NYT: America Needs More Racially Superior Foreign Genes

Steve Sailer writes: “During the Olympics you suddenly hear Human Biodiversity arguments in favor of More Immigration. After all, Americans are too genetically pathetic to medal in distance running, so we should just hire East African mercenaries to run for the USA the way Persian Gulf states do.”

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* The men’s 100m times (six under 10 seconds, winner at 9.81) were about the same as in the 1991 World’s Championship in Tokyo (six under 10 seconds, winner at 9.86), so that suggests that drug testing is currently fairly effective at preventing Great Leaps Forward like Ben Johnson and Flo-Jo.

* [Matt] Centrowitz’s dad is, not surprisingly, white. Mrs. Centrowitz was a runner with a fine track name — Bannister — from British Guyana. She could be a mixture of up to four races: white, black and two kinds of Indians.

* Maybe, Israel should start adding some Ethiopians and West Indians to THEIR track and field team. After all, how many medals did Israel win in Track and Field?

* In fairness, Israel did import a great many Ethiopians, an undertaking which American Jews continue to find thrilling, but Israeli Jews tend, in private, to regret.

Liberals, consciously if not always subconsciously, really do believe all the stuff they say about race. It is the holiest of all the holy doctrines of their religion. Most conservatives follow the same religion, albeit with much less enthusiasm, akin to Catholics who only go to Mass a couple times a year, never go to confession, eat meat on Fridays, etc.

If some other lost Jewish tribe were to be discovered in Africa, liberal American Jews would want them to likewise be airlifted to Israel. Many conservative, Trump-voting American Jews would want the same, if only to deploy as a talking point.

* Other African tribes in the wake of the Falasha have tried to get into Israel, with no success in Israel, not surprisingly, but also with little support from American Jews, who seem to have lost interest once Israel acquired one set of black tokens.

For some reason, the very intelligent concept of Diminishing Marginal Returns applies to immigration into Israel, but not to immigration into America.

* Does anyone really care about the Summer Olympics anymore? I recall seeing more ads and promos for the 2014 Winter Olympics at Sochi than this one; because there were more photogenic and sponsor friendly clean cut young White men and women likely to medal or at least compete for a medal.

Usain Bolt is probably the most impressive and fun to watch sprinter I’ve seen; and I can’t recall any commercials featuring him. Lindsey Vonn has a commercial. Meanwhile retired Peyton Manning still is making commercials.

The US could import half of Ethiopia and Kenya and it would not make a difference, fit soccer moms in yoga pants don’t want to buy stuff endorsed by either a Caster Semanya or a bunch of East Africans. They want plausibly idealized versions of themselves, like say Kerri Walsh Jennings of bikini beach volleyball fame. The US male interest in distance running or track in general is about zero. The NFL makes what, north of $4 billion a year just in TV revenues? How much does Track and Field make? Around $10 million maybe?

* I was watching the Women’s 800M when my wife walked in …..I pointed out Caster Semenya and Margaret Wambui and told my wife that this was a handicap race where some men could compete against women. She bought it. When I told her that Caster and Margaret were actually women she scoffed, “Yeah, right.” So, do we import runners like Caster and Margaret or just transition some slower East Africans. And with Michael Phelps probably retiring for good, can we outfit a dolphin with prosthetic arms and throw it in the pool. Silly comments, but what I really want to say is, why is any of this really important. It is because one day the NYT invalidates HBD and the next they tell you we need some so we can compete against East African runners, but why? The NYT also rails against national pride, so why would we need to best anyone at anything just to be proud.

* Immigration may cause us to disastrously spiral downward in terms of crime, poverty, disease, environmental disaster, overpopulation, and global competitiveness in nearly every area, but we’ll have more Olympic Medals! Every four years! Or something.

Of course, if there is more poverty, we won’t have as many resources to devote to athletic training. Not to mention, our athletes would likely be less healthy. And more crime also puts them more at risk. But Diversity!

