REPORT: “A leading London synagogue has cancelled a talk by an Israeli academic who said earlier this year that the only way to deter terrorists is by raping their female relatives.”
My question is what works.
From a Torah perspective, the killing of the families is less problematic than the raping.
I converted to Judaism 21 years ago and I still haven’t been given my very own media property. I don’t want no freakin’ bank, I want a newspaper or magazine or movie studio, and I want it staffed with hot shiksa secretaries, and I want it now before moshiach comes.
Every day I wait, my faith grows colder and I become more alienated. Just last week, I was rejected from art school.
From comments to Steve Sailer:
November 20th: Oh my goodness! What a terrible story! It’s almost like something out of a movie… I can’t believe this kind of thing still happens in real life!
December 1st: OK, it’s clear this story was punched up a little for the press but it’s clear something awful, if not necessary cinematic, happened to this poor girl on that dreadful autumn night.
December 5th: All right, lot’s of inconsistencies… her friends, supporters and Rolling Stone itself are backing off. Still! The girl was abused and mixed up or conflated several details. That happens with trauma.
December 10th: Wait- is it possible this entire effing thing was made up to garner the attention and sympathy of a particular classmate?
I’m asking for a friend.
Question: Can two sisters be taken together while taking slaves?
Answer: “It is permissible to have two sisters, a female slave and her aunt [her father’s sister], or a female slave and her aunt [from her mother’s side]. But they cannot be together during intercourse, [and] whoever has intercourse with one of them cannot have intercourse with the other, due to the general [consensus] over the prohibition of this.”
Question: What is al-‘azl?
Answer: Al-‘azl is refraining from ejaculating on a woman’s pudendum [i.e. coitus interruptus].
Question: May a man use the al-‘azl [technique] with his female slave?
Answer: “A man is allowed [to use] al-‘azl during intercourse with his female slave with or without her consent.”
Question: What is the ruling regarding a female slave who runs away from hermaster?
Answer: “A male or female slave’s running away [from their master] is among the gravest of sins…”
From comments to Steve Sailer:
* A native Texan’s observations:
All the things Steve’s pointed out over the years about Mexicans using public parks and green spaces are absolutely right-on. One thing I noticed in recent years is that the beautiful green belts in Austin, once populated by trustafarian SWPL hikers and townies drinking beer and smoking weed, are thickly crowded with Mexican families picnicking, building fire pits to roast meat, and insouciantly allowing toddlers and off-leash dogs to run about peeing in the sacred creek. These things are moral sins to honkies but of course criticism cannot be expressed aloud, so the good liberals simply drive further out into the Hill Country to get their Gaia on.
There is a world of difference between illegal immigrants who haven’t been here long and second-generation Mexican Americans and Tejanos whose families have been here for six or more generations. The first group aren’t political at all and they’re possibly the least p.c. people on earth. They take sex roles Very Seriously. They grow up into men and women around 16. They follow the Mexican custom of nicknaming people according to their physical characteristics. If you’re fat or black, you’re gonna be referred to, to your face, as Gordo or Negro. If you’re even slightly weird or socially awkward you are Maricon. They are Not Supportive of eccentricity. If you demand to be referred to differently they will amiably say “OK, Negro!” At my workplace I deal daily with people from around the world and I believe Mexicans are the politest people around.
The second and third groups have learned that resentment against white people brings cash and prizes. These are your Dem voters.
If some Texans seem squishy on immigration, it’s because for as long as there have been Anglo settlers in Texas, there have been Mexican settlers right alongside us. Contrary to liberal myth, Mexicans haven’t been here forever–Texas was Commanche country for a long time and they were terrifying predators on farming people. Larry McMurtry’s books aren’t wild exaggerations. Next to the land where I grew up there was a cemetery containing gravestones of people killed by Indians in the mid-to-late 1800s. Until the Spanish and later the settlers who came with Stephen F. Austin established a military presence this wasn’t a safe place for families. But Texas has never been exclusively Anglo.
* In Texas we have an easy way to tell if someone was raised in Mexico or here… just watch them finish a beer.
If they go over to the waste basket and put the beer can in it, they were raised in Texas.
If they drop the can straight to the ground and walk off… Mexico.
Not a joke.
* Incidentally, male Hispanics went Republican in the last TX gubernatorial election.
