‘I really just want to be left alone. I don’t want billionaires lecturing me every time I use their stupid products.’

Clh5sB0UYAADlTS

Source.

How did Google become the internet’s censor and master manipulator, blocking access to millions of websites?

By Robert Epstein:

Google, Inc., isn’t just the world’s biggest purveyor of information; it is also the world’s biggest censor.

The company maintains at least nine different blacklists that impact our lives, generally without input or authority from any outside advisory group, industry association or government agency. Google is not the only company suppressing content on the internet. Reddit has frequently been accused of banning postings on specific topics, and a recent report suggests that Facebook has been deleting conservative news stories from its newsfeed, a practice that might have a significant effect on public opinion – even on voting. Google, though, is currently the biggest bully on the block.

When Google’s employees or algorithms decide to block our access to information about a news item, political candidate or business, opinions and votes can shift, reputations can be ruined and businesses can crash and burn. Because online censorship is entirely unregulated at the moment, victims have little or no recourse when they have been harmed. Eventually, authorities will almost certainly have to step in, just as they did when credit bureaus were regulated in 1970. The alternative would be to allow a large corporation to wield an especially destructive kind of power that should be exercised with great restraint and should belong only to the public: the power to shame or exclude.

If Google were just another mom-and-pop shop with a sign saying “we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone,” that would be one thing. But as the golden gateway to all knowledge, Google has rapidly become an essential in people’s lives – nearly as essential as air or water. We don’t let public utilities make arbitrary and secretive decisions about denying people services; we shouldn’t let Google do so either.

Posted in Google, Homosexuality | Comments Off on ‘I really just want to be left alone. I don’t want billionaires lecturing me every time I use their stupid products.’

Was the Juice on the Juice?

Steve Sailer writes: Seriously, the reason the conventional wisdom has such trouble making sense out of the Simpson story is because O.J. epitomizes how beloved blacks had become by American whites in the last third of the 20th century…and how often blacks then let whites down…

There is an interesting story of an adolescent O.J. endangering his athletic career in San Francisco due to his gangbanging tendencies, so the San Francisco Giants’ all-world center fielder Willie Mays called him up. Willie didn’t try to argue the young O.J. out of being a thug. He just had the kid hang out with him for a day. Mays’ implicit message to Simpson was: This kind of life can be yours, too…if you don’t screw it up.

Eventually, after being given countless second chances by white society, O.J. screwed it up.

COMMENTS AT STEVE SAILER:

* Steve has written about this at various times, but it’s really striking how different California’s racial consciousness was in the 50s and 60s from the rest of the country; that was part of Willie Mays’s story (my dad grew up in the Bay Area worshipping Mays). I was looking up something and ended up watching a 1957 montage of local San Francisco TV news and there’s one part where the Governor of the US Virgin Islands comes on as part of the Debate on Segregation and talks about how much he valued being in integrated schools in California growing up. Racial progressivity was something Californians were obviously expected to be proud of even in 1957.

My favorite book about education and race, The Way It Spozed To Be, about teaching school in a black school in Oakland in 1958, makes clear that while the school is a mess, it’s not because of material deprivation or obvious discrimination. It’s very short and might be of interest to iSteve readers- pdf here.

* Juiced athletes of the 1960s become enraged psychopaths 30 years later… It would make for a great plot, on the model of “Concussion.” In fact, maybe it will turn out that the two delayed-reaction syndromes are related?

* Norm MacDonald hosted the ESPY awards a long time ago, when the OJ trial was still fresher in people’s minds. At one point during the ceremony he congratulated the recent Heisman winner, saying, “You’ve won something that no one can ever take away from you… unless you kill your wife and some waiter.”

The camera panned to the audience and there were some looks of shock. It was glorious.

* Violent jealousy of a particularly black male kind. Which is partially why he went free—the prosecution couldn’t mention it, because political correctness kept them quiet.

Let me explain.

If you read black message boards on these here interwebs, black women are constantly trying to ward white women off from dating black men. One thing black women bring up a lot is the fact that black men get frighteningly possessive of white women once they date them, even after break ups.