* Usain Bolt has said in many ways that he is a devoted Christian – I have no idea if he is a real Christian (my guess is that he is – the Miraculous Medal is not something many phonies want to wear – but I might be wrong, the fastest man in the world might have reasons to pretend to be a Christian when he is not, although I certainly hope that is not the case); in any event, he seems to be in the small group that includes, among others, Mariano Rivera (who would be Jeter-level famous – a similar number of World Series rings – if he were a womanizer like Jeter) and Tebow and Rick Santorum and Sarah Palin, that is, those who walk the walk (in each case, they may not be sincere, but they seem to be). Those guys (the Christian males and Palin, the Christian wife) are hated at a level that is hard to understand, and the ad industry and the media industry are afraid of them.

* This might make you think better of Bolt. He is being interviewed by what appears to be a Spanish language reporter. During the interview, which is on the track at Rio, the US anthem begins for a medal ceremony. Bolt stops talking and faces the flag. The reporter at first tries to keep talking then realizes Bolt won’t speak until the anthem is finished.

* As a relatively skinny white guy I’ve always wondered why a significant sub-section of north European whites are thin ectomorphs. Ectomorphs aren’t particularly suited for farming and heavy labouring, and are more likely to die from cold and famine.

In hot climates ectomorphs handle the heat better, and are better suited to activities like hunting and tracking small game, but they seem out of place in cold northern climates. Perhaps they are primarily the result of interbreeding with Mediterranean whites?

* 1) Of the three major body types, ectomorphs are (considered by most to be) the most sexually attractive women and (ditto) the second-most sexually attractive men. There is therefore a very strong sexual selection factor for ectomorph characteristics.

2) Europeans developed, relatively early, sophisticated methods of farming and keeping warm during the winter, and, unlike other groups who formed early, sedentary civilizations, continually improved their farming and architecture.

In doing so, they virtually eliminated the environmental selection factor against ectomorph builds, to the point where it was easily outweighed by the sexual selection factor in favor of them. Compare the similarly-ectomorphic people in cold parts of East Asia.

European civilization’s elimination of environmental selection factors is probably a big part of why whites are generally considered the most attractive people, including/especially by other races. It’s also probably a big part of why genetic diseases are continually increasing in frequency.

3) Ectomorphs are just the default/average body type, whereas the others likely have to do with recessive genes and/or epigenetics.[*] It’s obscured by adults who get into weightlifting or Big Macs, but think back to high school — there were the jocks, the fat kids, and then everyone else.

[*] Genes that are latent but may be expressed later in life at a random point or in response to some trigger. Think asthma and allergies; it’s also the most plausible current theory for the cause of homosexuality.

4) It’s not often discussed, being rather inconvenient for obvious reasons, but Europe used to be much warmer than it is now. The Romans had vineyards in Northern England and imported lions from Russia; we keep finding Viking villages buried under the ice as the Greenland glaciers melt (contemporary texts establish pretty definitively that the name “Greenland” was assigned in earnest).

* Why don’t we import racially superior immigrants to replace the entire NY Times staff and newsroom? Are they implying their white writers are superior to non-white non-immigrant writers?

* It’s Sunday morning and the Men’s Marathon is on. At the 35 km mark a white American, Galen Rupp, is one of the three leaders.

The BBC announcer had this to say:

“It is possible for Western athletes to compete alongside the mights of the East Africans – they’re human beings, they’re not machines, and if they can work hard, so can our athletes.

. . . I’m so pleased to see Galen Rupp up with in the mix in the medals because it sends the right signal to western-based distance runners that with the right amount of hard work there’s no reason you can’t be in the mix for a major medal come an Olympic games or major championship.”

When he finished talking the Kenyan and Ethiopian pulled away from Rupp. Not that there’s anything wrong with that – Rupp got the bronze, just missing out on silver.

If only Rupp had worked harder . . .