I think Texas does a better job of civilizing recent mexican immigrants than many of the other states do, because Texas *was* part of Mexico and has always had a substantial Mexican population. So if you make it out of the Valley and into Houston or San Antonio or whatever, there’s an already-installed base of Spanish-speaking, Mexican-heritage individuals who have middle class habits and family structure for you to assimilate to.
At least in the Houston area, I find the lower middle class latino neighborhoods to be more pleasant than the lower middle class white ones. The mexicans tend to decorate their front yards with a lot of gardening and lawn art, while the lower-middle whites just have the same green lawn that the house had when it was new in 1955. Likewise, streets in mexican districts are lively places, with ice cream trucks, chicharonne carts, and children’s pickup soccer games with minimal adult supervision. White neighborhoods are ghost towns as everyone’s inside on the computer or being shuttled off to extracurricular activity #3. Kids can’t play outside… there’s predators, don’tcha know. Someone might call CPS.
* Though Charles Murray is a punk for signing onto ‘gay marriage’, the theme of ‘coming apart’ may be the defining characteristic of our times.
Indeed, white folks are coming apart in so many ways. There was a time when rich whites, middle class whites, working class whites, and poor whites might have shared something in common in being Christians, believing in family values, remembering ancestors of humbler lineage down on the farm, reading columnists like Breslin and Royko and listening to Sinatra and watching Walter Cronkite.
Also, though there was always rich and poor, the standard family restaurant was a common thing among most white Americans. If you visited NY, Chicago, or some other big city in the 1970s, there were regular places where people of all stripes went to eat at.
When GRAPES OF WRATH came out, even rich white folks could, on so many levels, identify with the Joads. Joads were poor simple folks, but their core values weren’t so far from the values of rich Anglos and the like. Today, the holiest moral cause among urban gentry is ‘gay marriage’. A super-Lib like Chris Hughes feels more kinship with billionaire Tim Cook than with a hardworking journalist digging dirt about Apple, the biggest company in the whole wide world. Meanwhile, such folks look down on working class and poor white folks as ‘trash’. They sneer as bakeries are sued and shut down by a government that forces ‘gay marriage’ favored by homo and Jewish billionaires.
And Jewish and homo elites want to favor and promote the rise of homo elites in all other nations, so that there will be like a globo-homo-fringe-elite-rule all over the world. They want Russia and Japan to be ruled by homo elites who feel closer to the likes of Hughes and Cook than with their own peoples.
White Americans have come apart economically, culturally, morally, consumer-preference-ly, and etc. Like Murray said, even preference of beer says much about different classes and the like.
The truly odd thing is that there is one particular ethnic group that plays on and inflames these divisions, though to be sure, even that group, the Jews, is sort of coming apart as Lib Jews and Orthodox Jews(who have more kids) disagree on many things. Also, a crack is forming between total Zionist-supporting Jews and other kinds of Jews who, though supportive of Israel, are embarrassed that the increasing unity between Israel and the reviled GOP(mainly reviled by Jewish media) makes Jews look bad among the Democratic non-white coalition that isn’t too keen on Israel.
Anyway, though Jews play on white divisions, if white folks of various stripes are united on one thing, it is in their unconditional and mindless devotion to Jews and Israel. White Lib will say to White Con, “I hate you!”, and white Con will say to White Lib, “I hate you too”, and Jews will clap with joy at such hate and manipulate them to fight even more. Sam Fuller made a film called ‘white dog’, but maybe someone should make a movie called ‘white dogfighting’ as an allegory of how Jews encourage whites to hate and fight other whites. But both White Libs and White Cons are crazily devoted to Jews. It’s like the sinister general in Paths of Glory plays on all sides, but each side is fooled into believing that the general is its best friend and ally. We saw this with Russia and Ukraine too. Russians to Jews: “We love you Jews and we are trying to save you from Nazi Ukrainians.” Ukrainians to Jews: “We love you Jews and we are trying to save you from Nazi Russians.” Jews are surely loving this. They act as wedge but pretend to be the bridge among peoples.
Anyway, the Coming Apart scenario is true enough, and it’s happening on a global scale. Yet, the world is paradoxically ‘coming apart’ because it is ‘coming together’. The thing is the ‘coming together’ is highly selective than undiscriminating. If indeed the world were truly coming together, all groups, both sexes(or fifty sexes according to facebook), all nations, all ethnic groups, all religious groups, and etc. should be merging into one blobby mass of mankind.
