Ben Shapiro Shifting Towards Trump?

Vox Day writes:

cshd90oumaa2mgr

csg7gecxgaebbsy

Ah, so “never” for varying values of the term. Well, rats only swarm a winning ship. This is just an early sign of the coming Trumpslide. Let’s all welcome (((Ben))) aboard the #TrumpTrain!

COMMENTS:

* “Typical Jew making his living as an ideologue on the “conservative” side.”

The only one I trust is Michael Savage. He’s been beating the Nationalist drum long before it was popular. I can remember him ranting about language,borders and culture all the ay back in 2003. Whether it was popular or not he’s remained surprisingly consistent these many years.

* Dummy Ben Shapiro. He threw away a Breitbart gig for #NeverTrump. What a dummy. Didn’t it occur to him that reason Breitbart was getting all the clicks is because that’s where the voters were?

Ah well, let’s see how it goes. I hope he doesn’t turn out like other johnny-come-latelies who used be #NeverTrump such as Mark Levin. Levin will say “Vote Trump” then spend the next 3 hours bitching about him. That’s not helping, and this is war.

* While I’m annoyed with his earlier behavior, if his apparent change of heart helps keep Clinton from being elected, I’m perfectly willing to welcome Ben Shapiro aboard for the duration of the campaign.

* Looks like he gets more retweets and likes with this new strategy. So I think he’ll stay the course for a good while.

Whatever it takes to keep crooked Hillary off the levers of power – so yeah, welcome back Mr. Shapiro.

* Who’s going to be surprised when Trump helps facilitate the rebuilding of the temple?

* His ethnicity alone should preclude him from having a public platform for his views. I guess he saw the polls and realized there wouldn’t be much audience for an anti-Trump pundit who will spend four years arguing for open borders, foreign wars and anti-racism while still pretending to be right wing. I suppose MSNBC will need token (((conservatives))) to come on and bash Trump. Otherwise, Benji may want to look into learning a respectable trade.

* Michael Savage was manning the barricades, taking heavy artillery, and keeping America’s flame alive while many on this blog were potty training. He routinely pays homage to the men he calls “Eddys,” who fought the wars and protected the country. He is unassailable in his love for America first, in my opinion.

Posted in Ben Shapiro | Comments Off on Ben Shapiro Shifting Towards Trump?

Excluding The High IQ

Polymath writes: “The probability of entering and remaining in an intellectually elite profession such as Physician, Judge, Professor, Scientist, Corporate Executive, etc. increases with IQ to about 133. It then falls about 1/3 by 140. By 150 IQ the probability has fallen by 97%! In other words, a significant percentage of people with IQs over 140 are being systematically and, most likely inappropriately, excluded from the population that addresses the biggest problems of our time or who are responsible for assuring the efficient operation of social, scientific, political and economic institutions. This benefits neither the excluded group nor society in general. For society, it is a horrendous waste of a very valuable resource. For the high IQ person it is a personal tragedy, commonly resulting in unrealized social, educational and productive potential.”

Vox Day comments: In other words, more than a few PhDs at elite universities are more than two standard deviations below me in IQ terms. And here I am supposed to be impressed by a Bachelor’s degree in Philosophy of Language from a second-tier Midwestern university? In fact, given the ability of the Ilk and my Vile Faceless Minions to not only follow my lead in a disciplined manner but also correctly anticipate my intentions without having them explained, the evidence would tend to suggest that the mean intelligence of the regulars here is higher than the Cambridge faculty.

Based on my interactions with “intellectually elite professionals” this doesn’t shock me, although I’m a little surprised that both the mean and the ceiling as as low as they are.

So it should be no surprise that I’ve been “systematically and, most likely inappropriately, excluded” from the science fiction community, as its mean is probably around 1.5 standard deviations below the university professors. (Although in my estimation there are a few SF people with whom I have interacted who clearly have IQs over 139.) But in most instances, the intellectual gulf is simply too great.

Garth Zietsman has said, referring to people with D15IQs over 152, ‘A common experience with people in this category or higher is that they are not wanted – the masses (including the professional classes) find them an affront of some sort.’ While true, it is more likely a symptom than a cause of the exclusion. We need to understand why they are an affront.