* American Jewry has Israel over a barrel, but we basically never see them force Israel to do anything “liberal” that they push here. Stop electing people well to the right of (and far more nationalist than) Trump? Nope. Open borders? Nope. Stop building gigantic border walls? Nope. Diversity mania? Nope. End to Israeli Apartheid? Nope. End to Jewish Colonialism and Jewish Supremacy? Nope. Justice for the Palestinians? Nope. Affirmative action for Arabs and Palestinians? Nope. Stop shelling Palestinians every few years? Nope. Arab hope-n-change head of state in Israel? Nope. Media as open sewer? I dunno, but I doubt it.

Few thousand blacks who get treated like crap (I’m being kind)? Not really blowing my skirt up.

American Jewry has more power over Israel than they have over the US, but, not much in the way of results.

Unless you realize American Jewish leftism is phony, Jewish Supremacy (“Is It Good For The Jews?”) in disguise. That you’re seeing divergent aims, not performance. Then you realize there is no curious, sudden, selective ineffectiveness – reality makes sense again.

It’s not like American Jewry even makes much noise about this, never mind cutting off the purse strings. How many other issues can you think of that 1) Annoy Jews, and 2) Jews don’t complain about?

* The “black Hebrews” are not Jews. Judaism is a club; every crackhead in the Bronx doesn’t get to say if they are in the club because they got rejected by the NOI or whatever. Blacks who join the club according to the club’s rules, are in the club. There’s not many because you basically can’t join the club if your IQ is below 100. Disparate Impact wins again.

Related question, there are black cults who claim that they are the only real Muslims, black cults who claim they are the only real Jews; are there black cults who claim they are the only real Christians?

* In medieval England, body types tended to match your social caste. The worker class, the drawers of water and hewers of wood, namely your farmers, were endomorphs. They looked like the bulky peasants out of a painting by Peter Bruegel the Elder. They have the steady physical endurance you need for farming. The mesomorphs were the warrior caste, the knights. They hit hard but tire more quickly than the endomorphs. But the rulers were the ectomorphs. Go look at pictures of the British titled aristocracy both today and back then, and you’ll be surprised at how many of them are skinny, at least up to their mid-thirties. If you look at old paintings of the Plantagenets–at least the ones considered to be the most accurate–you’ll be surprised to see that they were ectomorphs. The reason women chase ectomorphs is that even in today’s society, ectomorphs are not lower class. They tend to be at least upper-middle class, so women who marry them are more likely to be marrying money and influence, or eventual money and influence as the ectomorph males work their way up their chosen career path. By and large, ectomorphs are clever, and they know how to say the right things and make things work for them, given enough time and experience.

Posted in Africa, America, Ethiopia, Israel, Olympics | Comments Off on NYT: America Needs More Racially Superior Foreign Genes

Will the Mormon Church’s Support for Muslim Immigration Block Trump’s Victory?

Tom Tancredo writes: The media is suddenly full of stories on Trump’s “Mormon problem.” According to the mainstream media, Trump’s call for “extreme vetting” of Muslim immigrants in his foreign policy speech kicked open a hornets’ nest of Mormon concerns about “religious tolerance.”

The truth is more simple, as is often the case in politics, and it has nothing to do with religious freedom as practiced by Americans under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

It is an open secret in Washington, D.C. that the Mormon church supports open borders and lax enforcement of immigration laws. Many Mormon politicians have been supporting amnesty and open borders for decades. When I was in Congress I had a confrontation with former Utah Senator Robert Bennett over his sponsorship of an amendment to exempt religious institutions from a Sanctuary City bill establishing penalties for harboring illegal aliens. It turned out he did it at the request of his church leaders. Mormon church support for John McCain in his Arizona Republican primary race is also due in large part to his open borders record and his challenger’s strong criticism of McCain’s hypocrisy on border security.

So, no one should be surprised that Trump’s call to build a wall on the southwest border and his plan for putting the war on Islamist terrorism above open immigration has encountered resistance among some Mormon politicians. What is surprising is the dishonest way even some Republicans have framed that disagreement as opposition to infringement on religious liberty.

ISIS leaders must be rolling in the mosque’s aisles in uncontrolled laughter over the Mormon concern over Muslim immigration, considering that religious liberty is the first casualty wherever radical Islam and Sharia are enforced.

