March 24, 2015 Jews admire the way Japan keeps out Muslims Luke Ford No sacred cows.

Jews admire the way Japan keeps out Muslims

Posted on March 24, 2015 by Luke Ford

Japan manages to remain a country almost without a Muslim presence because Japan’s negative attitude toward Islam and Muslims pervades every level of the population, from the man in the street to organizations and companies to senior officialdom. In Japan, contrary to the situation in other countries, there are no “human rights” organizations to offer support to Muslims’ claims against the government’s position. In Japan no one illegally smuggles Muslims into the country to earn a few yen, and almost no one gives them the legal support they would need in order to get permits for temporary or permanent residency or citizenship.

Another thing that helps the Japanese keep Muslim immigration to their shores to a minimum is the Japanese attitude toward the employee and employment. Migrant workers are perceived negatively in Japan, because they take the place of Japanese workers. A Japanese employer feels obligated to employ Japanese workers even if it costs much more than it would to employ foreign workers. The traditional connection between an employee and employer in Japan is much stronger than in the West, and the employer and employee feel a mutual commitment to each other: an employer feels obligated to give his employee a livelihood, and the employee feels obligated to give the employer the fruit of his labor. This situation does not encourage the acceptance of foreign workers, whose commitment to the employers is low.

The fact that the public and the officials are united in their attitude against Muslim immigration has created a sort of iron wall around Japan that Muslims lack both the permission and the capability to overcome. This iron wall silences the world’s criticism of Japan in this matter, because the world understands that there is no point in criticizing the Japanese, since criticism will not convince them to open the gates of Japan to Muslim immigration.

Japan is teaching the whole world an interesting lesson: there is a direct correlation between national heritage and permission to immigrate: a people that has a solid and clear national heritage and identity will not allow the unemployed of the world to enter its country; and a people whose cultural heritage and national identity is weak and fragile, has no defense mechanisms to prevent a foreign culture from penetrating into its country and its land.

Posted in Islam, Japan | Comments Off

King Bibi & Greater Israel

Posted on March 24, 2015 by Luke Ford

Chaim Amalek writes: “There are, of course, two ways of taking what passes for criticism of Israel in this article. There can be no peace in the mideast so long as Israel stands as a Jewish ethnostate. Therefore, Israel should immediately through open its borders and embrace diversity no less than has the White world. You can be an open borders type liberal Jew, or you can be a Zionist, but unless you want also to be a hypocrite, you cannot be both. You cannot be a cultural leftist who embraces diversity and open borders for western nations AND be a Zionist without also being a hypocrite.”

Eric Margolis writes: Obama could not even stop Netanyahu from coming to Washington and humiliating him before Congress. Is Obama going to force Israel and its 650,000 armed settlers out of the West Bank?

Not so long as Israel and its American advocates control both the Congress, the Republican and Democratic parties – and Hillary Clinton. The late Israeli PM Ariel Sharon reportedly said to an aide concerned about a negative US response, “don’t worry about the US, I control the US.”

Israel’s partisans hold important influence over France’s government and ruling Socialist Party. France secretly supplied Israel with nuclear weapons capability in the 1950’s.

Both Britain’s parties are similarly beholden to pro-Israel donors. Germany remains very timid in foreign policy and does pretty much what Israel demands, even supplying Israel with submarines to carry nuclear-tipped cruise missiles.

Russia’s Vlad Putin is quite pro-Israel and never forgets there are one million former Russians now living in Israel. China has wisely stayed out of the Arab-Israeli dispute. So short of the US, no power can force Israel out of its annexed lands.

Most Israelis will be happy with the electoral outcome. Poll show some 75% of Israelis oppose creation of a Palestinian state and don’t want to live near Arabs, whom many calls “Wild animals.” Their mood is somewhere to the rightwing of white South Africans during the apartheid era. Israel’s center-left, led by Ashkenazi European Jews has been shattered. Mideastern Jews and Russian emigrants now call the shots.