I can tell him that. People who work very hard and spend years in order to climb to what they regard as the pinnacle of achievement actively resent those who can simply leap up to the peak. And because their knowledge is hard won, they tend to cling to it much more tenaciously than the more intelligent individual who is no more tied to one piece of information than the next. What makes it worse is that they cannot fathom that the more intelligent individuals do not think like they do.

Members of high IQ societies, especially those that require D15IQs above 145, often comment that around this IQ, qualitatively different thinking emerges. By this they mean that the 145+ D15IQ person doesn’t just do the same things, intellectually, as a lower IQ person, just faster and more accurately, but actually engages in fundamentally different intellectual processes.

I’ve been pointing this out for years, if you recall. But because I don’t think like the less intelligent, I am regularly labeled everything from stupid to racist. In my experience, the 150 IQ individual does not resent the individual with the 160 or the 175 IQ, and this may be because being above 145, we all tend to engage in similar thought processes, albeit with different capabilities. The 135 IQ individual dislikes and fears the 150+ individuals, while the 115 IQ individual either doesn’t believe the 150+ individuals exist or blithely insists that they are crazy.

That’s why I despise midwits. You simply can’t talk to them. They don’t even try to understand you, but instead move to disqualify you as fast as they can. I have much more sensible conversations with people in the 75 to 100 range than I do with most in the 105 to 120 range. The 125 to 140 crowd is okay as long as they don’t have an inferiority complex, but when they do, they’re the biggest annoyances of all.

People with D15IQs over 150 are effectively ‘The Excluded’, routinely finding their thoughts to be unconvincing in the public discourse and in productive environments. If placed in a leadership position, they will not succeed.

Now you know why I have such an allergy to being asked to lead in any way, shape, or form. In any event, this may be one of the more interesting aspects of Brainstorm (a reminder, there are 20 places left for the Wednesday session at 7:30 PM Eastern), as even those who aren’t +3SD or higher are, at least, open in principle to the wild and crazy thoughts being expressed by the higher intelligences. If we can figure out how to best harness a community of High IQ Excluded, we should be able to come up with more than a few interesting projects.

Posted in IQ | Comments Off on Excluding The High IQ

The New Paradigm

Posted in America | Comments Off on The New Paradigm

KM: S&M, transgenderism and Jewish holidays: Transparent is “the most Jewish show on television.”

Amy Klein writes for Hadassah Magazine:

There’s a scene in the upcoming third season of Transparent—Jill Soloway’s hit show on Amazon about a father’s transgender transition and its effect on his family—where daughter Sarah Pfefferman is bound and getting flogged by a dominatrix. But Sarah is bored, distracted by her own neurotic train of thought.

“You know there’s this whole Jewish concept that if you do charity work you’re not supposed to tell anyone about it cuz if you tell anyone it voids the work,” Sarah says, the camera on her face in the vise, a whipping sound in the background. “It’s more about ego than charity…. If that’s true I haven’t done a single charitable action in my entire life.”

It’s typical Soloway: so, so irreverent and so, so Jewish at the same time.

But that’s Transparent, for you—”The most Jewish show on television,” says Soloway, the show’s writer and director. On September 18, Soloway, who based the series on her own experience—her father had transitioned to a woman, was awarded the 2016 Emmy Award for Outstanding Directing for a Comedy Series for Transparent. Actor Jeffrey Tambor, who plays father Mort Pfefferman, now Maura, also won an Emmy, for Best Actor in a Comedy Series. And the show—its third season premieres on September 23—won a 2016 Golden Globe award for best television series.

“I’ve always wanted to be part of a movement,” said Soloway in her Emmy-acceptance speech. “This TV show allows me to take my dreams about unlikable Jewish people, queer folk, trans folk and make them heroes. Thank you to the trans community for your lived lives.”

This season Sarah—played by Amy Landecker—gets kicked off the synagogue board and starts an organization called Hineni with brother Joshie’s ex-fiancée, Rabbi Raquel Fein. “Hilarity ensues: They gather in their kids’ school gymnasium and try to reinvent havdalah,” Soloway, 50, says in a recent interview with Hadassah Magazine. “Just like ‘East Side Jews,’” she adds, referring to the community of L.A. Jews—“An irreverent, upstart, nondenominational collective” Soloway founded 10 years ago.