Black women tell white women that a black man sees a white woman as a “prize” and as proof they are better than other blacks and better than whites; subsequently, if the white woman breaks up or leaves him, or is seen with another man, black women say the black man will get extremely violent, thinking they have lost the ultimate prize and are not worthy anymore.

The countless incidents involving black men and their estranged white girls attest to this stereotype being more than a little true.

Anyway, this kind of stereotype about black men who had white women used to be more prevalent in society. The Black Buck stereotype (google it) was part of this: the stereotype of black men who’ve tasted a white women becoming crazed in protecting it and utterly bloodthirsty if it’s taken away.

Had this been an earlier time, the motive would have been easily grasped and spoken of: OJ walked in in on his blond ex-white wife with another white man, and despite the fact that he wasn’t her husband, he snapped and flipped out on them due to his sexual embarrassment at losing possession of her and being cuckolded by another man (and a white man at that)—he had gone back to the ghetto and been degraded.

However, by the 1990s not only was this stereotype not prevalent in any non-black community, the prosecution couldn’t even mention it. Much like the stereotype of “rough trade” about gays was known, but as Steve pointed out, pcness has purged from our GoodThinking minds, so if we hear about a gay killed in seedy circumstances, we only think “hate crime.”

* Having OJ try on the gloves was Christopher Darden’s idea. No one, including fellow prosecutor Marcia Clark and at least one member of the jury, thought it was a good idea.

In the ESPN documentary (which is really good) they interview two jurors, both black. One is an ice-cold elderly woman who freely admits that her vote of “not guilty” was intended, at least in part, as revenge for the Rodney King beating (she claims “about 90%” of the jury was similarly motivated.) The other is a comparatively reasonable woman in her 40′s.

Here’s the younger juror recounting the day OJ tried on the gloves (brackets added to explain what the filmmakers communicated through courtroom footage):

It was later in the afternoon. The person who they had giving the testimony regarding the glove- you could see where it was leading up to. Obviously it was too big [when Johnnie Cochran put it on.]

At 24 years old, I could see: “This is a trick. Don’t fall for it. We could see that that glove is big on his [Cochran’s] hand. You don’t have to do anything.”

Defense lawyer F. Lee Bailey tells of baiting Christopher Darden into asking OJ to put on the gloves: “You’ve got the balls of a stud field mouse … If you don’t [ask him], I will!”

Marcia Clark begs Darden not to fall for it: “I told him in no uncertain terms why we should not be doing this. He said, ‘If we don’t, then they will,’ and I said, ‘Then let them.’” “It was the biggest fight I think Chris and I ever had.”

We then see the footage of OJ struggling to put the gloves on. As another member of the defense puts it, OJ goes into “Naked Gun mode.”

The juror’s reaction afterwards:

I looked at him [Darden] like, “I can’t believe you did it. You let him play you. You are the weaker one. And you didn’t have to be.”

… If OJ never put that glove on, I would have assumed it fit. I saw how big it was. And that’s when I just knew, you know- “Why is this guy here? He’s ruining this case.”

Posted in Blacks, California, Football, Los Angeles | Comments Off on Was the Juice on the Juice?

Why NorCal Beat SoCal

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* But the primary reason that the Bay Area beat the East Coast metros for tech supremacy is because California courts don’t enforce non-compete agreements. This makes it far easier for workers to jump from firm to firm, dispersing innovation. Best practices tend to spread quickly raising the average quality across all firms.

The reality is that 99%+ of non-competes don’t exist for their explicit legal purpose. The notion that a 22-year old college graduate is somehow essential to the existence of the enterprise is laughable. Non-competes exist as small print so that large corporates can use their extensive legal departments to discourage workers from looking for higher-paying jobs. Thus keeping wages down.

If any state wanted to compete as a major tech center, they’d adopt California’s policy and recognize non-competes as restraints of trade. But it’s highly unlikely: corporate lobbyists would obviously be opposed, Democrats have no interest in labor issues affecting white-color workers, and Republicans would somehow conceptualize it as anti free-market.

