Who Shapes America?

Joe Biden: “What affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else. … It wasn’t anything we legislatively did. It was ‘Will and Grace,’ it was the social media. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. That’s why I was so certain that the vast majority of people would embrace and rapidly embrace [gay marriage]. Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense.”

Chaim Amalek writes: The goy is too stupid to fight this on his own. Only with the aid of a Jew can the fight be carried to the enemy camp. That’s how it was for the Bolsheviks (they had Lev Bronstein), and that is how it must be in this as well. Jewish brains, Muslim valor, and Christian numbers might yet reverse this pink tide. AMALEK is available.

Just think how this might have turned out if instead of 1993’s movie “Philadelphia” there had been a big budget movie about the sexual preferences of John Wayne Gacey. Or a film biopic about the very short life and brutal death of the 13 year old white heterosexual Christian boy Jesse Dirkhising at the hands of two homosexuals.

Posted in America, Homosexuality | Comments Off on Who Shapes America?

What Is The Red Pill Community?

Wikipedia: The red pill and its opposite, the blue pill, are popular culture symbols representing the choice between embracing the sometimes painful truth of reality (red pill) and the blissful ignorance of illusion (blue pill). Redpills are people who have chosen to face reality, while bluepills remain living in ignorance of the truth, whether by choice or because they have not had a choice.

Posted in Culture | Comments Off on What Is The Red Pill Community?

The Hyper-Sexualization of Western Culture

When you read the Bible, you see the Hebrews creating a generally stricter sexual morality than that which reigned at the time. Still, the Hebrews frequently sinned in the sexual arena and the Bible is unsparing in pointing out their shortcomings.

I grew up a Seventh-Day Adventist where all sex outside of marriage was regarded as a sin. To the extent the Church could, it encouraged turning down the flame of sexual tension. On a practical level, I noticed among conservative Christians that sexual sins were regarded as the worst sins.

When I converted to Judaism, I noticed that sexual sins weren’t necessarily regarded as any more serious than breaking the dietary and Sabbath laws. I noticed that most Modern Orthodox Jews I knew had sex before marriage, every Orthodox bachelor I knew well was a porn addict, and that most Orthodox Jews who took Orthodox Judaism seriously kept sex for marriage.

At the same time, I wrote on Hollywood and the porn industry, where I noticed Jews pushing sexual boundaries.

I’ve never married. I’ve dated a lot (both Jews and non-Jews). I’ve noticed that Jews tend to have fewer hang-ups and compunctions about sex, power, money, fame, honor, success, etc. Jews and Judaism seem to have greater peace with the natural passions. According to what I’ve read and what I’ve seen, non-Orthodox Jews tend to have twice as many lifetime sexual partners as non-Jews.

There’s a lot of talk about “Jewish guilt” but I’ve rarely seen a Jew troubled by guilt regarding his sexuality.

Non-Jews play as big a role in the global porn industry as Jews. Pretty much every normal guy wants to see women naked and boffed. If all Jews disappeared from the media, would there be less of this? I doubt it.

None of the Jews leading the transgressive charge are Orthodox Jews. Traditional Jews are not interested in turning up the West’s sexual heat. I’ve never heard Orthodox Jews opining that anti-Semitism is the result of sexual repression. I’ve rarely heard normal Orthodox Jews say that sexual repression is a bad thing. The Orthodox Jews I know don’t like the pornification of America. They want to raise their children in a healthy environment and they don’t like sexualized billboards, magazine covers, pop music and the like.

Another thought — Jews don’t monopolize the media. They exercise an influence approximately proportionate to their IQ.

It is my impression that the media feel as free to mock Jews and Judaism as they do to mock Christians and Christianity.

I find Weeds and Orange is the New Black (OITNB) compelling viewing. I’ve watched every episode. Yes, they’re sexually transgressive. They’re also good TV and for TV, they’re smart.

Another thought — it’s weird for me to attend Orthodox shul daily, to pray daily with a minyan, to study Torah daily, and then to notice Jews in the media pushing sexual transgression.

The Jews I know have, in some ways, stronger and more cohesive family and communal lives than the Seventh-Day Adventists I know. If you go to a typical Orthodox shul, it overflows with children. Their parents are devoted and want to keep the kids safe from the goyim and from the sexually transgressive wider society.

