I Remember The First Time My Back Went Out

I believe it was late 1992 or early 1993. I had just passed the Reform Beit Din for my initial conversion to Judaism. I had just started placing and responding to singles ads. I had met a woman over the phone that week and I was fantasizing about her. I think we’d had one good conversation. I had been largely bedridden (about 18 hours a day) for the previous four years with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). I was living with my parents in Newcastle, CA. They were away for a few days. I rolled out of bed one night to go pee when my lower left back suddenly seized up and I was absolutely helpless. I couldn’t get up. Nothing like it had happened before. We lived on seven acres. Nobody was close. I started crying aloud for help but nobody could hear me. I panicked. I thought about the woman I’d just met and I dreamed she’d come to rescue me, but no rescue came.

After about 30 minutes, I managed to roll on to my side and push myself up. The pain was severe for a couple of days and then it gradually lessened. I couldn’t believe how vulnerable I was. Not just CFS, but my lower back could go into spasm and I would be essentially paralyzed.

After that, about every year or so, my lower left back would go out similarly and I would be hobbled for a couple of days and then gradually return to normal.

Now I’m reading about John Sarno MD’s methods and I am trying to explore the hidden emotional forces in my back pain. I’m wondering if I had a desire to become became helpless so this new woman would rescue me.

I remember in the weeks prior to my February 1988 collapse into CFS (when I was taking 21 units at college and working about 30 hours a week in addition to strenuous workouts every other day), I kept getting this unwanted and embarrassing thought — “I’m going to break through to success or I’m going to break down. Either way, I’ll get the love that I need.”

Howard Schubiner MD blogs:

It is important to realize that Mind Body Syndrome is not a new diagnosis. When Dr. Sarno described Tension Myositis Syndrome (TMS) in the 1970’s, he created a new name for a syndrome that has actually been known for hundreds of years. I agree with Dr. Sarno that we do need a name for this syndrome (and I will explain why in future blogs). However, when you look at the history of medicine you will find many examples of MBS. I highly recommend the book by the University of Toronto historian, Edward Shorter, From Paralysis to Fatigue: A History of Psychosomatic Medicine. Dr. Shorter uses the term psychosomatic, which is commonly used in medicine, but a term that I do not prefer to use because it has a connotation of being unkind to the patients, implying that they are somehow less than normal, or somewhat “crazy.” As I often say, I know that people with MBS are not crazy because I have MBS and I know I’m not crazy.

In any case, the reason people get MBS, or physical (or psychological symptoms) due to emotions which are often unconscious, is that they are human. They have a human brain that processes emotions in certain ways and they have human existences that often cause great stress in our lives. That is why there has always been MBS and there will always be MBS. However, the type of symptoms that the brain creates in our bodies does change over time.

For example, we know (courtesy of Dr. Shorter) that a common manifestation of great stress and emotions in the 1600’s and 1700’s was the development of paralysis. A story that captures this is about a young man who was beaten, abused, and berated his whole life by his father. When he was approximately 25 years old, while being berated once again, he had a great surge of energy and suddenly went to hit his father with his fist. At that very moment, his arm became paralyzed and he couldn’t move it at all. We know that he didn’t suddenly have a stroke because he regained use of the arm fully within a short time. And therefore we know that the cause of the paralysis was a combination of emotions, which were all unconscious (i.e. he was unaware that he was feeling them), and the main emotions were anger, fear and guilt. In those centuries, doctors did not consider this type of reaction to be caused by psychological factors, but rather some kind of physical condition. In the 1900’s, doctors learned how to tap on the tendons of an arm or leg and determine immediately if there was a stroke or some other severe neurologic condition. We now call these reflexes, the deep tendon reflexes, and use them all the time. When they are normal, in someone with sudden paralysis, we know that there is no neurologic condition and that the cause of the paralysis is due to MBS.

Since doctors have been able to use deep tendon reflexes, the number of people with paralysis due to stress and emotions has dropped drastically so that it’s relatively rare. Why? The cause of MBS is in the mind, in our unconscious mind that is trying to help us cope with great stress. The unconscious mind will find some physical symptoms to use when necessary and it will choose a physical symptom that makes some kind of sense. And typically, it will choose a physical symptom that will not be seen as “psychological.” Since paralysis is now seen as psychological, it is rarely used by the unconscious mind. We are more likely now to get Back Pain, headaches, fatigue, and stomach pains, which are more likely to be seen as physical conditions and therefore more acceptable to our self and to the doctors.

