The Fundamental Psychosexual Difference Between Men And Women In One Photo

saysitall

From the Chateau:

That’s Serge Gainsbourg and Jane Birkin. Photo was taken sometime in the 1970s, I’d guess.

As a psychological experiment, its raw unapologetic essence can’t be topped for rudely revealing the fundamental psychosexual difference shaping male and female desire. Both men and women — at least normal, sexually dimorphic men and women and not bitter androgynous blobs — would feel sexually aroused by this photo.

Which really says all you need to know about the sexes. Men are aroused by the sight of a beautiful woman submitting to a dominant man administering disciplinary blows to her backside. Men imagine themselves in the role of the man in the photo, and become excited.

Women are aroused by the sight of a dominant man exerting his uncompromising power over a vulnerable woman surrendering to her punishment. Women imagine themselves in the role of the beautiful woman in the photo, and become excited.

If you could only know one thing about women, this photo, and how men and women react differently to its stimuli, is sufficient to guide you through life.

Posted in Sex | Comments Off on The Fundamental Psychosexual Difference Between Men And Women In One Photo

Republican Convention Speeches

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* So I am watching the GOP convention for the first time, and Peter Thiel gets up there and gives a good common sense speech, and afterwards, all the CNN people can talk about — literally — is that he said he was gay. Just utterly clueless.

* Surely you don’t expect the CNN agitpropbots to discuss the issues Thiel raised? To borrow Thiel’s wording, are they going to talk about how the bubble economy is good for Wall Street but lousy for everybody else? Are they going to talk about Hillary’s endless and useless wars? About how fake culture wars distract from these issues? Of course not, they are going to talk about their obsession, identity politics. From the identity politics point of view — and today’s media progs don’t accept the existence of any other point of view — Thiel is a traitor to his tribe. That’s all they’re going to talk about. What else have they got?

* I know it was a good speech because the liberals are in a tizzy over it.

For the last ten months, people (myself included) worried that he’d back down on immigration when the general election came around. He did not. That we would be listening to a nominee hammer on the costs of illegals and the necessity of managing immigration in the national interest was the stuff of delusional fantasy a year ago. Trump has come through. Now he has to win.

* Trump’s speech KICKED ASS. This guy means to restore some sanity for real. Quite the opposite of his evil opposition.

At one point he even mimed a deliberate hand-to-chin smug Pepe.

* I too am disappointed in Charles Murray, especially since I am from his hometown, Newton, Iowa. He’s now 73 and maybe the fight has just gone out of him–he wants to be intellectually “respectable” there at AEI and he’s smart enough to see where racial consciousness could take him. He also has some half-Asian children, so the temptation to just close his eyes and pretend it’ll all be okay in the end is enormous. Never forget that that “blue pill” can be awfully tempting, especially if you live in rural Maryland and don’t see the consequences of racial diversity in your face everyday.

* Agreed, I haven’t been this disappointed in an intellectual since George Borjas threw Jason Richwine under the bus during a PC shakedown ginned up by Vox’s Dylan Matthews, during which Murray condemned Heritage for doing so.

* No one has been more formative in Donald Trump’s thinking on social and political matters than Michael Savage. Trump has been a big fan and listener of Savage for years and identified with his fellow Queens native. And they are a lot alike. Savage was promoting the “border, language, and culture” theme decades ago.

* It was a tremendous speech. After the Obama debacle, it is refreshing to see someone defend America so unapologetically and so forcefully. The President is, above all, a cheerleader for the country. Trump gets it.

* Miller is living the dream right now. My first real corporate job I remember the thrill I got when the big bosses started reading and considering the ambitious memos I was penning in the equivalent of the mail room. I can’t even imagine the rush I’d get from having my earnest manifestos suddenly getting plucked up and plugged verbatim by one of the most powerful people on Earth.

* Several weeks ago someone posted a link to a Steve Miller speech introducing Trump. It was one of the most inspiring speeches I have ever heard. Miller is an incredible public speaker. In our sad age when someone with the limited rhetorical skills of MLK is held up as an example of oratorical excellence, it’s inspiring to have heard someone like Steve Miller, who may not match the oratory of earlier US politics but can still give a speech that is lucid, logical and emotionally inspiring.

I hope Trump has this man preaching to the hustings up through and beyond November.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Republican Convention Speeches

Where’d Trump Get His Homicides Up 17% Stat? from the Washington Post

WP: More people were murdered last year than in 2014, and no one’s sure why

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Have you noticed the flurry of op-Ed’s and think pieces about how the crime isn’t really bad? Funny, for the last couple of years I remember multiple liberal politicians and media talking about how out of control gun crime was and how we need gun control. But now that cops are getting killed they hasten to say how crime isn’t really that bad compared to 40 years ago, etc.

* Trump made some good points on immigration.

The number of police officers killed in the line of duty has risen by almost 50% compared to this point last year. Nearly 180,000 illegal immigrants with criminal records, ordered deported from our country, are tonight roaming free to threaten peaceful citizens.

Lastly, we must immediately suspend immigration from any nation that has been compromised by terrorism until such time as proven vetting mechanisms have been put in place.

Decades of record immigration have produced lower wages and higher unemployment for our citizens, especially for African-American and Latino workers. We are going to have an immigration system that works, but one that works for the American people.

