Why Are Conservatives In Despair?

00:00 Dave Rubin vs Nick Fuentes
01:00 Tom Wolfe on American politics
02:00 Good People Must Be Dangerous People, https://amgreatness.com/2021/04/12/good-people-must-be-dangerous-people/
12:40 John Mearsheimer & Vishnu Som on “Why Leaders Lie”: Jaipur Literature Festival 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9URFBibUMPg
15:40 JM says Trump is delusional
18:00 The G.O.P. Is Getting Even Worse, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/22/opinion/trump-gop.html
19:00 Conservatives despair, https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/why-are-conservatives-in-despair/
28:40 Cops push back back on leftist rhetoric
33:30 List of genocides by death toll, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_genocides_by_death_toll
56:00 Peak National Dysfunction, https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/peak-national-dysfunction/
1:13:00 Spite: The Upside of Your Dark Side, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=138664
1:32:00 Effective communication skills, https://www.audible.com/pd/Effective-Communication-Skills-Audiobook/B00D94332Q
1:35:00 Appreciating Tom Wolfe, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=138741
1:51:00 Tom Wolfe’s Status Update, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=138714
2:00:00 National Justice Party – America now has a Nazi party

Posted in America | Comments Off on Why Are Conservatives In Despair?

Tom Wolfe’s Status Update

Michael Lewis writes:

Eighteen months! That’s what it took for Wolfe, once he’d found his voice, to go from worrying about whether or not to go on the dole to a cult figure. By early 1965, literary agents are writing him, begging to let them sell a book; publishers are writing to him, begging him to write one. Hollywood people are writing to ask if they might turn his magazine pieces into movies—though really all they want is to rub up against him. Two years earlier his fan letters had come mainly from his mother. Soon they came from Cybill Shepherd. He’s booked on The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson. He’s now as likely to use the margins of his notebooks to tally his lecture fees as to accommodate drawings of nude skydivers. He has a stalker….

Wolfe’s response to his new status—like Hunter Thompson’s—is to create a public persona as particular and distinctive as the sounds he’s making on the page. Once he becomes famous, people start to notice and remark upon his white suit, in a way they don’t seem to have done before: they take it as one of those eccentricities that are a natural by-product of genius. He bought the thing because it was just what you wore in Richmond in the summer and kept on wearing it because it kept him warm in winter. Now it becomes this sensational affectation. He buys an entire wardrobe of white suits, and the hats and canes and shoes and gloves to accessorize them. His handwriting changes in a similar way—once a neat but workman-like script, it becomes spectacularly rococo, with great swoops and curlicues. In his reporter notebooks he tries out various new signatures and eventually settles on one with so many flourishes that the letters look as if they are under attack by a squadron of flying saucers. The tone of his correspondence becomes more courtly and mannered, and, well, like it is coming from someone who isn’t like other people. Nine years after he bursts onto the scene he receives an honorary doctorate from Washington and Lee. “While a feature writer for New York magazine he, like Lord Byron before him, awoke one morning to find himself famous,” said the college president. And, like Lord Byron before him, Wolfe had a pretty good sense of what the public wanted from its geniuses.

Yet the elaborate presentation of self never really interferes with the work or the effort he puts into it—at least not in the way it would do with Hunter Thompson. It doesn’t even seem to interfere with his ability to report on the world. Wolfe gets himself on the psychedelic school bus Ken Kesey and his acolytes are taking cross-country to proselytize for LSD. There, in his white suit, he sits and watches Kesey and his groupies more or less invent the idea of sex, drugs, and rock ‘n’ roll. No one who reads Wolfe’s take on it all, The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test—at least no one whose letters or reviews are preserved—asks the obvious question: How the hell did he do that? How did he get them to let him in, almost as one of them? Why do all these people keep letting this oddly dressed man into their lives, to observe them as they have never before been observed?

* The marketplace will encourage Wolfe to write nothing but novels. And a funny thing happens. The moment he abandons it, the movement he shaped will lose its head of steam. The New Journalism: Born 1963, Died 1979. R.I.P. What was that all about? It was mainly about Tom Wolfe, I think.

* Fame, to him, didn’t come naturally. The world expected him to be a character he wasn’t. “I was so used to interviewing other people,” he says. “I had never been interviewed by anyone. People were expecting me to be a ball of fire. They felt so let down!” His gaze had been relentlessly outward-looking—one reason he saw so much, so well—and he didn’t respond well when he was required to respond to the gaze of others. He wasn’t like Hunter Thompson or even Norman Mailer or George Plimpton, all of whom seemed to enjoy playing themselves, maybe even more than they enjoyed writing about it. Hunter Thompson played his character so well and so relentlessly that he eventually became his character.

* The Great White Males of that moment had decided that rather than be bus-tour guides they’d become stops on the bus tour. George Plimpton set himself up as New York City’s fireworks commissioner, Norman Mailer ran for mayor, and Truman Capote hosted masked balls at the Plaza hotel.

