Comments at Steve Sailer:
* One might think that there would be some interest in discussing what effect all this disproportionate Jewish money might have on the US democratic process. Could Jewish donors have any particular political issues they are interested in? Do Jews have any interests that are different from the average American? Could there be any particular impact from all this money on US foreign policy?
However, these ineffable mysteries are simply left by the wayside.
Israel’s ‘right to exist’ does not exist. On the other hand, neither does a Palestinian nation have a right to exist. Palestinian nationalism seems as questionable and racist as Jewish nationalism, which is something a lot of leftists seem to have a double standard on.
* If the Trump revolution holds, we could be in the midst of a realignment. Jews are signaling that they are opposed to the vision of America that Trump voters prefer. That’s good to know.
* The world is becoming a strange place, when my morning glance at my country’s premier left-globalist newspaper’s website front page makes me think of Steve Sailer:
“Trump says Syrian refugees aren’t just a terrorist threat, they’d hurt quality of life”
Did Trump actually say: “this is why we can’t have nice things any more”, as well?
* Trump’s Jewish support seems highest among the least assimilated, least integrated Jews – Orthodox Jews, most of whom don’t personally pay much attention to politics and the wider culture, and whose political support is determined and directed by rabbis and community leaders. They’re also the most oblivious to the anti-Semitic support and subculture among the Trump supporters.
* As opposed to Clinton’s Black-and-Brown base, which reveres the Jewish People as the Chosen People of the One True G-d!
* Trump is going to get about 63-65% of the white vote, and surveys of American whites show extremely high levels of philo-semitism.
As for being concerned about the tiny group of neo-nazis, well if they want to elect a guy with a Jewish daughter, favorite son-in-law, and grandchildren, so what? American whites positively loath antisemitism and defeated Hitler at enormous cost.
* The 5% share of big Jewish donors for Hillary is typical given the industry and geographic distribution of very wealthy Jewish donors, Hillary’s unprecedented success in raising large donations from the extremely wealthy, and Trump’s smaller than normal haul from those same extremely wealthy donors.
Trump is doing much better than Romney with small donors to compensate, but Hillary still has a lot more cash to spend.
Romney’s big success with Jewish donors reflects the understanding that Obama is hostile to Israel and sympathetic to Islam. That was unsustainable when Hillary has been licking Likud’s boot and promising hot and cold running Arab blood in every street for the past 25 years.
Of course, she also wants to import as many Arab Moslems as she can get to the USA. Bring them here and they kill their relations abroad. Then bring more of them here so that they don’t radicalize. That policy will eventually doom Israel to annihilation, but big donors have never been known for their wisdom.
* No one is more pro-Israel than Donald Trump. He, not Hillary, made a commercial for Bibi Netanyahu’s re-election. And Trump, not Hillary, has the backing of Howard Stern.
But Jewish donors are more feminized than almost any other donor group. Being concentrated in media, finance, and related fields, they know that any mis-step gets them defenestrated. And culturally, they subscribe to the whole feminism-PC-Multiculti stuff that comes with having Upper Class women in a feral, carousel riding state well into their thirties. Instead of properly being concerned with family and children.
Self-evidently, mass Third World immigration is bad for most of the lower tier of the Upper Class, as the elites from other countries and sub-elites will compete and crowd out their kids for jobs in media, finance, tec.
Meanwhile as noted above, Trump does well with small donors. Most Dems loathe and despise Israel’s very existence, and certainly Bibi. Trump and his small donors like both.
* For the record, the Jewish quotas were perfectly reasonable. The Ivies were Protestant institutions–in origin for training churchmen–and there is no particular reason that Protestants should be forced to admit any Jews (tribally non-Protestant to say the least), much less allow Jews to become large pluralities of the students in their institutions. (In fact allowing it was a repudiation of the mission of those institutions.) The Jews could have just gone and built their own universities which is what the Catholics did. That Jews seriously cite “Ivy League quotas” to show how “victimized” they were, actually just shows how completely un-victimized they’ve been in America. (Not mind you as ridiculous as the Golfocaust.)
But this is just standard issue stuff. The fundamental Jewish interpretation of history and their victimization is that Jews are perfectly entitled to be a tight endogamous tribe, with in fact religious proscriptions against socializing outside the tribe, but if the host society populations react against our tribalism or even contemplate acting tribally themselves … anti-semitism!
It’s a very weird sort of sociology–when has any group in all of history treated its neighbors with contempt as the “other” and not gotten back the same? But it serves the interest of the tribe to dish it up.
In sum: Jews may be (proudly) tribal, host societies must be open and penetrable by Jews.
And this is what underlies all the Jewish borderline insanity in this election. Trump–however obviously friendly and comfortable with Jews, including his own family–is suggesting that the host society actually gets to decide who is allowed to park their butts here. The horror!
