{"id":89328,"date":"2016-03-06T19:09:47","date_gmt":"2016-03-07T03:09:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=89328"},"modified":"2016-03-06T20:27:53","modified_gmt":"2016-03-07T04:27:53","slug":"hillarys-depressed-turnout","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=89328","title":{"rendered":"Hillary’s Depressed Turnout"},"content":{"rendered":"

Steve Sailer writes about Super Tuesday<\/a>: Hillary had a good day piling up delegates, but she didn\u2019t generate much excitement among Democrats in the states where she cruised to victory by getting her core loyalists to dutifully turn out.<\/p>\n

The early word is that Hill and Bill, realizing they don\u2019t have much to say for themselves, are planning to run a negative, ugly campaign against Donald Trump, with lots of charges of sexism and racism.<\/p>\n

Comments to Steve Sailer<\/a>:<\/p>\n

* 20% of backs have above average IQ\u2019s and they have been pummeled by the loss of manufacturing jobs at least as badly as whites. At the moment, they all vote Democrat, but could enough of them go over to Trump to swing the election?<\/p>\n

In Britain, blacks are recent arrivals and will never vote anything other than Labour. US blacks are, like it or not, old stock Americans.<\/p>\n

In NZ, Polynesians will always vote Labour, because they think Labour gives them more free stuff, but the decline of manufacturing has knocked Maoridom for six.<\/p>\n

In reality National (the NZ equivalent of the GOP) has been at least as willing to throw money at them as they are tangata whenua (people of the land).<\/p>\n

If an indigenous Brit called himself indigenous, unemployment would be instantaneous.<\/p>\n

* True, that Hillary doesn\u2019t excite much of anyone on the democrat side, but Trump does inflame many of all political persuasions. Thus, while D turnout in the primaries is low, that doesn\u2019t translate to a low General Election turnout for the democrat nominee. Hate\/fear incites action as much as love, maybe more, I maintain.<\/p>\n

Assuming Trump survives the coming GOPe onslaught and evil convention and post-convention machinations, etc,. his ability to win the General against Hillary will rest with his ability to sound like the logical, smart guy he actually is behind the scenes. That might not move a fair number of dems to go to the polls and vote for him, but it WILL make them stay home.<\/p>\n

* #1 \u2014 Cheap Labor
\nThe Democrat and establishment Republican line is that our labor market should be open to the world\u2013that you deserve nothing as an American. Do you really want to be competing for your job with anyone who shows up at the border, from millions of Indians and Chinese. What sort of lifestyle does Hillary have in mind for you working at Indian or Chinese wages? No matter what color you are \u2026 this is a shitty deal.<\/p>\n

#2 \u2014 Why we can\u2019t have nice things \u2014 Diversity Creates Conflict
\nTrump needs to nail precisely the ideas behind Steve\u2019s \u201cwhy we can\u2019t have nice things\u201d. The Sanders SWPLs want to live in (70s era) Scandinavia \u2026 but you can only do that when you have a coherent, competent, high-achieving, high-trust society. We don\u2019t have that now\u2013never did to the same level as Scandinavia\u2013and Hillary\u2019s diversity program makes it worse and worse and worse.<\/p>\n

Diversity creates conflict. Tiny diversity may add spice\u2013ethnic restaurants! But big scale diversity means differences\u2013in behavior, in achievement, in success\u2013and creates friction and conflict.
\nThe examples write themselves:
\n\u2013 diversity and conflict around the world
\n\u2013 BLM \u2014 increased crime; black men need to obey the same rules as white men; there isn\u2019t some sort of \u201cyou get to assault a cop\u201d rule for black thugs; if they don\u2019t want to, then separate communities\u2013same community and different standards creates conflict
\n\u2013 muslims
\n\u201cblood borders of Islam\u201d\u2013everywhere they are mixed with anyone else \u2013> conflict and violence
\nAmerica has a particular culture\u2013sort of Anglo\\Christian. Muslims never had any presence here and that\u2019s been to America\u2019s great *benefit* \u2026 why import divisiveness and conflict; to me as a businessman that\u2019s just insanity, you don\u2019t set out to make your problems worse<\/p>\n

#3 Gender gap \u2014 Male bashing and \u201cmarriage vs. spinsterhood\u201d
\nTo win Trump will need to at least somewhat neutralize Hillary\u2019s \u201cgirl power\u201d nonsense.<\/p>\n

