Andy Tillett concludes his article for the Daily Mail: “The PUA technique had worked – and nobody could accuse me of misogyny.”
And that’s the important thing, right? Nobody accusing you of misanthropy.
Andy Tillett concludes his article for the Daily Mail: “The PUA technique had worked – and nobody could accuse me of misogyny.”
And that’s the important thing, right? Nobody accusing you of misanthropy.
“Hans Schulz is vice president for the private sector and non-sovereign guaranteed operations of the Inter-American Development Bank.”
He writes for the Washington Post:
As someone who works in international development, I often participate in discussions about gender equality. We lament that there are too few female entrepreneurs, bank clients, political leaders and chief executives. We talk about the importance of including female voices and having women in leadership roles.
And yet when development conferences come together, it’s shocking how few women are invited to speak.
In the past year, I spoke at 22 conferences in 11 countries. That adds up to 296 panels of two or more people, plus 226 keynote, opening and closing speeches, for a total of 1,905 speakers. Unfortunately, only 390 — or 20 percent — of those speakers were women. Seven conferences had four or fewer female panelists. And one conference did not have a single woman on the stage…
When I attend meetings or travel for work, I bring back business cards and compile contact information of the successful women I meet.
Comments at the WP:
* The whole thing is a farce. There is nothing female about anything these people are doing. If women want to be on the stage they need to get hired and then work their way up like those men did. Just having a woman in a particular spot makes no difference in banking, particularly if she is an unqualified token.
* Begging might help. Women usually fall for this type of thing.
* Didnt like the sausage party huh? I dont blame you. Conferences, particularly those abroad, are much more fun with some ladies around.
Who was the last nominee for President who was not pro-Jewish? I can’t think of any.
Jews dominate media, finance and academia. We set the agenda in America. Could Donald Trump challenge this?
A reader writes, “Everyone says Donald Trump can’t win. Exactly why not?”
David Leonhardt, editor for The Upshot, considers the question:
Can Donald Trump win the Republican nomination? Sure, it’s within the realm of plausibility; he’s now been leading the polls for months, after all. But it seems highly unlikely because it would violate just about every historical pattern of presidential races.
No modern candidate has received a major-party nomination — and perhaps no candidate in American history — while being opposed by the party’s elites: donors, media figures, politicians and others.
Elite support matters because they have the ability to shape public opinion through endorsements, public criticism and other means. Many voters don’t follow campaigns very closely. They don’t dig through position papers or watch hours upon hours of debates. They’re influenced by what they hear.
“The community has a history of building relationships, and we’ll reach out and build relationships where they do not exist, not just in D.C. but in field offices,” said Richard Foltin, the American Jewish Committee’s national and legislative affairs director. “To the extent that I have concerns, it’s having voices who oppose compromise and who are not comfortable with the notion that governing is about reaching accommodation both within the party and the other side.”
…The AJC’s Foltin named immigration reform, voting rights and energy security as issues the AJC and the broader community want addressed in the longer run.
…The Republican Jewish Coalition spokesman, Mark McNulty, said his group had ties into virtually every caucus member and was ready to educate anyone who got the slot.
“That’s why we’re here, we have the resources to educate people,” he said. “We have a lot of confidence in the resources our legislative team has developed over the years.”
It sounds to me like the agenda of these Jewish groups is not congruent with what I most want for America — immigration restriction, and majority rights over those of disgruntled minorities.
So let’s allow more Guatemalans into America? What could go wrong?
Anastasia Moloney, Reuters, October 2, 2015
In Guatemala, most pregnancies among girls under 14 are the result of rape at the hands of fathers or other relatives, but often it is the girl who is forced to leave the family home, and few perpetrators are punished, said a leading rights campaigner.
Nearly a quarter of all births in Guatemala are among teenage mothers–one of the highest rates of teen pregnancy in Latin America.
“In the majority of cases of sexual violence against girls, some as young as 10, most are committed by family members, mainly by the girl’s father or stepfather,” said Mirna Montenegro, the head of Guatemala’s Sexual and Reproductive Health Observatory (OSAR).
In 2012, nearly 90 percent of all pregnancies among Guatemalan girls under 14 involved relatives, including cousins and uncles, of which 30 percent were the result of rape by fathers, according to Guatemala’s human rights ombudsman.
Despite new laws passed in Guatemala to better protect against sexual violence, few who commit rape against girls are punished.
“Getting justice for girls who report crimes of sexual violence is still a big challenge for us. Often it’s the pregnant girl who is removed from her home and placed in a refuge and not the perpetrator of the crime,” Montenegro told the Thomson Reuters Foundation in a telephone interview.
According to a 2009 law, sex with a child under 14 is defined as rape, but of the 2,000 reported cases of under-14s getting pregnant in 2012, only eight resulted in convictions, Montenegro said.
{snip}
High levels of sexual violence against women and girls stem from the low status of women, especially indigenous Mayan women, in Guatemala’s patriarchal and macho society.
“Machismo is about men believing a woman is their property and possession. We’ve heard fathers say ‘She’s my daughter and my property so I will do what I want with her,” said Montenegro,
She said gender violence is also a legacy of Guatemala’s 1960-1996 civil war when rape was used as a weapon of war.
