O.J.: Made In America

Part one.

It’s a hot night in Los Angeles. Around 1 a.m. Sunday, I give up trying to sleep and watch the fifth and final installment of this superb ESPN documentary series.

The show brings back memories. I moved to Los Angeles on March 24, 1994, two days before Passover. For almost three months, I stayed in the condo owned by my elderly friend Jules Zenter (the late UCLA professor and counselor) at 923 Levering Avenue, #501, in Westwood, 90024.

I spent most of the previous six years in bed afflicted with what doctors called “Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.” Through the medication Nardil, I made a partial recovery. As long as I did not exert myself, I had about two-thirds of my normal health and could largely function normally. I was registered to return to UCLA in the fall but I dreaded going back to the study regime where I had gotten so very sick in 1988 and never quite recovered. I also feared I could no longer hack it. I didn’t feel strong enough to tackle anything difficult. I needed to stay on easy street for a while.

I had several primal drives that year, perhaps none bigger than my desire to get some lovin’. Within three days of landing in LA, I was meeting women in shul and at Passover tables. I then placed a singles ad and met a Julia Roberts lookalike movie editor for a couple of passionate dates. I also hooked up with a girl from my dorm floor at UCLA 1988-89, the one I’d fantasized about for six lonely years. I was her first and it was absolutely awful.

I reunited with my UCLA girlfriend for a couple of evenings and when I didn’t have a real girl, I enjoyed Jules’s video porn collection.

During my first week in LA, Jules padded into my room one night, excited by my tales of my torrid dating life, and on his knees, asked me if I wanted a blowjob. I said no. He asked me if I was sure. I said, yes, I am sure [I don’t want a blowjob from him].

Our friendship was never the same after that. In May, he asked me to move out by June 15. He said he considered allowing me to stay with him longer but I was not a considerate roommate. I left dirty dishes in the sink and made long distance phone calls without asking permission (though I made sure to let him know afterward and to pay him promptly when his phone bill came in).

Memorial Day weekend, an heiress about five years my senior, flew in from New York and stayed with me for me for three days (that Saturday, May 28, I turned 28 and we went to the Mountaintop Minyan that morning at Stephen S. Wise temple). In August, she paid for me to fly to New York to stay with her for three weeks on Manhattan’s Upper West Side and she took me to Broadway shows and gave me spending money every day. I had virtually no money of my own (except for what I earned as a non-union extra in movies and TV).

Beginning in the fall of 1988, I became a devotee of Dennis Prager. Now in 1994, I listened to him on KABC radio every weekday and saw him at Stephen S. Wise temple most Saturday mornings. Most of my new friends in LA were people I knew in common with Dennis.

Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman were murdered June 12 while I slept a couple of miles east in Westwood.

When I got up Monday morning, June 13, 1994, and turned on the radio, KABC was filled with reports of O.J. Simpson flying back from Chicago and police detectives wanted to interview him about the murders of his ex-wife Nicole and a waiter named Ron Goldman.

I learned from friends that Ron was Jewish.

I had no feelings about OJ. His football heyday was before I began paying attention. The news event did not seem any more important to me than any other murder except that it took place near me.

On his radio show, Dennis Prager refused to talk about OJ. He said the case had no great significance. He wouldn’t lower himself to gossip. Prager was my mentor, the things he said made sense, so I paid as little attention to the case as I could. I didn’t read articles about it. I didn’t watch news about it. I didn’t discuss it. I despised gossip. I was bigger than that.

In some ways, Dennis Prager was a good influence on me, and in other ways, he was a bad influence. In this case, he was a fool. In my fervent Pragerism of the time, I was not well served by trying to ignore reality (such as uncomfortable racial differences, which, to his credit, Prager acknowledged more than any other talkshow host I knew).

Earlier this year, I watched the ten-part FX series on OJ Simpson and was fascinated. I felt stupid for trying to ignore the case when it was going on.

My primary concern that first week of the OJ murders was where I was going to live now that I had to move out by Wednesday, June 15, 1994. I decided to take the easy way out and live out of my car. Surely something better would turn up. I was the type of guy who was doomed to rely on the kindness of strangers (aka women I was bedding). Jules said I could collect my mail from his place and come by daily to shower.