Posted in Israel | Comments Off

Gentrification = Whites Moving In

Posted on March 24, 2015 by Luke Ford

A Jewess tells me: My co-workers are talking about white male privilege. Shoot me in the foot. I told them I don’t feel so privileged having crackheads screaming at me every time I step outside my apartment. I told this guy I thought it was pretty sad that he sees his own existence as a problem that needs correcting. He was saying he was “part of the problem of gentrification”. I said “it’s so much better if neighborhoods stay poor and shitty isn’t it?” It’s not fun or romantic to live in a slum where you are constantly harassed. What I really wanted to say to him was: they really drilled it into you, didn’t they?

Chaim Amalek writes: “This is why New York Jews and Gentiles so love the Upper West Side of Manhattan. Very few crackheads, few people of color (except the paid servants of the Whites), and a great place from which to lecture the rest of America on the virtues of diversity.”

Posted in Whites | Comments Off

Is There An Ideal Chair?

Posted on March 24, 2015 by Luke Ford

Raquel Baetz writes: When my repetitive strain injury became too painful to ignore anymore, I was using a top-of-the-range ergonomic chair, specially designed for computer use.

I still got injured.

Why? Because no chair can prevent musculoskeletal disorders such as repetitive strain injury.

Back then, I sat with my legs crossed – Buddha style – up on the chair. At the time, I thought this position was ok, because it felt comfortable.

Not anymore. Now I know that how you use your chair is more important than what chair you use.

“The next posture is the best posture,” says Galen Cranz, professor of architecture at University of California Berkeley and author of The Chair: Rethinking Culture, Body and Design.

Cranz is a big proponent of moving – often – and changing chairs as much as possible throughout the day. In this podcast, she talks about the chairs she has in her home – a huge variety, and she moves between them regularly (as well as sitting and lying down on the floor).

Cranz is also an instructor of the Alexander Technique. This discipline teaches people how to sit, thus taking the responsibility for comfort and safety away from the chair completely. Here’s a blog by Alexander Technique teacher Adrian Farrell where he explains, “a chair is an inanimate object, it is incapable of ‘doing’ anything, let alone taking responsibility for you”.

We should all take a lesson from Farrell and Cranz – especially at the office.

In an ideal world, we’d all know how to sit, and we’d have many different chairs at our disposal, enabling us to change at least every 20 or 30 minutes, alternating with periods of standing, squatting, even sitting and lying on the floor like Cranz. (In this utopia, we’d all have the brand new iWatch too – reminding us to stand up.)

In my experience doing workplace assessments, the office workers I talk with find the idea of switching chairs…well, a bit weird. And most people think they know how to sit already.

Also, even if employees were willing to rotate chairs, most offices don’t have a big selection on hand, and people are often territorial about the chair they do have.

So short of changing chairs a lot, and giving everyone Alexander Technique (though I do recommend both), what can businesses do with regards to chairs to protect their employees? What chairs should they buy?

A good chair for use with computers and other digital devices need only meet a few basic criteria:

• A stable base supported by five legs with castors that glide smoothly
• Fully-adjustable components (preferably separate from each other), including height, backrest and seat pan
• Instructions (preferably a live demonstration delivered by the salesperson) on how to adjust the chair
• And, Farrell adds (and I agree) that the surface of the seat pan must be stable, ie, a stretchy fabric won’t give enough support to the sit bones

Practitioners of Alexander Technique may advise against using back support at all. But until you’ve got several years of this technique under your belt, and understand how to sit on your sit bones, you’ll need some help from a chair with back support, particularly when typing, mousing, scrolling, etc.

Here are some things to keep in mind when sitting in your computer chair and using your computer and other digital devices:

• Use the backrest as a guide (ie, feel your shoulders against it) to remind yourself to keep your shoulders upright rather than hunching forward – a good reason to get a chair with a backrest for the whole back
• Face your monitor straight on, ie, don’t twist your trunk
• Adjust your chair so that your arms are at a right angle to your desk when sitting in your chair
• Feet should always be flat on the floor (or a footrest) once the chair is at the right height to the desk
• Take frequent breaks and during those breaks, move as much as possible

Posted in Alexander Technique | Comments Off

Why Are Jews Left-Wing?