* The comparison between the two urban areas on the immigration front is even worse than it looks, and goes beyond illegal immigration from Latin America. Immigration to each place from outside the Western Hemisphere looks very different. In the Bay Area, you get high-IQ, high-productivity, “symbolic analyst”-type workers drawn by the tech industry. LA’s immigrants (not counting illegals from Latin America): more likely to be cutthroat small-businessmen, or out-and-out scammers, from the Middle East, former Soviet Union, and other low-trust, institutionally weak societies. This is increasingly a factor in doing business in the LA area, and is probably going to be an increasing factor of life other places that follow the LA demographic and urban model: count the silver and don’t risk more than you can afford to lose when you get ripped off. Places like the Bay Area may look like Star Trek. Places like LA will look more like the souk or bazaar.

* It’s partly that Southern Californians believe in individual taste, usually with unfortunate results. Beverly Drive in Beverly Hills is hilariously non-cohesive. The movie business meant that rich moguls would call in their set designers to design their mansions and tell them whatever crazed inspiration would come to mind to distinguish themselves from their neighbors : e.g., Think 12-bedroom Tongan hut!

I can recall visiting Florence, Italy in 1980 and realizing with a shock that centuries of Florence citizens had cared about what their ancestors had thought about design and tried to put up building that complemented the great buildings that were already there in order to make the entire city a unified work of art rather than each building as an assertion of ego and whim as in Los Angeles.

* Reverse snobbery is at war with admiration for architectural standards protected by well thought out regulations that protect quality of life. Reverse snobbery always settles for the safe middle ground which in a production/consumption culture based on human rights minus high culture apparently leads to a surfeit of duller, poorer people.

* Southern California has become like Italy south of Rome, while northern California has become like northern Italy. Once you acquire a large population of low-IQ black or brown people, your region becomes economically unremarkable and stays that way for hundreds of years.

But I’m not betting against the drooling and voracious real estate market. After seeing what’s happened to many coastal areas of the US in the last 30 years, I doubt LA can avoid hardcore gentrification. It has a good location, good weather, plenty of culture, and certain areas of the city are noticeably cheaper than others. The Hispanics now giving the boot to the blacks may have inadvertently cleared the way for younger whites fleeing expensive areas like San Francisco to give the boot to the Hispanics, move in, and start gentrifying the place well beyond the economic reach of any brown or black person in California.

Whites won’t move into a black area, but some of them have no problem with Hispanic areas. Once the wedge is in the door, other whites are more likely to follow once an affordable neighborhood becomes safer and the public schools whiter.

* As a Bay Area native (actually born in SF), this whole idea of Frisco beating out LA strikes me kind of amusing. When I was a child we were actually jealous of LA, because it got all of the attention, and why not, successful sports franchises, Hollywood, all of those rock groups on the Strip, etc., while SF could barely muster 750 K people (I think it’s still around there) and no one paid attention to us. That’s how it seemed, anyway.

I started to notice a change in the late ’70′s, before I left. I think it was because SF became the site of a larger financial sector. At any rate, that’s when things seemed to become more expensive and perhaps more decadent. The general vibe you were supposed to have was loyalty to the Bay Area, and a respect for its seafaring/prospecting roots, which also involved broad tolerance for weirdos and eccentrics. The general sense was that the economy was depressed because Harry Bridges had destroyed it as a port city during the longshoreman’s strikes.

But by the late ’70′s that had all morphed. Financial centers were everywhere, prices were rising, gays, who were once tolerated as “our weirdos” became practically oppressive (hence, PC evolution), bean sprouts started turning up in tunafish sandwiches, and the overgrown small town loyalty of the old days turned into the smugness ever since, usually by people who weren’t even natives.

In terms of development, remember there’s only so much you can do with all the hills around, and the threat of another devastating earthquake. It’s true that they didn’t build subdivisions all over Marin or Mt Diablo or the Berkeley Hills, but but that would be hard work to do so, and because of the configuration of the land, there would be a lot of traffic bottlenecks wherever you built. It’s not surprising that most of the expansion has been on the bayshore peninsula, the bayshore East Bay, and the San Jose area: nice and flat.

Again, I think the financial sector and then the fortuitous siting of the computer sector is what has made SF a winner. And that’s a rising tide that floats all boats.

