I want to live in an America where white people pick up the trash, use leaf blowers, clean toilets, work as janitors, hookers, fruit pickers, mechanics, gardeners, maids just as I want the same for Israel with Jews doing these basic tasks. Nationalism for everyone!
A white South African was “someone who would rather be murdered in his bed than make it.” We know how that turned out. Best for every group to blow their own leaves, and to make their own beds.
Chaim Amalek writes:
All talk of IQ is just another trap for the unwary white, and another path to becoming a cuckservative. After all, if IQ defines the merit of a population group, then you should cheer the conquest of the white race by East Asians. Whites lose. And if some subset of black suddenly started scoring higher than whites, would you want them to displace whites? Of course not. Whites would again lose. The argument is to support your group not because it is smarter or more ethical than other groups (although in some regards it may be), but because it is your group, and you want your group, your race, your people and your kin to succeed even if it means others will fail.
Also, you don’t see Jews making this mistake, at least not racially/tribally conscious torah yidden like Luke Ford. They don’t support one another because they score higher on IQ tests, but because they are Jews and goyim are not.
Finally, the forward-thinking white knows that a stupid, low-IQ immigrant, provided he is denied welfare and is heavily policed, is less of a threat to the white man of above average intelligence than is the brilliant immigrant from India or Korea who can handle whatever job he may be doing for less cost, and thus drive him to penury.
Dave Weigel writes: Late last week, a neologism was born. Twitter was the incubator. “Cuckservative,” a portmanteau of “conservative” and “cuckold” (i.e. a man whose wife has cheated on him) burned up Twitter as fans of Donald Trump’s politicking warred with the movement conservatives who opposed it.
RedState.com’s Erick Erickson, the Daily Caller’s Matt Lewis, and the team at the well-read conservative blog Ace of Spades were among the critics suddenly deluged with accusations of cuckservatism.
Below, we explain.
What is “cuckservatism?”
I’ll defer to Richard Spencer, president of the white nationalist National Policy Institute.
“#Cuckservative” is a full-scale revolt, by Identitarians and what I’ve called the ‘alt Right,’ against the Republican Party and conservative movement,” Spencer explained in an e-mail. “The ‘cuck’ slur is vulgar, yes, but then piercingly accurate. It is the cuckold who, whether knowingly or unknowingly, loses control of his future. This is an apt psychological portrait of white ‘conservatives,’ whose only identity is comprised of vague, abstract ‘values,’ and who are participating in the displacement of European Americans — their own children…
According to Spencer, “Trump is a major part of the ‘cuckservative’ phenomenon — but not because he himself is an Identitarian or traditionalist. His campaign is, in many ways, a backward-looking movement: ‘Let’s make America great again!’ Why Trump is attractive to Identitarians and the alt Right is: a) he is a tougher, superior man than ‘conservatives’ (which isn’t saying much), and b) he seems to grasp the demographic displacement of European-Americans on a visceral level. We see some hope there.”
…The white nationalism represented by Spencer has struggled to find footing. Youth for Western Civilization, a student group that attempted to bring millennials on campus into the “traditionalist” cause, burned brightly for a few years, then went inactive.
If you’re asking how many people might agree with the underlying argument — that the conservative movement has accommodated the cultural left for too long — the answer might be millions. As many as 45 percent of self-identified “conservative Republicans” oppose any legal status for undocumented immigrants — i.e., they oppose the establishment Republican position, as represented by Jeb Bush and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
Obviously, most of the people on the “kick ’em out” side of the ledger would hardly consider that an expression of white nationalism. “Cuckservative” is a frame that might be bigger than its founders intended.
Reuters: In Trump’s case, he appears to be cornering the market on white voters, the backbone of the current Republican Party, the poll shows. Republicans need as many white votes as possible to offset demographic shifts in the United States that have handed Democrats an electoral advantage in the last two presidential elections.
Ayanna Nahmias writes: Any man I’m with has to be committed to raising my son as his own. It’s very hard for a man to do that if he can’t see himself in a child — and that would be the case with most Ashkenazi men and my biracial son. Depending on who’s looking, my son is seen as either Latino or Israeli. But no one will ever mistake him for an Ashkenazi.