{snip}
Guatemala’s high prevalence of child marriage, where girls can marry at 14 with their parent’s consent, also fuels adolescent pregnancy, Montenegro said.
Guatemala’s congress is considering a bill that would raise the minimum legal age for marriage to 16 for girls and 18 for boys, with the issue a debating point ahead of the country’s presidential election run-off on Oct. 25.
From CNN: Farrakhan blasted the white establishment again on Saturday.
“Moses was not an integrationist and neither are we,” he said. “Let me be clear. America has no future for you or for me. She can’t make a future for herself, much less a future for us.”
On passing the torch, he specifically mentioned Black Lives Matter, the group that arose in response to police-involved deaths of black men, as the “future leadership.”
“These are not just young people who happened to wake up one morning. Ferguson ignited it all,” he said. “So [to] all the brothers and sisters from Ferguson who laid in the streets, all the brothers and sisters from Ferguson who challenged the tanks, we are honored that you have come to represent our struggle and our demands.”
It does not bother me that parts of Judaism and Jewish life consider Jewish souls superior. Every group at heart thinks it’s group is superior, the very center of the world.
I don’t think Jews are different in this respect from the Japanese, Chinese, Germans, English, etc.
I don’t think this ethnocentrism is a bad thing. You should think your group is superior and rack your mind to find ways that your people outdo all others.
The stronger your group identity, the more likely you are to think negatively about outsiders. This is a universal law, it applies equally to Jews and gentiles.
I don’t think Jews need to duck or hide from these statements. Instead, we should place them in the context of universal human proclivities.
From the perspective of Jewish law, it is a big sin for a man to dress like a woman.
This whole transgender movement is repellent for the traditional Jew. Orthodox Jews can’t stand this stuff. It turns the stomach.
Orthodox Judaism is structured around separations between men and women, Jews and Gentiles, adults and children, holy time and secular time, etc. The Hebrew word for holiness is “kadosh” which literally means separate.
It is discombobulating for me as a convert to Orthodox Judaism to see how non-Orthodox Jews in Hollywood, the media and academia are pushing the transgender agenda. It’s as weird as finding that the pornography industry is controlled by Jews as pornography is the very opposite of the holiness and familial solidarity that Orthodox Judaism seeks.
Are things Jewish because some Jews do them or because Jewish texts endorse them? There are no traditional Jewish texts that support the gay and transgender agenda.
Published on Sep 30, 2015
– Beginner picture: Macedonia
– Disastrous migrant: Hungary-Serbia border (Serbian side)
– Grateful migrants: Hungary (Budapest)
– Border Control: Austria (Slovenian border)
– Migrant actor: Hungary-Serbia border (Serbian side)
– Intelligent migrants: Hungary-Serbia border (Hungarian arie) (The fence was built from the border 2,5meters, in Hungarian area)
– Idiot migrant: Hungary (Bicske)
From the Chateau: QFT from the self-improvement guide “Might is Right”, authored in 1890 by an Original Realtalker:
There is nothing particularly inviting about barren, dyspeptic, blue-stocking ‘New Women,’ in pants and spectacles; talking idiotic snuffle through their noses; with busts made of adjustable india-rubber; with narrow or padded hips, and “wheels between their legs,” scorching across the curbstones like mad. When such women are ‘captured’ what good are they? They won’t even breed; or if they do so (by accident) their puny embryos, have to be delicately nurtured into life with steam-heated incubator-mechanism and afterwards fed and weaned on ‘the bottle.’ The sons of such women — bottle fed abortions — of what good are they?
It is women of this kind (unnatural monsters they are) that cause so much domestic unhappiness. They have been “educated” along false lines, filled with bookish artificialism, and thereafter when called upon to take up their maternal duty, they are organic incapables. Hence the divorce court scandals — the fruit of wholesale degeneracy — encouraged by State interference with domestic affairs.
Gradually the curse of ‘Law’ invades the privacy of every home. It encourages emotional feminines to defy husbands, and Deify an irresponsible Authority. In other words it deliberately promotes unfaithfulness and unlimited free-love. It undermines the husband’s Control, but at what a dreadful cost? With the “equalization” of women comes wholesale panmixia — scientific concubinage, State-regulated polyandry, and the poisoning of all inter-family intercourse. When average women find in Statute Law a “deliverer” and a “champion” more powerful than their husbands and brothers, they become both unfaithful and profligate — especially if “well educated.”
-Ragnar Redbeard, patron saint of Chateau Heartiste.
Bonus! R.R. on open borders, miscegenation, and alien mystery meats:
Purity of blood has played (and is yet to play) a leading role in the drama of racial evolution. Races held in bondage are necessarily mongrelized, degraded, ‘equalized.’ Homeliness is one result of bad breeding.
When a higher type allies itself by marriage with a lower, it paves the way for its own ultimate degeneracy. When Spartans and Athenians mixed themselves with imported Asiatic and Egyptian slaves, their downfall was foretold; and when “Equality” became the motto of Christian Italy; Latins, Asiatics, and Negroes miscegenated, evolving the modern ‘Dago’ — who slaves for the descendents of the men his ancestors conquered.