This is one reason why there are so many people today with these chronic symptoms and often they do not respond to biomedical treatments. Since so few doctors are aware of MBS, they often are not treating the underlying cause of the symptoms and therefore the treatment is trying to cope with the symptoms of the problem and is less likely to be successful…

MBS is not new. As long as there have been humans, there have been physical symptoms caused by stress and emotions. It is important to realize that physical symptoms, even very severe physical symptoms can be caused by stress and emotions. In fact, the emotions that tend to have the largest effect on us are precisely those that we are unaware of. There are two ways to think about how these symptoms can be produced.

The first way is to understand how the neurologic system works. Pain is a learned response, i.e. the body actually learns how to produce certain symptoms by experiencing them. For example, I had a patient who fell and hurt her back as a teenager. A decade later, she was in a very difficult situation in a job where she felt trapped and unable to get out of her problems there. At that moment, suddenly her back seized up and she had tremendous pain. The nerves that send signals from the back to the brain had been fired when she fell as a teenager and those nerve connections had been “learned” at that time. When a significant emotional situation arose where she had no way out, her body responded in a way that it already knew, by producing the Back Pain it had learned 10 years earlier.

A good way to understand how MBS works is by thinking about phantom limb syndrome. In this syndrome, which is very common among amputees, pain or other sensations can be felt in the part of the body (arm or leg usually) that is missing. There is obviously no disease in that area, yet we can feel pain (often severe) that appears to be coming from the missing body part. What has happened is that the nerves that send signals to the brain have been sensitized and are continuing to fire and those signals are interpreted as pain by the brain. A vicious cycle is formed of sensitized nerves that send signals to the brain, then those signals get amplified in the brain (by a structure called the anterior cingulated cortex; more about that area of the brain in upcoming posts), and then signals are sent out to the body by the autonomic nervous system (the fight, flight or freeze system). This pain is real, very real. However, there is no tissue breakdown, no tissue disease in the body. This is exactly what happens in Mind Body Syndrome. We may feel pain in an area of the body, for example, the head or back or stomach, yet there is no tissue breakdown, no tissue disease there. Of course, pain can be caused by tissue breakdown or disease, such as occurs in cancer, infections, or fractures. When the doctors are unable to find disease after a careful and thorough search, the diagnosis of MBS is usually correct. It is important to realize that MBS is a physiologic process, i.e. a process that occurs due to normal reactions of the body. When we get scared, our heart speeds up; when we get nervous, our stomach tightens up or we get clammy hands. These are physiologic processes, normal reactions that are 100% reversible. That is why MBS is curable. It can be reversed by interrupting the vicious cycle.

Posted in Back, Personal | Comments Off on I Remember The First Time My Back Went Out

Recent Shows

00:00 Who are the real sex pests?
06:00 Millenial Woes addresses the sex pest accusation, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH6rrwDJsco
20:00 Where Woes went wrong, https://trad-news.blogspot.com/2020/12/woes-finally-lauches-sex-pest-defence.html
1:13:00 The American Conservative magazine conference with Michael Anton, Chris Buskirk, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOk4VBdfIlw
1:54:00 Back Pain and Tension Myositis Syndrome, https://www.tmswiki.org/forum/threads/back-pain-and-tension-myositis-syndrome-tms.11990/
2:04:00 Prof John Mearsheimer – US Foreign Policy under President Biden, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaTGGdsomf4
2:05:20 R&B Lecture: “Daughters of Esther and Peace Between Abrahamics” by Roseanne Cherrie Barr, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMdn4yZeU8o
2:07:30 Dooovid makes Roseanne Barr laugh with a Luke Ford quote
2:15:00 Reb Dooovid joins the stream
2:34:00 Dooovid’s ability to find weak points
2:36:00 Dooovid found help for his anger in Hinduism
2:36:40 Dooovid’s multiple truth hypothesis
2:42:00 Prominent SPLC Board Member Vanishes from Website Amid Racism, Sexism Scandal, https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2019/03/26/prominent-splc-board-member-vanishes-from-website-amid-racism-sexism-scandal-n64720
2:51:30 Project Veritas releases CNN Tapes

Posted in America | Comments Off on Recent Shows

Why Did Blacks Make More Progress Before Civil Rights Than After?