The new season also has Rabbi Raquel jogging in the woods, with her voiceover discussing themes of redemption. “Each season has one big Jewish holiday in the center,” Soloway explains. The first was Shabbat, the second was the High Holidays and, this time, it revolves around Passover—“Seder stuff, liberation…the whole season’s a Hagaddah, if you will.” Soloway can’t help but joke: “Season 4 will be about Succot, by Season 8 we’ll be big into Lag B’omer, I guess, and season 11, Shemini Atzeret.”

Where does she get all her Jewish knowledge?

Soloway has three rabbinical advisors. Rabbi Susan Goldberg of Wilshire Boulevard Temple serves as a consultant for the show. “She comes in and sometimes we do Torah study,” Soloway says.

She also speaks daily to New York-based Rabbi Amichai Lau-Lavie, “a God-optional patriarchy-toppling Jewish modern mind. There’s a mandate among religious and spiritual thinkers to be thinking about the binary, the gendered, the feminist, the goddess, and Amichai reminds me of that every day.”

Her own personal rabbi, Mordecai Finley, of Ohr HaTorah synagogue in Los Angeles, “uses Torah as a way to understand brokenness,” she says. “He defines God as an energy hovering between love, justice, truth and beauty—somewhere between those four qualities is our search for spirituality.” That exact quote is also uttered by the new charismatic cantor working with Rabbi Raquel.

Posted in Hollywood, Jews, Trans | Comments Off on KM: S&M, transgenderism and Jewish holidays: Transparent is “the most Jewish show on television.”

Decoding an Anti-Semitic Meme Donald Trump Supporters Took From Anime

Jay Michaelson writes:

It turns out, the image is of Asuka, a character in the controversial, critically heralded anime series Neon Genesis Evangelion, created by Hideaki Anno in 1995. Evangelion created a mythology that makes Lost look like Candy-Land, blending together gnostic, Kabbalistic, Christian, and conspiracy theory themes and incorporating many of Anno’s own struggles with mental illness.

One of those themes concerns a shadowy organization called SEELE, which is essentially a mythologized blend of the world Zionist conspiracy (a la Protocols of the Elders of Zion), Illuminati, and United Nations. According to the Evangelion wiki, SEELE is “a secret and mysterious organization with influence over the world’s governments and organizations.” Its name comes from the German word for soul.

The United Nations is a participant in this secret organization, which has among its goal the uniting of all humanity and the erasure of national boundaries. Their ultimate motives are sinister, however, culminating in SEELE’s own control of the world (to greatly oversimplify). SEELE also has some specifically Jewish elements, in particular its knowledge of the Dead Sea Scrolls, which in Evangelion are prophetic, gnostic texts.

Asuka (full name: Asuka Langley Soryu) is a fighter pilot who becomes the great enemy of SEELE. A fourteen year old girl, she is the love interest of Evangelion’s tormented hero, Shinji. But she is also a warrior in her own right, destroying SEELE’s weapons, giant humanoid robots called Evangelions. (Fittingly for the dark series, these efforts are ultimately unsuccessful and catastrophe rains upon Earth.)

In other words, and again oversimplifying somewhat, Asuka is the warrior against the secret Illuminati/Jewish conspiracy to take over the world. And in the meme posted on my Twitter thread, she is Trump, wearing his signature hat.

Having decoded the meaning of the image, I then set about trying to document how and where it entered the employ of the white supremacist fringe.

I didn’t find much — but I did find something. On a reddit-like thread from January, 2016, I found a different image of Asuka-as-Trump as well as one post saying “If elected, Trump will bomb the shit out of SELEE [sic] and take their oil.” While this would seem to align SEELE with Arab states rather than Jews, if one takes the conspiratorial worldview that, in fact, the great conspiracy (Jewish, UN, Masonic, whatever) controls everything, then of course they also orchestrate the world’s wars over scarce resources. SEELE is as much behind Saudi Arabia and Iran as it is behind Israel.

