{"id":94636,"date":"2016-05-01T18:20:29","date_gmt":"2016-05-02T02:20:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=94636"},"modified":"2016-05-01T18:20:29","modified_gmt":"2016-05-02T02:20:29","slug":"is-there-anything-good-about-men","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=94636","title":{"rendered":"Is There Anything Good About Men?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Roy Baumeister writes<\/a>: You\u2019re probably thinking that a talk called \u201cIs there anything good about men\u201d will be a short talk! Recent writings have not had much good to say about men. Titles like \u201cMen Are Not Cost Effective\u201d speak for themselves. Maureen Dowd\u2019s book was called \u201cAre Men Necessary?\u201d and although she never gave an explicit answer, anyone reading the book knows her answer was no. Brizendine\u2019s book \u201cThe Female Brain\u201d introduces itself by saying, \u201cMen, get ready to experience brain envy.\u201d Imagine a book advertising itself by saying that women will soon be envying the superior male brain!<\/p>\n

Nor are these isolated examples. Eagly\u2019s research has compiled mountains of data on the stereotypes people have about men and women,which the researchers summarized as \u201cThe WAW effect.\u201d WAW stands for \u201cWomen Are Wonderful.\u201d Both men and women hold much more favorable views of women than of men. Almost everybody likes women better than men. I certainly do.<\/p>\n

My purpose in this talk is not to try to balance this out by praising men, though along the way I will have various positive things to say about both genders. The question of whether there\u2019s anything good about men is only my point of departure. The tentative title of the book I\u2019m writing is \u201cHow culture exploits men,\u201d but even that for me is the lead-in to grand questions about how culture shapes action. In that context, what\u2019s good about men means what men are good for, from the perspective of the system.
\n Hence this is not about the \u201cbattle of the sexes,\u201d and in fact I think one unfortunate legacy of feminism has been the idea that men and women are basically enemies.I shall suggest, instead, that most often men and women have been partners,supporting each other rather than exploiting or manipulating each other.
\nNor is this about trying to argue that men should be regarded as victims. I detest the whole idea of competing tobe victims. And I\u2019m certainly not denying that culture has exploited women. But rather than seeing culture as patriarchy, which is to say a conspiracy by mento exploit women, I think it\u2019s more accurate to understand culture (e.g., a country, a religion) as an abstract system that competes against rival systems\u2014 and that uses both men and women, often in different ways, to advance its cause.
\n Also I think it\u2019s best to avoid value judgments as much as possible. They have made discussion of gender politics very difficult and sensitive, thereby warping the play of ideas. I have no conclusions to present about what\u2019s good or bad or how the world should change. In fact my own theory is built around tradeoffs, so that whenever there is something good it is tied to something else that is bad, and they balance out.
\nI don\u2019t want to be on anybody\u2019s side. Gender warriors please go home.<\/p>\n

Men on Top
\n When I say I am researching how culture exploits men, the first reaction is usually \u201cHow can you say culture exploits men, when men are in charge of everything?\u201d This is a fair objection and needs to betaken seriously. It invokes the feminist critique of society. This critique started when some women systematically looked up at the top of society and saw men everywhere: most world rulers, presidents, prime ministers, most members of Congress and parliaments, most CEOs of major corporations, and so forth \u2014 these are mostly men.
\nSeeing all this, the feminists thought, wow, men dominate everything, so society is set up to favor men. It must be great to be a man.
\n The mistake in that way of thinking is to look only at the top. If one were to look downward to the bottom of society instead, one finds mostly men there too. Who\u2019s in prison, all over the world, as criminals or political prisoners? The population on Death Row has never approached 51% female. Who\u2019s homeless? Again, mostly men.Whom does society use for bad or dangerous jobs? US Department of Labor statistics report that 93% of the people killed on the job are men. Likewise,who gets killed in battle? Even in today\u2019s American army, which has made much of integrating the sexes and putting women into combat, the risks aren\u2019t equal.This year we passed the milestone of 3,000 deaths in Iraq, and of those, 2,938were men, 62 were women.
\n One can imagine an ancient battle in which the enemy was driven off and the city saved,and the returning soldiers are showered with gold coins. An early feminist might protest that hey, all those men are getting gold coins,half of those coins should go to women. In principle, I agree. But remember,while the men you see are getting gold coins, there are other men you don\u2019t see, who are still bleeding to death on the battlefield from spear wounds.
\n That\u2019s an important first clue to how culture uses men. Culture has plenty of tradeoffs,in which it needs people to do dangerous or risky things, and so it offers big rewards to motivate people to take those risks. Most cultures have tended to use men for these high-risk, high-payoffs lots much more than women. I shall propose there are important pragmatic reasons for this. The result is that some men reap big rewards while others have their lives ruined or even cut short. Most cultures shield their women from the risk and therefore also don\u2019t give them the big rewards. I\u2019m not saying this is what cultures ought to do, morally, but cultures aren\u2019t moral beings. They do what they do for pragmatic reasons driven by competition against other systems and other groups.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Roy Baumeister writes: You\u2019re probably thinking that a talk called \u201cIs there anything good about men\u201d will be a short talk! Recent writings have not had much good to say about men. Titles like \u201cMen Are Not Cost Effective\u201d speak … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[142],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-94636","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-feminism"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94636","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=94636"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94636\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":94637,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94636\/revisions\/94637"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=94636"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=94636"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=94636"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}