* The fortuitous circumstance of Stanford and the pioneers of electronic circuitry being located in Santa Clara was critical in making the Bay Area the tech capital of the world but San Francisco was the banking and finance capital of the West Coast. Bank America, Wells Fargo,Crocker bank and the Pacific Coast Stock Exchange were in SF. Southern California was savings and loan territory.

There was also the LA smog. I well remember people in Northern California refusing to take jobs in LA because of it. It was unnerving to be unable to see more than a few blocks down the street on a sunny day and toss in the burning sensation in one’s eyes and other deleterious health effects I wouldn’t underestimate the adverse impact smog had on Southern California’s economic development at this critical time when California transitioned to a post industrial economy.

While LA kept the film and entertainment industry it is really not that big of an employer. I’ve read that the entire film and TV industry accounts for fewer than 250,000 jobs nationwide.

* It’s not just “blacks and poor Mexicans” who are being priced out of LA, at all.

As far as downtown LA in particular, many people with good-paying professional jobs (disproportionately white and Asian) are also having trouble affording to live here.

And by the way, there are still plenty of obnoxious, intimidating, rude Africans all over downtown LA, many of them homeless. So one can have the privilege of paying $2,000 to $3,000 per month in rent and still being aggressively panhandled and sometimes harassed by the Bruthas on a daily basis, smelling urine on the sidewalks, and having trash float by.

* If he [Steve Sailer] starts hustling now, he can get it [novel] out in time for the thirtieth anniversary of The Bonfire of the Vanities.

Wolfe’s novel is often said to have captured perfectly the vibe of the go-go Reagan ’80s.

What’s a good title for a book encapsulating the zany zeitgeist of the multiculti transformative Obama teens? The Brushfire* of the Inanities?

*How does this plot sound?

In August 2012, with the president’s re-election campaign about to heat up, a Mexican laborer casually tosses a cigarette onto some trash that he dumped on the ground. His carelessness sparks a raging wildfire that torches large parts of Southern California.

The police launch a massive manhunt for the accidental arsonist. They find him hard at work, scrubbing toilets in a stadium at which a heavily-attended, nationally-televised college-football game is being played on Labor Day. When they swoop in to arrest him, he runs into the crowd and tries to make his escape. A white cop shoots at him, but misses.

At the moment that the cop fires the shot, the game is in its final moments. The home team’s star black running back is making an 82-yard rush for a game-winning touchdown, and the crowd leaps to its feet in anticipation.

The bullet hits a 300-pound black woman, standing on the edge of a balcony in the nosebleed section, in the head. Her body falls to the ground. Incredibly, she lands atop the running back as he rushes by below. The impact leaves him grievously injured. He does not make the touchdown, and the home team loses the game.

The angry (mostly-white) crowd turns on the cops. One cop misfires his gun, killing an 82-year-old white man, sitting in a seat on the 50-yard line, who happens to be the team’s biggest booster. In the ensuing chaos, the Mexican immigrant escapes.

(All of this is broadcast live as part of ESPN’s exclusive prime-time coverage of America’s favorite pastime.)

Overnight, an overworked Filipina nurse at the hospital accidentally administers an overdose to the paralyzed running back, killing him.

This incident sparks massive BLM-type protests around the country, and opens up fissures between blacks, Hispanics, and Asians that threaten to split the Democratic anti-white-man coalition. Black anger is stoked by the attorney general, who makes a series of inflammatory speeches.

The president attends the black football star’s funeral. There, his brilliant Jewish chief-of-staff meets the black football star’s hot-and-slutty-but-not-totally-brainless Hispanic girlfriend. They begin having a torrid love affair – a relationship driven solely by his lust and her greed. He draws up a plan to parlay her inadvertent fifteen minutes of fame into a political career.

In the weeks before the election, she headlines a series of rallies designed to draw blacks *and* Hispanics to the polls to END (Eliminate Nefarious Discrimination) the Hate and EARN (Eradicate All Racism Now) a Brighter Tomorrow. (Hispanic turnout at the rallies is disappointingly low, but black turnout is even heavier than expected.)