…It’s not just that the process has been difficult for me — my son has suffered because his mother was “not yet” Jewish, and because he is biracial. Bullied from kindergarten until he left Hebrew school, he was often excluded from events like birthday parties or sleepovers, and he never really made friends. He missed out on opportunities to develop the social skills that are practiced during these formative years. It was painful for him, and excruciating for me to watch him go through this, though I tried to protect him as much as I could so that he’d continue to get an Orthodox Hebrew education.
During all this, we kept on attending Orthodox synagogues — mostly Chabad, sometimes Modern Orthodox. But after my conversion was complete and we were fully Jewish, I noticed that my 13-year-old son was starting to look at non-Jewish girls his age. I confronted him: Why didn’t he like the girls at synagogue?
Because of the rejection he experienced, and the fact that he never saw himself reflected in the community, he observed that Jewish girls were “very pretty, but they all look the same.”
When he told me that he needed diversity, needed to see people from all different parts of the world — including Jews who looked like him — I explained that he could find that in Israel one day, but that we couldn’t make aliyah at the moment. He was firm: He wanted to see himself and he wanted to be seen.
Daniel de Porto comments:
The Forward jumps at every opportunity to make the orthodox community look bad. First of all, at 13, this boy should not be dating for marriage. Second, I don’t know where or in what decade this article was written, but in LA, where I live, which is the largest Jewish community west of NY, I look around and see a lot of diversify. There are bi-racial and fully racial Asian and black Jews, besides those of middle eastern descent. Gone forever are the days you walk down a major street in my neighborhood on Shabbos and only see Ashkenazim. Where is she living? Borough Park? Who knows? The Forward conveniently left that out.
I have visited orthodox Jewish elementary schools where racially diverse kids are fully accepted by their peers. So I’m gonna guess that this kid may have social or psychological issues that is causing his inability to blend with his peers. Young people these days, more than ever, are color blind and easily accept those who look different. But liberal rags, like the Forward, and race baters want to believe that the problems are all about the religious pale face’s inability to accept diversify.
As far as this woman’s difficulty in dating, it’s just too easy to blame the men for not accepting a bi racial son. An interview with any Ashkenazi middle aged woman with a fully Ashkenazi son will expose the difficulty even they have of finding any man who is willing to take on the responsibility of raising another man’s child. Marriage is a big step for anyone. I’m sure most women would also avoid a situation that would force them to accept an instant family.
But this rag was determined to, once again, paint orthodox Ashkenazim as intolerant racists. So they avoided inconvenient information that might present another side to this story and, thereby, got the outcome they desired.
Paul Ciotti: Andrew Marantz seems really pissed at the idea of SketchFactor, which he clearly thinks was almost blatantly racist. Okay fine. He may be right. (I wasn’t able to find it to test it). He’s even mad that the creator had the effrontery to leave the App up even though no one is apparently downloading it. What makes me mad though is that Marantz doesn’t recommend any other Apps to help people unfamiliar with a town avoid “sketchy” (possibly dangerous) neighborhoods. There is a need for an App (or something else) in that kind of situation. What’s his advice for helping people not get hassled or mugged? Or doesn’t he care? I suspect the latter.
…Crain’s ran an article about SketchFactor, an app that was set to launch the next day. It would allow users to report having seen or experienced something “sketchy” in a particular location; these reports would then be geotagged and overlaid on a Google map, creating a sketchiness heat map of a neighborhood or city. The idea was to help urban walkers be more street-smart, but the implications seemed insensitive at best, racist at worst. Allison McGuire, the app’s co-creator, had recently moved from Washington, D.C., to the West Village. Both she and her co-founder, Daniel Herrington, were white and in their twenties. At one point, the Crain’s reporter asked McGuire whether her company “could be vulnerable to criticisms regarding the degree to which race is used to profile a neighborhood.”
Here are excerpts from the past few months:
* “A large minority, perhaps a majority, of black Americans are incapable of civilized behavior to the standard of white norms without a strong pimp hand to keep them in line.”
* “The truth is” — Autonomic female verbal tic meaning “the truth is not”.
