Are Tiger Daughters Taking Over the SJW Racket?

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* A look at her LinkedIn page shows she has high-level skills in mathematics, computer programming, and robotics. She is also a marathon runner and has an incredible singing voice, based on readily YouTube videos.

And yet she was only able to get 40 people to turn out for her anti-rape protest at Berkeley.

* 1. I’ve noticed that among SJW/feminist women, there are disprortionately high percentage of Indian/Paki women. They’re something like 1.5% of the national population and mostly new immigrants, but they are very noticeable in activism. It’s interesting. For example, Hillary seemed pretty close to a few South Asian women (Huma Abedin, Neera Tanden), but she didn’t seem to hang out much with Asians.

2. Asians actually seem underrepresented among SJWs. I see some, but their representation is far smaller than their proportion of the population. Asians outnumber Indian/Pakis by a 2.5 to 1 ratio nationally, but are strongly outnumbered in the SJW world. Asian men are actually even more underrepresented as SJWs than Asian women. For whatever reason, Asians (especially Asian males) aren’t drawn to activism much.

3. Asian and Indian/Paki women have different personality types. Asian women (on the surface) are usually demure and try to be socially pleasing. Indian/Paki women are huge ball busters with attitude. Worse than white feminists and maybe even worse than Jewish women. That may influence their politics.

4. Both Asian and Indian/Paki women are really into white men. I’m not surprised that this girl’s boyfriend is white. Both races seem to regard their men as being undesirable and can be fairly accesible if you’re a white guy. Indian/Paki women seem to have an especially strong revulsion towards their men. Interestingly, Indian/Paki women seem to often marry their own men in the end. They’re accessible for dating, but have a strong preference for in-group marriages. They may rail against the white patriarchy, but they like dating it too.

* Matt Forney (a contributor to the site run by Turkish-American pickup artist Roosh Valizadeh) had an interesting article about Indian/Paki women.

If you live in the west, dating an Indian girl is one of the worst decisions you can make. Indians combine the worst of their native culture and the worst of American culture in one disgusting, rancid stew. Here’s why you should never date—or even pump and dump—an Indian girl.

1. They’re unattractive
Forget about Aishwaryi Rai and every other smoking hot Bollywood actress you’ve ever seen: the average Indian girl has a Coke can physique and bad genes. While not as disgustingly obese as the average American, even fit Desi girls are packing more poundage than any girl should be legally allowed to have. Even if she’s in shape, expect her to balloon up like the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man the minute she gets a ring on it. Have you ever seen a skinny Indian woman over the age of 35? Thought not.
Not only that, even decent-looking Indian girls have unappealing bodies. Desis may have big butts, but their asses and breasts are always squishy and soft, like a bowl of Jell-O. Additionally, every single Indian girl I’ve ever known had too much body hair. Combine that with their obesity-prone genetics and you might as well be sleeping with a fat guy.

2. They’re prudes
When I say Indian girls are prudish, I don’t mean they’re hard to get in the sack: God no. I mean they have all sorts of bizarre sexual hangups that make banging them about as fun as thrusting your dick into a vacuum cleaner. Indian girls have sexually conservative attitudes thanks to their parents, and navigating their sea of rationalizations is a prerequisite for getting your rocks off.
The first Indian girl I ever banged, in college, was an “everything-but” virgin, in that she did everything but normal, vaginal intercourse: blowjobs, anal, the whole nine yards. She actually believed that this excused all the slutting around she did. Another Desi I met not long after refused to go down on me, saying it was “gross”… even as she bragged about how much she loved it when guys went down on her. These selfish attitudes are reinforced by the spoiled, daddy’s little girl mentalities that Indian girls have.

3. They’re self-loathing
Membdiscussions by whining about how they can’t get white girls because of their brown skin. Indian girls possess the same exact inferiority complex. Every Indian girl I’ve ever known secretly loathed her ethnic heritage, wanted to be white, and fetishized white men to a degree that was downright creepy.
What separates Indian girls from other Asian girls, who wear their lust for white men on their sleeves, is their obsession with their native culture. Indian girls raised in the U.S. will never shut up about the glories of India, a nation where poor people shit on the streets and the government has to force people to use toilets. Meanwhile, these same loud-and-proud Indian girls date white men and complain about Indian men being “misogynistic” and “controllingers of the Roosh V Forum are well aware of Indian Race Trolls, self-loathing Indian men who hijack .”