As for where the exact meme originated, or whether white supremacists know any of this history, I don’t know. I’m certainly not going to engage with any of them in order to ask.

It’s also unclear how much all of this is really in Evangelion itself. Certainly, Anno incorporated conspiratorial themes into the series, and SEELE in particular. It’s also well-known that Japanese society often displays a curious blend of philo- and anti-Semitism, often admiring Jews for our disproportionate impact on society, media, and politics. This is true both in the mainstream of Japanese society (the Protocols of the Elders of Zion has often been a bestseller) and on the fringes (radical, conspiratorial antisemitism was part of the ideology of the murderous Aum Shinrikyo cult.

Japanese anti-Semitism experienced a surge in the 1980s and 1990s, with several books alleging that the United States was controlled by Jews and was plotting to destroy Japan. Aum Shinrikyo in particular developed fantastic myths in which the world would be destroyed and replaced with another one — myths quite similar to the plot of Evangelion, which appeared around the same time.

At the same time, Evangelion was deliberately constructed by Anno as a complex multi-narrative in which different viewers could see what they wanted to see. It is filled with dark sexual imagery and paranoid imaginings of all kinds. SEELE is part of that, but certainly not the sum of it. There is no trace of anti-Semitism in Anno’s political beliefs or other work. It seems more likely that the cultural familiarity of conspiracy theories provided a rich basis for Evangelion’s paranoid tapestry, without any particular animus or ideology.

Somehow, though, the obscure mythology of a 1990s Japanese animated series has found its way into the 2016 presidential election, with Donald Trump himself cast in the role of warrior against the international Jewish conspiracy.

Posted in Anti-Semitism | Comments Off on Decoding an Anti-Semitic Meme Donald Trump Supporters Took From Anime

Peter Beinart: The Death of ‘He Said, She Said’ Journalism

From The Atlantic:

Last Saturday, The New York Times published an extraordinary story. What made the story extraordinary wasn’t the event the Times covered. What made it extraordinary was the way the Times covered it.

On its front page, top right—the most precious space in American print journalism—the Times wrote about Friday’s press conference in which Donald Trump declared that a) he now believed Barack Obama was a US citizen, b) he deserved credit for having established that fact despite rumors to the contrary and c) Hillary Clinton was to blame for the rumors. Traditionally, when a political candidate assembles facts so as to aggrandize himself and belittle his opponent, “objective” journalists like those at the Times respond with a “he said, she said” story…

But the Times, once a champion practitioner of the “he said, she said” campaign story, discarded it with astonishing bluntness. The Times responded to Trump’s press conference by running a “News Analysis,” a genre that gives reporters more freedom to explain a story’s significance. But “News Analysis” pieces generally supplement traditional news stories. On Saturday, by contrast, the Times ran its “News Analysis” atop Page One while relegating its news story on Trump’s press conference to page A10. Moreover, “News Analysis” stories generally offer context. They don’t offer thundering condemnation.

Yet thundering condemnation is exactly what the Times story provided. Its headline read, “Trump Gives Up a Lie But Refuses to Repent.” Not “falsehood,” which leaves open the possibility that Trump was merely mistaken, but “lie,” which suggests, accurately, that Trump had every reason to know that what he was saying about Obama’s citizenship was false.

The article’s text was even more striking. It read like an opinion column. It began by reciting the history of Trump’s campaign to discredit Obama’s citizenship. “It was not true in 2011,” began the first paragraph. “It was not true in 2012,” began the second paragraph. “It was not true in 2014,” began the third paragraph. Then, in the fourth paragraph: “It was not true, any of it.” The article called Trump’s claim that he had put to rest rumors about Obama’s citizenship “a bizarre new deception” and his allegation that Clinton had fomented them “another falsehood.” Then, in summation, it declared that while Trump has “exhausted an army of fact checkers with his mischaracterizations, exaggerations and fabrications,” the birther lie was particularly “insidious” because it “sought to undo the embrace of an African American president by the 69 million voters who elected him.”

