{"id":92609,"date":"2016-04-04T08:27:45","date_gmt":"2016-04-04T16:27:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=92609"},"modified":"2016-04-04T08:27:45","modified_gmt":"2016-04-04T16:27:45","slug":"a-line-hot-girls-love","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=92609","title":{"rendered":"A Line Hot Girls Love"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><A HREF=\"https:\/\/heartiste.wordpress.com\/2016\/04\/04\/an-asshole-line-girls-cant-help-but-love\/\">From the Chateau<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s a line I sometimes toss out to faux bitchy girls glibly assuming I\u2019m just another chode waiting to polish their pussy pedestals. As far as asshole lines go, this one is lethally penetrative of girly egg-bunkering egos.<\/p>\n<p>The line is most effectively deployed on girls who are playing that \u201cI\u2019m too good for you\u201d flirty game that is common among many prime hotties. You know the type. She\u2019ll tell you, in so many words, how much better she is than you, or how you fall short of her standards in this or that way. It\u2019s irritating, but also promising, because girls generally don\u2019t bother with these sorts of vanity games unless they feel a pulse of attraction.<\/p>\n<p>GIRL: \u201cWe could never date. You\u2019re too short\/tall\/old\/young\/into your job\/full of yourself\/etc.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>THE COCKENING: \u201cGreat. You sound annoying anyway.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>DROP THE SHRIKE. I\u2019ve yet to have negative blowback from saying this to girls. Sure, there will follow a tumult of indignation \u2014 all of it phony \u2014 but eyes will brighten, cheeks will redden, and muffs will moisten. HOW COULD YOU! HOW DARE YOU! WHAT\u2019S YOUR DEAL?! And just like that I\u2019ve trespassed her hindbrain, and she\u2019ll start rationalizing reasons why we, in fact, could date.<\/p>\n<p>One reason I rarely get negative reactions to this supreme gentleman\u2019s riposte is because I tailor my asshole game to my recipient. Super-sensitive, shy girls a tit size short of an HB8 can be genuinely hurt by asshole-y lines like this one, taking it to heart that they really might be annoying, and this bad feeling will cause them to emotionally turtle or storm off in a huff and a bird flip.<\/p>\n<p>Asshole Game is powerful, which means it must be wielded with skill. You could carpet bomb assholery and get laid more than slouching toward incel as a perpetual niceguy, but you\u2019ll also lose a fair number of the less bitchy\/less haughty\/less egotistic girls who don\u2019t have strong urges to succumb to a total dick.<\/p>\n<p>Less egotistic? Yes! Contrary popular perception, girls with high self-esteem enjoy the charms of the asshole more than do lower self-esteem girls. A girl who thinks highly of herself \u2014 i.e., she thinks highly of her face and body as commodities to sell herself on the open sexual market \u2014 prefers more challenging men as potential partners in grime. On the other end of the female spectrum, less solipsistic or extroverted girls are thinner-skinned and quicker to bruise from backhanded compliments (tending to focus on the backhanded part) and reckless assholery. They can be coaxed into chasing assholes, especially if they\u2019re hotter than average, but will weary sooner of commitment-averse, ZFG jerkboys than will stronger, more self-confident women.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From the Chateau: Here\u2019s a line I sometimes toss out to faux bitchy girls glibly assuming I\u2019m just another chode waiting to polish their pussy pedestals. As far as asshole lines go, this one is lethally penetrative of girly egg-bunkering &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=92609\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[210],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-92609","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dating"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92609","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=92609"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92609\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":92610,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92609\/revisions\/92610"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=92609"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=92609"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=92609"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}