Debanking

In a recent interview with Bari Weiss, Marc Andreessen talks about America’s slide soft authoritarianism between 2013 to 2022.

Every public pronouncement I remember from Andreesen seemed like commonsense (unlike those of Elon Musk, which are often nonsense).

Over the past ten years, I’ve increasingly heard about people on the right getting debanked for their political views. Debanking is not primarily about individual bank managers making nasty decisions, it is about a structure set up by TARP in 2008 and chiefly weaponized by Democrats against their opponents.

DC Journal published:

In her new memoir, former First Lady Melania Trump reveals that she was abruptly dropped by a bank with which she had a long-standing financial relationship. She also discloses that her son, Barron, was blocked from opening a new account at the same bank, the name of which she does not reveal.

It’s unclear from the memoir if the bank harbored concerns about the legality of her deposits, or if bank associates were motivated by animus against the Trump family, since banks and not required to alert customers about either of those things. But Melania believes the refusal to open an account for Barron, at least, was driven by political discrimination.

Banks, like other private businesses, have the right to refuse service to would-be customers —whether for reputational risks, financial risks, or compliance concerns. However, there is a growing sense that financial institutions are being “nudged” by state regulators to act in line with political priorities.

Debanking is an alarming problem in the banking industry. It is the practice of financial institutions refusing services for political reasons to individuals, companies, or organizations. The relationship between a firm’s discretion, preference, and behind-the-scenes governmental pressure on financial firms has grown more intertwined since the 2008 financial crisis. Following the 2008 crash, a host of new laws and regulations were introduced around the world, such as the Dodd-Frank Act and Basel III, respectively, increasing regulatory scrutiny on banks’ risk management and corporate governance practices.

Most notoriously, the Obama administration’s “Operation Choke Point” targeted specific industries, such as firearms and ammunition manufacturers, by pressuring banks to cut off financial services. The initiative received blowback and revealed how government regulatory power can be misused to limit financial access. More recently, regulators have pressured banks to deny financial services to crypto-related businesses in what is being called Choke Point 2.0.

The Economist:

“What do Barron Trump, son of the president-elect; some Islamic charities in Britain; and America’s legal cannabis industry have in common? This is not a set-up for a bad joke. Rather, all have been at the sharp end of a rise in “debanking”, having lost or been refused access to the services of commercial lenders.”

The Heritage Foundation published Dec. 10:

President Biden has overseen nearly four years of a two-tiered justice system, as his pardoning of Hunter Biden and the political persecutions of then-candidate Donald Trump make all too clear.

But there have been quieter attacks on justice, like “debanking”—and few people realize they could be the next victims because they are a “politically exposed person,” that is someone who disagrees with the liberal status quo.

Debanking is a kind of financial blackballing that has appeared within just the last 20 years.

It started under then-President Barack Obama as a war to punish those seen as political enemies, like firearm manufacturers. Government documents unsealed at the end of 2020 proved that the federal government used its regulatory authority over financial markets to attack political opponents.

Government regulators essentially make it impossible for certain people or businesses to make online transactions, or to have a bank account or a credit card…

Dr. Joseph Mercola, a critic of the COVID vaccine, found his business accounts shut down by JP Morgan Chase, a move his chief financial officer claimed was at the same time Mercola spoke out against the Food and Drug Administration.

In her new memoir, Melania Trump says her bank account was terminated after the riots of Jan. 6, 2021, and her son Barron was unable to open his own account. She called it “political discrimination.”

In the modern world, exclusion from electronic financial services is an economic death sentence.

Regulators will claim that they’re not technically forbidding a private bank from doing business with an individual, and that the bank is freely choosing not to have that person as a customer.

But the reality is very different—because of the undue influence and control in the hands of today’s bloated administrative state.

A bureaucrat can make someone’s life so difficult that the victim is forced to comply—the government strong-arming a private individual or institution into doing what the government itself cannot do by law.

It’s like when the Biden administration pressured social-media companies into deplatforming anyone who questioned political talking points about the COVID pandemic.

The debanking scourge under President Biden has hit the crypto world particularly hard. The Securities and Exchange Commission has unleashed a plague of investigations, some real and some merely threatened, to force innovators and investors out of that space.

Dozens of tech and crypto founders have been debanked under Biden, and their inventions smothered.

On Joe Rogan‘s podcast, venture capitalist Marc Andreessen blamed the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a group set up at the behest of Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) to go after crypto firms in particular.