Instead, certain elements of a particular group come apart from rest of their own group and merge with certain elements of other groups(than with the entirety of that group). Consider Turkey. Under Ataturk, there arose a kind of collective modern nationalism based on secular western values. So, despite the ethnic and religious divisions, there was an emphasis on unity among all Turks. But in recent times, as Turkey became more free and democratic, Turkey has been coming apart along religious and secular lines. There are some religious folks in Turkey who now feel nothing in common with secular Turks and feel closer to devout Muslims outside Turkey. And there are secular Turks who are turned off by the rise of new religiosity and feel closer to secular whites in Europe.
It’s been noted by Murray, an IQ expert, that the rise of meritocracy has led to the coming apart based on skills. As science and technology becomes ever more advanced, it’s not good enough to be smart. You gotta be very smart. And as globalism has made cheap labor available all over the world, the smart and rich can hire people in other nations. Also, as women have equality to pursue academics and careers, many very smart women go to top schools and marry very smart men.
There is, of course, a coming together of high-IQ people. Smart Jews, smart whites, smart yellows, smart Hindus, smart blacks(or mulattos), and etc are marrying one another. But smart whites are coming apart from other whites. Smart yellows are coming apart from other yellows. Smart Hispanics are coming apart from other Hispanics. For every ‘coming together’, there is a ‘coming apart’. So, if successful black men come together with white women, they come apart from black women. When yellow women come together with white/Jewish men, they come apart from yellow men. When white women with limited brains but great looks go with rich men(of any stripe), they come apart from white men of their class origin. When Mexican chicks go with Anglo men, they come apart from Mexican men. And there are imbalances in these ‘coming together’ scenarios.
Globally, there is much coming together but this also entails much coming apart. The elites of Britain come together with the elites of Israel, Qatar, Hong Kong, and Nairobi, but they are coming apart from non-elite white Britons. There was a time when even a rich powerful Briton would have felt a common national bond with his fellow countrymen. We don’t see that today. British elites promote ‘diversity’ and excoriate & even punish any lowly Briton who says anything about racial and national survival of Britain. When Lawrence(of Arabia) came together with Arabs, he came apart from Britons, and in the end, he couldn’t handle the contradictions and returned to being a Britain and went back home. Today, the Muslim world is spreading all over UK.
As for the British underclasses they(like the French underclasses)seem to be coming apart from their own history, heritage, and tradition and ‘coming together’ with Hollywood fantasies and rap music/culture.
In the 1970s, there were rich parts in any city, but if you walked around, you still felt the city-as-a-whole was a working class, middle class, and family place to be. Today, many urban areas are like glittering bejeweled paradises for lawyers in love. They are glass palaces. Eateries are fancy pantsy.
The ‘high rise man’ of the 70s and early 80s are nothing compared to high-rise man of today.
The class/cultural/economic differences back then were downright ‘communist’ compared to the brazen, shameless, narcissistic, and sky-is-the-limit look and feel of today’s rich urban areas. Back then, even if you lived well in a fancy place, you were reminded of REAL PEOPLE and REAL PLACES that were all around you. And even fancy places weren’t all that fancy. It’s like Taki keeps complaining about how yachts used to be made tastefully, but today the bigass palatial yachts of billionaire(such as the Oracle guy) has no limits.
When Royko wrote a column about the high rise man, readers(even rich folks) could nod their head in agreement about the class pretensions of the hip and well-to-do:
The High-Rise Man described by Royko would be considered backward and crude by today’s standards of urban liberal gentry privilege. He would be like Gordon Gekko’s bigass portable phone.
Today, when ‘gay pride parades’ in the richest hearts of the city is the main celebration of the year(bigger than St. Patrick’s Day and Christmas), no one will even get the joke.
Despite all the conceit of ‘victory of the left’ in the culture war, it’s really victory of elite Jewish-homo privilege that hides behind ‘progressive’ symbol-puppets like Obama whose main priorities have been serving Jews, homos, and Wall Street.
When I was a kid and walked or biked around rich areas, I thought Wow. But I didn’t see them as being separate from the rest of the city. Just much better off. Today, when I see some areas in NY and Chicago, by golly, I don’t know if I’m in the world of reality. If you live in such a place or esp was raised in such a place, why would you feel any cultural connection with people outside it? You will be filled with class privilege/snobbery. But since US values are still officially ‘egalitarian’, you will pretend that your disdain for other Americans is due to issues of politics, ethics, or agendas.
