{"id":9235,"date":"2009-07-01T07:32:22","date_gmt":"2009-07-01T15:32:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=9235"},"modified":"2009-07-01T07:36:34","modified_gmt":"2009-07-01T15:36:34","slug":"a-pilgrimage-of-passion-the-life-of-wilfrid-scawen-blunt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=9235","title":{"rendered":"A Pilgrimage of Passion: The Life of Wilfrid Scawen Blunt"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m reading an essay by the author <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Elizabeth_Longford\">Elizabeth Longford<\/a> about her writing up the life of poet <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wilfrid_Scawen_Blunt\">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>She was all hot and bothered by Blunt&#8217;s voracious sexuality.<\/p>\n<p>She writes:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8230;But I have to admit to a moment about halfway through when I felt he was prostituting his poetry to an unworthy mode of life. He felt it too; which was one reason why my loyalty and affection returned to him long before the end.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;All this I am afraid is very fin de siecle and immoral,&quot; he wrote in 1891 when he found himself sending copies of precisely the same passionate verses to three different ladies on the same day. &quot;But what can one do?&quot; he continued. &quot;Love is no respecter of time and place.&quot; (One might reply, what did he mean by this kind of &quot;Love&quot;?) With a final burst of ingenuousness, he concluded this unattractive passage by asserting the odious Victorian &quot;double-standard&quot; in sex with apparent sincerity. He expected no trouble, he wrote, from the three recipients of his love-verse even if they found out. &quot;Women are not jealous in this way as men are,&quot; he assured his Victorian self, &quot;for it is in the order of nature that a man&#8217;s love should be divided.&quot;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>I admit I have done this same thing &#8212; sending multiple versions of the same poem to various women telling each it was for her. Hence, I have more sympathy for our cocksman.<\/p>\n<p>Elizabeth Longford writes:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The total number of his &quot;loves&quot;, from the year 1862 to about 1920 when he was no longer &quot;capable&quot; amounted to 38&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;No, the problem was to prevent the beauty of Blunt&#8217;s best poetry, the virility of his prose, and the courage and effectiveness of his political career from being damaged by the monotony of his lusts.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Elizabeth Longford might find Blunt&#8217;s lusts monotonous, but that&#8217;s her opinion. I doubt most men would find a cataloguing of Blunt&#8217;s lusts boring. I don&#8217;t. The beauty of his poetry and the virility of his prose is not diminished for me because Blunt screwed around.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m reading an essay by the author Elizabeth Longford about her writing up the life of poet Wilfrid Scawen Blunt. She was all hot and bothered by Blunt&#8217;s voracious sexuality. She writes: &#8230;But I have to admit to a moment &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=9235\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[38],"tags":[18157,18156,18158,5372,18159,18161,18160,18162],"class_list":["post-9235","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-literature","tag-cocksman","tag-elizabeth-longford","tag-fin-de-siecle","tag-love-quot","tag-love-verse","tag-lusts","tag-sincerity","tag-virility"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9235","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9235"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9235\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9235"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9235"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9235"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}