The World Cup of soccer was going on in Southern California. I was excited about rejoining life after six years on the sick bed. I loved soccer. I loved LA. I loved sliding inside woman after woman after woman. I was idolizing Dennis Prager and going to every Jewish event I could. I was applying for acting and modeling work, taking background parts for a little money, and I had an agent sending me out for auditions. I was weak and scared and broke. I loved LA. I had loved it since I discovered MTV in 1982 and saw all the pretty Southern California girls in music videos. Now I was having a good time with the girls and nothing in the world was sweeter to me than those varied connections. For an hour or two at a time, they made me feel whole.

With summer beginning June 21, my life oscillated from extremes of pleasure and excitement in the big city to feelings of genuine satisfaction from the community and substitute family I developed in the Jewish community to the desperation of my poverty and poor health and my frustration with the unnecessary turbulence I created with some people around me. Dennis Prager, as with most people I met that year, like me, but he also kept his distance. They could tell there was something unusual about me, something not quite right.

I spent my first night ever sleeping in my car Wednesday, June 15. It turned out not to be a big deal. I showered at Dr. Zentner’s place Thursday and Friday morning. Friday afternoon, as I listened to KABC radio, O.J. Simpson was dominating the news. He had not turned himself in as agreed.

I loved living in the middle of where things were happening. That made me feel important. All the TV channels were showing his white Bronco going down the freeway (from that point on, I had no doubt about his guilt) and there was a big basketball game that evening between the New York Knicks and the Houston Rockets. My primary attention was on the singles get-together that night at Mogen David synagogue on Pico Blvd.

I loved it that the Jews I knew weren’t so religious that we couldn’t talk about news and sports and anything else we wanted on the Sabbath. I was developing a relationship at the time with a UCLA nurse about five years older than me. We would last about three months, but what our thing lacked in length it made up for in intensity. It also gave me a nice place to stay that was Beverly Hills adjacent near the library. Much better than living out of my car.

When we ended in late September, I borrowed $500 to pay the mechanic and get my car out of his shop so I’d have a place to sleep. I paid her back a month later.

What I’m trying to say is that when I watch this ESPN documentary on OJ Simpson, I remember living right next door to where this was happening and I feel like I understand many of OJ’s troubles such as his sex addiction, his desire to pull himself up from nothing to get ahead and to get along and to do well in polite society and to be loved and adored and to hone your manipulative skills to get a maximum of that, to be worshiped as a god even while your body and mind are failing you, but somehow no matter how much you get what you want, your life doesn’t work, and you get flooded by blinding all-consuming jealous rages and you do stupid things. I felt those same things at that time. I too lived in the midst of plenty, got a lot, more than I ever would again, and yet the highs didn’t last as long as the lows and the fundamentals of my life didn’t build towards something holy.

Like OJ, I was a lousy actor.

apricot

apricot1

Usually when I watch something, I try to imagine that that’s me on the screen and I think about how I would handle myself in that situation. Perhaps only narcissists do this?

As I ricocheted from woman to woman in my first 18 months in LA (my promiscuity ended when I decided in September of 1995 to write a book on the porn industry, I think the subject drove me to be more religious and conservative in my private life to maintain my sanity), I maintained certain basic ethical standards such as no cheating, no married women, no drugs, no unsafe sex, no getting anyone pregnant, no lying and deception. Despite my morals, I felt myself being pulled into a quicksand around sex. I despaired that I would ever be able to say no to a sexual exchange with a pretty woman even if it violated everything I held sacred.

When I did intimate things with a woman, I quickly developed intimate feelings, and I viscerally understood why people kill over this stuff. By sleeping around, I was playing with fire. When I thought a woman belonged to me and then she got with another guy, I felt sick to my stomach. When women teased me but didn’t please me, I felt rage.

I’ve never hit a woman, never gotten close, I can’t even spank them the way some of them want to be spanked. But even a beta male like me can feel things like jealousy and rage and try to sublimate through promiscuity.

Because of my illness, I didn’t leave home until the summer of 1993 and it was only in the beginning of 1994 that I regained enough strength to lead two-thirds of a normal life.

When the largely black jury acquitted OJ of murder on October 3, 1995, I realized that blacks and whites saw the world very differently. I realized that blacks would side with blacks even when they murdered people. I didn’t want to think this way. Influenced by Dennis Prager, I wanted to divide the world between the moral and the immoral, not between black and white. I wanted values to be most important, not skin color. With the OJ verdict, however, reality splintered my prefered worldview.

In the fall of 1995, I began borrowing computers from friends, and I started writing my book. My life as I know it today, however, didn’t begin until I bought myself a proper PC for about a $1000 on July 3, 1997, and connected to the internet and began to blog within an hour of getting home.