Now that I no longer watch porn, I like action movies. I still get an adrenaline high and the murder relaxes me.
As soon as a camera was invented, a man, Jewish or non-Jewish, has wanted to point it at a pretty woman and get her to undress. The visual medium inevitably leads to pornography. As the Torah commanded, do not follow your heart and your eyes after which you prostitute yourselves. (Num. 15:39)

Yom Tov: “To me it makes sense. When you try to escape the one true source of values that explicitly lists and forbids these specific sexual deviancies, sexual deviance is the ultimate statement of having been liberated from the confines of Jewish practices/law.”

Christopher Donnellan: “The Jews that established themselves in Hollywood, and built the modern film industry, such as Jack Warner and L.B. Mayer, were pretty conservative morally, and conformed to Anglo-American aesthetic and moral standards, but their wayward children and grand-children turned popular culture into an open sewer.”

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Hollywood, Jews, Pornography, Sex | Comments Off on The Hyper-Sexualization of Western Culture

Japan vs. England – FIFA Women’s World Cup 2015 Highlights

While watching this game, I found myself rooting strongly for England. I guess because I feel a deep genetic, historical and cultural connection. The more similar I am to someone, the more I like them. I guess I’m a horrible racist.

Posted in England | Comments Off on Japan vs. England – FIFA Women’s World Cup 2015 Highlights

Jews, Whites & Women

I had a chat this week with two Jewesses and a goy. It went something like this:

One Jew got an email from a goy about Jews that read in part: “That they deliberately bred Talmudic scholars may have selected for genes that facilitate deception/trickery/sophistry/lying. Jews tend to make good lawyers for this reason. Jews also score very highly in verbal IQ.”

Jewess A: “Do you think that’s true?”

Luke: “I’d like to rework some of his concepts to make them more value neutral, and to simply recognize that Jews, like all peoples, have in general certain gifts and certain traits and certain liabilities. I’m studying Talmudic tractate Nedarim (vows) right now and you see subtle Jewish legal reasoning at work. You study it and you see why Jews are such good lawyers and so good at working a system.”

“All closely identifying in-groups tend towards suspicion, hostility and contempt for outsiders. Jews are no exception to that rule. The more a black identifies as black, the more a Muslim identifies as Muslim, the more a Jew identifies as Jewish, the more likely they are to have hostility for outsiders and when you live as a tiny minority, you have to be careful expressing that contempt or the majority will hurt you. Ashkenazi Jews are the most intelligent ethnic group in the world, on average, and so for a person of lesser intelligence, Ashkenazi Jews are likely to be resented for their trickery. Most people with IQs under 95 don’t particularly care for those with IQs over 120 who can discern patterns.”

“You could replace the word ‘Jew’ in the email with ‘women.’ Why are women more adept at manipulation than men? Why are they in some ways more ruthless? Because of evolution. Women are the physically smaller, weaker and more fragile sex and they’ve had to survive partnerships with dangerous bigger male creatures apt to killing and raping them through superior physical force and so women learned to survive through superior inter-personal management skills. So too for Jews. Most Jews over the past 2500 years have lived as a tiny minority among frequently dangerous goyim and to have survive, they’ve had to develop some superior managing skills that usually involve subtlety, intelligence, dexterity, and hidden manipulation. Jews didn’t survive by telling the goyim in general what they really thought of them. From a Jewish perspective, of course Christianity is idolatry, but that is not a wise thing to tell your more numerous Christian neighbors, so you dissemble. You say terrible things about Christians but you call them ‘Esau’ in your sacred texts and claim that these references are to the pagans of old.”

“If you are strong in your Christianity or your Islam or your Judaism, you are likely to have contempt for other religions. This is not a uniquely Jewish tendency. What is unique to Jews is their superior intelligence.”

A: “But that doesn’t really work because people always figure it out.”

Luke: “What’s the alternative? To be honest with people who have superior weaponry and fighting skills and numbers? To let the goyim know how you really feel? Let them know that you regard yourself as a nation within a nation primarily loyal to other Jews around the world rather than to your Gentile rulers? Jews need to do business with non-Jews, and to get the most of the good things in life that they can snag (just like any other group wants to maximize its interests). Do you see blacks building charitable hospitals for non-blacks? Do you see Chinese building charitable hospitals for non-Chinese? No. With the exception of Anglos, most groups are out for themselves.”

“Eventually the clash of interests becomes so severe between Jews and non-Jews that Jews have been kicked out of almost every Western country.”