Posted on March 24, 2015 by Luke Ford

Stephen Steinlight writes:

* As a Jew (one who was once solidly left-liberal and held a high position in one of the country’s most prominent Jewish Establishment organizations) I find nothing remotely offensive about Congressman King’s assertion that most Jews are liberal Democrats first and Jews second. Of course he’s right, as most Jews (especially the great majority who are thoroughly secular and leftist would admit in private). I travel all across Americas speaking and debating immigration policies for a DC think tank, and in the aftermath of my talks I am repeatedly asked by friendly Christians why is it that Jews are so solidly Democrat given Obama’s hostility to Israel and the growing partisan divide on Israel, with the GOP much stronger in support (see polling by Gallop). The answer to the Congressman, and I’ve given it at great length to many Christian friends, has to do with our history as a people who have been despised, oppressed and the object of mass murder and genocide. That history is instructive up to a point — concern about injustice and developing a high sense of empathy are good things –, but it also creates hardwired long-term attitudes, behaviors and neuroses that are impervious to historical change and frequently leave little room for critical thought, as in the way Jews are wont to identify with every group that defines itself as “oppressed,” no matter how unconvincing their case and regardless as to whether or not they hate Jews. The problem, in a nutshell, is many Jews have quietly ceased to be Jews (that is to say people who have a unique cultural and religious identify) and have become worshippers of political correctness, so that being a liberal Democrat is seen as conterminous with being Jewish. This attitude leads the faux Jews to declare as apostates those Jews whose social and political views may be more centrist or conservative. Taken to its extreme, the Jewish proclivity for over-identification with “the oppressed” causes Jews to identify even with their enemies. But until and unless Jews can develop a normal and healthy level of ego strength they will remain their own worst enemies.

* Who was it who anointed the previous fringe leader of the far left anti-Zionist J-Street King of the Jews? And who denominated Peter Beinart, an arrogant superficial “public intellectual” who just embraced his Jewish identify a few years ago in order to exploit it to to attack real Jews as his Grand Vizier? It’s bad enough that yet another purblind far leftist ass runs the Reform Movement (one would think they might have learned something from the embarrassing tenure of Eric Yoffie). These people do not speak for the great majority of America’s Jews — though they do speak for a wide section of its plutocratic oligarchical organizations run by limousine liberals. Jews should respond by boycotting these organizations and until and unless Rick Jacobs “walks back” is record of loving political correctness more than Israel — they should seek to topple him from leadership at the UAHC. It’s had enough that for European Jewry we’re back in the 1930’s and that the Middle East has never been more chaotic and danger: but it is intolerable when there is such an active Fifth Column within the Jewish community.

J-Street is a loathsome bunch of leftist biological Jews that were born without backbones and hate anyone that was. They love James Baker because he said “Fuck the Jews.” I say, “Fuck J-Street.”

* I’m a strong fan of Michael Oren — who is to diplomatic to say the obvious: Obama INTENDS that his remarks cause Israel “strategic damage.” He’s been looking for something, ANYTHING, to jump on to distance from Israel, and now he thinks he’s found it. But he is not taking on board the very different reaction of Congress, and Obama’s efforts will almost certainly die in the cradle.

* If Netanyahu is annoying Obama by “poking him in the eye” Obama is using the excuse to stab all of Israel in the back.

* That powerful, earnest and unqualified statement of support [by Ted Cruz for Israel] means that 75 percent of Jews will now automatically HATE Ted Cruz, even if they knew nothing about him before. The majority of leftist Jews are reminiscent of the character Groucho Marx loved to play: he would never join a club that would take him for a member. J-Street loves the anti-Semite James Baker; but someone who genuinely supports and cares for the Jewish people and Israel like Ted Cruz — he must be crazy.

* Martin Indyk is a revolting little would-be kapo. He is far more loyal to the vile Obama than he is to the Jewish people; and he is far more loyal to his own career advancement in the Israel-hating Establishment than to any sense of honor.

* Who the hell is Jeremey Ben-Ami to tell American Jews anything? I know the Obama Administration is trying to anoint him the Grand Rabbi, but most Jews who are compos mentis understand he is, in effect, a traitor.

* Rather than wasting their time with the White House or State Department (two bastions of Jew-hatred) the Jewish Establishment ought to be exerting maximum pressure on Jewish members of Congress to SAY SOMETHING. Where, for example, is Chuck Schumer? Is he that afraid of Obama and Hillary? If they don’t stand up for Israel now Jews should get serious about replacing them. We get far better support from our Christian allies, to whom I am profoundly grateful. But it is a disgrace that we get NOTHING from Jewish Democrats.