First off, take a strong stand against the Democrat\u2019s male bashing. Strong, productive men actually hold this joint together.
\nA good line for Trump, is he has plenty of women in the Trump organization, doing business stuff, but his buldings are put up by guys\u2013steel, concrete, piping, heating, AC, plumbing, hanging drywall, etc. etc. Out in the world: drilling for oil, designing engines, airplances, running power plants keeping your lights on, refineries gas for your car, fixing your car, building houses, installing your furnance and keeping natural gas in the pipe to keep it going. Hillary\u2019s spent her life doing absolutely nothing productive so she probably doesn\u2019t realize it\u2013doesn\u2019t *want* to realize it and thinks it all \u201cjust happens\u201d. It doesn\u2019t. It\u2019s guys out there making our modern American lifestyle possible.<\/p>\n

Secondly take on *real* gap\u2013single vs. married.
\nSay explicitly there\u2019s less a \u201cgender gap\u201d than a married gap. Democrats do well with single women who don\u2019t have husbands and want the government to take care of them\u2013by collecting money from all the guys out there that haven\u2019t married them. Married women are much more Republican they look at their husbands paycheck and think \u201cthat\u2019s mine\u201d\u2013that\u2019s for *our* family, our children. They don\u2019t want to hand it over to Hillary to spend.<\/p>\n

Trump should face the camera \u201cI want to speak to young women out there who think Hillary\u2019s laundry list of things she\u2019ll do for you sounds good. Money doesn\u2019t grow on trees. Men and women work for it. No one is entitled to be supported by someone else\u2019s labor, someone else\u2019s savings. Hillary promises to go out and loot men to give you stuff. I suggest that if you want some guy\u2019s money\u2013you marry him. That\u2019s a fair deal. Find a good man with prospects, marry him, build a family together taking care of yourselves. And that will be easier to do when i\u2019m president and America isn\u2019t flooded with cheap foreign labor. But that\u2019s really your choice. If you want a government supported spinsterhood\u2013vote for Hillary. If you want to have a husband, children, a *family*, then vote for me.\u201d<\/p>\n

If Trump wants to win, he\u2019s going to have to tackle these iSteve themes *head on*. Telling me Hillary is ugly or a bitch \u2026useless. Every guy with two in the sack knows she\u2019s the screechy \u201cprogressive\u201d version of the controlling tell-everyone-what-to-do church lady from hell. Trump needs to say what needs to be said. Say it clearly and ram it home again and again and again.<\/p>\n

* Trump has already signaled what he will do against \u201csexism\u201d etc. Highlight Bill Clinton\u2019s rape charges and compare him directly to Bill Cosby. Hillary had said that line for a while, Trump brought up her Husband\u2019s actions, and she shut up. I\u2019m sure she will go at it again, but Trump is not Romney \u2014 the weak loser who wants to lose and roll over and show his tummy.<\/p>\n

Trump has ample ammo \u2014 Bill Clinton and credible rape charges, that Hillary and Bill were happy to take his money before, Hillary\u2019s email server, the Clinton Foundation corruption machine, etc.<\/p>\n

I would have expected that Obama would have quashed the email investigation long ago, my guess is that he will have Hillary! indicted right before the convention, and Sanders figures this too so he\u2019s staying hoping to make a deal with Kingmaker Obama. My second guess is that Obama already has someone in mind and its not an aging Jewish guy who gets on his nerves for existing \u2014 but someone Black and easily controlled.<\/p>\n

Re Trump, Christie is not a dummy, he\u2019s already on board, and I expect a fight between those elected Republicans who are not part of the Washington axis \u2014 and the Romney types. Trump has shown ambition can be served not by foam party antics and donor pandering but by base satisfaction, and there is a whole slew of elected Republicans who would like to advance just by the means Trump has. My guess is that a rump of Republicans form a new party, but end up taking enough Bernie Bros unhappy with say Al Sharpton or Kamala Harris or Spike Lee as the nominee.<\/p>\n

Dems really are the Black Party, Republicans are now the White party, and White women are the only wild cards. White women have big issues with White men \u2014 they don\u2019t need or want beta male provision and beta male placating and such enrage them. Moreover White women are allied with Blacks in all sorts of ways \u2014 principally to jettison White men save the Alphas and take over spoils in AA raiding parties. Europe\u2019s immavasion suggests we are near the end of that free ride however. A society cannot run on White female disgust at the lack of sexy dominance of beta White males. Which is what Hillary\u2019s entire career really has been, if you think about it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Steve Sailer writes about Super Tuesday: Hillary had a good day piling up delegates, but she didn\u2019t generate much excitement among Democrats in the states where she cruised to victory by getting her core loyalists to dutifully turn out. The … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21791],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-89328","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-america"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89328","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=89328"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89328\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":89335,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89328\/revisions\/89335"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=89328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=89328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=89328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}