Under Sharia law enforced by orthodox Muslims wherever they have the power to do so, religious liberty is defined as giving Christians and Jews and other “infidels” a choice: either convert to Islam, pay the “Jizya” tax, or die. That is religious liberty under Islam, and it bears no resemblance to the religious liberty guaranteed by the US Constitution.

Trump is advocating a new policy of vigorous, effective screening of Muslim refugees and immigrants to identify likely Islamist terrorists and bar their admission to our country. So, how did a ban on admission of likely terrorists become a war on religious liberty? Once you find a good answer to that question, my friends, you will have discovered the answer to the riddle of political correctness run amok.

Immigration restrictions based on national security concerns are not new. Maybe liberals and progressives do not want to remember it, but during the cold war against international Communism, America had laws restricting immigration from the Soviet Union and a dozen communist nations. Why is a ban on admission of Islamist terrorists any different?

Why is it suddenly an affront to religious liberty to say with Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson, “The Constitution is not a suicide pact”? Justice Jackson’s famous phrase was in dissent to a 1949 Supreme Court ruling striking down a Chicago ordinance prohibiting incitement to riot. But the same common sense sentiment was expressed by a Supreme Court judge appointed by President John Kennedy, Arthur Goldberg, when he said in 1962, “Congress has broad power under the Necessary and Proper Clause to enact legislation for the regulation of foreign affairs. Latitude in this area is necessary to ensure effectuation of this indispensable function of government.”

The truth is that not only does the Constitution NOT prohibit immigration restrictions on persons holding beliefs hostile to public safety and national security, there are several US Supreme Court decisions upholding Congress’s and the President’s powers to put the nation’s safety and security ahead of any alleged universal right of foreign nationals to enter the United States. Suggestions to the contrary, whether expressed by Sharia advocate Khizr Khan addressing the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia or Mormon Senator Jeff Flake stirring up opposition to Donald trump in Arizona, is pure demagoguery and ought to be called by its right name no matter where it occurs.

A clear-eyed look at the current presidential campaign suggests to me that the extent of Mormon opposition to Donald Trump is being exaggerated by the hostile media and some “Never Trump” opponents. The recent announcement by an ex-CIA agent of the Mormon faith, Evan McMullin, that he will wage a candidacy as an independent candidate for president, is not generating a tidal wave of support in Utah or anyplace else.

Nonetheless, the statements of some Mormon leaders raising the specter of religious persecution if immigration of radical Muslims is banned, is poisonous to intelligent debate over immigration policy. But then again, this is not new: the open borders lobby has never wanted to allow intelligent debate on the issue and has always tried to slander proponents of border controls.

Governor Herbert of Utah has been pouring kerosene on the smoldering fire by trying to link immigration policy to religious persecution. The former LDS missionary recently said, “I am the governor of a state that was settled by religious exiles who withstood persecution after persecution, including an extermination order from another state’s governor. In Utah, the First Amendment still matters. That will not change so long as I remain governor.”

Posted in America, Islam, Mormons | Comments Off on Will the Mormon Church’s Support for Muslim Immigration Block Trump’s Victory?

Orthodox rabbis condemn Donald Trump’s ‘hateful rhetoric and intolerant policy proposals’

LINK:

We the undersigned are a group of American Orthodox rabbis, speaking as individuals, who have come together — in solidarity with other religious leaders — to make this statement on a matter of grave religious import.

We believe that religion should be lived in daily life and applied in the public square and in making policy judgments. We also believe that religion should be invoked with care because its tendency to judge matters in absolute or ultimate terms may interfere with the ability of the political system to work through partial steps, compromises and pragmatic accommodations. We also affirm that it is improper to claim that God or our religion is totally on one side, be it progressive or conservative. We affirm that people of good faith can come to contradictory conclusions on policy matters.