Posted in Tom Wolfe | Comments Off on Tom Wolfe’s Status Update

Want to Hookup?: Sex Differences in Short‑term Mate Attraction Tactics (4-22-21)

00:00 Media rush to judgment on police shooting teen knife girl
04:00 Dennis Prager calls LeBron James a moron
06:40 Heather MacDonald talks to Dennis
12:00 USC’s Song Girls project a glamorous ideal; 10 women describe a different, toxic reality, https://www.latimes.com/sports/usc/story/2021-04-22/usc-song-girls
18:00 Want to Hookup?: Sex Differences in Short‑term Mate Attraction Tactics, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=138669
19:40 GET HIM TO COMMIT TO YOU: 3 Steps To Turn A Hookup Into A Boyfriend, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2y6-zwPVqmk
40:00 Sexual Assault Allegations Against Biographer Halt Shipping of His Roth Book, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/21/books/philip-roth-blake-bailey.html
1:09:00 Men, STOP Hooking Up || A Jewish wife talks about sex!, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95wp_Qsz7vc
1:6:00 Thoughts on Autobiography from an Abandoned Autobiography by Janet Malcolm, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=138693
1:18:00 Dreams and Anna Karenina, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=138689
1:21:00 Spite: The Upside of Your Dark Side, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=138664
1:26:50 How to Dress Like a Gentleman, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDjqbP7gikI
1:40:00 Stalking the billion footed beast, https://harpers.org/archive/1989/11/stalking-the-billion-footed-beast/
1:44:00 Tom Wolfe’s gangbang scene in Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test
1:49:30 Tom Wolfe: Reporting on the Times, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpYNUFL2Aes
1:56:00 Cynthia Ozick Asks Norman Mailer About Dipping His Balls in Ink, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLFQ5wQOY-g
2:25:00 Dozens hurt in Old City clash as extremist Jews march chanting ‘Death to Arabs’, https://www.timesofisrael.com/dozens-hurt-at-old-city-clash-as-extremist-jews-march-chanting-death-to-arabs/
2:34:00 Fewer Sex Partners Means a Happier Marriage, https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/10/sexual-partners-and-marital-happiness/573493/
2:47:00 Andy Ngo on Antifa, BLM
2:50:00 Tucker Carlson on stabbing
3:08:30 Cop Explains Makhia Bryant Shooting, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiY3CcQ5P18
3:18:00 Land of Hope and Glory, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpEWpK_Dl7M

Posted in America | Comments Off on Want to Hookup?: Sex Differences in Short‑term Mate Attraction Tactics (4-22-21)

Thoughts on Autobiography from an Abandoned Autobiography

Janet Malcolm writes: Another obstacle in the way of the journalist turned autobiographer is the pose of objectivity into which journalists habitually, almost mechanically, fall when they write. The “I” of journalism is a kind of ultra-reliable narrator and impossibly rational and disinterested person, whose relationship to the subject more often than not resembles the relationship of a judge pronouncing sentence on a guilty defendent. This “I” is unsuited to autobiography. Autobiography is an exercise in self-forgiveness. The observing “I” of autobiography tells the story of the observed “I” not as a journalist tells the story of his subject, but as a mother might. The older narrator looks back at his younger self with tenderness and pity, empathizing with its sorrows and allowing for its sins. I see that my journalist’s habits have inhibited my self-love. Not only have I failed to make my young self as interesting as the strangers I have written about, but I have withheld my affection. In what follows I will try to see myself less coldly, be less fearful of writing a puff piece. But it may be too late to change my spots.

Posted in Journalism | Comments Off on Thoughts on Autobiography from an Abandoned Autobiography

Dreams and Anna Karenina

Janet Malcolm writes:

* Tolstoy was obviously well acquainted with the guard who stops us at the border of sleep and awakening and confiscates the brilliant, dangerous spoils of our nighttime creations. The capacity to recreate these fictions in the unprotected light of day may be what we mean by literary genius.

* One of these continuities—perhaps the most significant—is Tolstoy’s keen, almost prying, interest in the sexuality of his characters and the hierarchy he has set in place that runs parallel to, though distinct from, his moral hierarchy. At the top he has set his sexually robust characters—Anna, Vronsky, Oblonsky, Levin, Kitty, and Dolly—and to the bottom he has consigned figures like the creepy Landau and Varenka, a sexless young woman Kitty meets at the spa to which she has been sent to cure her broken heart, and whose limp handshake is echoed a hundred pages later by Landau’s flaccid grip. Levin’s bloodless-intellectual half-brother Sergey Ivanovich Koznishev, a kind of double of the bloodless-intellectual Karenin (as Lydia Ivanovna is a double of another dreadful pious woman named Madame Stahl—the novel is filled with doubles and doublenesses), is another member of the league of the sexually underpowered, though his portrait is a mere sketch in comparison to the full-blown case study of impotence that Tolstoy has fashioned out of his complicated cuckold.

Posted in Literature | Comments Off on Dreams and Anna Karenina