The original score for this ESPN documentary is gorgeous. It embodies why I want to live in LA. I don’t know how to write musical criticism, but when I listen to this theme, when I hear it soar, it makes me feel that LA is the place for me, that it’s the place where I will get to feel what I want to feel. This is the city where I will become a hero.

I am rewatching the series. It begins with OJ saying that growing up, the thing he wanted most was fame. Ditto.

He talks about his humiliating work in jail as a porter and janitor. Boy, do I identify with that. I have lived my life dreaming about grandeur while in reality I swallowed constant humiliation.

When I put myself in his shoes, I feel bad for him. There is nothing that is human that is foreign to me. Is it wrong for a person to feel empathy with a murderer? No. Feelings can never be wrong. You’re not a bad person for having feelings. You’re only a bad person if you do bad things that outweigh the good you do.

So what if this documentary was about Hitler? I watched Downfall (2004) about Hitler’s last days and I felt empathy for Hitler. Watching that movie, I felt like I understood him a little bit.

I don’t think anybody views themselves as a bad person.

From the perspective of the universe, there are no good guys and bad guys. There are just forms of life struggling for survival. Only when we see things through the lens of faith are we able to distinguish good from evil. I have faith and I have belief in God and in objective good and evil, but sometimes I like to step away from that and just look at life as war without any good guys and bad guys. I think this is called realism. In real life, the good guys don’t win more than the bad guys. In real life, who’s good and bad depends upon your perspective.

There are thousands of stories of charming black men who turn out to be murderers. The Australian one is called The Chant of Jimmy Blacksmith. Only whites who want to believe that race is not real are surprised.

What do you think Father’s Day is like on an aboriginal reservation? Do you think it’s a big holiday in Africa?

Do I lack a life? I’m now watching the OJ Simpson documentary for the second time. I wish someone could explain the theme music to me. It feels like something out LA noire. It makes my heart ache with love for this city.

The documentary features a lot of professional blacks, including ones so pale that they could pass for white, such as Danny Bakewell and Walter Mosley (who also identifies as Jewish).

WalterMosley-Photography-W

Like Barack Obama, these guys identify as “black” because it gives them an advantage.

According to the doco, the population of blacks in Los Angeles went up 600% between 1940 and 1960 while other groups merely went up 100%.

Mosley: “The hope is that all the troubles I’ve known will be gone. I will no longer be held down by this notion held against my skin and my hair.”

What notion? That race is real? That blacks on their own are incapable of first world civilization? That blacks everywhere in the world have crime rates many times higher than that of whites and East Asians? How many people would like to ride a 100-story elevator exclusively designed and built by dark-skinned blacks? That’s as ridiculous as expecting a white guy to start at cornerback in the NFL.

Bernard Parks, the former black chief of the LAPD, notes that Chief Parker transformed the LAPD into non-corrupt agency.

Parks: “Everything in the police academy and command structure was white.”

Gee, I wonder if that had anything to do with the LAPD’s efficiency? As the LAPD has become more diverse, it has become more corrupt. The more affirmative action it institutes, the more corrupt and incompetent the cops.

When there’s corruption and brutality in the LAPD these days, smart observers immediately suspect the affirmative action latino officers.

The more diverse an institution, the weaker and more divided it is likely to be. A homogenous white or East Asian police force is much more likely to be honest and upstanding than a force with lots of affirmative action hires.

OJ’s USC teammate Fred Khasigian: “USC controls TV, Hollywood, banking, finance, law, medicine, in Los Angeles. The alumni are very powerful and their whole existence revolves around the success of the football team.”

Dumb goy. It’s not USC that controls “TV, Hollywood, banking, finance, law, medicine.”

Posted in America, Los Angeles, Personal | Comments Off on O.J.: Made In America

Steve Sailer: Man Who Fathered Feminist Susan Faludi Is Now Woman Who Definitely Didn’t Mother Her

Steve Sailer writes: I haven’t read the book, but it sounds like another example of a widespread pattern in postwar feminism: bright Jewish daughter grows up angry (sometimes with good reason, as in Susan Faludi’s case) at at least one member of her Jewish family. But she learns that she’ll be rewarded if she generalizes and intellectualizes her resentment toward a Jewish relative into blaming her animus on Society or Men or Stereotypes or anti-Semites or whatever it is that gentiles can be badgered into feeling guilty about.

