | Comments Off on The Corner of the Field

Nearer to What?

Posted on June 18, 2026 by Luke Ford

Sarah Flower Adams (b. 1805, d. 1848) wanted the stage. Her lungs ruled against her. She turned to verse, and in 1841 she handed her minister thirteen hymns for a collection he was assembling, Hymns and Anthems. One of the thirteen retells Genesis 28, the night Jacob lays his head on a stone and dreams of a ladder set on the earth with its top in heaven. Adams called it “Nearer, My God, to Thee.”

She wrote it inside a small and radical world. Her congregation met at South Place Chapel in London under William Johnson Fox (1786-1864), a Unitarian who had broken with orthodox Christianity and would sit in Parliament. Unitarians of his stripe kept the moral example of Jesus and dropped the Trinity, the blood atonement, and the threat of hell. They trusted reason. They trusted the conscience. They held that a man climbs toward God by growing better, not by being washed in a sacrifice he did not make. Adams had already worked the theme at length in her verse drama Vivia Perpetua, about a Christian martyr who rises to God through her own death.

Read the hymn and you find that creed in it. There is no Christ in the verses. There is no cross of Calvary, only the personal cross the singer carries, the “cross that raiseth me.” There is a stone for a pillow, griefs called stony, and a ladder of steps to heaven that the singer climbs by taking what God sends. Hymnodists noticed the absence and some complained of it. A hymn about drawing near to God that never names the Son struck Trinitarian ears as thin, but the thinness has a use.

Eliza Flower (1803-1846), Sarah’s older sister, set the words to music. Eliza was the better-known artist in her day. Then consumption took her. Sarah nursed her and caught it. Sarah died two years after her sister, in London, in 1848, at forty-three. The woman who wrote the hymn of ascent watched ascent fail to lift a body off a sickbed, and then went the same way. No ship. No band. No crowd. A room, a cough, a sister already in the ground.

Hold that picture and bring in Ernest Becker (1924-1974). In The Denial of Death and Escape from Evil, Becker argues that a man knows he will die, cannot bear the knowledge, and so builds a scheme that lets his life count past the grave. Becker calls these schemes hero systems. A hero system tells a man what counts as a life worth having lived and what counts as a death worth dying. It hands him a part in a drama larger than his body. Cultures script the part in different ways. The warrior earns his place by courage, the saint by holiness, the father by his sons, the builder by his works. Each system answers the same question. How do I count for something when I am food for worms.

Adams answered it in four stanzas. Loss raises you. The cross, the stone, the dark, the wandering, each becomes a step. Suffering builds the stair. That is a hero system in miniature, and it belongs to a particular world, the dissenting, reasoning, Romantic Protestantism of South Place Chapel.

Sixty-four years after she wrote it, the hymn met the death the twentieth century would not stop retelling. The RMS Titanic struck an iceberg late on April 14, 1912, and sank in the small hours of April 15. Of the 2,224 aboard, around 1,500 died. The legend holds that the ship’s band, led by Wallace Hartley (1878-1912), played “Nearer, My God, to Thee” as the deck tilted and the water climbed.

Truth before comfort, so say the doubtful part first. Survivors disagreed. Some heard ragtime to the end. Some named a waltz, “Songe d’Automne.” Some recalled a different hymn, “Abide with Me.” Those who named Adams’s hymn could not settle on the tune, since three compete, Bethany by the American Lowell Mason (1792-1872), Horbury by John Bacchus Dykes (1823-1876), and Propior Deo by Arthur Sullivan (1842-1900), and Hartley the Methodist might have known the British two and not the American one. Six years before, the band and passengers of the SS Valencia sang the hymn as that ship broke up off Vancouver Island, and some historians think the Valencia handed the Titanic its script.

Set the doubt down and keep it in view. Whatever the band played, the hymn became the sound the disaster carries in memory, and the reason it can carry that weight is the reason to read it through Becker. On that deck many hero systems waited for the same water, and the same four stanzas meant a different thing to each man who might have heard them. Nearer, the hymn promised. Nearer to what, each system answered on its own terms.

