{"id":91687,"date":"2016-03-28T11:48:15","date_gmt":"2016-03-28T19:48:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=91687"},"modified":"2016-03-28T12:13:52","modified_gmt":"2016-03-28T20:13:52","slug":"guess-the-candidate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=91687","title":{"rendered":"Guess The Candidate"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"guassthecandidate\"<\/a><\/p>\n

From the Chateau<\/a>:<\/p>\n

* Here are my guesses:<\/p>\n

Group 1: Kasich or Cruz<\/p>\n

They look pretty conventional, middle America, nice White lady vibe from the women, and cuck vibe from the men.<\/p>\n

Group 2: Trump<\/p>\n

Men aren\u2019t smiling, have that shitlord look to the eyes. UNCUCKED. The women look like they enjoy the company of men.<\/p>\n

Group 3: Cucksich or Cruz (leaning Cruz)<\/p>\n

Sunglasses, military, flag shirt, guitar. The men are good ol\u2019 boys. The women look friendly but also a little mentally unstable. Possible religious nuts?<\/p>\n

Group 4: Sanders<\/p>\n

Men: Baseball hats, beards\/goatees, and that Quentin Tarantino-ish faggotry about the face. Women: exotics, cat ladies, and art and crafts hippies.<\/p>\n

Group 5: TheCunt<\/p>\n

The men are all weird-looking omegas, and one of them is doing something stupidly ironic in his profile pic (sipping on an iced coffee). The women look like manjawed lawyercunts and sluts. Two of them are wearing \u201cproblem glasses\u201d.<\/p>\n

You can find the answers here., along with PA\u2019s 5\/5 winning picks and reasoning behind each one. I\u2019ll give myself 4.5\/5. The sexually de-polarized manjaws and omega males were the easiest; those are Hillary folk!<\/p>\n

PS PHYSIOGNOMY IS REAL<\/p>\n

COMMENTS<\/a>:<\/p>\n

* Kasich people have a wholesome but naive look<\/p>\n

Trump men have strong eyes<\/p>\n

Cruz: \u201cconservative\u201d looking black guy; women have a clean but bossy hen look<\/p>\n

Sanders males have that gay daddy-baiting look; all are White<\/p>\n

* Mrs. B.J. Clinton\u2019s male voters look very weak, like they prefer women but would happily bend over and go full powerbottom for Bathhouse Barry if he ordered it. Three of Bern\u2019s supporters, the middle three, would sodomize little boys were it not illegal, and the one on the left would videotape it and pleasure himself later.<\/p>\n

* How Trump teases an attention whore<\/a>. Female reporter is back-hamstering to explain what happened when she interviewed Trump. She grilled him about being a negative racist, he went through the usual motions of swatting away each silly question, then as they were concluding he nuked her with a compliment. Of course this is supposed to be a somewhat meta accounting of a press conference rather than a direct report of the issues, but notice how the chick becomes \u201cWowJustWow\u201d and protests too much about how he affected her:<\/p>\n

\u201cAs the meeting ended and we were walking out of the room, I thanked Trump for taking my question. He turned to me and said, \u201cI really hope I answered your question,\u201d and added casually with a smile, \u201cBeautiful.\u201d I was stunned. I didn\u2019t say thank you [too busy preening], and I don\u2019t think I smiled [grinning from ear to ear]. He then walked out to meet with my Post colleagues briefly before heading to the elevator. I stayed in the conference room for a few minutes as it sunk in that the potential GOP nominee for president thought it was okay to comment on my appearance. Did he just say that?
\nPlanning out how to question Trump in a way that was illuminating was like planning for asymmetrical warfare against an opponent who doesn\u2019t follow the same rules as you do. Who doesn\u2019t believe in rules. Who thinks that rules won\u2019t help make America great again. In Trump\u2019s world, commenting on a woman\u2019s appearance in a professional setting is fair game\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n

* I do this all the time and of course they think I\u2019m creepy. The power of success. You can tell how hard she\u2019s trying to sound neutral yet subtly judgemental about it: but can\u2019t resist crowing about it very publicly, and admiring his disregard of the rules of \u201cacceptable discourse\u201d.<\/p>\n

* Epic fail does not begin to describe the situation.<\/p>\n

\u201cBeautiful\u201d is a common way someone superior would conclude the conversation with an inferior as an favourable assessment of a situation
\n(\u201cHow are you guys doing?\u201d \u201cWe poured the concrete.\u201d \u201cBeautiful\u201d)
\n(\u201cHow are you doing\u201d \u201cI\u2019m feeling much better\u201d \u201cBeautiful\u201d)<\/p>\n

Has nothing to do (prima facie that is) with the skank\u2019s appearance.<\/p>\n

These ((people)) are so ignorant it boggles the mind.<\/p>\n

MORE COMMENTS<\/a>:<\/p>\n

* \u201cPS PHYSIOGNOMY IS REAL\u201d \u2014\u2014\u2014 Isn\u2019t it depressing? It\u2019s what I started calling \u201cBiological Calvinism\u201d a while back. And I was wondering whether ugly chicks appear ugly to us because a gazillion generations of Darwinian Nihilism have imbued in us [or, more specifically, in our hindbrains] the ability to sense serious character flaws merely by glancing at a person\u2019s face.<\/p>\n

* I used to believe that \u2013 that the \u201cnurture\u201d takes its toll on the \u201cnature\u201d. But Biological Calvinism says that you have to consider whether it\u2019s actually the \u201cnurture\u201d [the environment] being created by the \u201cnature\u201d. So that ugly people aren\u2019t ugly because they\u2019ve spent their entire lives frowning and frumping and being miserable \u2013 we seem them as ugly because that\u2019s how our hindbrains try to convey to us the message of \u201cDanger Will Robinson!\u201d<\/p>\n