4. They’re feminists
For some reason, Indian girls in the U.S. are unusually susceptible to feminist and social justice warrior brain rot. Despite their wealthy, cushy upbringings, Indian girls almost always become ardent feminists, swallowing the cultural Marxist program whole. SJWs like Beejoli Shah, who invent stories about being raped, are representative of the average Indian girl and the noxious ideological soup she bathes in.
Indian girls justify their misandry by claiming that Indian culture is “sexist” and “patriarchal,” but this couldn’t be further from the truth. Indian families are matriarchal, with mothers dominating their husbands and children. In particular, Indian mothers control their sons with guilt trips and shame, which is why so many of them become sackless weaklings and Indian Race Trolls. Indian girls growing up in America are some of the most privileged people on Earth.

5. They’re mentally ill
This shouldn’t surprise anyone, but Indian girls are almost always off their rockers. When you combine SJW ideology, racial self-loathing, and bizarre attitudes towards sex, you end up with a psycho. Dating an Indian girl will be a constant roller coaster of fights, drama and frustration, with your only reward being getting to nail a hirsute chick with a pudding pop ass.
The absolute worst types of Indian girls are the ones adopted by white couples, fairly common in upper-middle class America. The most insane girl I ever banged was an Indian with white parents: she was a borderline who tried to provoke me into hitting her because she felt I was “neglecting” her. While she didn’t mindfuck me in the way that BPD girls usually do to their men, the abusive relationship screwed me up for months after it ended.
The only justifiable reason to pursue a Desi girl is because you want to get your Indian flag. But hanging around them longer than it takes to bust on their faces will end in tragedy for you. When it comes to girls, any ethnicity or race is a better bet than Indians.

* I have noticed a similar phenomenon on the right with the meteoric rise of young (barely out of college), attractive women writing books and offering ‘conservative’ commentary on news shows. (i.e., Katie Pavlich, Tomi Lahren and Lauren Southern).

They offer nothing unique to the debate other than great legs.

* Both Asians and Indians place a huge emphasis on money-making and status-striving. This is likely a product of thousands of years of extreme malthusian selection. Both races are masters of the malthusian death match.

Their embrace of SJWism is motivated mostly by economic factors. They see there’s a lot of money and power being awarded to the SWJ leadership class – and they want in. Simple as that.

However, by personality, Asians tend to be socially introverted, verbally not that articulate, usually agreeable, and non-opinionated. They’re not the type to protest, annoy the public, or insult people. So they don’t make good SJWs.

Indians seem very verbally fluent and adept at mastering vocabulary. They also are much more outgoing than Asians and enjoy opining a lot more. So they’re more suited for SJWism. Another advantage (as I mentioned above) is that Indian women have difficult, ballbusting personalities. Asians are too agreeable.

They’re a fair number of Indian-Americans on the right too (Governor Jindal, Ramesh Ponnuru of NR, Dinesh D’Souza, Governor Nikki Haley).

Indians/Pakis are verbally strong, a bit obnoxious, and highly adept at self-promotion and grifting. That makes them a good fit for careers as SJWs and politicians.

Lots of Indians seem very talented at gaudy self-promotion too.

For example, here’s this Indian kid who goes by the name of “Shawn Valentino.” He claims to be a pickup artist. He’s been very successful at promoting himself on tv and even selling a pickup advice book. I’ve seen him on tv (dating shows, Tyra Banks, Dr. Phil, etc) quite a few times.

Do you know what’s especially impressive? Despite having no discernible ability to charm women, he still manages to get himself airtime. It takes a certain shrewdness to do that.

* She’s hot in one photo but in the others she’s putting out a vague Jackie Coakley vibe which is a tad unnerving. Maybe she’s Jackie with a bit more talent and savvy. Though Jackie did fool a few hundred million people.

Now what about the skin tone fluctuations? Cream lightener, seasonal exposure, or photoshop? Only her hairdresser knows for sure.

* I work in Corporate America. “Diversity” is a scam designed to shelter upper class white men from financial and sexual competition. An upper class / upper management white dude introduces “diversity” to his organization in order to demonstrate his commitment to SJW-ism. The non-white male patrons reward said dude by never, ever criticizing a single thing he does, and by ratting out the individual contributors or first-level managers who say anything. Non-white male patrons will never seriously challenge an upper class white guy, who gives them prizes and gifts, for power in an organization.