From comments to Steve Sailer:

* By every standard you can measure….blacks were much better off before “civil rights.”

Prior to the left “helping” blacks with desegregation, blacks had thriving businesses, an intact family unit, a much lower rate of illegitimacy, strong churches and church attendance, lower rates of crime and substance abuse, etc.etc.etc.

Welfare incentivized single motherhood….and fatherless boys do MASSIVE crime. Out of wedlock births are now 76%, the more intelligent (leadership class) fled to white hoods to escape high crime leaving blacks without decent leaders, substance abuse and gang crime exploded, the entire family structure was destroyed, and now blacks are dependent on govt. handouts.

* Black people, on the whole, had much more self-respect in the earlier era, even though they didn’t advertise it to anywhere near the degree they do now. Sort of ironic.

The various pathologies which characterise way too much of black culture today were trivial back then by comparison. We now have a society which disparages personal responsibility and celebrates every kind of immorality, and is much more racist than ever before. Also sort of ironic.

I’ve seen single black moms struggling with their sons. It can’t be easy. Our cultural propaganda makes it nigh impossible. No one dares tell kids that they shouldn’t have kids of their own, outside a stable family unit. The results are everywhere.

* Anything subsidized grows: TANF, SNAP, Section 8, heating assistance, free school lunches and breakfasts, free preK-12 education, Pell grants, etc, etc. We are subsidizing the reproduction of the least able people. The crop of neck and face tatooed carjackers that bedevil our streets have been brought into being by the good intentions of people like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer.

* America has been sliding downhill overall since 1970, with blacks sliding even more than whites. Striving for equality is just one of many things that America can’t do as well as it could 50 years ago. Personally, I look at the Apollo 17 mission returning from the moon for the last time one month before the Supreme Court decided the U.S. Constitution includes a right to abort fetuses, and I wonder if the nation turned its back on the blessings of God available to it. Secularists can formulate that idea in their own secular terms if inclined.

* Moving to the North with lots of good jobs in factories for those with limited education or skills undoubtedly helped. But as the workforce for manufacturing declined, it probably affected blacks the first and the most, as there were no comparable employment opportunities to replace them. Toss in badly misguided social policies and we have experienced a social disaster.

They were then sold on the transformative promise of college education, with the result that culturally they place a high premium on credentialism while being fleeced like no other group by the higher ed industry. That has led to the current moment of millions of people with useless degrees and no practical skills believing only a systemic force organized solely to hold them back is responsible for all the disappointments.

* Things that hit the fan for Blacks around 1970: Black fathers disappearing and Black marriage rates plummetting; deindustrialization; lots more whites going to college on financial aid; drug use and selling by blacks going way up; rising crime rates.

Plus let us not forget the ability of white people to replace black labor with Hispanic labor due to mass illegal migration and stagnation of wages that has now lasted decades and loss of labor union membership.

* Perverse incentives in the 1960s turned the black lower class feral: that’s well understood by now.

Perverse incentives today are turning the black elite destructive and useless. I’m thinking of incentives like: white credulity, meaning that a hate hoax results in career advancement and monetary rewards; booming employment as DIE enforcers, resulting in talent (such as it is) getting channelled away from honest productive work, and the proliferation of professional black racists; intensification of affirmative action (from a thumb on the scale, to a foot on the scale), eroding the need to study and perform even at the levels a mediocre person would be capable of.

* There’s also been a general race blind falling behind of the working class, which disproportionately affects blacks compared to whites and so ceteris paribus increases the black-white gap. It’s something that the civil rights movement is partially responsible for because it helped suck the oxygen away from old school economic liberalism that was dedicated to giving the working class stability and economic resources. It’s still a pretty common response to pointing out how much more economically equal the US used to be or certain other countries currently are to say that well those places are racist so we shouldn’t copy them. Civil rights also poisoned many whites against the left broadly

You’re also ignoring the fact that the black-white relationship never stabilized around no net discrimination, but has been ratcheting up more and more net anti white discrimination for decades.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on Why Did Blacks Make More Progress Before Civil Rights Than After?

Sailer: Both Pfizer and Moderna Could Have Announced Their Vaccines’ Efficacy Before the Election, Which Likely Would Have Meant a Trump Victory

Steve Sailer writes: “… if Trump really were the authoritarian strongman his haters claim he is and his fanboys hope he is, he would have done something about this, such as, at minimum, dispatch his SEC to warn Pfizer that if they don’t disclose results according to their published protocol, they will be sued. But that’s not who Trump is… Trump probably would have been re-elected if he’d made Pfizer follow its published protocol or let Moderna carry out its clinical trial on the kind of people who want to volunteer for clinical trials. But Trump failed at those tasks.”