“Through cleverness, you survive for today. It’s like the rabbi in the story who forestalled a pogrom by promising the ruler he could teach his favorite dog in a year to talk, betting that over the course of 12 months, perhaps the dog would die or the ruler would die or the Jews would leave or maybe he’d teach the dog to talk.”

B: “Women are manipulative because they have vaginas, and those are in short supply when compared with dick, which is plentiful and cheap. Women have become aware of their power and they milk it.”

A: “Why do Talmudic scholars have to lie?”

Luke: “They don’t have to lie, but in Judaism, truth primarily has an instrumental value. Rabbis have a license to say anything that gets Jews to behave as the rabbis wish, to do more mitzvahs, to study more Torah, to give more charity, etc, and the Torah commands Jews to follow their sages. Rabbis can present fables as true if that will emotionally move their audience to be more Jewish. See Marc Shapiro’s book, Changing the Immutable: How Orthodox Judaism Rewrites Its History.”

B: “Doesn’t everyone deceive people?”

Luke: “Yes.”

B: “Is there a Jewish monopoly on deception?”

Luke: “No.”

“Most people are self-deceived, but if you are part of group that is 98% of the country’s population, you don’t have to worry about the things you worry about when you are just 2% of a population but have 50% of the wealth.”

A: “Blacks have a strong group identity.”

Luke: “And Jews hate black nationalism (such as the Nation of Islam) though not as much as they hate white nationalism because blacks are less intelligent and therefore less formidable adversaries.”

“Gentile nationalisms are going to make Jews nervous because it unites the goyim and puts Jews on the outside.”

B: “I see Jews pushing multiculturalism more than ever.”

Luke: “All human relationships are difficult because every individual has at times clashing interests with others. So too for groups. They’re constantly in conflict”

B: “I notice that white nationalists hate nationalism for Jews.”

Luke: “Different groups have different interests. When the other guy gets organized, that’s often a threat to your own group.”

B: “It should be nationalists doing their own and let the multiculturalists play in their rainbow pile. Can’t we unite in that we are all nationalists?”

Luke: “That’s what I support. I hope that’s true.”

“Prior to the Civil War, Jews in the Southern states were either pro-slavery or silent. Jews played a big role for the Confederacy.”

A friend: “I’m too Jewish for the Nazis and too Nazi for the Jews.”

A: “Are we all in a Darwinian struggle for survival?”

Luke: “Yes.”

A: “Who will win?”

B: “I’ve always been scared of the Chinese. I feared they would take over.”

Luke: “You can talk to Chinese born and raised in America and if you ask them why they are studying a particular topic at university, they might say it is for the mother country, and they don’t mean America.”

Posted in Jews, Nationalism, Whites | Comments Off on Jews, Whites & Women

Hope For The Future

Friend: “It seems to be a Spanish territorial port in Africa. Technically, Spanish territory. Per the video, the narrator stated that Spanish police were stopping illegals, going against international law. So, apparently, stopping illegals from entering a country illegally is against international law? Ridiculous.”

Posted in Blacks, Immigration | Comments Off on Hope For The Future

Ashkenazi Ancestry

Chaim Amalek writes:

Ridiculous. We Yidden are no more “white” than Australian Aborigines are Chinese. I recently had 23andme analysis of my genome, and it showed that not only am I about 2.5% Neanderthal, that that I’m over 10% West African. In other words, I am a deciroon. Not too suprising, given my look, but what about paler versions to be seen in every yeshiva? JEWS ARE NOT WHITE OR BLACK OR THIS OR THAT. Because in the end, we are not goyim. We are Yidden. And to be a Yid is to transcend color. Color is for goyim.

If I were to sell a set of crayons for Yiddishe kinder, I would change the name of the color “fleshtone” to “goyfleish” and maybe include a new crayon labeled “Yiddishe Neshama” that would be invisible, but that would still over-color any other crayon…

Look at Brazil. There remain white people there, notwithstanding all of their diversity. Truth is, the dark ones covet pale blonde goyellas and so will always try to breed a few of them just to keep a supply of white girls on hand for them to rape.

West Hunter: I’m looking at abstracts on Ashkenazi genetics from ASHG 2013 and SMBE 2014 – by the same group, with Shai Carmi as the lead author. They did 128 whole genomes, 50x deep.