Meanwhile, the introduction of protected persons introduces enormous tension in the organization at the individual contributor position. Moderately unacttractive or unattractive beta white males are required to pick up the pace left by non-whites employees, and to do so with a smile. The situation works to the advantage of upper management, by keeping employees distracted and conflicted with one another rather than competing for management positions. Also, the whites required to pick up the pace increasingly have SJW women and sub-cons for management, who will never care about workloads.

* I worked in a job that dealt with federal government hiring and federal contractors and non-profits close to The Swamp. You can not imagine the glut of young upper-middle/upper-class, self-assured liberal females with straight-A poli-sci and area studies degrees from Georgetown U. School of Foreign Service, GWU, Tufts Fletcher School, Johns Hopkins School of Adv. In’tl Studies, et al., with extensive foreign travel, study abroad, internships, etc., who all are expecting to get into the federal government or some contractor working in geopolitical busybody work to save the world. My work has also covered IC work and so I can tell you first hand that this type has throughly infected State Dept. and CIA and is the reason Trump really has to shut down CIA and move those intelligence operations to DoD.

* Consider also that the subcontinentals we get are selected from the Brahmin type castes–priest-king-scholar-scribes. I suspect that selects for/emphasizes verbal fluency. Indians as the new Jews–if there’s an intellectual movement, it’s going to need articulate spokesmen, and you’ll find Nikki Haleys and Kamala Harrises well out of proportion to their demographic numbers.

* Coming from a family full of Ole Miss sorority sisters, that one made me laugh. They spend a lot of time mastering that perfect BF hug angle.

A friend sent me a video of one of these SJW models speaking at an enviro group conference. She was perfect: cascading blond hair, tan, riot-girl outfit that didn’t have a speck of dirt, one shoulder tattoo. She went into one of those intersectionality/kitchen sink/Subterranean Homesick Blues/state of the world poems this class writes, intoning in precise boarding school diction. She made a nod to her “Viking heritage”- now that’s interesting. She gets to jet set around and speak and conferences as her gig, kind of like the half-Nordic teen indigenous activist who looks like he’s all set to be a brother in the struggle for the United Colors of Benneton.

If your tastes run cruncher, check out this SJW music duo -lots of posing here.

* Back in The Sixties, it was an open secret that the reason why most guys got into what used to be known as “The Movement” was because, face it, it was a great way to meet babes and get laid.

* Please let’s all stop entertaining these lunatics’ pretended nationalities and ethnicities just as we don’t entertain their pretended sexes.

The “Texan boy” with the clock was not. The “Floridian man” who murdered the homosexuals in Orlando was not.

And so on. Calling these people Texan, Floridian, French, etc. should be met with just as much outcry in the media as that crazy white lady (Dolezel?) who pretended to be black was met with. But it never is.

So we pretend Salma Hayek, a relatively fair, attractive, and buxom Lebanese lady is representative of swarthy, ugly, pudgy mestizos in Mexico.

We pretend murderous Somalis, Arabs, etc. are British, American, and French.

On and on it goes. You don’t get to dictate your own identity. Sure, you can take up surfing or learn to play a piano, study chemistry rather than philosophy. But those are behaviours. If I say I am a tall, blonde Dutchman with piercing blue eyes and washboard-abs, I’ll still be a 5’10″ American with brown hair, green eyes, and an unremarkable body. Period. If I described myself as the Dutchman I’d be pitied, ridiculed, reviled, or some combination thereof. At best people would think I had a zany sense of humour.

We must stop humouring the pretenders and play-actors. You wanna be something you aren’t? Fine, call over some friends to play Dungeons & Dragons. You can be an elven knight. When the game is over, though, you have to go back to being you; no one at the office is going to treat you like an elf come Monday morning.

* Note that Haley and Jindal were reared in the deep South (South Carolina and Louisiana, respectively) and Ponnuru in Kansas. Haley and Jindal changed their names to be more American sounding and both converted to Christianity. Ponnnuru was raised a Christian and became a Catholic later in life. D’Souza is a separate case, being an immigrant himself from a Catholic Goan family – he’s atypical both for an Indian and for an immigrant the U.S. from India.

I suppose the question is whether Indian immigrants are most apt to adapt to the culture and politics of where they land in the U.S. owing to their status-consciousness and need to climb socially and economically. In other words, would their politics in the U.S. be less Democratic if they immigrated in larger numbers to the South and Plains rather than the Northeast and far West?