* Will ANY of the huge majority of American Jews who made the indefensible decision to vote for Obama TWICE admit their mistake? I doubt it. Biologically Jewish, but no more, their deepest identity is as left-liberals and the god on in their Holy of Holies is still Obama. Jews may have high IQs, but they are politically as dumb as posts.

* I detest what [Yonatan] Geffen said. That said, assaulting him is a moral outrage, a serious crime, and a stain on Israel. Even in times as tense as these it is a moral obligation on the part of Israelis and Jews to treat each other we at least a modicum of civility. This attack is a disgrace.

* More sickening pandering. The President and the prevaricating Mr. Clapper have already quietly removed Iran, the greatest supporter of global terrorism, off this year’s Terror Assessment List in what must be called yet another act of the most craven appeasement. (Where’s the “New York Times” when it’s really appropriate to define something as “craven?”) That was yet another major concession to mollify the Mad Mullahs. Now we have this — something like a Thanksgiving greeting to the rulers of that brutal regime. Hasn’t Obama tired of playing the role of Neville Chamberlain? Surely central casting could come up with a better stand-in.

* First, it must be stated that the article‘s giving pride of place to the assessment of Netanyahu by J-Street’s Jeremy Ben-Ami, whom many in the pro-Israel Jewish community regard as something of a traitor, is unseemly at best and an inexcusable choice at worst. The framework of the article is also simplistic in its black-and-white analysis: is Netanyahu Dr. Jeckyll or Mr. Hyde. The answer is that he, like all politicians, is a mix. But some of the “evidence” being regurgitated to prove he is a monster, especially by the disingenuous and cynical Obama and his media flacks (including Jeffrey Goldberg), is beneath contempt. I refer to the outrageous and entirely misplaced accusation that he is a “racist.” To make that charge is to project American experience onto Israel in a manner that is entirely unjustified. That Netanyahu let his anxiety about many Israeli Arabs turning out to vote didn’t show he’s a “racist;” it showed he’s concerned about the political effect of that vote on his chances. Period. The Arab Israeli/Jewish Israeli divide doesn’t play into the American pattern of a racial divide nearly so much as a clash of national aspirations. What is at stake is a land claimed by different and rival peoples. But that doesn’t make Netanyahu a racist. France and Germany have fought over Alsace-Lorraine in more than one war. Does that mean that the Germans in WWI were “racist” about the French or the French were “racist” with regard to the Germans? This is pure idiocy. The term “racism” has been virtually stripped of all meaning by those who have employed it illegitimately in the US time and time again. Let’s not do the term or Netanyahu and additional disservice by misusing it once again in the context of the Israeli election.

* It’s time to face some inconvenient truths. If this latest incident doesn’t break down the wall of left-liberal of Obama’s mindset it’s hard to imagine what might. The obvious explanation for the president’s flippant trivialization of the “folks in a deli” and the ugly commentary by the White House spokesperson (there were people there that weren’t Jewish!) as well as the equally evasive and mendacious State Department spokesperson is that Jewish blood counts for nothing to Obama. If you haven’t figured that one out by now, wake up.

WASHINGTON (JTA) — Some Jewish Democrats demanded an apology from U.S. Rep. Steve King of Iowa for saying that American Jews “can be Democrats first and Jews second.”
King, a conservative Republican who is important to his party’s potential presidential candidates in part because of his influence in Iowa, the first caucus state, was asked Friday by Boston Herald Radio about Democrats who had boycotted the speech to Congress in early March by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel.
“I don’t understand how Jews in America can be Democrats first and Jewish second and support Israel along the line of just following their president,” he said.
The National Jewish Democratic Council “condemned” the remarks in a statement.
“For anyone, let alone an elected official, to actively belittle the hundreds of thousands of American Jews who vote for Democratic candidates is beyond the pale,” the council’s chairman, Greg Rosenbaum, said. “Rep. King is essentially stating that we aren’t Jewish enough for him. How dare he. We demand and deserve an apology at once.”
Rep. Steve Israel (D-N.Y.), the highest-ranking Jewish Democrat in the House of Representatives, berated King in Twitter post.
“I don’t need Congressman Steve King questioning my religion or my politics,” wrote Israel, who has headed fundraising for congressional Democrats in the last two elections. “I demand an apology from him and repudiation from GOP.”
King replied, also on Twitter, that “real men make such requests face to face,” which prompted Israel to call King “mashugana,” or crazy.