Start with the men who held the instruments. Hartley led seven other musicians. They had no duty to play. They chose to. A working musician on a White Star liner ranked as hired help, brought aboard to fill the first-class evening with light airs and ragtime. On the tilting deck the job ended and the men kept doing it. For the craftsman the hero system runs through the work. A man is the quality of what he makes and the steadiness of his hands while he makes it. To keep playing as the bow goes under is to die at the bench, tools in hand, the job not dropped. Hartley is said to have told a friend that if he ever went down with a ship he would play “Nearer, My God, to Thee.” For him nearer meant the post. Stay at it. The music is the man, and the man does not run.

Up among the first-class staterooms a different system dressed for the occasion. Benjamin Guggenheim (1865-1912) had gone to bed and come up to a sinking ship. He sent his life belt away, returned to his cabin, and put on white tie and tails. He told a steward to carry word to his wife: “We have dressed in our best, and are prepared to go down like gentlemen.” He added that he would not die like a beast. John Jacob Astor IV (1864-1912), the richest man on the ship, saw his wife into a boat and stepped back. For the Edwardian gentleman the hero system runs on the code and the witness of his peers. Manners outlast the body. Bearing is the soul. A man earns his standing past death in the verdict of the others who will tell the story, and the story must record that he stood aside, kept his collar straight, asked for a brandy, and did not push past a woman to a seat. Nearer, for Guggenheim, meant nearer to the code, and the code held that how a man dies is the last sentence the world writes about him.

On A Deck an old couple took two deck chairs. Isidor Straus (1845-1912) had built Macy’s into a great store and served a term in Congress. Ida Straus (1849-1912) had been his wife for forty-one years. Men pressed her toward a boat. They offered the old man a seat beside her, an exception to the rule of women first, on account of his age. He refused while younger men stood on the deck. She refused to go without him. Where you go, I go, she is said to have told him, and they sat down together to wait. Their hero system runs through the marriage. The thing that does not sink is the bond, four decades of it, and to step into a boat alone drowns the one thing worth keeping afloat. Nearer, for the Strauses, meant nearer to each other. A heaven without the other was no heaven they wanted.

Below, in the steerage, the Church did its work. Father Thomas Byles (1870-1912), an Englishman and a convert, had said Mass that Sunday morning and preached on the need for a lifebelt of faith against spiritual shipwreck, not knowing the hull already had its hours numbered. When the water came he went down to the third-class passengers, many of them Irish and Catholic, raised his hand, and called for calm. He heard confessions. He gave absolution. He refused a seat in a boat twice. As the stern rose he stood among more than a hundred kneeling people and led the Rosary, and the responses came back loud, Catholic and not, while the last boats pulled away. For the sacramental system the soul rises by the Church’s grace, confessed and anointed before the end. A good death is a death in a state of grace, the soul handed up to God through the priest. Nearer, in steerage, meant nearer to absolution. The hymn’s Protestant ladder and the priest’s Rosary aim at the same heaven and ask different things of the dying.

Keep going down, past the priest, to the people the hymn could not reach. The Titanic carried more than seven hundred in third class, Irish, Scandinavian, Italian, Syrian, most of them bound for American work and American children. Their hero system ran through the future. A man crosses an ocean so his name goes on in a new country, in sons and daughters who will have what he never had. The barriers that kept steerage from the boat deck, whatever their exact working that night, fell hardest on these passengers, and many died below the waterline with the future they had crossed the ocean to build still locked on the decks above them. Here the hymn turns cruel. It promises that loss raises you. For the drowned emigrant loss took the one ascent he believed in, the climb out of the old country into the new. Nearer, for him, meant nearer to nothing he could name, the dream cut off behind a gate.

Go up again, to the men who built the ship and believed in her. Thomas Andrews (1873-1912) drew her lines at Harland and Wolff and sailed on her maiden voyage to watch her perform. He went below after the collision, counted the flooded compartments, and knew the sum before anyone else. He spent his last hour helping passengers into belts and boats. The age that built the Titanic had a hero system of its own, the faith of the machine and the engineer, the trust that man rises by what he can make, that steel and rivets and watertight doors push back the sea and push back death with it. The ship was the cathedral of that faith. They called her practically unsinkable and half forgot the practically. For Andrews, nearer carried no comfort the hymn could give. He knew his arithmetic had failed and the water was honest. If a hero system can break on a single night, his broke at twenty past two in the morning, and he met it sober, counting boats, finding them too few.