Another interesting wrinkle is that in my experience where there is a mix of Indian and Pakistani immigrants in the U.S., the two groups tend to polarize politically. In my area, Pakistanis are patrons of the Democrats (probably because they apologize for Islam more than Republicans) and so the Indians coalesce around the Republicans. But the relationship seems to be a carryover from their home nations – they seem to understand the relationship as transactional rather than ideological. They donate money and later extract favors. I have no idea whether the Indians actually vote for Republicans above the Mayor/Township Supervisor level and therefore buck the national trends and averages.

Posted in America, Diversity, India | Comments Off on Are Tiger Daughters Taking Over the SJW Racket?

Does HIAS Promote Anti-Jewish Immigration Into Israel?

Not so much. HIAS is greatly concerned with the security of the Jewish state. As for the security of gentile states, it seems not so much.

COMMENT: Now, it is true that HIAS indeed has a section on its website related to Israel. After clicking on a couple of links, the following information is provided:

HIAS in Israel

Today, now that the Israeli government and the Jewish Agency have assumed full responsibility for immigration and absorption of olim, HIAS is using our expertise to help the country develop a humane admission system for refugees and asylum seekers that adheres to international legal standards and protects the security of the state. According to UNHCR, there are 55,000 refugees in Israel: roughly 36,000 from Eritrea, 15,000 from Sudan, and 4,000 from other African countries.

Assistance to Individual Refugees in Israel

HIAS meets with individuals and families (mostly from Eritrea and Sudan) to help them evaluate options for reuniting with family in other countries, including the United States, Canada, Italy, Australia, Switzerland, and Sweden.

So while refugee resettlement lies at the heart of HIAS’ work in the U.S., it is not a priority for HIAS in Israel. In israel, HIAS is merely willing to meet with the African refugees to help them reunite with their family in western countries, but not to help them resettle in the Zionist state. There are no appeals by rabbis telling the Knesset to keep Israel’s doors open for the refugees, urging them to prioritize refugee resettlement, protection, and human rights. No pre drafted personal letter to send to their Member of the Knesset.

So much for being guided by history and the Jewish value of “welcoming the stranger.”

If you’re looking for a clue that explains this difference, HIAS itself reveals it in the following:

HIAS is using our expertise to help [Israel] develop a humane admission system for refugees and asylum seekers that adheres to international legal standards and protects the security of the state.

I looked all over, but I couldn’t find a similar qualifier for HIAS’ work in the US.

Posted in HIAS | Comments Off on Does HIAS Promote Anti-Jewish Immigration Into Israel?

Who Backs Trump?

Peggy Noonan writes: Normally a new president has someone backing him up, someone publicly behind him. Mr. Obama had the mainstream media—the big broadcast networks, big newspapers, activists and intellectuals, pundits and columnists of the left—the whole shebang. He had a unified, passionate party. Mr. Trump in comparison has almost nothing. The mainstream legacy media oppose him, even hate him, and will not let up. The columnists, thinkers and magazines of the right were mostly NeverTrump; some came reluctantly to support him. His party is split or splitting. The new president has gradations of sympathy, respect or support from exactly one cable news channel, and some websites.
He really has no one but those who voted for him.
Do they understand what a lift daily governance is going to be, and how long the odds are, with so much arrayed against him, and them?

Posted in America | Comments Off on Who Backs Trump?

Torah: Parashah Va’eira ( Exodus 6:2–9:35)

This week’s Torah portion is Va’eira (Exodus 6:2–9:35).

* If being America First is anti-Semitic, then all nationalists outside of Israel must become anti-Semitic. If Jews lead resistance to Trump, America’s president, does this make them anti-American? If Jews find Trump’s call for national unity “chilling”, then they are against national unity. If identity politics are anti-American, then who has led the charge for identity politics?

* All the expressions of “Jesus” in the inauguration prayers may predict a return of confidence to the goy. Not saying “Jesus” to avoid offending Jews and other groups shows a lack of confidence.

* Ex. 5:1 shows that the Elders have melted away. It is only Moshe and Aaron, just like Trump almost by himself mounted a hostile takeover of American politics.

* Do you believe in free will?

* “Servant” and “slave” are the same word in Hebrew. “Jews don’t want to serve anybody,” says Dennis Prager. They don’t want to be waiters and servants.

* It seems like a third of CNN’s online staff don’t have typical American names.

* When did you come to love Donald J. Trump? For me, it was his Friday rally in Mobile, Alabama in August of 2015 when he talked about the power of genes.

* The parashah begins with God revealing himself to Moshe. How real do you want God to be in your life? Do you want God in all aspects of your life? There’s a Jewish ideal that you think about God during sex. I heard a 12-step teaching that if you masturbate, you should only think about God. Is each of us ready to leave the Egypt of our addictions? How free do you want to be?