“Basically every crypto founder, every crypto startup, either got debanked personally and forced out of the industry, or their company got debanked,” Andreessen said.

Andreessen added that others, like Kanye West, have been debanked, “For having the wrong politics. For saying unacceptable things. Under current banking regulations, after all the reforms of the last 20 years, there’s now a category called a politically exposed person, PEP. And if you are a PEP, you are required by financial regulators to kick them off, to kick them out of your bank.”

Posted in Banks | Comments Off on Debanking

Hollywood vs. America: Popular Culture and the War on Traditional Values

There’s nothing I find so regularly disturbing in movies and TV as sex scenes between dudes. I recently had to stop watching the Netflix thriller series Black Doves because of the incessant explicit homo sex scenes.

I don’t think I’m alone in my involuntary disgust reaction.

This academic study written up in The Pink News (“PinkNews is the world’s largest and most influential LGBTQ+ led media brand”) in 2017 rings true:

The study, which was carried out by the American Institute of Bisexuality, found that even those who say they are accepting of the LGBT community have a physical reaction upon seeing two men showing affection for each other.

The participants were shown images of gay men kissing, hugging and engaging in sexual activities.

Scientists then measured the levels of salivary alpha-amylase present in the men’s saliva, which is a type of a digestive enzyme which has links to stress and disgust.

Dr Blair and their team found that when they were presented pictures of gay men kissing, the participants produced the same salivary alpha-amylase levels as when they were confronted with images of rotting flesh and maggots.

It also showed that the level of alpha-amylase was the same for those who were shown to be tolerant of gay relationships and those who were not.

Here’s an example of the opposite approach studios could take: FT: “Religious films are a saving grace in tough year for Hollywood”

I’m willing to put up with a lot of my internal disgust reactions if the movie or TV series is great. Black Doves was mediocre so it wasn’t a big sacrifice to give it up. The TV series Industry and Aaron Hernandez: American Sports Story were great and so I didn’t give up watching despite all the gay sex. I also loved the gay cowboys movie Brokeback Mountain. I just stopped watching during the four homo scenes.

Michael Medved wrote in his 1992 book, Hollywood vs. America:

In 1990, for example, NBC lost several hundred thousand dollars when it proved unable to sell all the available advertising time on its controversial docudrama on the abortion issue, Roe vs. Wade. ABC took an even bigger hit by sanctioning the inclusion of a scene in “thirtysomething” in which two gay male characters appear in bed together, talking about the one – night stand they’ve just enjoyed. This brief sequence cost the network more than $1 million in lost revenue, but following the fiasco top corporate officials assured “thirtysomething” producers that “they would fully support any future exploration of the gay characters’ lives.” True to their word, they authorized another show in the next season (1991) in which the same two characters exchange a midnight kiss at a New Year’s party. This time, advertiser withdrawals cost the network more than $500,000. “I am grateful that ABC was willing to air the program at a loss,” said Ed Zwick, co – creator of the critically acclaimed series. Robert A. Iger, president of ABC Entertainment, told the press that his support for the embattled episode reflected his “social and creative responsibilities.”
Along similar lines, NBC aired a January 1992 edition of “Quantum Leap” about a heroic homosexual cadet who becomes the victim of gay – bashing aimed at a naval college. Four months before the broadcast, NBC executives had asked Universal Television, producers of the series, to accept liability for any lost advertising revenue associated with the episode’s controversial content, but in the end they relented and agreed to swallow the loss themselves. The predictable result of this noble decision: a setback for the network estimated by official sources as “about $500,000.”
This pattern — repeated on several other shows in recent years — could be applauded as a courageous example of unselfish devotion to principle, or it could be condemned as a stubborn refusal to respond to public and advertiser concerns over highly sensitive materials. In any event, it demonstrates that in today’s Hollywood, the famous bottom line is not always the bottom line.

No one could deny that the formidable gay presenee in the entertainment business encourages industry leaders to take a far more sympathetic view of homosexuality than does the public at large. In a 1990 study of “Hollywood opinion leaders” by University of Texas government professor David F. Prindle, 68 percent said they supported “gay rights,” compared to only 12 percent who endorsed that position in a 1987 national Times Mirror poll. More recently, an impressive array of the Hollywood establishment’s most influential figures have provided support for leading gay rights organizations. In August 1991, top executives from all four television networks and from the eight largest movie studios served together on the host committee for a gala dinner to benefit the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.