* “Men give women what they think women deserve. If you look like a good-to-go slut and you have a Tinder profile, most men will think you deserve little more than a …”
* “All women are capable of exploiting men for emotional and financial provider services. What separates the manipulative woman from the endearing sweetheart is something more than simply differences in innate characteristics: It’s the exploitability of the men they meet and date.”
* “Findings reveal that while communication patterns tend to be supportive and relationship-focused in women’s bathrooms, the graffiti in men’s bathroom walls are replete with sexual content and insults, in the course of the construction of hegemonic masculinity.”
* “Most women (read: non-reptiles) are happier raising kids than they are raising profit margins. Most men are happier in the office than they are at home changing diapers. Men and women are different to their cores, and feminism is a project of lies with the goal of eradicating those core differences.”
* “Mad Men is the expectoration of Matthew Weiner’s low T combined with his envy of the Winkelvoss golem and his lifelong mixed feelings for his overbearing Jewish mother.”
* “Do the Western cultural elite have a death wish? Do they WANT normal, good people to hate them with a fury? Because that’s what’s gonna happen if they keep it up. And the washout won’t be pretty in pink.”
* “I dream one day the world’s HR broads have to sit through a 45 minute powerpoint presentation on false rape accusations.”
* “The nation has taken a wholesale turn away from beauty and toward ugliness. We embrace the ugly, castigate those “beauty bitter clingers”, and rejoice at the death of judgement. All the while our spirits and our bodies turn into formless pulp, manifesting our new beliefs, and we become ripe for defeat by more vital outsiders.”
* “Lena Dunham despisers, aka normal well-adjusted people, aren’t threatened by her any more than they’re threatened by a steaming wet pile of dog shit they almost stepped in. But they’re still gonna make a face and demand that the dog owner clean up the mess.”
* “You can tell a feminist coven is about to begin their occult clitual when one of them salutes the “sultriness” of the homeliest skank in the group.”
* “Sexual infidelity is a man’s worst fear, while love and resource infidelity are a woman’s worst fear.”
* “Glibly charming people who lie pathologically or who have been caught stealing should be like a flashing red warning light.”
* “When a man is seeking to settle down with a lifelong lover and mother of his future children, he wants the BEST DEAL HE CAN GET. If he plans to invest everything in one woman, you bet he’ll make sure he’s getting good return on investment.”
* “Friendzoning is almost entirely the province and prerogative of prime nubility women subconsciously (or knowingly) abiding their alpha fux, beta hugs Darwinian Directive.”
Christopher Donnellan Luke has been mining ‘the manosphere’ for articles lately.
Miriam Lilian D Or First, he came for the Mexicans, then the Colombians, then the feminists, now beta males and infidelity. I can’t help but sit at the edge of my seat when I read his posts.
Christopher Donnellan You forgot the Russians. He’s been hating on the Russkies lately. I wonder, did he get turned down for a date by a Russian girl?
* “What many women consider to be friendship is little more than them cultivating sexual attraction in men they have no interest in, so that they can harvest ego strokes. That’s why any man worth his salt knows the number one rule: never take advice about women from women.”
* “Men who want admiration, devotion and loyalty from a lover would do well to avoid dating (or god forbid marrying) any woman who could challenge them in the bed post notch department. Virgins aren’t prized the world over for no reason.”
* “The more alpha fux a woman has accumulated over her prime fertility years (without commitment from any of them), the worse she’ll behave toward any beta males unfortunate or stupid enough to take on the role of her sloppy sixtieths.”
* “Some lower smv women prop up their self esteem by being bitches to men who approach them because in some way it must allow them to feel like they are emulating the behaviour of women with higher smv and like they have choices (ultimately they don’t).”
* “Observing her Christian missionary parents doting on their black babies and converting the noble savages in Africa, eventually young Rachel Dolezal came to equate being black with being loved.”
* “Now that the media industrial complex is a wholly-owned subsidiary and propaganda arm of the globo-equalist ruling elite, the opportunity to devise and execute a conspiracy to neuter enemies, and get away with it, has never been more tempting.”
* SELF-PITYING PRINCESS: oh whoa is me, whoa is me yada yada mada yada yada fada welcome to camp grenada…
THE DEVIL’S PHALLIC AVATAR: I understand.