Posted in Jews, Stephen Steinlight | Comments Off

We All Have A Worry Budget

Posted on March 24, 2015 by Luke Ford

Eric writes: My personal guess (and I think there’s some preliminary evidence pointing to it) is that every person has a personal “worry budget” that will be fully “spent” regardless of the actual level of threat to oneself.

We’re now living in one of the safest times ever, meaning we have fewer and lesser major threats to worry about. But because of those worry budgets, we now spend the same time and effort worrying about minor threats (or mere inconveniences) that we used to spend worrying about major ones.

Someone summed it up as “working class black parents worry about their kids getting shot. Upper middle class white parents worry about their kids getting their shots.” When you have lots of realistic things to worry about, you can’t afford to indulge in worry about remote hypothetical risks like supposed vaccine-autism connections.

Of course there are other factors, like media sensationalism (there’s a strong negative correlation between crime coverage and actual crime rates) and various vested interests that benefit from a scared population, but I think the “worry budget” is what enables them.

Posted in Happiness | Comments Off

Steve Sailer: What We Can Learn from the Dreyfus Affair About Haven Monahan, Ferguson, Duke Lacrosse, Etc.

Posted on March 24, 2015 by Luke Ford

Steve Sailer writes:

The Dreyfus Affair in France, 1894-1906, was similar to many recent controversies in America, such as Haven Monahan, Ferguson, Trayvon, Duke Lacrosse, and others going back to Al Sharpton promoting Tawana Brawley’s gang rape hoax against white cops in late 1987. A patriotic French Jewish Army officer was unjustly accused of treason, and society soon divided up into acrimonious camps debating his case. Eventually, the facts became clear, poor Major Dreyfus was released from Devil’s Island, and the winners who backed Dreyfus’s innocence pushed through massive political changes at the expense of the losers.
It wasn’t just that the anti-Dreyfus right was wrong about one case, it was that they looked like they suffered from systemic biases that encouraged them to misunderstand these facts and promote an injustice. So, the side that turned out to be wrong on the facts paid a heavy political price: the famous 1905 French law on Separation of Church and State, which established France’s tradition of laïcité that Marine Le Pen defends vociferously today, was a consequence of the losers making themselves look bad.

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* I’d add that what’s going isn’t just anti-white, it gains tremendous tactical advantages from its amorphousness. It’s anti-Core, pro-Fringe, so it can shapeshift to meet most objections.

* The powers that be will use tragedy to their advantage when it serves an end they desire, and will ignore it when it does not.

The Dunblane Massacre was used to justify massive limits on the right to bear arms in Britain.

The far costlier and deadlier 9/11 attacks were not used to justify curtailing Muslim immigration to the West, which seems to have only accelerated since 2001.

* Since the Dreyfus Affair is trotted out endlessly to show … well … the innate perfidy of gentiles, especially conservative ones, it’s an excellent judo move to demand repeatedly–whenever any of these Maoist tantrums is debunked–that the same label of perfidy be attached and the same political consequences due for the folks if the same perfidy and same political consequences due for the folks who pushed the Duke rape case, Trayvon!, Ferguson, UVA …

* Noam Chomsky once said that the true right would only rise in this country if they had a leader who couldn’t be bought. Chomsky was frightened of that ever happening. But, it’s true. As long as the standbearers of Conservatism are wh^res who willingly concede cultural issues to the Left due to economic compromises, nothing will stop these people, nothing.

Many of our political, economic and media leaders are part of a bipartisan social club. That really contributes to elite immunity. It’s hard to destroy a man if your kids go to school with his. Or if you marry his niece, sort of like Arnold and Uncle Ted.

This insular, bipartisan, elite culture is increasingly cut off from the mass, and they have little or no empathy with them. A point made time and again by Charles Murray is that many of these people or their spawn have no idea what it’s like to have a job that makes a body part ache at the end of the day. With such people can we be surprised that they push the notion about Latinos doing jobs Americans won’t?