They concluded Ashkenazi Jews were about 50% Middle Eastern and 50% European. In the 2013 abstract, they were pretty specific: they estimated the European ancestry fraction at 55% , plus or minus 2%. ( In our book, we had a crude estimate of about 40% European ancestry.) They estimated the split between Europeans and Middle Easterners at about 9000 BC: which sounds about the right date for the entry of the Sardinian-like farmers. From other data (mtDNA) , and from the fact that you see almost zero WHG or ANE in Ashkenazi autosomal genes, one can conclude that the European admixture was mostly Italian, with some southern French. Very little German or Slavic – by that time serious endogamy had set in..

By looking at IBD segments, they conclude that there was indeed a bottleneck in Ashkenazi ancestry, ~350 individuals, followed by a rapid expansion. IBD analysis should pin this down quite accurately. They estimate that this was about 800 years ago, but I would bet money that it was a little earlier – more like 1100 years ago. In other words, the founding bottleneck, the time when the ancestors of the Ashkenazi Jews moved from Italy into the Rhineland, not a later persecution bottleneck.

Posted in Ashkenazim | Comments Off on Ashkenazi Ancestry

Love Wins!

11270133_10204594632007280_421988723_n

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Love Wins!

The Shameful Liberal Exploitation of the Charleston Massacre

Heather MacDonald writes: The racist massacre of nine black worshippers at a Charleston, S.C., church on June 17 was an act of such heinous ugliness that it demands to be scrutinized for any larger meanings it may possess. That the victims had graciously welcomed the murderer, Dylann Roof, to their Bible study class at the Emanuel A.M.E. Church and had politely sat with him for nearly an hour before he started shooting makes their killings all the more heart-wrenching.

Given America’s history of racial terror, including attacks on black churches, it is appropriate to ask humbly, with trepidation, whether the shooting reflects currents of hate that are still active in American culture. It is not, however, appropriate to answer that question with boilerplate rhetoric that bears little resemblance to reality. An honest appraisal of race relations today would conclude that the Charleston massacre belongs to the outermost, lunatic fringe of American society.

The country’s revulsion at the carnage was immediate and universal, resulting in a justified movement to banish the Confederate flag, embraced by Roof as a white-supremacist symbol, from official sites. Roof was not expressing the will of anyone beyond his own narcissistic, twisted self. White-supremacist killings are not a common aspect of black life today; their very rarity is what made this atrocity so newsworthy. And yet the Democratic elites, from President Obama on down, opportunistically turned Roof into a stand-in for white America, linking his rampage to the Left’s standard grab bag of institutional racism that allegedly poisons black life. Eulogizing Emanuel A.M.E.’s pastor, the Reverend Clementa C. Pinckney, on June 26, Obama fingered virtually every white as a potential co-conspirator in the killings. “Maybe we now realize the way racial bias can infect us even when we don’t realize it,” Obama said. In other words, it took this violence for white America to wake up to its enduring racism, racism that is continuous with Roof’s homicidal mania. Obama cautioned “us” (read: whites) about other manifestations of “our” potentially lethal racism. Once we “realize” how we are “infected” with bias, he said, we will be “guarding against not just racial slurs, but . . . also . . . against the subtle impulse to call Johnny back for an interview but not Jamal. So that we search our hearts when we consider laws to make it harder for some of our fellow citizens to vote.”

Obama’s admonition ignores the fact that in every elite workplace today, whether a university, corporation, law firm, bank, foundation, newsroom, or research lab, being black is an enormous advantage for a job applicant, desperate as employers are to parade their “diversity” to a bean-counting world. But even if that weren’t the case, job hiring has nothing to do with the Roof massacre. And while one can debate the extent of voter fraud and the need for additional measures to prevent it, it is preposterous to suggest that someone seeking to strengthen vote-integrity rules needs to “search his heart” for complicity in the Roof massacre…

The formula for escaping poverty as an adult also has nothing to do with race: Graduate from high school, wait until you are married to have children, and work full-time. Whites who eschew those bourgeois behaviors are as likely to be poor as blacks who eschew them. Only 2 percent of individuals who follow those rules are in poverty, according to Isabel Sawhill of the Brookings Institution; 72 percent of those who follow them earn at least $55,000 a year. The American poverty rate would be cut by 70 percent if the same percentage of Americans engaged in those responsible behaviors as did in 1970, regardless of race. America spends over $1 trillion a year on programs for disadvantaged families, estimates Ron Haskins of the Brookings Institution. In the liberal worldview, where compassion is measured by government spending, that vast sum should buy the American “we” some dispensation from race-mongering. Compassionate or not, however, that spending is unable to counteract the effects of nonmarital childbearing, a social catastrophe about which Obama, Kristof, and other scourges of alleged racism are silent. Family breakdown explains the other racial inequalities that Obama seized on. He criticized “us” for “permitting” so many children to grow up “without prospects for a job or a career.” This lachrymose accusation again overlooks the reality that a black boy who graduates from high school today with a modestly respectable GPA will have scores of selective colleges beating down his door; should he finish college in decent standing he will be able to write his ticket to the graduate school of his choice. If few black students are able to take advantage of those racial preferences, it is because children from single-mother homes enter school far behind their peers in reading, math, and social-emotional skills, a gap which schools struggle to close. Fatherless children, especially boys, are less likely to graduate from high school or college and are more prone to crime and gang involvement…