Two years ago, Maga9428 posted on Patriots.win:

I have had it with this bullshit, I’m so tired of seeing gay shit thrown into otherwise normal TV shows. If a movie or TV show is going to have gay kisses or sex scenes then it needs to be a movie/TV show intentionally made for gay people. But this crap of just pushing gay shit into TV shows that aren’t about gay stuff is becoming more then just obnoxious. Its intolerable and disgusting.

Straight men do not want to watch dudes kissing or fucking other dudes. Its fucking repulsive, and completely unnecessary on top of that. And I’m sick of seeing Hollywood shilling lesbian crap too. I’ve absolutely had it with these giant corporations not giving a shit anymore about what their customers actually want and instead just trying to shove their beliefs down our throats.

I scroll and scroll on Google about this disgust reaction by straights to unexpected gay scenes and I can find no respectful or sympathetic treatment of our pain. Similarly, I scroll and scroll through Google and can find no sympathetic treatment of the distress normal people feel when they can’t figure out whether someone is male or female. I guess our pain doesn’t matter.

Grok gave an even-handed reaction when I wrote in: “I hate seeing gay scenes in movies/tv”

Grok included this response:

Opposition to Inclusion:
Personal Discomfort: Some individuals express discomfort or dislike for these scenes, often citing personal taste or cultural upbringing. This discomfort might not necessarily stem from homophobia but from a general aversion to sex scenes or unfamiliarity with non-heterosexual relationships.

Oversaturation Concerns: There are opinions that the inclusion of gay characters or scenes has become excessive or tokenistic, used more for the sake of appearing inclusive rather than serving the narrative genuinely. This perspective sometimes leads to discussions about whether such inclusions are forced or if they contribute meaningfully to the story.

Grok linked to this LaShaun Turner essay:

“I don’t mind if people are gay or transgender, it’s their choice and body and none of my business. However, I’m offended to see this rammed down my throat every tv show I watch as if it’s normal when it isn’t. I don’t accept that and shouldn’t be forced to. Be gay but don’t be overly graphic about it to prove a point. Where is my choice? I don’t want to see that garbage as it repulses me,” wrote one commenter on a thread.

I don’t enjoy watching gay sex scenes. I find it somewhat repulsive. In my opinion, it would be better to insinuate it, that’s enough.

Grok linked to this Reddit post:

Why are LGBTQ Characters so Over-Represented in modern Television, Movies and Streaming (Especially Netflix)?
According to Where We Are on TV Report – 2020 | GLAAD , LGBTQ characters represent 9.1% of characters on prime-time T.V.

The largest reputable estimate of the LGBTQ population I could find is 5.6%. LGBT Identification Rises to 5.6% in Latest U.S. Estimate (gallup.com) (Note that this number has increased from 3.5% to 5.6% in the past 9 years).

Using these numbers alone, representation of LGBTQ characters in prime-time television is a whopping 71% higher than what you might expect to find in reality, however when you compare the numbers of specific stations it is clear some take it further than others.

The CW is the leader of the pack, having had 14.2% of their characters as LGBTQ. This is an astounding 2.5x higher than our best guess at representation in the real world.

The report from GLAAD does not detail the specific percentages for streaming services (although reading the report suggests they have the data available) however one thing is abundantly clear: Netflix Originals have by far more LGBTQ characters than other producers.

There are roughly the same amount of LGBTQ characters in Netflix produced shows (110 total counted) than in The CW, ABC, FOX, NBC, CBS, Amazon Prime and Hulu Combined (111 total counted).

Grok linked to this X post: “I am getting so tired of almost every show/movie coming out and having some male homosexual effeminate character that adds nothing to the story. It is disturbing because the majority of gay males do not act like women or broadcast gay.”

I asked Grok: “I find it disturbing when I can’t tell if somebody is male or female.” I got back a purely PC response: “Luke, it sounds like you’re grappling with some discomfort around gender ambiguity. This is a common feeling for many people as societal norms around gender become less binary.”

I put “distress” into a search of Rony Guldmann’s book Conservative Claims of Cultural Oppression and received more empathy for my lived experience:

* “psychic distress is a kind of mental pain” and “is plainly something that people prefer to avoid.” There is thus an obvious sense in which conduct that causes it—like the consumption or dissemination of pornography—is “harmful” and falls within the ambit of the harm-principle, irrespective of secondary effects. The same holds true of communal harm: “If people get satisfaction or happiness from living in a particular kind of community, then conduct that subverts that kind of community and thus reduces such happiness inflicts a kind of ‘harm.’”