What is needed is ruthless, driven actual traditionalist leadership on the political or media front. We need more Charles C. Johnsons to go after these people where they live. Note how scared they are of him.

We should take heart whenever there are stories about increasingly confrontational personal disputes in Congress.

* The never-ending conversation about what’s now called ‘The Dreyfus Affair’ is primarily about shaping memory. This overblown ‘affair’ is a modern teaching opportunity. The lesson? If you suspect Jews of disloyalty or wrong-doing, then you are probably wretched and evil yourself. In fact, you might even suffer from a psychiatric disorder. Why? Jews are humble and virtuous (Ann Frank), unjustly accused (Dreyfus), overwhelmingly brilliant (Einstein) and conspicuously benevolent (Jewish philanthropy). These are the dominant moral messages which dart incessantly throughout our media-saturated universe. Thinking otherwise might mean you’re an ‘anti-Semite’, which is very very BAD.

So while Americans are reminded about victims like Dreyfus, Ann Frank, the Israeli athletes (Munich) and of course The Holocaust, lessons involving the Rosenbergs, the Bolsheviks, US immigration policies, AIPAC’s unstoppable machinations, America’s ‘unfortunate’ War on Iraq (or Syria or Iran or Palestine) never receive the same focus or moral singularity. This is no accident. There are Jewish fingerprints all over these ‘lessons’, some of which disappear altogether. This is grand, media-driven political theater, dressed up as self-governance.

Unfortunately, these most important victims often write the script, edit the story, direct the actors, and produce the program.

More comments to Steve Sailer:

* When are we going to be grown up enough to admit that a majority of lynching ‘victims’ were in fact perpetrators of some rather serious crimes? That lynching was not mere violent racism, but in fact a system (inferior though it may be) of justice?

* Yes read about Black Albinos in Africa and marvel how fairly they respect their disabled countrymen. Black Africans positively *SHRED* these poor people, tearing them literally limb from limb; it’s beyond sickening. Since it’s only a question of albinism, we know that the difference in this dyad are truly only skin deep and yet this is how they treat their brethren who differ from themselves in only one respect: white skin.

More comments to Steve Sailer:

* How many blacks have been killed by the KKK over the past 50 years? Maybe a dozen, if that.

How many blacks have been killed by other blacks over that time? Hundreds of thousands.

How many whites have been killed by blacks over that time? Tens of thousands.

But for the media, it is the specter of lynching that interests them. In the recent article Steve posted about Otis Byrd it said:

There is no more powerful image in the South than that of a black man’s body hanging from a tree. Though the practice of lynching reached its peak during the 19th and early 20th centuries, the idea continues to haunt, explaining in part why the case of Otis Byrd has captured the nation’s attention.

Given the facts above we should ask why do they consider that the most powerful image of the South? The answer is because it is most useful image for them. And what is it useful for? For promoting anti-white bigotry, which is the rock upon which their whole worldview is founded and their deepest moral principle.

Like Steve says it is also the “KKKrazy Glue” that holds together their “coalition of the fringes” (which is another nice term that clearly explains the left’s strategy, more so than the clumsy and opaque term “cultural marxism”.)

* The number of actual Ku Klux Klan members in the U.S is so miniscule that even The Communist Party USA has a larger membership than the KKK.

Communist Party USA has over 20,000 members. Compare that to the KKK which is estimated to have only about 5,000 members.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Communist_Party_USA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan

Yet the Left Wing media wants us to believe that there is a Klan member on every street corner in flyover country.

In the U.S you are more likely to bump into a Communist than you are to bump into a Klan member.

Posted in Blacks, Steve Sailer | Comments Off

Top New York Times Comments On The UVA Rape Fraud

Posted on March 24, 2015 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* I think most readers understand the truth notwithstanding the NYT’s efforts to muddy the waters. Here are the top ranked comments:

“Universities need to stop acting as the intermediary when there is rape with a college student. They should NOT be in charge of investigations and the student should be reporting the crime to the police at the time it happens so that acutal law enforcement can do an immediate investigation and not one done months later when evidence is hard to find. Why campuses even have the authority to manage such investigations is beyond my understanding.