Her career is threatened when, on the Friday before the election, her father-in-law (a white, mentally-unstable bodybuilder transitioning into transwomanhood) goes berserk and shoots up the biggest EARN rally to date. (Ironically, it is being held in the same stadium as the fateful football game.) He escapes. A massive manhunt fails to find him.

The Democratic Party now threatens to burst apart at the seams.

On Sunday evening, the girlfriend makes a dramatic prime-time speech in which she tearfully claims that her father-in-law was physically, emotionally, and sexually abusive toward her, her mother, and her sisters for years and that she is a victim of white-male racism and sexism. At the end, she announces that she is bisexual.

This speech stops the political hemorrhaging, but the election is now too close to call.

On the day before the election, a white computer nerd living in Los Angeles uncovers documents suggesting that the whole sequence of events, beginning with the wildfire, is a black-ops scam designed by the president’s chief-of-staff and implemented by the CIA. The operation is designed to create enough chaos in the country to give the president a pretext to suspend the Constitution and cancel the election.

The final twist in the plan is this: On the morning of Election Day, the girlfriend will attend an END/EARN prayer breakfast with a bunch of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton types. The deranged transsexual bodybuilder – a CIA operative – will set off a bomb at the event, and issue a declaration that he has struck the first blow in the Great Patriotic War* for White Supremacy. The crime will spark massive race riots, disrupting voting all across the country. The president will declare a state of national emergency, institute martial law, announce that he is postponing the election “until calm returns”, and establish dictatorial rule.

As the nerd is about to post the documents on his WikiLeaks-ish site, henchmen burst into his house and start shooting. They blow up his house.

He barely escapes with his life and the documents (on a USB stick) and hops in his old, beat-up car, with the henchmen hot on his trail. He has no phone or computer, having had no time to grab either, and he cannot stop, even for red lights. He must keep on driving, or die.

CIA operatives issue a false report that the nerd is, in fact, the deranged transsexual bodybuilder, and that he killed three police officers while making his escape. The cops pursuing him are given orders to eliminate him with extreme prejudice. (These orders come directly from the president’s chief-of-staff himself.)

Within minutes, the cops’ pursuit of the nerd turns into a massive televised chase.

As fate would have it, at the very moment that the cops are about to stop the nerd once and for all, the Mexican immigrant who started the wildfire, drunk out of his mind, is driving home on the same freeway, but in the opposite direction. When he sees the dozens of police cars and helicopters, he assumes that they are coming for him, freaks out, and loses consciousness. His car swerves across the median and plows into the police car directly ahead of the nerd’s car; both cars erupt in a massive fireball. The nerd, his reflexes honed by many lonely nights playing video games, swerves to the right at the last second and careens down into a ditch. The cops on his tail simply plow head-on into the wreckage. The chain-reaction crash leads to a 152-car pileup.

When the nerd comes to, he is shaken but unhurt, and he realizes that, in the confusion, he has a narrow window of opportunity to escape.

After a few frantic seconds, he finds the USB stick and makes his getaway mere seconds before the car explodes. After peering through several windows of a nearby apartment building, he spots a laptop. He smashes the window, grabs the laptop, and runs to a nearby McDonald’s, to access its free WiFi.

Crouching in a bathroom stall, he finds that the WiFi is agonizingly slow – almost as bad as an early-’90s dial-up connection. It will take several minutes to upload the 100K worth of documents, and the upload page hasn’t even finished loading yet. But he dares not leave.

Preoccupied by his bandwidth troubles, he fails to notice that the stall next to him is now occupied by a petite Filipina – the same Filipina who administered the overdose to the football player at the hospital. He also fails to notice that she is holding a syringe, and that she is reaching under the stall, preparing to stab the syringe into his leg…

What happens next? You’ll never know, unless someone writes an ending.

*In the end, the U.S. government will expose the bodybuilder as a Russian operative, giving the president an excuse to launch World War III.

* My guess is that Asians can tell that Conquistador-Americans have Miami locked up tight via ethnic nepotism and won’t play fair with Asians, much less let Asians get away with ethnic nepotism.