* They would have lots of reasons not to announce it before the election. One of the super legitimate ones is to not have Trump turn their vaccines into a toxic highly partisan political issue like he did with hydroxychloroquine.

If the pharmaceutical companies hate Trump it’s certainly not because he did anything worthwhile to earn their hatred. There would be plenty that a real right wing populist would have done to do that, but that’s not Trump.

Overall I and I’m pretty sure Steve have no idea what is and isn’t typical in in drug trials. It’s kind of absurd to say that the delay (if there even was a delay) was definitely because of one thing or another without some kind of real smoking gun (e.g. an email laying out intent, not what Steve calls a smoking gun). The argument Steve is making is ultimately a probabilistic one that has to be built on a very deep foundation of background knowledge about the process.

* Some in the African-American community have argued that there is _too much_ testing on Blacks, and have called for Blacks to stop volunteering for trials.

“Earlier this month, Kimbrough, the president of Dillard University, and C. Reynold Verret, the president of Xavier University of Louisiana, issued a public letter announcing that they were participating in a Covid-19 vaccine trial. Kimbrough and Verret, both leaders of private, historically Black universities in New Orleans, encouraged their students, faculty, staff, and alumni to consider participating in the same trial or others like it…

Their message was in line with others from HBCU leaders and the Congressional Black Caucus. But their letter, because it was aimed in part at students, provoked outrage.

The HBCU leaders should not put students forward as experimental “lab rats,” parents, alumni, and others fumed in a torrent of social media comments that generated headlines in the local press. A prominent economist said they had contributed to the excessive recruitment of Black people for trials. Leaders of a Black church political group demanded that Kimbrough and Verret “immediately disclose if they are being paid to urge students to participate in the trials.”

* Sailer: Now, both StatNews and the New York Times have reported that Pfizer stopped processing nasal swabs from late October until the day after the election in order to not know if it were time to disclose the results of its clinical trial according to the protocol it had published.

Pfizer is free to offer evidence against what these two publications have stated. If you are aware of any evidence other than emphatic denials, please let us know.

* Rejoinder: My point is that I have no idea how unusual it is that they stopped processing nasal swabs, what their official explanation is, how reasonable that explanation is. Vaccine testing and approval is an area I know very little about.

Now I know their official justification: because they wanted to change the benchmark to one more rigorous and didn’t want to cross the threshold of the previous benchmark until they got permission to do that change. Is that unusual? I have no idea. Is that explanation bullshit? I have no idea. I don’t have the background knowledge to make that call.

* What’s particularly bizarre about the account of Moderna’s decision to slow down its trial is that it reports that it was the head of Operation Warp Speed itself, Slaoui, who was putting pressure on it to do so.

Is this really accurate? Was Trump unable even to get Slaoui on board to get the vaccine out as soon as possible? Was Slaoui himself pressured by other forces to push for tests on minorities at the expense of speed?

* Mr. Sailer is assuming here:

1. there was a subset of voters who were awaiting news about a potential vaccine under Trump’s watch, and were ready to change their mind the moment there was an announcement;

2. there was a subset of voters who up until the election day were uncertain who they were going to vote for, and needed “good news”, in particular on the vaccine front, and decided not to vote for Trump because he failed to deliver.

The problem with Sailer’s peddling of this vaccine political conspiracy theory, while possible, is that there had been tens of millions of mail-in votes already casted before Pfizers alleged malfeasance, and thus they would have been unaffected compared to those going in person to the polls. More than likely, people had already made up their mind about who they were going to vote for.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Sailer: Both Pfizer and Moderna Could Have Announced Their Vaccines’ Efficacy Before the Election, Which Likely Would Have Meant a Trump Victory

A Little Less Lonely

A listener says: “Hey Luke been listening to your show a lot lately and thought your segment on loneliness and having a “place for you” was beautiful. I’m a 25 year old who hasn’t had a friend or girlfriend since I graduated college and I really related to what you said. You run a great show, thanks for making me feel a little less alone for a couple hours each day.”

Posted in Happiness | Comments Off on A Little Less Lonely