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* The amazing thing to me was that the CNN panel which followed that event were so furious that they had been “played” (their word) by Trump in such a fashion. And then to see in the NYT that Trump’s questioning Obama’s birth place, after Obama had sold his books on the basis of his having been born in Kenya and raised in Hawaii and Indonesia, was considered by the esteemed editors a “lie.” I never knew that one could “lie” by asking a question.

* I think Trump is deliberately and naturally very funny.

His comment to the effect that Hillary probably paid PR guys $2 million but he came up with “Crooked Hillary” all by himself for free tickled me no end.

I thought SPY Magazine’s characterization of him as the “short-fingered vulgarian was funny. But he’s much funnier than they were.

And as adaptable and resilient as he’s proven himself to be under the relentless, unfair and dishonest onslaught by the left, I bet he’s pretty healthy psychologically. Certainly healthy enough to be POTUS.

* The left always marched humorously in lockstep. The pranks those guys pulled seemed mean-spirited whereas Trump’s stunts are more good-natured. They wouldn’t have called their followers “deplorables”–that’s what they would have called the squares or straights. They laughed at the Establishment but they didn’t laugh at themselves. They were full of righteous indignation thinly overlaid with smug humor. It was obvious to me as a teenager that in the left’s eyes, all people were equal but some people were more equal than others.

Posted in Journalism | Comments Off on Peter Beinart: The Death of ‘He Said, She Said’ Journalism

Les Deplorables

From the Chateau:

Trump entered the stage in Miami to a piece of shitlord political showmanship we haven’t seen the likes of in America since well, forever.

TheCunt called 1/3rd? 1/2? 3/4ths? of Trump supporters “deplorable”. So what does Trump do? Why, naturally, he co-opts the theme tune of a beloved shitlib Broadway musical, Les Miserables, and struts out under the Les Deplorables banner to a roaring crowd of American revolutionaries.

Folks, this is a TEXTBOOK application of the Game technique Agree&Amplify. Trump is a MASTER of so many Game principles that his meteoric rise should be studied by generations of young beta males for REAL WORLD EVIDENCE of the efficacy of Game. Trump will be studied by political historians for sure, but his life demonstrates so much more than mere political acumen. It’s no surprise he’s had a parade of some of the world’s most beautiful women as lovers.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Les Deplorables

Why Are So Many Single Women Tatted Up And Obese?

From the Chateau: Sexual markets are vulnerable to changes in the incentives for paternal investment. (Paternal investment itself is a crucial aspect of the sexual market.) As women become more economically self-sufficient and sexually liberated their mate acquisition algorithm begins to emphasize the targeting of men for sexual and romantic validation and to undervalue men who would make dependable resource providers.

Likewise, men who are less interested in commitment and family formation would seek out women primarily for sexual thrills rather than their maternal instinct or faithfulness.

If this is the operative sexual market, then tattoos and single mommery would not only have little effect on women’s SMVs, they may very well raise their SMVs by advertising a greater willingness to go all the way right away, (and to not make much of a fuss when she’s dumped post-chaste).

Now ask yourself, where do you see women with lots of garish tattoos and bastard spawn? The lower classes. And where do you see less dependable fly-by-night men? The lower classes. In the upper classes single mommery is still rare and tattoos, though more common than they once were, are tastefully inconspicuous. Obesity, too, is rarer among upper class women.

So it’s in the lower classes (now gradually expanding into the working and middle classes) where the sexual market has responded to the changing incentives and women have resorted to more “slut signaling” accoutrements like tattoos, skimpy trashy clothes, and yes even bastard spawn (a single mom is a slutty mom).

In the upper classes, paternal investment is still important, so we see less of this among the women who have kept to the traditional SMV norms of their sex: slenderness, clear skin, and childlessness…

So if you notice a lot of tattoos, obesity, and single mommery in the sexual market, you can deduce the following dynamics are in play:

Men have less leverage and fewer mate options (due to sex ratio skew or female emancipation from needing to rely on men to provide for them).
Women have utterly given up trying to find a husband and have settled for finding a cock notch or a sperm donor.
Sluts are ascendant.
Men are dropping out and tuning into substitutes for female companionship.
Enormous upstream social forces are streaming down and wreaking havoc on the normal functioning of the sexual market.
None of the above redact the primacy of the sexual market. They are instead first responder symptoms of a sexual market in dire flux. In the final analysis, SMV remains king of human society, and any secondary markets (economic, social, political) that exert downstream pressures on the sexual market will eventually be reconfigured, even corrupted, by the unstoppable feedback loops unleashed by a primal sexual market convulsing from rapid transformation of the individual players and the higher order systems those players design.