White guilt is the worry that your ancestors were too ethnocentric; Jewish guilt, as I learned from reading Philip Roth, is the worry that you aren’t ethnocentric enough for your ancestors.

Jewish guilt turns out to be more personally useful.

COMMENTS:

* Philip Roth is a good example. Just chart the progress from “Defender of the Faith” (which got him trouble with the Jewish community) to The Plot Against America. In the former, he’s mildly critical of Jewish ethnocentrism. In the latter, he’s fantasizing about about Christian America slaughtering Jews….

* I wonder if it was also at least in part an unfortunate side effect of having a larger than average crop of 120+ IQ women who weren’t going to find mothering intellectually stimulating enough *plus* a tendency toward intellectual leftism since the right was historically the more anti-Semitic side *plus* a lack of value on traditional masculinity since Jewish men didn’t engage in physical occupations historically.

I mean, feminists really do believe their own BS–they engage in behaviors repulsive to men and encourage each other not to reproduce, which doesn’t sound to me like a very evolutionarily successful strategy. It’s got to be a side product of something else. (And I doubt Kevin MacDonald’s ideas apply here, since there’s no evidence Jewish feminists spawn any more than gentile ones. Mercifully.)

* At one time I helped run an adult outdoor sports club. I have heard several stories from lapsed Jews whose families freaked out at the idea of them participating in Boy/Girl Scouts with gentile troops as children.

Oy Vey, call the Rabbi, What a Shonda!!!

Explains a lot about the ACLU’s decades long obsession with destroying the BSA.

* The dangers of inappropriate bonding and imprinting at a hormonal age are well known.

You wouldn’t want your daughter to be a coal-burner, they don’t want their daughters fornicating with cute goy boys.

That is one of the (subterranean) reasons for Birthright Israel: send ‘em to Israel in their late teens or early twenties and let them imprint on some strong, macho Israeli males. They may come back and wind up marrying some yehudon dentist, but at least they know what’s out there.

* Leftists in general, and feminists in particular, have pushed the idea that normal family life is actually a fount of sickness and cruelty, and the source of many of society’s evils. It is a view that is actually a complete inversion of reality. And it seems to stem from the personal dissatisfaction of those people with their own upbringings. The personal is political: that is to say, some people’s particular personal hang-ups become politics for the rest of us.

A sensible response to these people would be to say: Gosh, I’m sorry your childhood sucked, but mine was just peachy, so don’t ask me to turn society upside down and shake it out like a waste basket just to exorcise your personal demons.

* Sailer on the Future of Intermarriage

12:02 PM Fri 4 Jun 99

Steve Sailer here:

It’s interesting to speculate on the future of intermarriage in America. Marriages are increasingly likely to be between people of different ethnic groups but of similar IQ’s, and there’s no reason to assume this trend will stop. America’s obsession with sending everybody to college means that young people get sorted by SAT score (i.e., IQ) when they’re at their most romantic. Therefore, it’s quite possible that the top dogs in America will in future generations look different than they do now, but they probably won’t look much like the future underdogs, either. If we were to halt immigration now, continuing intermarriage along IQ lines might in many generations lead to the country being run by an IQ overclass of mostly “Jeurasians” (i.e., a genetic blend of the smarter European gentiles, Jews, East Asians, South Asians, Armenians, and possibly other Middle Easterners). In contrast, the lower ranks might consist largely of “Redblex”: a rather lumpy partial blend of redneck whites, blacks, and Mexicans.

Of course, continued immigration slows genetic and cultural assimilation. For example, right now Japanese-Americans are fading into Eurasians because of the decline in immigration from Japan (since there are no terribly poor people left in Japan) and their very high rate of intermarriage with whites (especially for Japanese-American women). Chinese-Americans, in contrast, can be expected to remain a distinct ethnic group for several generations more (despite a high rate of intermarriage), since there is no imminent shortage of poor Chinese desperate to come to America.

The Jews are another interesting case to speculate about. The next generation of the “IQ elite” (e.g., Ivy Leaguers or lawyers or media figures or frequent flyers or whatever category you think representative) may well have a lower percentage of pure Jews … but a higher percentage of part-Jews, as intermarriage between Jews and smart gentiles continues.