Stand back and the deck holds more systems than one night can sort. A Jewish passenger who knew the Genesis chapter in Hebrew would hear something the hymn leaves out. In the Torah the stone at Bethel and the ladder belong to Jacob, and the promise God makes him is no private ladder to a private heaven but a covenant, a land, a people as many as the dust of the earth. The same stone pillow, and a heaven made of descendants and a homeland rather than a soul’s solo climb. A Stoic on that deck might reach past God for composure, the only thing left in his power as the water rose. A revolutionary might hear the hymn as the old lie, the drug that teaches the steerage to climb a ladder in the next world instead of demanding a seat in this one. A man with no god at all might hear only a tune from childhood, his mother’s parlor, and grieve for a comfort he could not believe. Each of them faces the same water. Each carries a different account of what a death is for.

Return to the thinness of the verses, the missing Christ that troubled the Trinitarians. The gap is the reason the hymn could do all this. A creed thick with one tribe’s doctrine dies with that tribe. A hymn that names almost nothing in particular can be filled by anyone. Adams wrote a vessel. Into it a Methodist bandleader, a Catholic priest’s mourners, an Edwardian agnostic, a grieving secular son, even a queen and three American presidents could each pour his own heaven. Victoria (1819-1901) favored it. President William McKinley (1843-1901) is said to have whispered its lines as he died of an assassin’s bullet. It played at the burials of Garfield and Ford. Becker’s harsh point fits here. The hero system that spreads widest wins by portability. It lets the most people feel heroic before the same darkness, and truth has little to do with the spread. Adams’s near-empty ladder beat thicker, prouder creeds at the deathbed for the plain reason that it asked the dying to believe almost nothing and let them feel they climbed.

Which returns to the doubt set down earlier. The historians may be right that the band played a waltz, or “Abide with Me,” or nothing anyone could later fix in memory. The legend grew anyway, and its growth is the last piece of evidence. A civilization that had built the unsinkable ship and watched it sink needed a scene in which men chose how to die, in which order and dignity and faith survived the failure of the machine. The hymn supplied the scene. The story of the band playing “Nearer, My God, to Thee” gave the public the assurance it required, that the death meant something, that the steerage and the millionaire and the bandsman all climbed the same ladder in the end. The hero system did more than tell men how to die. It went back afterward and wrote the death it needed.

Sarah Flower Adams never saw any of it. She died in a London room in 1848 with her sister two years in the ground, both of them taken by the same slow illness, no orchestra, no headlines, four stanzas of hers loose in a Unitarian hymnal that asked the reader to believe the cross might raise him. She wrote about the only ascent she could still picture from a sickbed, the climb a soul makes while the body fails. Sixty years on, strangers on a sinking ship, or strangers who needed to believe strangers had, turned her private prayer into the anthem of a public death, and filled her empty ladder with a hundred heavens she never named. The stone is always the same stone. The pillow under the head of the dying man is hard, and the dream above it is whatever his hero system lets him see. Adams gave the dream no fixed shape, and so it fit them all.

Posted in Christianity | Comments Off on Nearer to What?

A Hero System Essay on St. Andrews Cathedral Music Director Ross Cobb

Posted on June 18, 2026 by Luke Ford

In the autumn of 2020 the cathedral on George Street stood empty and Ross Cobb kept playing. The choristers could not gather under one roof. The law forbade it. So they sang into phones and laptops in scattered homes across Sydney, and the parts came back to be stitched into one sound, and the sound went out on YouTube to people who sat alone in their kitchens. A man at a great organ, in a sandstone room built to hold a thousand, playing to no one in the room.

Set that scene against the tradition Cobb came from and you have the whole question. In the high English cathedral world that trained him, the empty room is the tragedy. Beauty with no witness is beauty wasted. The point of the King’s College sound, of Herbert Howells (1892-1983) writing his Collegium Regale, of the stones piled up over centuries, is that men touch the eternal through what they hear, in that room, together. Take away the room and the gathered hearers and you have taken away the thing.