YOU voted for Obama. You are friends or friends of a friend of the Rolling Stone writer who exposed ‘rape culture’. You attended a cocktail party about ‘climate change’. But it’s really snobbery draped in trendy causes. It’s like Hughes and Cook are united cuz both are homo and rich, but Hughes tries to turn his class-homo solidarity into an issue of social justice, what with Cook being so ‘heroic’ to come out. (Funny, but it took more courage for him to remain in the closet as the homo community was yelling at him to come out, dammit).
Even the language is snobby, even downright contemptuous. If you not on the ‘gay marriage’ bandwagon, you are said to be ‘less evolved’. Ooh-ooh ah-ah, does that make me an ape?
Given the way things are going, the dominant theme among whites must be COMING TOGETHER. This is why Jewish elites are especially after Richard Spencer. Though Spencer is powerless, he has the right idea, and if his idea takes hold, it can spread like wildfire. Spencer is saying whites should all unite in common interest, from US to Europe to Russia. He organized a meeting in Hungary—midpoint between western europe and eastern europe—where all whites would be welcome from US, Europe, Russia, etc. Even Dugin was planned to appear. Jews freaked out and exerted great pressure to have him arrested and humiliated. Jews, who have the power to drive a wedge between Russia and US/EU, treated Spencer like a little toy. But they were afraid of his ideas. And Jews are now going after him in his own homebase in Montana. As Montana is mostly white, if Spencer can win over whites in Montana, there is a possibility that white consciousness may spread to other places. A forest fire, after all, starts in one single area. It later spreads. So, Jews are trying to snuff even his little fire in Montana because they fear his idea of COMING TOGETHER of whites.
White Right should also be mindful of cumming together as a race is only as good if the men and women of the race cum together and produce babies of the same race. After all, suppose Norway had been having kids with non-Norwegians on a huge scale for 1000 yrs. Norway as we know it today wouldn’t even exist. It would have genetically vanished long ago.
To promote and encourage the cumming together, maybe we need to create a new kind of spiritual idea. Jews have the thing with the covenant with God where Jewish men gotta have their foreskins cut off.
Suppose the covenant concept of white folks is that a white man and white woman is only truly blessed by the god of white power/race when they have sex. The covenant is fulfilled with white penis meets white vagina, especially to produce a white child.
When white men and white women continue to cum apart, their race will unravel and die off.
Imagine if Norway were drift off to Africa and became physically adjoined to Nigeria with a much bigger population. Suppose Norwegian women run off with Negro men and have mulatto kids. Suppose Norwegian men have fewer white women to have kids with and have kids with black women. What will happen to Norway in the long run? It will disappear as a people, race, and culture. It will disappear in a few generations. Who wants that?
Of course, with massive migrations from Africa, Europe may indeed disappear. All those ships carrying blacks, esp black men, are like Afro-Shaft Carriers, in some ways more dangerous than Air Craft Carriers. Invasion forces are arriving.
From comments to Steve Sailer:
* Then there was that roofie incident with the guy ending up becoming a slave for 12 years.
* My experience with alcohol indicates that (1) heavy intoxication can cause you to fall asleep in locations that are pretty surprising when you wake up, (2) You or a partner may be enthusiastic about whatever is on your minds at the time but may not remember any of it the next morning.
Without alcohol in the equation, I predict date rape and rufie accusations would plummet. People have to start being honest about the effects of alcohol. They can be pretty drastic.
I’m too old and too married to have a dog in this fight, and I also like a drink here and there, so I am just passing along some common sense information.
* I recall a Jewish-Canadian music journalist writing in the 90s about carrying around a GHB-laced water bottle at raves. As memory serves, this was something she reported warmly embracing as an alternative to Ecstasy when that became too much, until (as these things happen) GHB proved to be too much too.
* One would think that the number of women being drugged by stranger sexual predators has been in decline for decades as almost all bars and clubs have been required by law, their local liquor licensing boards or their insurers to install surveillance cameras inside establishments.
In fact, over the years numerous sexual predators have been identified by video using drugs like GHB to incapacitate their female victims and convicted.
It is worth noting that gay bars have fought for decades against requirements to install cameras in order protect their patrons from being drugged. They have argued that their customers demand that their privacy be protected at all cost. So much for being out and proud.