Posted in California | Comments Off on Why NorCal Beat SoCal

Do The Democrats Have A Lock On The Presidency?

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* All throughout 2012 I convinced myself the polls must be biased. It was a cute theory that explained a lot and turned out to be 100% wrong. A simpler explanation of the polls and election results is that we are rapidly approaching (or whizzed past without realizing) the point where the Democrats efforts to elect a new people have made the Democrats the permanent ruling party. Kind of like Sovier Russia but at least there you could understand what their end game was. Here the PC crazy train has no brakes.

* I think while undergraduate affirmative action works mostly the way you’d expect it to (i.e., it puts black students in schools that are too competitive for them, but the colleges are still mostly grabbing the best black students they can get), affirmative action at other levels is actually more irrational still. I’ve seen quite weak students get into top grad schools because they knew how to talk the intersectionality lingo just right, while strong students, if they applied to fields like literature where there’s a fair amount of black applicants, struck out because they made the mistake of acting like they wanted to study Dostoevsky and Kipling instead of comic books and Chimamanda Adichie.

Coates was a quite good magazine journalist, within his narrow beat- his 2007 Cosby article and 2008 Michele Obama article were both fine, and I even liked Fear of a Black President. But there was an enormous pent-up desire for an authentically black public intellectual who said the things people wanted to hear- no wishy washy Glenn Loury or John McWhorter or Roland Fryer. (It was a lot like how Piketty became a #1 bestseller with a quite boring book saying the same thing as any number of magazine articles about inequality, simply because he was an Official Economist saying it.) All the better that Coates was a college dropout, and one from West Baltimore at that- the one ghetto neighborhood in America that, thanks to the Wire, every Goodthinking journalist in America knows well.

(A lot of the Ta-Nehisi Coates phenomenon of 2009-2015 was about how he related to other journalists. I think if you hang out on Twitter you realize there are twelve quadrillion journalists and would-be journalists all sweating each other, terrified that they’re going to get fired, jealous of every big “piece” that comes out but anxious to be seen as praising it, and so on. Ta-Nehisi Coates is, well, “like crack” to that precise demographic; he’s black and authentic when they’re white and all went to Vassar or Brown; he reads long books about distant history while they are all hysterical about the news of the last minute; he writes lyrically and is willing to make calls and interview sources while they all use the same jokey Vox/Buzzfeed/Slate lexicon, short sentences and do most of their interviewing by e-mail; he had a convivial (and then hagiographic) relationship with his blog readers and commenters while they are constantly shouted down by thousands of angry anonymous comments. Undoubtedly, he also offers something to the broader culture, but you have to see him as a choice of other journalists first (in a time when, due to the changing economics of media, journalists have more readers but less money and security than ever before.) The last piece is that he was unusual among journalists in talking with historians, and his blog had a lot of historians commenting for a while; it gave him a particular cheering section within academia that could expand rapidly.)

* What I find fascinating about Sotomayor invoking “the talk” is the sheer cluelessness (alternatively, patronizing lecturing tone) of such recitation. If Sotomayor feels especially ‘put out’ by the existence of “the talk,” it might behoove her to know (white) parents have been raising their children to conduct themselves with propriety when in public and to show respect for police officers (authority figures, adults), so there is no need for “the talk” as it is built in to their upbringing and character.

Perhaps the Latina is not so wise after all.

* Coates is a fucking retard and so is the wise Latina. Only reason they are where they are is their race. They know it, everyone knows it. And this is what we have, retarded intellects all over the courts, schools and ruling class. Puppetheads of color doing the bad-guys’ bidding. Those bastards were brilliant using the morons against us.

* I just saw a video of a speech made by Stephen Miller introducing Trump that was pretty remarkable in its clarity and power. (I generally hate listening to speeches, but this one easily kept my full attention.)

I of course wish Trump himself possessed the same level of focus and sharpness in his speeches, but you get what you get. Obviously nobody would be listening to Stephen Miller if there were no Donald Trump.