Cobb played anyway, and the playing changed nothing for him, because by his own account the music was never for the room. That is the argument of this essay, and it runs through Ernest Becker (1924-1974).

Becker’s book The Denial of Death (1973) makes one claim and worries it from every side. A man knows he will die. He cannot live with that knowledge, so he builds, or inherits, a hero system: a scheme of cosmic significance that lets him feel he is more than meat, that his short life counts on some stage that outlasts his body. Every culture is one of these schemes. Each tells a man how to be a hero, how to earn a place that death cannot cancel. Self-worth is the private sense that you are succeeding inside your own scheme. The schemes compete. When one runs into another, each unsettles the other’s defense against the grave, and that collision is where Becker locates a good deal of human cruelty.

Apply this to a church musician and the first move undoes the obvious reading. The obvious reading says music is Cobb’s hero system. He is an organist of the front rank. He has given recitals at Notre Dame de Paris, the Royal Albert Hall, St Paul’s in London. He trained at the Royal Academy of Music and King’s College London. He chairs the New South Wales branch of the Royal School of Church Music and presides over its Australian body. In 2017 the Archbishop of Canterbury honored him for service to church music. In 2020 the RSCM gave him an award for promoting the highest musical standards. By the measure of the cathedral-music hero system, a measure that runs from the Tudor composers through the Victorian organ lofts to the Cambridge chapels, Cobb is a hero. He has the equipment and the honors. The name goes on the program.

But that is not the scheme he serves, and the gap between the two is the man.

Cobb serves in the Anglican Diocese of Sydney, which holds, with a force matched almost nowhere in the Anglican world, that the gospel ranks above everything, including the church, including beauty. The diocese descends from the Reformation and the Thirty-Nine Articles and the 1662 prayer book. It reads the Bible as God’s Word written. Its college, Moore, has trained generations of men in expository preaching and biblical theology. Its temper traces to the Billy Graham (1918-2018) crusade of 1959, after which a wave of young converts went to Moore and then into the parishes, carrying with them the conviction that the central act of a church is to preach Christ crucified and call men to repentance and faith. John Stott (1921-2011) taught Sydney to work through the text verse by verse and resist the topical and the merely moving. The hero, in this scheme, is the man who reaches another man with the news that Jesus died and rose, and so wins him eternal life. The immortality is not symbolic. It is the thing itself.

Cobb arrived in November 2005, hired by the then Dean, Phillip Jensen (b. 1945), brother of the then Archbishop, Peter Jensen (b. 1943). Phillip Jensen carried a reputation as a Calvinist iconoclast who distrusted the old sacred music and the vestments and the smells and bells, who had replaced Sunday evensong with a contemporary gathering, and under whom the previous music director had left after the choir’s chances to perform were cut back. Into that came an Englishman with a Cambridge-chapel pedigree, the exact pedigree the diocese eyed with suspicion. The hire looks strange until you read what Cobb said when he took the post. He loved the best of traditional church music where it “sheds light on the written Word of God,” and the best of contemporary church music where it did the same, and he held that the two were not opposed. There is the line, and there is why he could thrive where his predecessor could not. He had already subordinated his art before he walked in the door.

That subordination is his heroism in the Sydney scheme, and it asks of him the hardest thing an artist of his rank can be asked. He must make the music point past the notes to Christ, and at the moment the beauty starts to draw the ear to the beauty, to the performer, to the soaring vault and the held chord as ends worth having on their own, he must check it, because at that moment the music has set up as a rival scheme. The Reformed evangelical fear is exact and old. A man comes to the cathedral for the Bach and the architecture and the hush, mistakes the feeling for God, and walks out unconverted, his soul lost down a beautiful road. So the music gets demoted on purpose. Cobb is the man who can build the cathedral sound at the top of the craft and who has, by confession and by daily practice, bound it to a master. He turned what looked like an artist’s defeat into the highest service. He instigated the liturgical performance of Bach cantatas with orchestra inside the Sunday services, and he ran them not as concerts but as the Word sounded.

Now watch the central word do its work in other lives, because the same word changes its whole meaning when it moves between schemes.