But my greatest compassion will be for our own struggling citizens. My plan is the exact opposite of the radical and dangerous immigration policy of Hillary Clinton. Americans want relief from uncontrolled immigration. Communities want relief.

Yet Hillary Clinton is proposing mass amnesty, mass immigration, and mass lawlessness. Her plan will overwhelm your schools and hospitals, further reduce your jobs and wages, and make it harder for recent immigrants to escape from poverty.

* Right after Trump’s speech, a male PBS commentator said Trump was stretching the truth by citing the 17% murder rate increase because the 17% increase only applied to 50 cities (!) and not suburban or rural areas.

The PBS journalist also said it was a dark, doom and gloom type speech. I’m sure most of the country thought it was glorious.

* I blame clickbait “news” sites like Buzzfeed for the decline in headline quality over the past few years. I’m so sick of “X event happened; here’s why” (which the above WaPo headline is an form of) and “Person did Action; here’s what happened”.

The running joke South Park did last season about the blurred line between ads and actual news was spot on.

* I don’t think there is today such a thing as a “centrist” Democrat. The entire US congressional membership strike me as a bunch of far left wacko open borders commie extremists. Tim Kaine rates an “F-” with NumbersUSA on immigration issues. So do his VA amigos Warner, Connelly, and Beyer. “F-”. They would import all of Latin America into the US over the weekend if they could get away with it, and put as many whites (themselves excluded of course) into unemployment as possible. Kaine is a far left Spanish-speaking nut job who dreams of turning to the US into Latin America Norte. “Centrist” to me implies that he might at least a little America First or a smidgen of patriotism in his DNA. He doesn’t.

Posted in America, Crime | Comments Off on Where’d Trump Get His Homicides Up 17% Stat? from the Washington Post

Facebook Suspended My Ability To Post For 24 Hours

Facebook suspended my ability to post for 24 hours yesterday morning because I reposted Ricky Vaughn suggesting hashtag #freethefaggot regarding Milo, who was banned from Twitter. Milo refers to himself as the dangerous faggot.

The only other time Facebook removed something I posted was this photoshopped picture of Donald Trump pointing a gun out of his car and saying, “Get in faggot. We’re making America great again.”

get-in-faggot

From Breitbart: Suck It Up Buttercups: Dangerous Faggot Tour Returns To Colleges In September

Triggered social justice warriors and cowering college administrators were breathing a sigh of relief. They thought it was all over. They were wrong.
Breitbart senior editor Milo Yiannopoulos, the Dangerous Faggot himself will be returning to America’s campuses in the fall semester in a tour that promises to be bigger, badder, and more dangerous than ever.

Milo is already confirmed to appear at 26 campuses this fall, with more schools signing on every week. Be sure to keep an eye on the tour page for updates. Students interested in adding the most memorable speaker their university will hear from this year (or in some cases for all time) can contact the tour manager for more information.

Posted in Facebook, Milo | Comments Off on Facebook Suspended My Ability To Post For 24 Hours

Steve Sailer: Look What Happened Last Time Liberals Took Over Criminal Justice: The 1960s

Cn76YaPWAAAD405

Steve Sailer writes: But take a look at the single most dominant notable feature of the graph: the huge increase in murders in the second half of the 1960s and the first half of the 1970s when liberals took charge of the criminal justice system:

Wow.

It might make you think twice about the new Abolish Mass Incarceration conventional wisdom whose rise has coincided (perhaps not coincidently) with the 17% increase in homicides seen in the 50 biggest cities in 2015 over 2014.

COMMENTS:

* I would love to see a similar graph for attempted murders (shootings, stabbings, etc) per 100,000 males aged 15-35. The picture would not look so rosy then, especially in comparison to the early 1900′s when a much larger percentage of the population consisted of young males and differences in medical care and evac, etc. meant that you were much more likely to die when shot.

* It may be new to millennials, but the conventional wisdom for the last four decades been that the spike in crime from c. 1965 to c. 1971 coincided with the institution of Great Society welfare programs that underwrote mass migration of the rural poor to inner cities.

What’s new here?

On the other hand, it might be worth a second look so that we can find less boring, more sophisticated causal explanations.

For instance, a typical movie in 1965 was ‘The Sound of Music.’ In 1971, ‘The French Connection’. In between those two points, movies steadily became more and more violent, starting with a ‘A Fistful of Dollars.’ People must have streamed out of movie theaters, increasingly surly and worked up, resulting in the spike in crime.

More seriously, this is the third time in three weeks that I’ve scoured the nets in vain for an article I saw that correlated the number of young black men swept up and incarcerated from the streets of New York City with the drop in crime rates during the Giuliani administration. Anyone?

* I remember reading some amazing facts about incarceration in Kansas in the 70s in Bill James’s book Popular Crime. It began with murderers being considered for parole after seven years. From there, the possibility of being released on parole became an automatic right if the convict had done nothing wrong in prison. But the craziest part was that the period spent awaiting trial was counted as time served – even if the murderer had been out on bail. So if a killer could get bail and delay his trial for as long as possible, serving four years for murder would be a realistic prospect.

Posted in Crime | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: Look What Happened Last Time Liberals Took Over Criminal Justice: The 1960s