Jeffery Dahmer was notorious for years for drugging bar patrons and taking them to the back rooms where he raped them. Numerous complaints were filed with police concerning Dahmer’s activities but he was never identified due to lack of solid evidence. But flyers were posted with Dahmer’s general description in gay bars and neighbourhoods, so Dahmer would travel to several states to continue his predations. Eventually things got too hot for Dahmer, motivating his serial killing spree.
Indiana’s own homosexual mass murder Herb Baumeister followed a very similar pattern to Dahmer.
Bill Kurtis productions did excellent documentaries on both Dahmer and Baumeister. Kurtis made a strong point that in both cases law enforcement was very much hindered in attempts to catch them over long periods of time because gay bars were able to convince politicians that video cameras required in straight bars would not be accepted by gays.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Dahmer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herb_Baumeister
Last, obviously if cameras were required in the gay bars of Laramie, Wy the entire myth making surrounding the murder of Matthew Shepard would never have occurred. Video would have shown that Shepard was a drug dealer and was engaging in “rough trade” over a long period of time with his eventual killers.
But hey calling for the installation of video cameras in gay bars to cut down on violence against gays will only get you labelled a raging homophobe. So fuhgeddaboudit.
Fighting the phantom war against cisgendered redneck anti-gay violence = good.
Stopping real violence by gays against gays = bad.
* This is like the rash of Big Foot sightings in the 70′s and a lot less interesting. The notion of large, strange, hairy creatures who roamed through the back woods and rural districts of American always had a certain charm to it.
This doesn’t. It’s simply intellectual bankruptcy going full tilt boogie.
It’s also a advertisement as to why young white adults ought to eschew college altogether and either focus on trade school or self-education. Look colleges are becoming centers of endarkenment and low grade Stalinesque thuggishness that cost a lot of money and can ruin a young man for life for simply dating a young woman.
* In her memoir? . . . autobiography? . . romance novel? . . . Lena Dunham describes herself as having consumed alcohol, Xanax, and cocaine prior to inviting her attacker? . . . rapist? . . . hooker-upper . . . back to her room. Of course, the whole accusation is now unravelling, and it’s doubtful that even this much happened. In fact, it’s doubtful that anything happened, which may be what she’s trying to conceal.
This is some new version of criminal procedure which would leave King Solomon scratching his head. A woman accuses an ambiguously identifed (first name only) rapist of an ambiguously defined offense (which actually isn’t rape), not in a police sation or court room, but in a book. The offender isn’t entirely identified, but enough clues are dropped along the way that those who were on campus at the time or who choose to dig into the story later can figure who “the offender” surely must be.
It then turns out that this “narrative” is at best ambiguously “true” in some post-structuralist way in which everything sort of is and sort of isn’t true, depending on the narrator’s critque of political dynamics, social norms, gender roles, varities of “seeing”, the alignment of the planets, the music of the spheres, the welfare of Gaia, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle . . . and whatever.
* OT, or rather back on the topic of “Jackie” from UVA, GotNews has now posted an alleged screen capture of her Facebook page. Apparently her favorite TV show is Law and Order. Interesting as there is an L&O episode remarkably like her story:
http://lawandorder.wikia.com/wiki/Girl_Dishonored
Synopsis: A young woman pledging a sorority is raped on a college campus, and the investigation is hindered by a campus community that turns a blind eye toward such incidents.
[…}
The original complaining victim, Lindsey, withdraws her complaint, wanting to get on with her life, but the detectives find multiple victims from the fraternity that raped her and discover that the fraternity is known as The Rape Factory for all the rapes that have occurred there. SVU takes the school to the grand jury to charge them with their complicit actions, but before the case is resolved, Lindsey commits suicide. This causes one of the fraternity brothers, who had participated in a different rape and felt guilty about it, to reveal that Lindsey was telling the truth about the rape and turn over a cell phone video where the rapists brag that they gang-raped her. They are arrested while the school Dean and chief security officer are arrested for accessory to rape for their roles in the cover-up with the help of statements from the school counselor and a security officer who both felt guilty as well with Lindsey’s suicide.
* Once was out with a friend and a 5’10″, 100lb soaking wet model he was trying to get with. I was drinking hard stuff, and she decided she wanted to keep up; she had two hard alcohols (vodka or whiskey, I forget) and was staggering on the street. She went from silly drunk to angry drunk, and started yelling that we’d roofied her.