Take a master drummer in a Yoruba town in southwest Nigeria, his hands on the talking drum, the pitch bending under the squeeze of his arm until the drum speaks the praise names of the dead. For him music is the wire to the ancestors. The drum keeps the fathers present, keeps the line from breaking, holds off death by refusing to let the dead go silent. The note is not beauty offered to a transcendent God. The note is the family reaching backward through the grave and finding the grave answered.

Take a qawwal at a Sufi shrine in Sindh, leading the long devotional climb of the song until the self thins out and the singer feels himself dissolve toward union with God. For him music is the road to fana, the burning away of the ego. The aim is to lose the I. Set him beside Cobb and the contrast sharpens. Cobb keeps the self intact and points it outward to a Word that stands over against him. The qawwal wants the self gone. Same act, two opposite cures for the same fear.

Take a techno DJ in a Berlin club at six on a Sunday morning, four hours into a set, the room moving as one body, the drop landing and the floor lifting. For him the all-night set is communion and the dance floor a brief deathlessness, a few hours where the dancers are pure present tense, alive and sure of next weekend. The eternity on offer lasts till the lights come up.

Take a session player in Nashville cutting a track he did not write for a singer he will not meet. For him music is craft and the check and the song that keeps getting played on the radio after he is gone. His shot at outliving himself is a hook in a stranger’s car.

And take the old chorister, English, eighty now, who sang treble in a cathedral as a boy and lost his God somewhere in his thirties and never lost the music. He still goes to evensong. He weeps at the Howells. The beauty is the only church he can still enter. He is Cobb turned inside out. Same sound, opposite scheme. In him the beauty became the idol the Sydney men warned of, and then, when the faith burned off, the beauty was all that was left, and it held. The thing Cobb labors to keep in second place, this man has put first, and it is the last thing standing between him and the dark.

Then there is the woman in the cathedral pew whom both schemes claim. A widow, say, who started coming for the Bach after her husband died, who knew nothing of the diocese or its theology, who came for the cantata and the cool stone and the hour out of the week. The Sydney scheme worries over her. She is the soul who might love the music and never hear the gospel. Cobb’s answer, the answer his whole position depends on, is that the cantata can carry the Word into a heart the sermon alone might not reach, that the beauty can be the open door and not the closed one. Whether the music delivered her or only consoled her is the question his life turns on, and it is a question no honor from Canterbury can settle.

The same split runs through his other sacred word, excellence. He has spent a career at the highest standard and has been decorated for it. In the concert-artist scheme excellence is the path to a personal immortality, the recording that outlasts the man, the name that goes down. In Cobb’s scheme excellence is an offering, the best brought because God is owed the best, and it carries a danger the concert artist never feels, because the better the offering, the more it tempts the man offering it to admire his own gift and forget whose altar it sits on. He walks that line every Sunday. He has to be very good and stay unimpressed with being good.

This is the cost, and it is the meaning. Cobb can do the great thing and has tied it to a lord. He directed the music at state funerals and at royal visits, played for Queen Elizabeth II (1926-2022), led the cathedral choir on a European tour for its bicentenary, ran what was called the largest festival of sacred music Australia has staged. And the logic of his own scheme tells him that none of it saves him. The choir will sing at his funeral as it sang at the funerals of the great, and the singing will be magnificent, and the magnificence will not raise him. Only Christ will, by his lights. So his music is honest about its own smallness in a way the cathedral tradition rarely asks its music to be. The beauty admits it is a servant and not a savior. That admission, made by a man who could plausibly believe the opposite, is the heroism. The denial of death sits at the center of it, named and faced. He does not pretend the music is the answer to the grave. He points past the music to the only answer his scheme allows, and he keeps the music from getting above its station even as he makes it as glorious as he can.

Which returns us to the empty room in 2020. To the cathedral tradition, a man playing to no one is a man robbed of his reason. To Cobb the empty room exposed what was always true. The room was never the point and the gathered hearers were never the point. The point was the news reaching all, and the wire that day carried it past the locked doors and the sandstone and out to the kitchens, further than the stones ever threw it. He played to an empty house and lost nothing, because in his hero system the house was only ever a means, and the music was only ever a servant, and the servant does its work whether or not anyone in the room is watching.

Posted in Sydney | Comments Off on A Hero System Essay on St. Andrews Cathedral Music Director Ross Cobb