* Torah makes no room for practice of religion outside of Judaism in the Holy Land.

* The battle between the Hebrews and the Egyptians reminds me of modern conflicts between the two groups.

Waled, an Arab, writes:

According to IQ and the Wealth of Nations, Arab populations have a mean IQ of approximately 85. Donald Templer of Alliant International University replicated this finding. This places Arabs about a full standard deviation’s distance away from European populations, who have a mean IQ of 100, and two standard deviations away from the Ashkenazi Jewish population, who have an average IQ of about 115.

It is worth noting that an IQ of 85 or lower used to be regarded as mentally retarded by cognitive scientists until this threshold was shifted down to 75 in the 1960s. There is general agreement, however, that anybody with an IQ within the range of 80 can possibly be categorized as mentally retarded.

Applying these statistics, Egypt, which was historically Israel’s chief adversary up until the late 1970s, had a 1967 population where somewhere between 33-50% of its individuals could be categorized as mentally retarded by European standards. This cognitive deficit is reflected by the extreme poverty that characterizes Egypt today (GDP per capita $3,314 per year), its political instability, and the decisiveness with which its people were defeated on the battlefield by the Israelis in multiple wars.

Does this imply that the Egyptian nation can be characterized as “retarded”? No. What it does imply, however, is that the talent pool available to Egypt from which it could cultivate strategists, technologists, entrepreneurs, and manufacturers has been extremely limited throughout its modern history. It also implies that Egypt has had to deal with dysgenic problems related to low intelligence that Israel does not have to face, such as aforementioned elements of poverty, civil war, sedition, and decreased competitiveness in the world economy…

In 1967, there were roughly 1.6 million Ashkenazi Jews in Israel. This is a population whose IQ is about 115. Assuming that IQ distribution in the Ashkenazi population can be modeled after a typical Caucasian bell curve, this would suggest that roughly 15% of their population is “gifted” by European standards, implied by an IQ score of 130 or above.

This relatively high degree of intelligence explains the prosperity and stability which Israel possesses within its borders. Israel is one of the technological capitals of the world–Intel develops their chips there, and some of the world’s best aviation and military technology has been developed and manufactured by Israelis in Israel. On the battlefield, the best their adversaries have managed to affect against their military machine is stalemate, and the Jews have repeatedly embarrassed and humiliated the Arabs throughout the course of their short history.

Why IQ Matters

Perhaps it goes without saying that, if you want a sophisticated military with advanced technology and hundreds of thousands of personnel at your disposal, you need smart people to design, manage, and coordinate it. Modern militaries have an extremely high number of variables to account for–picture all of the troops, tanks, watercraft, fighter jets, supply trains, communications networks, and maintenance logistics that need to be accounted for. Then factor in the extreme pressure that military leaders are under in existential wars like the one fought by the Arabs and Israelis in 1967. The responsibilities are absolutely massive and the room for error is extremely small.

Furthermore, air forces–the crux of modern military superiority– require very intelligent personnel to operate effectively. The US air force, for example, requires its fighter pilots to have an IQ that is between one and two standard deviations above the average population. The people actually building the aircraft are essentially geniuses…

If we stack up every country involved in the 1967 war by total population, then count the number of intellectually “gifted” (IQ greater than or equal to 130), individuals in the population, we observe:

Egypt

Total population: 33 million

Gifted population: 33,000

Syria

Total population: 5,760,000

Gifted population: 5,760

Jordan

Total population: 1,278,000

Gifted population: 1,278

Israel

Ashkenazi population: 1,700,000

Gifted Ashkenazi population: 255,000

So, in other words, the total gifted population in Israel in 1967 was more than six times the number of that in all of its Arab adversaries’ countries combined. This qualitative difference in intelligence has translated to an overwhelming advantage for Israel, and the Arabs would do well to learn this lesson.

* Punishment is collective. The Hebrews suffer as a people. The Egyptians suffer as a people. If your group contains those who do immense harm, such as terrorists, your whole group will suffer. Only in Protestant countries are people seen first as individuals rather than as members of groups.

* Goy: Just why would God harden pharaoh’s heart and make them go through all the plagues? Why not just change pharaoh’s heart right away? Pretty abstract, but this section is close to incomprehensible to me… like what the heck is God? Also 8:25-27… hm. Seems shady.