There ya go. That’s it. “I understand.” No more need be said. Let her smear her make-up all over you and when her aqueduct is about run dry you express your very succinct understanding.
Oh sure, if you want to be creative, you can refract your response through a female narcissism filter.
“It’s right for you to feel bad.”
I swear 99% of the time this strategy (as elementary as it is) will leave you in her higher esteem than before. Why? Because women don’t want answers to their problems; they want wagon circling sympathy feels. And they LOVE LOVE LOVE a man who will step aside and let them have their emotional cleansing once in a while.
* “The girl wants to feel your power and charm first, affection distant third. The problem with the more romantically earnest sort of beta males is that they start with the affection, and then clumsily try to segue to the power and charm when they see that their affection is driving the girl away. It never ends well.”
Miriam Lilian D Or Who in the world would want to date a beta male, anyways.
Paul Ciotti I figure that perhaps only 10% of the men out there are alpha males. If these are the only men one dates what do you do when that ten percent supply is taken? Be single, childless and chaste?
Miriam Lilian D Or I never had a problem with it, usually men get interested when they know I want them to take the lead. If I had the choice between being single and childless or marry a guy who is going to be scared of me, has no life ambition, conformist etc…I don’t know what’s worse.
Paul Ciotti It’s true that beta males may be scared of women in comparison to alpha males. But from what I know beta males may also have intense (quiet) ambition, be far less conformist than alpha males and in general be miles ahead when it comes to creativity. I once read a column where the author observed in passing that the best comic strip artists were beta males. I knew exactly what he was talking about.
Miriam Lilian D Or Hmm, interesting. I don’t know any betas though. I don’t know how it would work, I’m of a submissive personality.
Paul Ciotti Make friends with a cartoonist. He’ll appreciate your having taken an interest in him and you’ll enjoy his wit.
* “The more a girl has her ego stroked by a phalanx of online dating desperadoes, the less she’ll feel the urge or the need to devote her full attention to any individual man unlucky enough to take her on a real world date.”
From Chateau Heartiste: Mass non-white immigration to white countries erodes social trust, which decreases the support for wealth redistribution to groups of swarthies who act and look very differently than your friends and family, hence increased “economic freedom”.
Related: A reader forwards this ROK piece by Roosh:
The Western elite, especially in Europe, got into power by pushing peace, harmony, equal opportunity, and multiculturalism, but beneath these feel-good concepts includes the blueprint for destruction of the very force that threatens their power: nationalism. Introducing massive numbers of Muslims, Mexicans, or destitute Somalian refugees into your nation reduces the likelihood that you will look to your neighbor and see someone like you, a brother-in-arms who can help you rise up against the cyclical inevitability of a corrupt government ruling over you.
Now that you see a dozen different colors surrounding you on the subway and in the Starbucks, some of whom are looking at you suspiciously, you feel distrustful of these outsiders because they have a different background and belief system than you do. You find yourself in a diluted world culture with standardized gadgets, entertainment, and government-friendly talking points conveniently disseminated by all media outlets. Now instead of looking to your neighbor to help fight against governmental oppression, you will seek comfort in your own amusements, Facebook feeds, internet memes, and legalized marijuana. You turn inwards to satisfy your hedonistic needs while allowing the government to run over your rights and push policies that you feel increasingly helpless to fight in your social isolation.
This is all done by design. The liberal governments of the West will allow the collateral damage of terrorist acts because they need those immigrants to defeat the greater threat to their power: national identity. Destroy the culture and you remove a citizen’s motivation to fight for a nation he would have given his life for not three generation ago. Immigration must not stop because the liberal elite must maintain their power, and the useful idiots in the media and academia will continue spinning the narrative required to ensure that happens. The death of twelve lives or 1,200 is inconsequential.
Chateau Heartiste: This is a Nimitz Class Attention Whore (and Control Freak; she wants to shove her smelly snatch in men’s faces and sadistically deny their male sexuality by demanding their desexualized consideration). And there’s no doubt she’s the type of chick (there are an uncomfortably large number of them) who gets off dreaming about a rapist having his way with her.
