Opioid Nation

Dr. Marcia Angell writes:

The problem with these three books, and it’s a big one, is that they treat the Purdue story as though it were the whole story of the opioid epidemic. But OxyContin did not give rise to opioid addiction, although it jump-started the current epidemic. Heroin has been a common street drug ever since it was banned in 1924. Morphine has also been widely abused.

Nor would taking OxyContin off the market end the epidemic. The overwhelming majority of opioid deaths are caused not by OxyContin but by combinations of fentanyl, heroin, and cocaine, often brought in from China via Mexican cartels, and frequently taken along with benzodiazepines (such as Valium or Xanax) and alcohol. These drugs are cheaper and stronger, particularly fentanyl. Fentanyl was first synthesized in 1960, and soon became widely used as an anesthetic and powerful painkiller. It is legally manufactured and highly effective when used appropriately, often for short medical procedures such as colonoscopies. The illicit production and street use is relatively new, but it is now the main cause of most opioid-related deaths (nearly 90 percent in Massachusetts).

The steady increase in opioid deaths after OxyContin came on the market has been supplanted by a much faster increase starting around 2013, when heroin and fentanyl use increased dramatically. We now have two epidemics—the overuse of prescription drugs and the much more deadly and now largely unrelated epidemic of street drugs. By concentrating on the first, we are closing the barn door after the horse is long gone.

Posted in Opiods | Comments Off on Opioid Nation

How To Win The Internet (5-11-21)

Packy writes: The Meta Game here is your life and your career. The more you evolve and level up, the more opportunities you’ll have. If you build up a following, meet the right people, and get involved with the right projects, you’ll have put yourself on an entirely new trajectory.

The fun part is, if you do it right, it really can feel like a game. Don’t take it too seriously. Don’t wait for the perfect moment to jump in. The vast majority of people reading this won’t want to quit your job and make a living entirely online; that doesn’t mean you can’t play. Play on the side, learn some things, build some new hobbies and relationships. Give yourself an insurance plan if things don’t work out in your job, and a supercharger if they do. You never know when it might come in handy, or what new path you might discover.

Posted in Internet | Comments Off on How To Win The Internet (5-11-21)

Rockets Over Jerusalem (5-10-21)

00:00 Dooovid joins to discuss Israel
41:10 Kenneth Brown on nationalism, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7bFDmBNBkw
46:00 Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn’t, and Why It Matters, https://www.wsj.com/articles/unsettled-review-theconsensus-on-climate-11619383653
50:40 Identity Politics Wins Big in the UK Elections, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sq1KbhM_SPg
53:30 Rush Limbaugh – How Talk Radio Works, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELRmgJw8muw
57:30 Colin Liddell: Is Nick Fuentes Lying About His Flying Ban, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVbppPCTQgk
1:02:00 Talk: A Novel by Michael A. Smerconish, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139199
1:09:00 Smerconish takes on Rush Limbaugh’s legacy, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxF_SN2-zyc
1:15:00 Australian media personality Mike Carlton writes in his 2018 autobiography about his six decade career, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139194
1:18:00 Australian radio host and comic Richard Stubbs, https://radiogamechangers.com/richard-stubbs/
1:32:20 Richard Spencer on American downward social mobility
1:42:00 Matt Forney talks to Joseph Cotto on the future of the internet, https://rumble.com/vgl80x-matt-forney-on-vaccine-passports-chauvins-conviction-more.html
1:44:40 IS MELINDA DIVORCING BILL GATES OVER JEFFREY EPSTEIN?, https://www.bitchute.com/video/aByeE08e7jGQ/
1:49:20 Hillary Clinton fears the Philippines might become a ‘subject of China’, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYbIc12rZNM
1:51:10 Matt Christman on USA v China, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izhK03bEk8k
2:02:40 Ten Global Trends Every Smart Person Should Know, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIANLddo-ec
2:09:30 Rational optimism (Matt Ridley, Steven Pinker, Bjorn Lomborg, etc)
2:11:30 Why Hitler Lost WWII (In a Nutshell), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjgW5AWOJ2U
2:15:00 Hobby vs business
2:20:00 How A White Supremacist Infiltrated The Military, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhn2MUWy9JQ
2:26:20 Sargon of Akkad reminds you that Youtube is not a job
2:39:00 ON INFOWARS’ & REBEL MEDIA’S CLAIMS ABOUT CHINA BEING BEHIND ANTIWHITE PROGRAMS IN THE U.S., https://www.bitchute.com/video/uzGZwGDQPwvc/
2:44:10 Tucker Carlson on Nicholas Wade’s essay on the origins of Covid-19