Reply 286Recommended
RS Philly 12 hours ago
False accusations destroy lives.

The woman should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Reply 214Recommended
NYT Pick
H.G Jackson, Wyomong 12 hours ago
I am not quite clear why the university is changing the rules for fraternities based on a crime that did not happen. One would think if the rules were imposed based on the gang-rape of the student, that they would be withdrawn if the reason that they were instituted is no longer valid.

It seems that university administrators lose all perspective, acting frantically even before the evidence is in, but demonstrating no similar haste in rectifying their mistakes, if it turns out no crime was committed at all.

Reply 189Recommended
CAF Seattle 12 hours ago
And what consequences does a woman face when she makes up false sexual assault allegations against a man or men, wrecking their lives?”

The problem that sites like the NYTimes have is that they no longer control the megaphone so that disturbingly un-Cathedral like views written by people who have not drunk the Kool-aid are being aired. They are under pressure from web gurus to be more interactive but my prediction is that they will kill off comments at some point or require the use of a real verified name or get rid of the “like” button. In the old days, before they would print a letter to the editor (they printed mine a couple of times) the would call you and verify that you wrote it.

* The fantasy world aspect of the internet is a big boost (enabler) to those who weave fantasies. 20 years ago Jackie’s fantasies would not have gotten further than the dormitory floor she lived on.

* Young women at the height of their powers can leave a trail of destruction. The likely trauma she caused all those young guys who were interrogated by the police. The wasted man hours.

Young men who leave a trail of destruction usually go to jail. The fertile young woman will be accommodated.

* Relative to males, the earning power and buying power of women is much higher than it was say 30 years ago. Just look at how advertisers cater to their whims and fantasies. Plus the range of businesses that cater to female desires is a much larger percentage of the US economy than 30 years ago. Who ever saw a nail salon 30 years ago? Guys paying taxes to the welfare system keep those Vietnamese run places afloat. Certain lines of automobiles slant their pitch towards women. My mother never bought a car. My father did this.

* One thing lefties sincerely hate and despise is the idea that they have been made fools of.

For a group that prides itself on being smarter than everyone else, the idea that they have been duped is infuriating to a degree that you tend to notice it. They aren’t mature enough to admit being fooled, and so double-down on ridiculousness, or forget it exists, or else vehemently set out to burn the witch who fooled them. It’s almost has if they have brain damage on that part of the brain that in normal folks tells them, “Lighten up, Francis, ya got conned. Just learn from it.”

And so the ritualistic burning-in-effigy of Stephen Glass and Jason Blair (less so the latter, because black) as master-manipulators, instead of, you know, a couple of dudes who found it triflingly easy to pull the wool over lefties’ eyes so long as you told them what they wanted to hear.

So this Haven Monahan fiasco has to go down the memory hole, so lefties don’t feel stupid, or else Erdley will be burned in effigy as well.

Posted in Rape | Comments Off

Let’s Start World War III!

Posted on March 23, 2015 by Luke Ford

“I’m willing to start World War III!”

That’s a favorite phrase among Jews I know to indicate their commitment to something.

I’ve never gotten used to Jewish intensity. My WASP upbringing was more laid back. Jesus suffered and so we have to suffer too and we should suffer quietly and patiently with faith in God. By contrast, “It’s not a big deal” is not a common Jewish phrase.

When a Jew took me to lunch the other day and my order did not arrive after ten minutes, he raised holy hell to get me my order. I kept trying to calm him. I would have sat there meekly for half an hour without complaint.

I often see Jewish intensity, commitment and verbal skill winning many battles in the world around me, but I wonder if sometimes these battles are won at the expense of the war. If you cause people to resent Jews because of your intensity, that’s not good for the Jews in the long run.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off

Jewish Disregard For The Goyim’s Safety Laws Can Lead To Dead Jews

Posted on March 23, 2015 by Luke Ford

Heshy Fried writes on FB: “One of the most frightful days for the yeshiva administration was when the fire inspector showed up. I remember one instance when Rabbis were communicating with the janitor and beis medrish guys as to where exactly the inspector was located and where to place batteries in the smoke detectors…”

For some Jews, the laws of the goyim are only obstacles to be maneuvered around.