In the past, attention whores of this magnitude would violate only a handful of people’s lives… those closest to them. And they would be discarded once their friends and family caught on to their sickness and gave up showering them with the sympathetic ardor they crave. We see with the rise of the internet and social media that the insufferable attention whore has a new lease on her vampiric, emotion-sucking malevolence. The online world has enabled her like no BFF or doting mother could; it has not created a monster, but turned a monster into a contagion, devouring cultures whole.
* Look at the language different genders use for those they find unattractive.
If a man sees a woman with low SMV, he will only judge her on a skin deep level. Ugly, butterface, small tits, fatass, etc. Since we don’t find women sexually attractive because of their personality, being unattractive does not make them a bad person to us. We won’t call an ugly woman a creep, we won’t call a woman with small breasts pathetic. They may become invisible to us, but there is no real inner hatred for them.
But a woman? When a woman sees a man with low SMV, it’s personal. Creep, loser, pathetic. These are all words flung around by even the sweetest of women at men they find unattractive. Since women are attracted to what to more than just surface level physical attraction, an unattractive man isn’t just ugly, fat, or any of that. He’s a bad person. This is why it’s so easy for women to treat low SMV men like shit, to manipulate and despise them. Low SMV men aren’t just unattractive or invisible, they’re dirt.
Feminists may say this is what they want, to be judged for their actions and personality rather than on a purely physical level. However, once again, the watch what she does and not what she says principle applies. Why? Because there is one thing men do that absolutely infuriates women. Slut shaming. This is a direct attack on women’s character for actions they’ve done in the past, and they can’t stand it. Once again proving that women want all the good things about being a man with absolutely none of the negatives.
* The mere presence of a low SMV man is not offensive to women, because low-SMV men are literally invisible to women; they literally do not even see an invisible low SMV man…
…until he hits on her. Then, that is when his presence becomes “offensive”. And it is “offensive”, because it forces a woman to perform self-introspection; i.e., she begins thinking to herself, “is this the caliber of man I attract?” “Am I putting on weight?” “Did I put on my makeup this morning?”
She starts looking at a low-SMV man hitting on her as an affront to her own SMV. So in order to avoid taking agency for her own self, she projects those disgusting feelings onto the low-SMV man hitting on her. He’s a bad person because he made her feel like a low SMV girl.
* It’s biological; this argument is extremely simplistic, but a natural represents good DNA. Good, masculine looks and a healthy upbringing led him to be confident as a kid, which led him to make friends and be a leader of his friend group, and his positive behaviors were reinforced and got him attention. He was always one of the cooler kids, so he never had problems getting a girl, so he developed confidence with women as a result of always being able to have someone around due to his physical and social value. He’s not necessarily “good DNA”, but chances are, the golden boy natural playboy statistically represents better, stronger DNA as well as ability to provide for that DNA.
The guy who was a loser, say he naturally was weak, spindly, and bullied (aka physically inferior to other guys), developed loser habits, like extreme self consciousness, aversion to risk taking, fear of confrontation, etc. Even though someone with perfectly robust DNA could wind up in this situation, in our primitive minds, we know it’s statistically likely that the guy who’s a loser has bad “nature” as well as bad “nurture”. Being low SMV is fine; you get ID’d as suboptimal DNA. When you improve your SMV, you are walking shit-tier DNA that is wearing the clothes of superior DNA.
You are essentially the most risky trap a woman can fall on, something that in caveman times would endanger her life, and more importantly, her lineage. Old aversions do not die, even though times have changed to the point where plenty of people with poor DNA are naturals and people with good DNA are losers. The loser who improves is odious to her subconscious not because he himself is repulsive or immoral, but because he actually threatens her biological function (to get the best genes she can get).
When you make it to the top, torch your past. Burn all your old pics, nuke your social media. Your climb means everything to you, but to women, it’s a “L” branded onto your forehead.
* If you want to get a real, possibly painful, introduction to your SMV, then take a job in a public environment with a steady stream of new college girls forced to interact with you. This happened to me about 3 years ago and its been brutal. All my life I had experienced the quick eye lock, look away maneuver from pretty girls. But when you work in a cubicle or construction site, you don’t have to own it everyday. Once it starts happening several times a day, you either change for the better, or wilt. Actually one of the best things that’s happened to me in several years.
