{"id":96057,"date":"2016-05-15T06:38:56","date_gmt":"2016-05-15T14:38:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=96057"},"modified":"2016-05-15T06:39:44","modified_gmt":"2016-05-15T14:39:44","slug":"when-the-wrong-are-right","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=96057","title":{"rendered":"When the Wrong Are Right"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ross Douthat seems a tad reactionary here<\/a>:<\/p>\n

THE rise of Donald Trump, and with him a white-identity politics more explicit than anything America has seen in decades, has created an interesting division on the political left \u2014 over the question of what, if anything, liberal politics ought to offer to people who seem bigoted.<\/p>\n

On the one hand there are liberals determined to regard Trumpism as almost exclusively motivated by racial and cultural resentments, with few legitimate economic grievances complicating the morality play. From this perspective, the fact that Trump\u2019s G.O.P. has finally consolidated, say, a once-Democratic area like Appalachia is almost a welcome relief: At last all the white racists are safely in the other party, and we don\u2019t have to cater to them anymore.<\/p>\n

On the other hand, there are left-wingers who regard Trump\u2019s support among erstwhile Democrats as a sign that liberalism has badly failed some of its natural constituents, and who fear that a Democratic coalition that easily crushes Trump without much white working-class support will simply write off their struggles as no more than the backward and bigoted deserve.<\/p>\n

I like how the left-wing gadfly Fredrik deBoer framed this issue: \u201cWhat do you owe to people who are guilty of being wrong?\u201d It\u2019s a question for liberals all across the Western world to ponder, given the widening gulf between their increasingly cosmopolitan parties and an increasingly right-leaning native working class.<\/p>\n

But as a conservative, I would add another question: What happens if the bigoted sometimes get things right?<\/p>\n

Don\u2019t worry, this isn\u2019t a setup for my slow reconciliation with the candidacy of Donald Trump. Rather, it\u2019s a warning against organizing your politics around antibigotry alone, and assuming that just because there are racists or nativists or xenophobes on the other side of a policy argument your side must be right.<\/p>\n

Here are a few pertinent examples, from the recent past to the present day.<\/p>\n

For decades following the 1960s, liberals insisted that the Republican Party\u2019s tough-on-crime rhetoric wasn\u2019t really about crime at all; it was a barely coded appeal to racists, a transference of white supremacist politics from \u201csegregation now, segregation forever\u201d to paranoia about Willie Horton.<\/p>\n

Tough-on-crime rhetoric did indeed play on racial fears; lots of white bigots did vote for law-and-order Republicans. But the rhetoric also played on fears of the actual immense crime wave sweeping the United States, a wave that liberal governance failed miserably to arrest or roll back. And for a long time, elite opinion was so determined not to give white bigots any aid and comfort, so determined not to take racists\u2019 side in any way, that it ignored or minimized the actual policy problem, the actual crisis at its door…<\/p>\n

If bigots are for it, we\u2019re against it. It\u2019s a powerful credo. But there\u2019s always a danger that by following it too far, you end up being against reality itself.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ross Douthat seems a tad reactionary here: THE rise of Donald Trump, and with him a white-identity politics more explicit than anything America has seen in decades, has created an interesting division on the political left \u2014 over the question … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[237,29752],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-96057","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-crime","category-donald-trump"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96057","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=96057"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96057\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":96059,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96057\/revisions\/96059"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=96057"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=96057"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=96057"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}