Nevertheless, there are times when the political discourse veers into morally offensive language and policy proposals that violate fundamental religious norms. In such cases, we feel that we must speak up — and as Orthodox rabbis in particular — since we believe that every action in life should be shaped and guided by our religious values.

We issue this statement on the heels of the week of the 9th of Av. On the Jewish religious calendar, this commemorates the anniversary of the destruction of the Second Holy Temple and the Great Exile — the greatest catastrophe of Jewish history until the Holocaust. The Talmud states that this disaster was a direct consequence of the release of gratuitous and unrestrained hatred into the body politic.

In the current presidential election, we have been deeply troubled to hear proposals that condemn whole groups and which are justified by pointing to evil behaviors by members of that group or religion. Wholesale condemnations — such as the proposal to ban all Muslim immigration into the United States — violate the principle of individual responsibility and violate the fundamental religious principle of “love thy neighbor as thyself,” which is one of the greatest commandments of Judaism (see Jerusalem Talmud, Nedarim 9:4). These proposals violate the biblical prohibitions to spread hatred or slander about groups and individuals and violate the oft-repeated biblical command to love the stranger.

We add that we were shocked by the disrespect shown to parents who suffered the greatest pain — losing a son who died in the service of our country. The Torah commands us always to comfort mourners. The fact that the parents criticized a candidate does not justify harsh and hurtful retaliation.

Similarly, we condemn the candidate’s remarks demeaning women, and we denounce his attacks labeling many Mexican immigrants as rapists or criminals. Again, opposition to immigration or to amnesty for illegal aliens cannot justify wholesale denials of the dignity of human beings or threats to round up and deport millions of families. These remarks and proposals are gross violations of the fundamental principle of our religion that every human being is created in the image of God and should be treated as equal, as unique, and as a person of infinite value and dignity.

Finally, we are troubled by candidates who signal authoritarian tendencies and pursue personal vendettas that come across as a dismissal of constitutional rights and legal processes. Protection of the law, equality before the law, and respecting democratic political processes (though they may fall into gridlock or frustrate us from time to time) are the bedrocks of democracy. Democracy is the system most protective of human dignity. Upholding it and protecting its processes is of the highest religious value. The fact that these dangerous tendencies have been coupled with statements of admiration for authoritarian dictators has aroused our conscience.

All these behaviors, taken together, have led us to make this extraordinary statement in the name of our religious principles. Our core religious values and essential theological beliefs require us to condemn Donald Trump’s hateful rhetoric and intolerant policy proposals in the strongest possible terms.

Rabbi Dr. Irving (“Yitz”) Greenberg, a scholar and theologian, is the founding president of the Jewish Life Network/Steinhardt Foundation and of the National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership in New York City. Rabbi Daniel Ross Goodman, J.D., is a Ph.D. candidate at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America in New York. Other lead signatories on this statement were Rabbi Dr. Shmuly Yanklowitz, founder and president of Uri L’Tzedek: The Orthodox Social Justice Movement, and president and dean of the Valley Beit Midrash in Scottsdale, Arizona; and Rabbi Aaron Potek, who works with Jewish young adults in Washington, D.C. At least 36 other Orthodox rabbis have also co-signed this statement.

