Bill Kristol tweets: “Simple question for the sophisticated accommodators of Trump: Why aren’t Trump’s comments on Judge Curiel simply disqualifying?”<\/p>\n
John Rivers replies: “La Raza is a racial advocacy group. Hey, Bill, are you in any racial advocacy groups?<\/p>\n
It’s fine for hispanics to be in groups called The Race. What’s racist is for white people to notice.<\/p>\n
It’s so racist to notice that a judge is in a racial advocacy group called The Race. Disgusting!”<\/p>\n
Peter Brimelow writes<\/a>: <\/p>\n \nOf Course Trump Is Right About Minority Judges\u2014Remember The \u201cWise Latina\u201d?<\/p>\n The more I think about it, the more I like James Kirkpatrick<\/a>‘s contention that the Main Stream Media, not the Democratic Party or any political organization, is now the Official Keeper (and enforcer) of the Cultural Marxist Narrative<\/a>. A few moments ago, I googled on “Wise Latina + “Donald Trump” and found that there’s only one (1) reference: WashPost Unleashes on Trump, The Mexican-American Judge, and the ‘Wise Latina’<\/em><\/a>, by Jeffrey Lord (whom we’ve praised before<\/a>), Newsbusters<\/em>, June 4, 2016: Let\u2019s recall that the Washington Post <\/em>endorsed then-federal judge Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court. During her confirmation hearings it came to light that Sotomayor regularly gave some version of the following quote in her speeches:<\/p>\n “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion.”<\/em><\/p>\n Got that? Sotomayor was explicitly saying that her view of judicial decision-making was related not to the law and the Constitution but her ethnic\/racial heritage as a \u201cwise Latina.\u201d<\/p>\n And yet? And yet the Washington Post endorsed that, in this editorial <\/a>headlined: “Confirm Sonia Sotomayor.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n It takes an impressive amount of discipline to avoid noticing that, if a Supreme Court Justice openly congratulates herself for making decisions based on her race, Donald Trump has every reason to be concerned about the impartiality of a professional Mexican like U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel.<\/p>\n VDARE.com has long argued that, given the U.S. now has legislating judges, they should be compelled to face elections i.e. impeachment<\/a>. If you follow that link, you will see that a high proportion of the legislating judges we have exposed have been various sorts of minorities. (There is the occasional honorable exception<\/a>).<\/p>\n Diversity is not strength, and it above all is not an impartial judiciary<\/a>. That requires a degree of cultural consensus that post-1965 immigration policy has destroyed.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Bill Kristol tweets: “Simple question for the sophisticated accommodators of Trump: Why aren’t Trump’s comments on Judge Curiel simply disqualifying?” John Rivers replies: “La Raza is a racial advocacy group. Hey, Bill, are you in any racial advocacy groups? It’s … Continue reading
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n\n