(The Bureau of Justice Statistics stopped publishing its table on interracial crime after 2008, perhaps not coincidentally, the first year of the Obama presidency. The agency explains its decision on the ground that some of the estimates in particular crime categories, such as sexual assault, are based on sample sizes that are too small to be statistically reliable. But that is no reason not to tabulate data on the crimes for which reliable estimates are available.)

Posted in Blacks, Crime, Latino, Whites | Comments Off on The Shameful Liberal Exploitation of the Charleston Massacre

Young, Male, and Single

Chaim Amalek writes: “Unz.com is fast becoming one of the best sources of news and commentary online. It does not always connect, and sometimes its pieces are not well grounded in reality, but on certain issues, such as race and gender it is an important read. This piece in particular is excellent, as it describes how things really are on the ground for most men.”

Peter Frost writes:

At present, there are more White American women outmarrying than White American men, particularly in younger age groups. This disparity is mainly in marriages with African American men, there being no gender difference in marriages with Hispanic Americans and the reverse gender difference in marriages with Asian Americans (Jacobs and Labov, 2002; Passel et al., 2010). Overall, this factor further skews the ratio of young single men to young single women in the White American community.

This disparity isn’t new. What is new is its extent, for both legal and common-law marriages. An idea may be gleaned from statistics on children born to White American women, specifically the proportion fathered by a non-White partner. For the U.S. as a whole the proportion in 2013 was between 11% and 20% (the uncertainty is due to 190,000 births for which the father’s race was not stated). By comparison, the proportion in 1990 was between 5% and 13% (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013; see also Silviosilver, 2015).

Whenever this issue comes up for discussion, there are often reassurances that the disparity will disappear in a post-racial world that has been cleansed of “White privilege.” I’m not so sure. The European female phenotype seems to be very popular, and this was so even when white folks were geopolitical weaklings. Today, the term “white slavery” is merely a synonym for prostitution, but it originally meant the enslavement of fair-skinned women for sale to clients in North Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia. At the height of this trade, between 1500 and 1650, over 10,000 Eastern Europeans were enslaved each year for export (Kolodziejczyk, 2006; Skirda, 2010). The overwhelming majority were young women and pre-pubertal boys who were valued for their physical appearance. And yet they were powerless.

No, I don’t think this kind of preference will disappear as whites lose “privilege.”

Exit strategies

So more and more young men are being left on the shelf, particularly in White America. How do they cope? Mostly by turning to porn from Internet websites, videocassettes, or magazines. Love dolls are another option and may grow in popularity as they become more human-like, not only physically but also in their ability to talk and interact.

Another option is outmarriage. In the past, this trend largely concerned older men marrying East Asian or Hispanic women, but we’re now seeing plenty of young men outmarrying via Internet dating sites. Despite the local supply of single women in the African American community, there is a much stronger tendency to look abroad, generally to women in Eastern Europe, South America, or East Asia.

Then there’s gender reassignment, which means either entering the other side of the mate market or tapping into the lesbian market. It’s a viable strategy, all the more so because many white boys can be turned into hot trans women. I’m not saying that some young men actually think along those lines, but gender reassignment is functioning that way.

Finally, there’s “game.” My attitude toward game is like my attitude toward gender reassignment. Both are attempts to push the envelope of phenotypic plasticity beyond its usual limits, and neither can fully achieve the desired result. A lot of boys aren’t wired for game, and there are good reasons why, just as there are good reasons why some people are born male. Male shyness isn’t a pathology. It’s an adaptation to a social environment that values monogamy and high paternal investment while stigmatizing sexual adventurism. Our war on male shyness reflects our perverse desire to create a society of Don Juans and single mothers.

But if game works, why not? Whatever floats your boat.

Posted in Game, Sex | Comments Off on Young, Male, and Single