{"id":98635,"date":"2016-06-10T16:58:45","date_gmt":"2016-06-11T00:58:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=98635"},"modified":"2016-06-10T17:00:04","modified_gmt":"2016-06-11T01:00:04","slug":"here-are-10-more-examples-of-google-search-results-favorable-to-hillary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=98635","title":{"rendered":"Here Are 10 More Examples of Google Search Results Favorable to Hillary"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><A HREF=\"http:\/\/freebeacon.com\/politics\/here-are-10-more-examples-of-google-search-results-favorable-to-hillary\/\">Washington Beacon<\/a>: \u201cCrime\u201d and \u201cindictment\u201d are not the only terms Google is keeping hidden from searches of Hillary Clinton, a Washington Free Beacon analysis finds.<\/p>\n<p>Common search terms associated with Clinton appear to have been scrubbed from Google as the tech giant has been accused of manipulating its autocomplete results to favor the Democratic presidential candidate.<\/p>\n<p>Matt Lieberman of SourceFed released a video showing examples of Google skewing its autocomplete results for Clinton, while other search engines simply display the most searched terms.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhile researching for a wrap-up on the June 7 Presidential Primaries, we discovered evidence that Google may be manipulating autocomplete recommendations in favor of Hillary Clinton,\u201d SourceFed wrote. \u201cIf true, this would mean that Google Searches aren\u2019t objectively reflecting what the majority of Internet searches are actually looking for, possibly violating Google\u2019s algorithm.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>For example, when searching Hillary Clinton \u201ccri,\u201d Google finishes the phrase as \u201ccrime reform.\u201d On Yahoo, the result is \u201ccriminal charges.\u201d On Google\u2019s own trend website, there were not enough searches for Hillary Clinton and \u201ccrime reform\u201d to build a graph of the results.<\/p>\n<p>Typing Hillary Clinton and \u201cind\u201d gives Google users results on Hillary Clinton and Indiana. On Microsoft\u2019s Bing search engine, a user gets Hillary Clinton and \u201cindictment,\u201d yielding results for the FBI investigation into Clinton\u2019s private email server.<\/p>\n<p>Just putting the name \u201cHillary Clinton\u201d into Google, you are directed towards searches for her \u201ctwitter,\u201d \u201cemail,\u201d \u201cage,\u201d and \u201cspeech.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><A HREF=\"http:\/\/dailycaller.com\/2016\/06\/09\/julian-assange-google-is-in-bed-with-hillarys-campaign-video\/\">Julian Assange: Google Is In Bed With Hillary\u2019s Campaign<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Speaking at a European journalism summit on Tuesday, Julian Assange claimed that through several outlets, Google has been working to put Hillary Clinton in the White House.<\/p>\n<p>According to the International Business Times, the WikiLeaks founder told attendees at the \u201cNew Era of Journalism: Farewell to Mainstream\u201d conference that \u201cGoogle is directly engaged with Hillary Clinton\u2019s campaign.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Washington Beacon: \u201cCrime\u201d and \u201cindictment\u201d are not the only terms Google is keeping hidden from searches of Hillary Clinton, a Washington Free Beacon analysis finds. Common search terms associated with Clinton appear to have been scrubbed from Google as the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=98635\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1204,185],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-98635","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-google","category-hillary-clinton"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98635","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=98635"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98635\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":98638,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98635\/revisions\/98638"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=98635"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=98635"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=98635"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}