* Steve, Shows what a lean source of black references Sotomayor has when she quotes Teh Genius Coates , James Baldwin and W.E.B. DuBois in a legal ruling. There were no pertinent quotes from James Brown, or Little Richard or more currently Lil Wayne? And seeing she is Latino, no Latino sources? Thurgood Marshall would cry with shame.

* The reason most cops act like jerks is because basically they are vulnerable and they want to be in control of the situation and not have anyone question their authority. And they pretty much treat everyone the same way.

As cops get older and more experienced they start to get better cues about the people they are dealing with and that’s where you get the more laid back type cops, once they have you typed as OK. I would bet that 90% of the needless shootings by cops are by guys or gals who haven’t been doing it long enough to feel secure in what they are doing.

For this reason the best way to deal with a police officer is to let him know he is in charge. Call him officer or sir, keep your hands in plain sight, bow your head, comply with commands, no sudden movements, engage in non-hostile dialog. That can change the interaction right there. Even if you have a point however it’s advisable not to talk too much during a stop. They can’t process all of that when they are trying to process you and the environment, and if they get overloaded they will get a threat feeling and turn into a jerk again.

I know most of the local cops where I live so I never have a problem with them. Out of state, if I see an officer doing something I will approach slowly, call him officer, and ask if he needs assistance. Never any problem there, either.

You are right that if black kids are always “taught” that the cops are out to get them they are likely to go into any stop by a police officer with a big chip on their shoulder. And that can get bad really quick.

* It’s amazing how much you can defuse a tense situation with the police with a simple yes sir/no sir or a yes ma’am/no ma’am. Of course it is hard for those with low-impulse control to use this kind of behavior.

* I never got “the talk” in one sitting, but had a father who more effectively dropped his pearls of wisdom along the way. Upon seeing a guy in an overcoat in July, “anyone wearing that much coat in summer is crazy, carrying a sawed-off, most likely both.” Entering an eatery, “never sit up front, sit further back, along the wall if possible, to view the whole room. Know all your exits. Someone looks all antsy before walking in, be ready to book.” “Never go to a bar where you know no one, good way to get your self beat or at the least robbed, at least overcharged by the bartender. Only go with someone known there.” “Going to a ball game or concert with your buddies? What if they ditch you? Pin $100 in your shorts and you can hail a cab home or put up in a hotel for the night and phone for a ride in the morning.”

Cops? Assume bad and corrupt until they prove otherwise. They all have one name: Officer. Some are jerks out of the fun of it, others because they’re as scared as you. The street is no place to dispute a ticket. Court is, and find a lawyer as crooked as the judge.

He didn’t push the stupid people in stupid places doing stupid things, or nothing good happens after 10 p.m. memes, just never get under the influence in strange places so you can keep your wits sharp and cut out when the going gets weird and the weird turn pro (again, the $100 Get out of Dodge money in your undies for the cab to the Holiday Inn). And when walking through ghettoes, stand tall and look everyone in the eye. They’ll think you’re a cop, nuts, or both, and not horse with you.

Posted in Affirmative Action, America | Comments Off on Do The Democrats Have A Lock On The Presidency?

Why Are Jews So Successful?

IQ accounts for most of it.

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* You can say that’s a result of them being smarter than the rest of us, but that explanation just doesn’t hold water when you take into account what a small percentage of the population Jewish people are.

* Actually, you can run the numbers and you’d be surprised. Take the average American IQ (100) and standard deviation (15), an estimate for the average Jewish American IQ (115) and standard deviation (15) and the percentage of Jews in the population (say 2%) and just by doing an itegral of a Gaussian function you can calculate the percentage of Jews among people above a certain IQ. The numbers are:

IQ Percent of pop. above that IQ that is Jewish:
120 8.1
130 13.7
140 25.2
145 35.3

Pick a profession in which you think Jews are overrepresented and think about what the minimum IQ to enter that profession is. With something like a leading scientist it is probably around 145, and so you would expect from IQ effects alone that Jews would be 35.3% of leading scientists. This sounds about right. Then there are all the effects of working hard, a culture where parents expect achievement, etc, and so high numbers of Jews in these various positions need not be attributed to nepotism.

Posted in IQ, Jews | Comments Off on Why Are Jews So Successful?