Or…she’s a stick-thin young female who doesn’t normally drink hard alcohol.
Spin, hamster, spin!
* A narrative is not a statistic but I know of at least one case where a very serious, close to abstemious young woman was ‘roofied by a male apartment mate during a group date. She was knowledgeable enough to realize what was happening and immediately got a girl friend to take her to the ER. Her father had hospital privileges and demanded a blood screen. It came back positive for Rohypnol. She cut a deal with the guy involved that he immediately leave the apartment and pay rent until an alternate apartment mate was found or she would press charges. This was probably a more severe punishment than the criminal justice system would have meted out.
I wonder if a lot of Jordan Kisner’s male informants might not have been the victims of homosexual rape while they were under. Chances are they’d never know for sure and might recoil from any little evidence that they’d been orally or anally penetrated; a pretty disgusting thought for any normal male. Predatory homosexuals are capable of even more appalling behavior than their heterosexual counterparts.
* The widespread anxieties that young women have about being drugged and gang raped are just a symptom of more general social fears. Women are profoundly ambivalent about being strong and independent versus being weak and protected. As their personal insecurities rise (job, marriage, children, older parents) the insecurity “leaks out” in weird ways.
Other societies experience similar sex-related hysterias. For Africans, witches and witchcraft provide a convenient channel. Several times a year, one can read in African newspapers and websites of witches causing penises/breasts/vaginas to disappear.
The roofie/gang rape hysteria is merely the American middle- to upper-class white female version of the same phenomenon.
* The date-drug rape obsession in the media reflects an innate drive in the female homo sapiens to be forcefully taken. This desire expresses itself in fantasies, especially in more … mature women.
This innate drive is an evolutionary vestige from hundreds of thousands of years ago, millions of years ago, when at some point or points in our evolutionary history, forced sex was not uncommon. Heck, you don’t even have to go back that far.
The current date-drug rape media obsession is simply a reflection of that innate female drive, one that is suppressed in our society, in part because that biological fact conflicts with parts of The Narrative. Specifically, in order to optimize the supply of american labor and consumption, females must become pseudo-males in many ways. This is how our corporate overlords grow in wealth.
Thus, this innate desire of females to be forcefully taken is suppressed. It’s not a conspiracy; it’s an ecosystem. Although suppressed, that biological fact will squirm its way to the surface from our subconscious.
* You won’t get women to agree to drink less. They simply like alcohol too much. Both the dopamine surge and the lowered inhibitions – it’s a magic elixir.
Gruber was born on September 30, 1965, son of Martin Jay Gruber and Ellie Gruber. His father, Martin, is Professor Emeritus of Finance at the New York University Stern School of Business, having been a professor there for 45 years. Jonathan Gruber was raised in the New York suburb of Ridgewood, New Jersey. He completed his BS in economics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1987 and his PhD in economics from Harvard University in 1992, with a thesis titled Changes in the Structure of Employer-Provided Health Insurance….
In November 2014, a series of videos emerged of Gruber speaking about the ACA at different events, from 2010 to 2013, in ways that proved to be controversial. Many of the videos show him talking about ways in which he felt the ACA was misleadingly crafted and/or marketed in order to get the bill passed, while in some of the videos he specifically refers to American voters as ill-informed or “stupid.” In the first, most widely-publicized video taken at a panel discussion about the ACA at the University of Pennsylvania in October 2013, Gruber said the bill was deliberately written “in a tortured way” to disguise the fact that it creates a system by which “healthy people pay in and sick people get money.” He said this obfuscation was needed due to “the stupidity of the American voter” in ensuring the bill’s passage. Gruber said the bill’s inherent “lack of transparency is a huge political advantage” in selling it.[23] The comments caused significant controversy.[24][25][26][27][28] In two subsequent videos, Gruber was shown talking about the decision (which he attributed to John Kerry) to have the bill tax insurance companies instead of patients (the so-called “Cadillac tax”), which he called fundamentally the same thing economically but more palatable politically. In one video, he stated that “the American people are too stupid to understand the difference” between the two approaches, while in the other he said that the switch worked due to “the lack of economic understanding of the American voter.”[29]
The average Ashkenazi IQ is about 110, the highest of any group IQ. The confident successful high-achieving Ashkenazim I know frequently regard the rest of the world as stupid. So Jonathan Gruber reminds me of these guys. This is how they speak. The goyim need to be fed lies to be kept in line. Lack of transparency is frequently an advantage because the goyim are too stupid to know what is good.