Yet liberals will greet such claims with “peremptory dismissal” and “dismissive indignation,”…

* Though the old Victorians have an undeserved reputation as meddlesome moralists and officious busybodies, they would in reality “have been as distressed by the overtness and formality of college regulations governing sexual conduct (with explicit consent required at every stage of the sexual relation) as by the kind of conduct—promiscuity, they would have called it—implicitly sanctioned by those regulations.”

* Therapism seeks to “professionalize” normal human distress, appropriating common sense as its own special province, and thus persuade the public that it requires specialized assistance to cope with normal human travails. Enfeebling the objects of its compassion, therapism is an assault on the “American Creed” and its paramount virtues of self-reliance, stoicism, and courage. In undermining these, argues Sommers, therapism has gradually slid the nation into a permanent regime of “therapeutic self-absorption and moral debility.” By resisting the solicitude of therapeutically-minded liberals, conservatives are once again signaling their rejection of the disciplines and repressions of the buffered identity, whose innerness they cannot but see as “therapeutic self-absorption.” Their antagonism to therapeutic ideals is merely one outgrowth of their broader resistance to the liberal elites’ ordering impulses, which are always lying underneath the altruism. In rejecting these impulses in favor of “the trials of everyday life,” conservatives are embracing the pre-modern anti-structure that forever upsets all merely human designs, announcing their resignation to the flux and disorder that the modern order refuses to acknowledge.

Posted in Hollywood, Homosexuality | Comments Off on Hollywood vs. America: Popular Culture and the War on Traditional Values

The Lily Phillips Challenge To Liberalism (12-13-24)

01:00 Only Fans Brit Who Banged 100 Men in One Day is Kind of Our Fault, https://www.jollyheretic.com/p/only-fans-brit-who-banged-100-men
05:00 Outrage over Lily Phillips, https://www.newsweek.com/lily-phillips-100-men-video-sparks-outrage-1999203
46:00 Republican asymmetrical advantages, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYNcJlbLFBo
48:30 Why is the right obsessed with these purported mystery drones over New Jersey?
1:01:00 Marc Andreessen on using drones to monitor crime
1:06:00 NYT: I Traded My News Apps for Rumble, the Right-Wing YouTube. Here’s What I Saw., https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/12/13/business/rumble-trump-bongino-kirk.html
1:18:00 Mr. McMahon documentary series, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._McMahon_(miniseries)
1:19:30 Duke stripper admits she made up her accusations against the Duke lacrosse team
1:27:30 Kip joins to discuss Kellyanne Conway’s powerful use of words
1:32:00 Sex workers are not usually dead inside
1:41:00 Disassociating often begins as an adaptive habit but then becomes maladaptive
1:45:00 Historian Jon Meacham, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Meacham
2:00:30 The power and influence of Charlie Kirk & Steve Bannon
2:28:00 Famous athletes who quit on their team, https://www.stadiumtalk.com/s/john-wall-uninjured-athletes-who-refused-to-play-342a0cd8db3f4a84
2:34:00 Van Jones – the most honest man in politics? https://chriscillizza.substack.com/p/van-jones-is-the-most-honest-man
2:52:00 Why the electoral map is moving toward Republicans, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJ68wdv0Cx8
2:54:40 Joe Biden’s border wall fire sale
3:06:00 The Political Lessons of Liz Truss’s 44 Days in Office, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTa_HPoBjmc
3:19:00 NYT: How Trump Targeted Undecided Voters Without Breaking the Bank, https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/05/us/politics/trump-streaming-ads-strategy.html
3:22:00 Van Jones on Trump’s winning 2024 strategy

Posted in America, Ethics, Liberal, Pornography, Sex | Comments Off on The Lily Phillips Challenge To Liberalism (12-13-24)

‘No one has the faintest idea of how to prevent major mental illness.’ (12-12-24)