Posted in Israel | Comments Off on Rockets Over Jerusalem (5-10-21)

Primal Screams: How the Sexual Revolution Created Identity Politics

Mary Eberstadt writes in this 2019 book:

* Wolves live the way people do, in families made up of a mom, a dad, and their children. Sometimes an unrelated wolf can be adopted into a pack, or one of the mom’s or dad’s relatives is part of the pack (the “maiden aunt”). . . . But mostly wolf packs are just a mom, a dad, and their pups.

* New investigations into the social lives of animals also reveal this corollary: though many human beings might play today by the rules of the TV comedy Modern Family , according to which a “family” is whatever its self-appointed members say it is, other animals do not. Thus, by way of a few examples, what goes for wolves goes also for coyotes and many other mammals: they live in nuclear or extended biological families. 4 Orca offspring live with their parents all their lives. 5 Barring capture, female elephants stay with their mothers until one or the other dies, and baby elephants remain within some fifteen feet of their mothers for the first eight years of life. 6 Bottlenose dolphins can recognize related dolphins after being separated for twenty years. 7 And so on.

* Most complex animal societies are actually families in which group members are related and therefore share a high proportion of their genes. The cooperative and often complex collective action that arises from such family groups is a product of the interaction of individuals seeking to maximize their own evolutionary fitness.

* Why did anyone believe in the myth of the “lone wolf” in the first place? Temple Grandin and Catherine Johnson theorize that people missed the truth initially because most research on wolves was done on animals in captivity. Animals in captivity—typically separated from their families and surrounded by nonrelated animals in an unnatural setting—exhibit behaviors markedly dissimilar from those left in nature. These effects range from heightened anxieties and aggression to the development of “stereotypies,” or compulsive repetitive tics, and other self-destructive habits that do not arise in the animal’s native ecosystem. 16 Animals can indeed live in “forced packs” (i.e., among unrelated members of their kind). But it is in forced packs that problems of dominance and hierarchies become accentuated, as animals deprived of familial order must then develop new strategies for competition. Wolves living in families, explain Grandin and Johnson, do not have dominance fights.

* Premonitions of social and political catastrophe abound. “In America, Talk Turns to Something Not Spoken of for 150 Years: Civil War,” warned a 2019 headline in the Washington Post . 22 Citing a “hyper-partisan atmosphere” and “a crumbling of confidence in the country’s democratic institutions and its paralyzed federal government,” the piece went on to quote forbidding forecasts of serious unrest by leading politicians and pundits. Similar grim assessments ricochet throughout the media. The Atlantic has foretold “the end of the American order.” 23 New York magazine has described the United States as “ripe for tyranny.” 24 Project Syndicate speaks of “Apocalypse Trump” 25 and is not alone.

Posted in Sex | Comments Off on Primal Screams: How the Sexual Revolution Created Identity Politics

A Conservative NPR?

A friend says: Conservatives will never have a chance to penetrate into the elites without something like NPR with calm music, soft spoken interviews. I love NPR but that its taxpayer funded is shocking. After an hour of listening, I was ready to switch party affiliation because every issue they frame puts liberal point of view as well thought out and calmly reached. John Batchelor was only thing that even approached NPR. Need something w younger people who frame the Right perspective as though it was obvious, w Right leaning scholars to interview. A large part of its appeal is apparition of sophistication, although if you step back you realize you are being subtly inculcated w liberal left ideas that have strong counterarguments. The Right, being shut out of academia, scholarly circles can’t calmly and good naturedly make their arguments. They are forced to shout above the rising white noise of defacto progressive culture, and it can be off-putting no matter how correct.

Posted in Radio | Comments Off on A Conservative NPR?