My sense is that the Alt-Right is neither. It is largely white people who think like Jews when it comes to their own people. They are goyim discovering that they have group interests which often clash with the interests of other groups. All told, they prefer their own kind. Just as Jews ask, is it good for the Jews, Alt-Right gentiles ask if things are good for their group. <\/p>\n
The Alt-Right is the equivalent of Tibetans who prefer that Tibet remain Tibetan rather than be overrun by Chinese. They are the equivalent of the Japanese who prefer that Japan remain Japanese rather than a mixture of races. <\/p>\n
Ben Shapiro writes<\/a>: One of the great mouthpieces of the alt right is Milo Yiannopoulos of Breitbart News, whom I consider a friend and with whom I occasionally engage in spirited bouts of insult-fighting.<\/p>\n Milo appeared on Dave Rubin\u2019s podcast today to explain why people like me shouldn\u2019t be bothered by the apparent bigotry of those on the alt right. Here was his explanation:<\/p>\n “Generation Trump, the alt right people, the people who like me, they\u2019re not anti-Semites. They don\u2019t care about Jews. I mean, they may have some assumptions about things, how the Jews run everything; well, we do. How the Jews run the banks; well, we do. How the Jews run the media; well, we do. They\u2019re right about all that stuff\u2026It\u2019s a fact, this is not in debate. It\u2019s a statistical fact\u2026.Jews are vastly disproportionately represented in all of these professions. It\u2019s just a fact. It\u2019s not anti-Semitic to point out statistics\u2026.The anti-Semitism on the internet, which is really important, I want people to understand this because nobody seems to, when Jonah Goldberg of National Review is bombarded with these memes, and anti-Semitic \u201ctake a hike, kike\u201d stuff, it\u2019s not because there\u2019s a spontaneous outpouring of anti-Semitism from 22-year-olds in this country. What it is is it\u2019s a mischievous, dissident, trolly generation who do it because it gets a reaction. Right? That\u2019s been the case for young people for generations….They can get to people in positions of power, and people in positions of power and keep biting, they keep taking the bait\u2026.It\u2019s a direct response to the language policing, it\u2019s a direct response to being told they can\u2019t say things.”<\/p>\n So Milo seems to be making two points here. The first: not all stereotypes are rooted in falsehood (true). The second: trolling people with viciously nasty language is a positive good because it rips away taboos surrounding language (false). Then Milo wraps all of this in the mantle of political incorrectness.<\/p>\n As someone who despises political correctness with the fiery hatred of a thousand suns, I find this problematic. Here\u2019s why: I believe there\u2019s a difference between political incorrectness and bigotry, or political incorrectness and vulgarity. I have this problem with Trump, and I have this same problem with the alt right that simplistically embraces Trump because they mesh being a jackass with being politically incorrect. They\u2019re not the same thing. It is politically incorrect to point out that black Americans commit a wildly disproportionate share of crime, or that Jews comprise an outsized percentage of successful media moguls, doctors, and lawyers. It is also politically incorrect to point out that cultural stereotypes are sometimes rooted in reality — Milo’s right about that. It is racist, however, to tweet the word \u201cn*****\u201d at a black person, and it is anti-Semitic to tweet a meme of a stereotypical hook-nosed Jew controlling the world or greedily collecting shekels. There is a difference between the two.<\/p>\n And it actually does the cause of political incorrectness a grave disservice to merge the two. It makes it easy to dismiss solid information and data by writing it all off as the work of bigots. The alt right isn\u2019t tearing down taboos regarding language, if that\u2019s really what they think they\u2019re doing. All they\u2019re doing is re-enshrining in the American mind a basic falsehood about the right itself: that we are bigots who use selective data-picking to back our political viewpoints. The self-aggrandizing belief that trolling Microsoft Artificial Intelligence bots on Twitter into tweeting about the wonders of Hitler somehow strikes a blow for free speech is sheer fantasy. It\u2019s teenage puerility. It\u2019s damn dumb.<\/p>\n There\u2019s another problem, too: the alt right gives cover to actual anti-Semites and racists. I\u2019m glad to grant Milo\u2019s premise that there\u2019s hardly any racism, sexism, homophobia and anti-Semitism in America. I believe that. But when I can\u2019t tell the difference between a David Duke tweet and a tweet from Milo\u2019s biggest fans, that\u2019s not my fault \u2013 that\u2019s the fault of the person tweeting like David Duke. When I can\u2019t tell the difference between a trolling tweet and a death threat, perhaps the author ought to be clearer in his verbiage.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" My sense is that the Alt-Right is neither. It is largely white people who think like Jews when it comes to their own people. They are goyim discovering that they have group interests which often clash with the interests of … Continue reading