01:00 New York Post: OnlyFans model cries after sleeping with 101 men in a day: ‘Sometimes I feel so robotic’, https://nypost.com/2024/12/11/lifestyle/onlyfans-model-lily-phillips-cries-after-sleeping-with-101-men-in-a-day/
08:00 Failing the Severely Mentally Ill, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9kTPLfK7ZM
25:20 The wit of the child wards off the parent’s depression, https://x.com/lukeford/status/1867313436742627570
27:00 How do you prevent major mental illness?, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=158215
28:00 Niche construction, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=158213
29:00 Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers (1986), https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=158211
31:00 Insane Consequences: How the Mental Health Industry Fails the Mentally Ill (2017), https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=158209
33:00 DJ Jaffe’s TED Talk at NatCon18, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Eh_Keo5Xjw
48:00 What is a hero system according to Ernest Becker?, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=158207
50:00 Commentary magazine crew: Pro Publica vs Pete Hegseth, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGiC0OQSahw
54:00 Explain buffered identity in liberalism, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=158199
1:00:00 British business culture vs American, https://x.com/Thomashornall/status/1866433916027973671
1:05:00 ‘Conservative Claims of Cultural Oppression: On the Nature and Origins of Conservaphobia’ by Rony Guldmann, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=158193
1:20:45 Reason: We Shut Down State Mental Hospitals. Some Want to Bring Them Back., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9aRo-aRRY0
1:34:20 Iran’s Next Move – with Raz Zimmt,
1:38:30 Mark Halperin on Trump Transition News, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPcrobfaLjI
1:45:00 The 2024 Elections: What Happened and What’s Next? | DealBook Summit 2024, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHBFl17RqL0
2:00:00 Democrats are a bigger mess than people know right now
2:02:00 Trump governs from the outside in while Biden governs from the inside out
2:04:00 Is Iran’s Islamic regime vulnerable? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGR7ZZ9P02M
2:11:00 The media appears chastened by Trump’s resounding victory
2:43:00 DJ Jaffe’s Legacy and the Future of Mental Illness Policy Reform, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhn7-aR7Xmw

Posted in America, Psychiatry | Comments Off on ‘No one has the faintest idea of how to prevent major mental illness.’ (12-12-24)

New York Post: OnlyFans model cries after sleeping with 101 men in a day: ‘Sometimes I feel so robotic’

According to the New York Post:

Lily Phillips, 23, had sex with over a hundred men in a day back in October to create some scandalous content for her subscription-based social media page.

But despite previously insisting that she enjoyed the extreme stunt, all that sex didn’t make her feel good.

“Sometimes I feel so robotic,” Phillips admitted in YouTuber Josh Pieters’ documentary titled, “I Slept With 100 Men in One Day.”

The British sex worker fought back tears as she recalled that day.

“I think by the 30th when we’re getting on a bit, I’ve got a routine of how we’re going to do this and sometimes you disassociate and it’s not like normal sex at all,” Phillips said.

Although it was a momentously frisky feat, it wasn’t all that memorable for the young woman, who admitted she didn’t remember much of it…

Phillips shared that it’s not just the physical intimacy of having sex with so many men that made her feel “so bad” but also disappointing them by not being able talk with them, or even being interested in doing so.

She said that conversing with them was also “hard” and recounted how one man complained that they only chatted for about two minutes when she had said beforehand that they would talk for about five minutes…

When asked if she thinks she should feel bad about not talking with each man for a set amount of time, Phillips explained that she felt she had disappointed her supporters.

“I guess when you’ve promised something to people who support you, it’s kinda hard to let them down,” she said.

The sex worker also admitted that she hadn’t yet processed what she did on that day, but said she wouldn’t forget the day of her emotional interview.

I wrote about the porn industry from 1995 to 2007. I found the experience often retarded my thinking. The more time I spent around porn, the dumber I got. Friends would say to me: “I remember when you were smart.” Other people noted how I became more coarse and more socially inappropriate the more time I spent around porners.

There are probably many revelations and many forms of knowledge that are not good for most people. For example, the happily married people I think I know seem to have positively distorted views of their spouse. I wonder if it is possible to love someone and to see them as they are.

I can’t recall examples from history of pornography serving as a stimulus to great intellectual achievement.

What would be the best way for a woman who starred in a 100-man gangbang video to leverage that achievement for success in polite society?

Her ability to disassociate might help her to become a great spy or shock jock.

Would you be proud to introduce this woman to your family and friends as your future bride?

Lily’s mother is her manager.

Posted in Pornography | Comments Off on New York Post: OnlyFans model cries after sleeping with 101 men in a day: ‘Sometimes I feel so robotic’