* “Harden” means “strengthen” in the Hebrew. I guess this means that Pharoah would have felt more empathy without God’s intervention and let the Hebrews go. A “hard heart” was apparently not natural for the Pharoah.

God wanted the world to see His strength. I wonder if that word spread? Because we don’t have independent sources attesting to that.

As a Jew reading Exodus, it really does remind one of the Holocaust. I’m not sure a goy would catch that parallel. Hitler said he would go down as the hardest man in history. Perhaps he lost WWII by being too soft, not wiping out the British army at Dunkirk and not driving on Moscow in August of 1941. To get things done, all of us in our lives harden our hearts at times. I wonder if Stalin’s heart had been softer, would he have won WWII?

To do ethnic cleansing, you have to have a hard heart. Without ethnic cleansing, empires get overwhelmed by genes different from those who built the empire. To practice eugenics and stop stupid people from breeding, or to stop people from reproducing who don’t have the genes you want for your civilization, you have to have a hard heart. The alternative is that stupid and criminally inclined people reproduce more rapidly and drive out the sturdy genes.

* Hating the “other” invariably means you love your own kind. What does it mean to love your people if you don’t hate its enemies? How can I say I love you without also saying that I hate those who want to harm you?

* It was weird seeing Rabbi Marvin Hier give the benediction at the Inauguaration because much of what he stands for is the opposite of what Trump stands for.

* The Ten Plagues are all aimed at demeaning separate Egyptian gods. This idea that you should never demean other religions is foreign to Torah. The battle of the Torah is to demonstrate the supremacy of God over nature.

* Ex. 7:1. Moshe is made a master over Pharoah. Every person, every group wants mastery. It would be a strange person or strange group who only wants to serve others.

* Goy: “Talk about Obama saying Israel can’t be both Jewish & Democratic. So maybe America can’t be white & democratic. But Israel will choose “Jewish” before democratic. Maybe we should too.”

* The doxxing of Millenial Woes and Mike Enoch. In general, the more integrated your life, the better. In general, positive visibility is essential to a prosperous life. Hiding and biting result in poverty and death.

* The three assaults on Richard Spencer.

* Can Jews be part of the Alt Right? Purity spiralling and virtue signalling on the Alt Right.

New York Times:

Mr. Spencer, who is credited with coining the term alt-right and describes himself as an “identitarian,” was punched in the head on Inauguration Day by a person clad in black as he was being interviewed by a journalist. At the time of the attack, Mr. Spencer was explaining the meaning of Pepe the Frog, a cartoon figure adopted as a mascot by the alt-right, a racist, far-right fringe movement that is anti-immigrant, anti-Semitic and anti-feminist. Video of the attack shows Mr. Spencer reeling to one side under the force of the blow and his attacker darting through a crowd after landing the punch.

A bystander who chased the attacker later posted a video on YouTube of his encounter with the man. The assailant can be heard telling a friend that the man filming them is “mad at me because I hit Richard Spencer.” (The bystander who made the video does not appear to be a supporter of Mr. Spencer and disparagingly refers to the activist in the clip as “a neo-Nazi.”)


Mr. Spencer’s video was recorded from what he described as “a safe space.” He said he thought the attack happened, in part, because he was in the wrong place at the wrong time.

“There was an actual anti-fascist rally going on, and I walked into it,” he said. Margarita Mikhaylova, a spokeswoman for the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department, said on Friday afternoon that Mr. Spencer had not filed a police report.

Video of the attack quickly inspired a flood of jokes and memes online, some of which set the punch to songs like “Born in the U.S.A.” Jon Favreau, a former speechwriter for Barack Obama, was one of many who posted a comment.

There was little substantive debate online about the ethics of punching Mr. Spencer. Twitter is not a place where minds are often changed, and the supporters and opponents of the sucker punch were unmoved by one another’s quips.

Opponents of the punch tended to say that violence had no place in political debate. Supporters tended to say the punch was funny, and more than a few compared Mr. Spencer’s attacker to famous Nazi punchers from pop culture, like Indiana Jones and Captain America.

Posted in Alt Right, Torah | Comments Off on Torah: Parashah Va’eira ( Exodus 6:2–9:35)

Getting Ahead As A SJW Warrior

Steve Sailer writes: “Being young these days requires constant beavering away at career-building. The SJW industry is highly competitive so only the most enterprising and relentlessly self-promoting amateur SJWs can expect to attain paid sinecures.”

Posted in America | Comments Off on Getting Ahead As A SJW Warrior