Posted in Dating | Comments Off on Why Are So Many Single Women Tatted Up And Obese?

#ImWithHerpes

From the Chateau:

Hillary Clinton……excuse me, thecunt…..has made genital herpes acceptance part of her campaign.

You think I kid. I kid you not.

Hillary Clinton Thanks Woman for Shattering STI Stigma in A Powerful Letter

Hillary Clinton’s powerful letter to a 24-year-old writer living with genital herpes is striking a nerve on social media.

***
Dawson shared the letter in a Tuesday tweet, prompting a story on the Washington Post.

Clinton praised Dawson for speaking candidly about genital herpes and taking a stand against the hateful rhetoric that women often encounter on the internet.

“I am so grateful to you for not only speaking out against the stigma,” Clinton wrote, “but for also taking a courageous stand against the ridiculous, but very real, barrage of hate you received online.”

“The erosion of civil public discourse is one of the most concerning developments in our society today,” Clinton went on. “As you point out, the internet is not a friendly place for women, and you are not alone in facing the relentless onslaught of baseless, personal attacks.”

herpesacceptance

That’s the prematurely aging slut with genital herpes and the thousand-cock stare, on the left. Her name is Ella Dawson. (Twatter handle: @brosandprose) I have no problem revealing that, because neither does she. As a strong, empowered, and vaginally adventurous woman in The Current Year, she is very proud of having contracted a sexually transmitted disease, so proud that she wants everyone else to pat her on the back for fucking a battalion of dirty-dicked jerkboys (probably half of them black).

“I have never seen a politician understand the danger of the Alt-Right,” Dawson wrote. “It made me sad that a fringe hate community has become so central to American politics that a presidential candidate has to make a speech about them. But it also filled me with genuine, raw hope for the first time since I became an activist.”

Something’s raw with her, but it’s not hope.

“My work consists of raising awareness of STI stigma”

This is possibly the most Millennial feminist sentence ever written.

FYI, Ella, there’s a good reason why certain afflictions have a stigma. Dirty hos are stigmatized as a warning to other women who might be tempted to follow your path and acquire a petri dish of STDs and regret. Agitating to remove the STD stigma is an insult to people suffering from diseases that aren’t the result of poor life choices and low impulse control.

But hey if you really want to remove your genital herpes stigma, how about a centerfold of your chancrous cunt, the weepy labia spread for the world to admire? That’ll exorcise those man-hating demons inside you for good.

Enough of this attention whore. The real story here is Hillary Clinton aka Illary, who is now so mentally rekt by her neurological illness that she thinks genital herpes acceptance is a winning campaign issue.

How obtuse can a presidential candidate get? Who is this going to appeal to, besides bitter lonely feminists and their gayfag BFFs? Whatever she gains in xojane readers she loses fifty times as much in normal Americans who aren’t yet on board with the notion that the crotch diseases of street whores are worthy of the same sympathy as cancer patients.

Thecunt is going down in a landslide in November, and it will be because of her hubris, and the hubris of her shitlib feminist supporters, who live in a culture bubble and can’t conceive that millions of people think differently than they do, or that their shitlib project to ulcerate healthy human instincts isn’t yet a fait accompli. The alt-right Basket of Deplorables was the first gut punch they’ve received since wresting power of all the cultural megaphones, and they are reacting exactly how you’d predict a bloated, complacent piggish enemy to react: with squealing, impotent horror and rage.

The next beautiful shiv will be the killing blow.

Posted in Hillary Clinton | Comments Off on #ImWithHerpes

Is Trump Hitler?

If so, then Hitler wasn’t such a bad guy.

Posted in Adolf Hitler | Comments Off on Is Trump Hitler?