[Editor\u2019s Note: This article was rejected by 45 different magazines, periodicals, and journals across the political spectrum: Far left, left, center, unaffiliated, right, far right, and libertarian.]<\/p>\n
Two professors write<\/a>:<\/p>\n Perverse as it sounds, the Trump brand of political mockery might be just what this nation needs most right now.<\/p>\n These problems truly are cancers to our democracy, and a President Trump might be potent, if rough, medicine. There\u2019s little question that his incompetence, inexperience, impetuousness, and incivility would cripple both the effectiveness and reputation of American politics for as long as he held office; and the embarrassment to the American citizens, if it were to elect him, would be almost unbearable. Our relationships with many, if not most, other countries would deteriorate, our economy would struggle (if it didn\u2019t crash outright), and many of our problems would either multiply or fester. Such pains, though, may be the metaphorical equivalent of what chemotherapy does to its unfortunate patients. The question to our minds, then, isn\u2019t whether a Trump presidency would be bad for America\u2014it unquestionably would\u2014but whether America might survive the medicine and come out better for the noxious treatment.<\/p>\n We think it may. The United States is a carefully constructed democratic republic with divided powers, and a terrible president, while coming at a serious cost, will prove limited in the scope of his capabilities. Congress is very unlikely to back much of what Trump proposes, for instance, and they just spent eight years demonstrating that if only half of our elected legislators have such a mind, they can grind American politics largely to a halt. Even if he is able to unduly pressure Congress, Trump would still have the Supreme Court to reckon with, and it would rarely go in his favor even were he able to stack the deck slightly to his favor by placing a few justices. Some in the US Military have already indicated that it is unlikely to follow his orders as Commander in Chief, if they are unconscionable or outright war crimes (a concept that Trump, in all his bluster, clearly doesn\u2019t understand). In all likelihood, the force of the laws and traditions of the United States will be strong enough to render Trump largely impotent as president.<\/p>\n Is it a risky bet? Absolutely. A Trump presidency cannot be seen in a more flattering light than an attempt to drink a little chemo, get sick, and kill a handful of political cancers at once. Is it flirtation with fire? Yes. The whole gambit rests upon the horror of a Trump presidency creating a political backlash that repairs our most damaged institutions. Are we going to vote for Trump? No. No one should. What we\u2019ve written constitutes the only reasonable case for supporting Trump, and it\u2019s weak. That there\u2019s even such an argument to be made, though, tells us a great deal about what\u2019s going wrong in our society.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" [Editor\u2019s Note: This article was rejected by 45 different magazines, periodicals, and journals across the political spectrum: Far left, left, center, unaffiliated, right, far right, and libertarian.] Two professors write: Perverse as it sounds, the Trump brand of political mockery … Continue reading