1. Rabbi Dr. Elisha Ancselovits
2. Rabbi Yonah Berman
3. Rabbi Dr. Tsvi Blanchard
4. Rabbi Barry Dolinger
5. Rabbi Michael Emerson
6. Rabbi Steven Exler
7. Rabbi Dr. Josh Feigelson
8. Maharat Ruth Friedman
9. Rabbi Jeffrey Fox
10. Rabbi Aaron Frank
11. Rabbi Daniel Geretz
12. Rabbi Dr. Bin Goldman
13. Rabbi Daniel Goodman
14. Rabbi Ben Greenberg
15. Rabbi Steve Greenberg
16. Rabbi Dr. Yitz Greenberg
17. Rabbi Ari Hart
18. Rabbi Shmuel Herzfeld
19. Rabbi Dr. Richard Hidary
20. Rabba Sara Hurwitz
21. Rabbi David Jaffe
22. Rabbi David Kalb
23. Rabbi Will Keller
24. Rabbi Fred Klein
25. Rabbi Dr. Eugene Korn
26. Rabbi Danny Landes
27. Rabbi Dr. Dov Lerea
28. Rabbi Aaron Levy
29. Rabbi Jon Leener
30. Rabbi Dov Linzer
31. Rabbi Ariel Evan Mayse
32. Rabbi Avram Mlotek
33. Rabbi Micah Odenheimer
34. Rabbi Avi Orlow
35. Rabbi Dani Passow
36. Rabbi Aaron Potek
37. Rabbi Haggai Resnikoff
38. Rabbi Chaim Seidler-Feller
39. Rabbi Ben Shefter
40. Rabbi Garth Silberstein
41. Rabbi Daniel Raphael Silverstein
42. Rabbi Victor Ureki
43. Rabbi Devin Villarreal
44. Rabbi Dr. Shmuly Yanklowitz
45. Rabbanit Devorah Zlochower

Jewish Press responds:

The quote from the Yerushalmi is the famous note by Rabbi Akiva that “Love your friend as you would yourself” is a great Torah principle. It is, but it refers exclusively to Jews, as can be easily discerned from the complete verse: “Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against the people of your nation (B’nei Amecha), and love your friend (Re’acha) as you would yourself, I am God.” Of course, there are universal interpretations of this verse, but as it happens, the Yerushalmi chapter the group cited actually emphasizes one line earlier the idea of the verse referring to the people of your own nation, meaning Jews.

Frankly, even if one does not support Trump’s xenophobic attacks on “Rapist Mexicans” and “the Muslims,” a group of 45 learned rabbis could have come up with a more convincing, perhaps intellectually challenging argument, especially since they present the Trump proposals on banning—temporarily—Muslim immigration without context, as if the candidate just picked a fight with a billion and a half peaceful people who are minding their own business just worrying about grazing their camels and perfecting their hummus.

The 45 rabbis also say they were “shocked by the disrespect shown to parents who suffered the greatest pain—losing a son who died in the service of our country. The Torah commands us always to comfort mourners. The fact that the parents criticized a candidate does not justify harsh and hurtful retaliation.”

This time they didn’t go to the Yerushalmi to support their “always comfort mourners” point. It’s probably not true, as can be seen in the commandments regarding the beautiful war captive, where comforting her as she is mourning her killed parents is distinctly not part of the Jewish soldier’s obligations.

They also attack Trump for his “authoritarian tendencies” and “personal vendettas that come across as a dismissal of constitutional rights and legal processes.” They’re about a year late in comforting Prime Minister Netanyahu, who suffered from the personal vendettas of the current US president. Maybe there’s something in the Yerushalmi about that.

Posted in Donald Trump, Orthodoxy, Rabbis | Comments Off on Orthodox rabbis condemn Donald Trump’s ‘hateful rhetoric and intolerant policy proposals’