When I challenge a smart successful Ashkenazi Jew about something outrageous he’s said (these are not bad people, they just have a distinct discussion style), he’ll often launch into a personal attack. They have tremendous energy and ingenuity and I usually don’t have the energy and strength to fight back, so they have contempt for my weakness and ride roughshod over me.
When an Ashkenazi takes his Judaism seriously, he may behave more decently.
Would a WASP talk like Jonathan Gruber? I doubt it. Being a member of God’s Chosen People imbues you with a confidence that you know best.
Paul Johnson wrote on page 545 of his History of the Jews book:
Yet the animating spirit of the Labour movement remained European socialism. It was a party of city intellectuals whose kibbutzim were their weekend cottages. It was university-educated, culturally middle class. To the workers, especially to the Afro-Asian-Sephardi immigrants, it turned a face of well-meaning condescension, patiently explaining what was good for them, rather as Rosa Luxemburg had once tried to lecture the German proletariat. They were the natural aristocrats of the new state, or perhaps one should call them a secular cathedocracy.
That sounds to me like an accurate description of Jonathan Gruber and the Ashkenazim of the elite media and academia.
I think you could expand the analysis of the power dynamic w/ the recent example of Jonathan Gruber and his various Kinsley gaffes. It turned out the source of all these it-bleeds-it-leads YouTube clips of the ACA non-architect’s plain speaking was this one guy in suburban Philly who’d had his health insurance policy canceled and then proceeded to spend much of his free time watching speeches by Gruber, Ezekiel Emanuel, and the rest of the holy brain trust. What followed was a schizoid freak-out– not only was Gruber retconned as a vagrant who’d wandered into the White House somehow, but “Zealot Truthers Refuse to Accept Obamacare Is Working” pieces became plentiful. The point is to scare all the isolated bourgeois taxpayers with above-average reading & financial skills who feel chagrined about their premiums & co-pays getting jacked up, so that they don’t do anything as drastic as form a group to have their say on the unfolding trainwreck — that would be a complete disaster from cathedral POV.
The recreational self-expression coalitions under the “Tea Party” banner in 2010-12 did have a strange carnival/Lollapalooza aspect to them yet underneath the mockery you could smell the fear in the NYT, CBS-ABC-NBC, NPR coverage of the social phenomenon. Coincidentally the press guild/cathedral invested much enthusiasm in the comparatively short-lived Occupy Wall Street, which also drew from a significantly shallower demographic cross-section, to the point nobody understood “what it was about” & was easy pickings for SEIU/AFSCME and the unshowered anarchist black bloc to hijack; the contemporary cartoon “Things You Learn By Watching the News” by ElvisNixon.com summed it up pretty well.
Chris the Goy, who has ambivalent feelings about Jews, says: I do think Ashkenazi Jews are white and European for the most part as they are at best of mixed ancestry, with a lot of Germanic and Slavic ancestry, but whether they are ‘Western,’ that is another question entirely. ‘Western’ in the cultural, social, spiritual sense.
If the West goes down Jews will go down with it. They are interconnected with its fate regardless of their feelings concerning Christianity or various historical wrongs they accuse ‘The Goy’ of perpetrating against them, real or alleged.
Wanting to preserve western civilization doesn’t necessarily mean personally liking all the peoples who make it up.
I usually think that George W. Bush was the worst president in the history of the republic with his useless stupid invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, but if his unique policies prevented more 9/11 type attacks on America, policies that would not have been duplicated by other politicians, then he was a good president in that respect.
On the one hand, I don’t care what we do to suspected terrorists who pal around with terrorists and are not American citizens. On the one hand, I don’t care about this new CIA report on torturing suspects. On the other hand, I care about stopping this bad behavior if it leads to bad things for Americans.
REPORT: Street thug Eric Garner had at least eight domestic incident reports filed against him, including several for unwanted sexual touching.
One of them even involved throwing his newborn grandchild and his daughter out of his car, NYPD sources told Gotnews.com.
Under New York law domestic incident reports are filed whenever the police are forced to respond to a domestic altercation. No charges may be filed by the victim but police are still duty bound to report and catalog it.