Would this mean the non-violent extinction of Jews (except for the Orthodox)? Possibly, but it might also imply that America’s overclass would become even more dominated by Jewish attitudes, e.g., Hitler-obsession (which has played such a major role in influencing the views on the Balkans of our Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, National Security Adviser, and their colleagues). In the future most highly articulate white Americans will be related to Jews by genes or marriage, which no doubt will impact what views are popular in society (even more than today, when a Marlon Brando is automatically excoriated for saying that Jews have lots of power in Hollywood!)

For an extreme example of how pro-Semitism can come about within an individual merely through genes alone, consider me. Although I’m Catholic, I became very pro-Semitic at the age of 13 when my powers of logic kicked in (and my hair turned curly). I quickly noticed that a high percentage of the thinkers I either agreed with (e.g., Milton Friedman) or whom I considered it a worthy challenge to argue against were Jewish. Since I was adopted, a few years later I concluded that it was likely that I was half-Jewish biologically, (which indeed appears to be the case based on evidence my wife dug up when I was 30). It’s important to understand the chain of causation: having a very Jewish-style brain (e.g., enjoying logical argument), I sought out the best logical arguers to read, very many of whom were Jewish. (You may object that my political views today don’t sound much like those of the majority of American Jews, but I was enormously influenced by Jewish neoconservatives in the 1970s and 1980s. Having gone to some lengths to expose myself to Jewish thinkers (not because they were Jewish per se, but because those who most stimulated my kind of mind more than writers from other ethnic groups), I absorbed from them a lot of typically Jewish political stances: e.g., pro-Israel and pro-immigration.

Now, my pro-Semitism came about even though I was being raised in my (adoptive) family, which has no Jewish relatives, and, in fact, has a slight anti-Semitic mindset. (I realize my case is only a single data point, so I recommend somebody conduct a formal adoption study of Jews and part-Jews adopted by gentile families.) In the future, however, most children of the IQ elite will have Jews in their extended relatives, which will make my kind of pro-Semitism even more widespread in the future.

* Steve Sailer: I’ve never taken a DNA test. As an adoptee who is a full-time professional writer, it would seem like a natural topic for a book proposal or a long magazine article. But I’ve never gotten around to taking a test. And the thought that I ought to do something serious and potentially profitable with the topic getting a DNA test has discouraged me from using up what material I already have by blogging for free about it.

But someday, I hope, I’ll get the test and write the book, along with my idea for a book about how the St. Andrews golf course inspired the theory of evolution. But a Surfeit of Events keep providing me with plenty of material to write about 350-360 days per year as it is. A Trump presidency would probably wear my typing fingers to the bone.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: Man Who Fathered Feminist Susan Faludi Is Now Woman Who Definitely Didn’t Mother Her

Gay Jesus & Jewish Hollywood

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* I mean, EVERY year, right around Easter time, you can count on a major news magazine or newspaper doing a cover story on “the REAL Jesus.” That story will explain that Jesus was actually an Essene, a communist, a fraud who faked his death, a rebel who was killed and eaten by wild dogs, a madman, an atheist, a fictional character, a woman, a homosexual, a sorcerer… pretty much anything except the son of God.

Now, speaking as a practicing Catholic… it wouldn’t bother me a whit if Jesus WAS married. There’d be nothing shameful or sinful in a married Messiah having sexual relations with a woman he was married to. So, I’m not scandalized by suggestions that there was a Mrs. YEshua ben-Yussif. I just find it hard to believe none of the Gospel writers thought her important enough to mention, if she DID exist.

* Ms. Jesus was an in-your-face feminist affronting traditional values about gender, sexual roles, and the family. (What else could she have been?) Therefore, we discover that radical feminism has been a core feature of Western, Christian civilization from the beginning. We just didn’t know it. Now we know it. As good Christians, we will thereafter have no choice but to raise our daughters as good, Christian feminists on the newly discovered model.

But, there is a problem. Some of the newly found documents also suggest that Jesus was a homosexual. So what was Jesus doing with a wife? Maybe they had an open marriage and Ms. Jesus was a lesbian … you know, the kind where Jesus was with the guys and Ms. Jesus was with gals but they pretended they were married for appearance sake. Anything goes …. maybe Jesus and Ms. Jesus were not homosexuals. Maybe they were bisexuals. We’ll just have to dig deeper into the ancient texts to get a better take on what was really going on to sort this out.

The implications are enormous. When you think about it, it means that radical “diversity” has been at the core of Christianity and Western Civilization from the beginning. We just didn’t know it. Now we know it. Moving forward, anyone who touts traditional Christian values is a religious heretic who rejects the newly found and previously suppressed sacred documents. Traditional Christianity is now exposed as a long-standing patriarchal conspiracy that was designed to retcon history and eliminate the real Jesus, his feminist wive, and his socially progressive disciples from the historical record. We’re now setting that record straight.