WP: ‘Racial realists’ are cheered by Trump’s latest strategy

Washington Post: OAKTON, Va. — Jared Taylor hits play and the first Donald Trump ad of the general election unfolds across his breakfast table. Syrian refugees streaming across a border. Hordes of immigrants, crowded onto trains.
“Donald Trump’s America is secure,” rumbles a narrator. “Terrorists and dangerous criminals kept out. The border, secure; our families, safe.”
Taylor, one of America’s foremost “racialists,” is impressed and relieved. “That’s a powerful appeal,” he said. “If he can just stick to that, he is in very good shape.”
From his Fairfax County home, Taylor has edited the white nationalist magazine American Renaissance and organized racialist conferences under the “AmRen” banner. He said that Trump should “concentrate on his natural constituency, which is white people,” suggesting that winning 65 percent of the white vote would overwhelm any Democratic gains with minorities.
When Trump made Breitbart News CEO Steve Bannon his campaign’s chief executive this week, Taylor found reasons to celebrate. It was the latest sign for white nationalists, once dismissed as fringe, that their worldview was gaining popularity and that the old Republican Party was coming to an end.
The rise of the alt-right — named for the Alternative Right website that the “identitarian” nationalist Richard Spencer set up in 2010 and adopted by those opposed to multiculturalism and mass immigration — has come to define how many of its adherents see Trump. There’s less talk now about a “pivot,” or a moment when Trump will adopt the ideas of people that he conquered. His strategy now resembles the alt-right dream of maximizing the white vote — even as polling shows his standing with white voters falls short of Mitt Romney’s in 2012.
Trump’s newest speeches, read from a teleprompter, hit all of their favorite notes. “I don’t think Trump had mentioned ‘sanctuary cities’ previously,” Spencer said in an interview. “There’s reason to believe that Bannon is returning him to his powerful, populist message — indeed, honing it. [Former campaign chairman Paul] Manafort was turning Trump into a standard Republican, with the [Mike] Pence [vice-presidential] choice, the economic policy, talk of how ‘Hillary is the real racist,’ if not quite in those words. Bannon is making me hope again, making Trump Trump again.”

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on WP: ‘Racial realists’ are cheered by Trump’s latest strategy

Bad! ‘Yesterday we published a review of Seth Rogen’s new animated film, Sausage Party’

LINK: After we published the review, we heard from Latinx readers who believe the portrayal of Salma Hayek’s taco was racist and that it reinforced harmful stereotypes. We heard from readers who were upset that we labeled the taco a lesbian when it seems more likely that she was bisexual. We heard from readers who questioned the consent of the sexual encounter between the taco and the hot dog bun. We heard from readers who found the taco to be a damaging portrayal of a predatory queer woman.

There are several reasons I should have listened to the alarm bells of unease I felt about the Sausage Party review. First and most damning: we allowed a non-Latina writer to cover a story about a caricature of a Latina, and while the review didn’t specifically mention the film’s stereotyping, by praising the film as a positive portrayal of a queer Latina, we allowed a white writer to, in effect, condone that stereotyping. Second, when I was looking for reviews, I trusted the opinion of mainstream newspapers and websites and didn’t specifically seek out reviews written by women of color, generally; or Latina women, specifically. Furthermore, if the review had been written by a staff writer we would’ve talked it out with the writer in Slack if we had concerns and asked them more questions. Since the writer was a freelancer, we chose not to reach out to ask follow up questions over email; instead, we plowed forward for the sake of a time-sensitive article. Third, we did not consult with our full team to see if anyone had heard anything positive or negative about the film’s portrayal of a queer Latina character. And finally, we put the burden on Yvonne of being the conscience and voice for all queer Latina women.

I want to personally apologize to every reader who was hurt by the Sausage Party review. I failed you as a senior editor of this website and I failed you as an ally. I am wholly sorry for the pain and anger I caused you. I offer you no justification. I was blinded by my own whiteness existing inside a system of white supremacy. I must do better. I will do better. I also want to take full responsibility for not working more closely with the freelancer. This was not her fault. This was an editorial failure. I should have asked more critical questions about the film, especially since no one I know had seen it.

A note from Yvonne: I want to apologize to our Latinx readers specifically because I could’ve stopped this from happening, especially when I recognized the red flags and didn’t stop to question them. I knew the taco was a racist caricature but attributed it to a systemic problem in media that wasn’t necessarily our problem. But it became our problem when we used our voice as a queer publication to write a positive review of that racist caricature and perpetuated a racist narrative for the sake of the queer representation in the film. I was wrong for not stopping this immediately, especially when it deeply effects my own people. I’m a Latina and I’m also susceptible to the racist, oppressive system we live in. I know how incredibly challenging it is to find genuine Latinx representations in media and I’m sorry I was a disservice to Latinxs by not demanding better. These aren’t our stories and we deserve better. I’m deeply shamed by this deplorable mistake and I will definitely learn from this and make sure I can provide the best representation for people of color going forward.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Bad! ‘Yesterday we published a review of Seth Rogen’s new animated film, Sausage Party’