Growing up as a Seventh-Day Adventist, the laws of the land were taken very seriously (such as laws about taxes, fire safety, customs, immigration, school standards, etc). When I converted to Judaism in 1993, I quickly noticed that these same laws were not always given the same respect. I suspect that at least half of yeshivas in America use dodgy tax accounting (they often function as opportunities for money laundering and tax evasion). Whenever America goes to war, many Jews uninterested in becoming rabbis enroll in yeshivas to escape the draft and few rabbis see any moral problem with this. These Jews don’t feel the same obligation to the United States of America that the goyim do.

J.J. Goldberg blogs:

The Sabbath fire that killed seven children in an Orthodox Jewish family in Brooklyn on Saturday was at least the fourth deadly blaze in the borough resulting from Sabbath and holiday observance in the past 15 years.
In all 11 people have been killed in the four fires, all but one of them children. At least six other people were injured in the four fires, including the mother of the seven children killed this weekend, Gayle Sassoon, who was fighting for her life in the specialized burn unit at Jacobi Medical Center in the Bronx. An unknown number of others have been injured in similar fires that didn’t result in deaths.
Police and fire officials were quoted in news reports saying this weekend’s fire was caused by a malfunctioning electric hotplate in the family’s kitchen that was keeping food warm overnight in observance of the religious restriction on cooking during the 25 hours of the Sabbath.
A similar fire, also caused by a malfunctioning electric hotplate, killed an 8-year-old boy during the festival of Sukkot in October 2010. That fire, like this weekend’s, took place in the Midwood section of Brooklyn, the center of the borough’s large Syrian-Sephardic Jewish community.
Three other people were killed in two deadly fires caused by ritual candles, one in Borough Park in 2002, the other in Williamsburg in 2000, during the festival of Shavuot.
The victims in the Williamsburg fire were the granddaughter of Satmar Grand Rabbi Moshe Teitelbaum, Sarah Halverstam, and her 5-month-old baby Chaya.
Other Sabbath and holiday candle fires have resulted in serious injuries, including one in Borough Park in 2009, caused by an unstable oil-burning Hanukkah menorah, that wounded a 3-year-old and her babysitter, and another in the upstate Satmar enclave of Kiryas Joel in 2011 that critically injured a 70-year-old developmentally disabled woman.
By comparison, the controversial ritual of metzitzah b’peh, sucking the blood from an infant’s circumcision wound by mouth, is said by the New York City Board of Health to have killed two infants since 2000 and caused brain damage in two others, all apparently as a result of herpes simplex virus transmitted from the mohel’s mouth.
In all 12 infants contracted the virus through the ceremony during the period, though a respected Yeshiva University rabbinic scholar, Rabbi Hershel Schachter, was quoted in 2013 claiming that there were as many as 15 cases per year, most them covered up by hospital fearful of losing Hasidic business. He reportedly inferred the number, based on his daughter’s account of what she’d seen at the hospital where she works as a nurse. There’s been no confirmation.

J.J. Goldberg continues: “It’s a pity that so many Jews respond to bad news and questioning of our actions by circling the wagons, seeing only enemies and shreying gevalt. It’s especially troubling because it all too frequently prevents us from listening to the criticism, considering the advice and seeing how things could be improved. All the more so when children’s lives are at risk. They’re all our kids.”

Chaim Amalek writes: “In case any of you goyim reading this are wondering, there is absolutely nothing in the Torah that mandates or even mentions this penis-sucking ritual. And nothing in Torah forbids the use of electricity on the Jewish Sabbath. In each case, ignorant rabbes made the whole thing up.”

The New York Times reports:

While an untended hot plate warmed food downstairs in their brick and stucco home minutes into the new day on Saturday, their mother slept a floor above. The hot plate was her answer to a Sabbath restriction on lighting a flame, a way to feed warm food to her eight children. They slept nearby.

When the hot plate malfunctioned, it sent flames creeping toward an open stairwell that led to their bedrooms. Soon they were trapped, screaming from behind a wall of flames. Their mother, Gayle Sassoon, 45, and their second-oldest sister, Siporah, 15, broke through the glass of second-floor windows and jumped onto the grass.

…There did not appear to be smoke detectors on the first or second floor of the house, the officials said.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off