At least it feels good to think these thoughts ….

* Hollywood is in the business of telling stories, pleasant or not so pleasant fictions … fictions are by definition not truth.
The absence of caring about Christian Morality might be a reflection of which groups write, edit, direct, produce and own the studios, choose the stories to be told and the stories that never get told.

* Deborah Solomon has established a popular weekly feature in the New York Times in which she snarkily interviews somebody much smarter than herself. The secret to her success: being ignorant and surly.

* Leftist, ahistorical feminists have so thoroughly pervaded all disciplines of academia that it shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone (at least not Unz people) that a tenured Harvard Divinity prof like Karen King would prove to be completely intellectually dishonest. My SJW Radar is constantly alert to this type of thing…unfortunately.

So, it seems Karen L. King earns her keep at Harvard Divinity School via her “particular theoretical interests in discourses of normativity (orthodoxy and heresy), gender studies, and religion and violence.” The SJW alarm bells went off immediately upon learning of her authorship of books on ‘goddesses’ and ‘divine feminism’ in the church.

There’s an extremely amusing backstory to all of this further explained in Mary Kassian’s amazing books “The Feminist Mistake: The Radical Impact of Feminism on Church and Culture” and “The Feminist Gospel”.

* It’s depressing, though, that almost no Americans understand either why Saudis and Egyptians attacked them on 9/11 or why the USA invaded Iraq. Especially since both these questions have the same answer. [Israel.]

* Why, it’s almost as if she didn’t WANT to know the truth and her ideological agenda was more important to her than mere facts. Thank God that this attitude is not more widespread among leftists in our society, especially among those in high positions, or else we would be in real trouble.

* My favorite Rumsfeld bit was when some turmoil had taken place in Haiti, and he was asked if the U.S. had plans to send the military to Haiti. He said we had no plans, but then corrected himself, saying approximately, “Actually, we have plans for sending troops into every country who can think of, and a lot more that you couldn’t think of, but regarding Haiti right now, we have no plan to use any of our plans.”

Posted in Hollywood | Comments Off on Gay Jesus & Jewish Hollywood

White People

ClMj6zAVAAAHJro

Posted in America | Comments Off on White People

Steve Sailer: Let’s Talk About Me … Black Lives Matter at U. of Missouri Hijacks Orlando Memorial

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* BLM campus guards are logical extensions of the typical attitudes of millennials. I am special, I am interesting, I am unique and I deserve recognition. These people must not be recognized as black lives/lies matter protesters, but something separate and different.

These people are logical outcome of participation trophies, special recognition for the talented tenth and genetic reality.

Gifted with little but victimhood status, they feel oppressed if others don’t recognize them and their ability. They do not feel the need to prove that ability or the greatness of that identity. They just need to exist and be recognized as great – their parents told them so. So did society.

This is really an internal struggle not for acceptance by society, as they claim, but coming to terms with the fact they are average, boring and tritely unoriginal. And that is their great battle – against their own mediocrity.

* Here’s an idea for screening immigrants: use the thematic apperception test

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thematic_Apperception_Test

We see how would-be immigrants react to images of George Washington, pretty New England towns, John Winthrop, Norman Rockwell paintings, cowboys, etc

If the tests reveals bias against Anglo-American imagery, they don’t get in.

* When you see them in person it only reinforces the impression they’re very self absorbed and not very bright or self-aware. They’re all performing, but it’s a different dynamic depending on who you are. But I find it amusing and interesting how the great American dynamic–black people performing for fascinated whites–is very much on display. But you also see these pale-skinned black girls who probably have a white mom at home in the suburbs, and their Obama-esque need to blacken up leads them to emotional extremes.
I’ve got some pretty good YouTube footage of the one Trump/anti-Trump encounter I made it to here in Portland.
I think it’s pretty funny what happened to this Tea Party guy who tried the ol What Would MLK Do on an already worked-up SJW snowflake:

* College administrators have the atom bomb of punishments. They could have threatened, and then carried through with, expulsions. Like this.

The problem in US universities today isn’t that students have gotten out of control. It’s that the faculties are are out of control, and they’re using the students as pawns.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: Let’s Talk About Me … Black Lives Matter at U. of Missouri Hijacks Orlando Memorial