{"id":88749,"date":"2016-02-28T18:14:21","date_gmt":"2016-02-29T02:14:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=88749"},"modified":"2016-02-28T18:34:43","modified_gmt":"2016-02-29T02:34:43","slug":"steve-sailer-rubio-cruz-denounce-trump-for-failing-to-denounce-kkk-bavarian-illuminati-and-knights-templar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=88749","title":{"rendered":"Steve Sailer: Rubio, Cruz Denounce Trump for Failing to Denounce KKK, Bavarian Illuminati, and Knights Templar"},"content":{"rendered":"

Comments to Steve Sailer<\/a>:<\/p>\n

* Cruz and Rubio are getting more and more ridiculous as they watch their \u201cpresidential\u201d hopes drain away. As typical cuckservatives notice how they go straight to the Democratic Party playbook of name calling \u2013 racist! \u2013 xenophobe! \u2013 despicable! \u2013 abhorrent!
\nThey are both to stupid to realize that using the Democrat\u2019s playbook only helps Trump with the voters. <\/p>\n

* More point-and-sputter guilt-by-association. What Trump should do is say \u201cLook, candidates get endorsed by all sorts of people. I\u2019m not beholden to the desires of David Duke or anyone else. If he votes for me that\u2019s his business. I welcome all votes, as
\nany honest politician would admit to. Only a fool would turn down political support.\u201d<\/p>\n

Not that David Duke says anything all that bad anyway. His antipathy towards Jews is comparable to mainstream antipathy towards white goyim.<\/p>\n

* This pissy name calling that is occurring now in the Republican primary is nothing compared to what will occur in the general election. It will be non-stop race baiting \/ charges of sexism lobbed by Hillary and her surrogates. The fun part is that not only does the Donald seem unfazed but that his supporters are as well. In fact, it seems to have the opposite effect. This is what the Democrats probably fear the most.<\/p>\n

It is not an accident that Meghan Kelly tried this right out of the gate. Like everything about Trump, it is hard to tell if this miscue about the David Duke was contrived or accidental. He must have known this was coming at some point.<\/p>\n

* Trump\u2019s defense is that he is a NYC developer who gave Don King and Al Sharpton a helicopter ride, whose entire staff is Jewish and has a Jewish son in law and grandkid and has been twice named Israel Day Grand Marshall \u2014 how the heck was he supposed to know who David Duke was?<\/p>\n

* Trump should hold a presser and say something about seeking the endorsement of every type of American group, from the NAACP to La Raza and the Log Cabin Republicans and #BLM and the SCLC and the KKK and John Birchers, homo and hetero, Moose, Elk, UAW, AFL-CIO, We are all Americans, all in this together. Something like that. It would be a big hit.<\/p>\n

* As usual, the media is lying through its teeth. The entire premise is made up. Trump repudiated Duke immediately, and now, reasonably, is bristling at the ADL and SPLC\u2019s attempt to force him to utter words. It\u2019s their usual technique to humiliate people. \u201cWorkers of the World Unite\u201d is not Trump\u2019s style, and neo-Bolsheviks pushing him around could lead to some humor. This is their best card they\u2019re playing, so we\u2019ll see how it goes.<\/p>\n

* Get ready for 24\/7 Trump = Hitler for the next eight months.<\/p>\n

* The media is focusing on Trump\u2019s need to repudiate Duke\u2019s support but has closed ranks on Hillary\u2019s bizarre demand that the media not witness her boarding her campaign plane? What could explain her bizarre demand? I suspect that there was some form of medical emergency.<\/p>\n

* Refusal to jump through media hoops which gives them the power to set the narrative. Trump made some statement on Duke a while ago, so a reporter (you know, someone who is supposed to be well versed in background material) already knows Trump\u2019s position, but by constantly asking for Trump\u2019s position, they keep a story alive in order to make \u201cnews\u201d which isn\u2019t exactly news.<\/p>\n

If Fox News asked Obama to denounce Van Jones at every press conference Obama ever held, despite Van Jones, the communist, no longer working in the WH, the fact that Fox was asking for a denounciation wouldn\u2019t make the question a legitimate news question, rather it would be a tool drawn from a propaganda toolchest, a question designed to reinforce the notion that Obama loves communists and communists love Obama.<\/p>\n

* I\u2019ve never understood why this line of reasoning has any traction whomever\u2019s ox is gored.<\/p>\n

Trump is the one running for office, and who would hold power. Not Duke. Isn\u2019t it altogether good for the country that extremists of whatever variety endorse the democratic process as the means to achieving their objectives, regardless of how distasteful anyone else might find them?<\/p>\n

While a proven moneymaker for the SPLC, we\u2019re all better off without the reputation routine.<\/p>\n

The news here is that even David Duke wants to catch the Trump wave.<\/p>\n

* Nobody is pointing out what a crazy world it is where the biggest and richest hate group in America are are hounding Trump for not stating the obvious fact that he doesn\u2019t agree with David Duke.<\/p>\n

I remember MSM making a big deal of it in 1996 when Duke endorsed Pat Buchanan, seemingly harming Buchanan\u2019s bid for the nomination. I hope things are different this time, and it looks that way so far \u2013 most Trump supporters couldn\u2019t give a damn, by the looks of it.<\/p>\n

* New York media types talk about \u201cthe KKK.\u201d The KKK, they say. They always use the definite article. Notice that?<\/p>\n

There is no \u201cThe\u201d KKK, and there hasn\u2019t been since the 1920s. A gaggle of mostly tiny groups have used that name in recent decades but there is nothing like a national organization. Talking in conspiratorial tones about \u201cthe\u201d KKK is a mark of either serious ignorance or pure malice.<\/p>\n

* Trump flirted with the Reform Party in 2000 and disavowed Duke back then.<\/p>\n

What\u2019s interesting and amusing is that Trump\u2019s response was that he \u201cknow[s] nothing\u201d about Duke, which of course harkens back to the Know Nothing Party, whose members would reply that they \u201cknow nothing\u201d when asked about associations that they were familiar with.<\/p>\n

* David Duke, a truly repulsive creature, has been on the fringes for decades and now CNN and the ADL want to make him a household name again. Great job.<\/p>\n

Trump obviously was trying to make the point that he has absolutely nothing to do with Duke so he shouldn\u2019t have to make any comments about him. Otherwise, he\u2019ll be stuck playing this game endlessly.<\/p>\n

* David Duke is sort of the Neil deGrasse Tyson of White Nationalism: he\u2019s well-known by the public but not one of the ground\u2013breakers in his field. They\u2019re both popularizers and creatures of the media more than anything.<\/p>\n

* As far as I know, there\u2019s no copyright on the Klan name, so anyone can set up a chapter with its own rules. As the name does have a strong attraction for certain types of people, I suspect many of the chapters are set up by federal agents or informers in order to attract these people and keep them under surveillance.<\/p>\n

* On Twitter, the other big news is that vile homunculus Alex Pareene and his fellow Gawkerites got Trump..or whoever runs his Twitter account..to retweet a saying of Mussolini, on an account attributable to \u201cilduce2016.\u201d They are trumpeting (pun intended) this as a big \u2018gotcha\u2019 moment, getting Trump to agree with Mussolini. By their own admission they\u2019ve been running this account since December, and this is their first \u2018 bite.\u2019 It\u2019s a pretty anodyne quote, \u201cBetter to live a day as a lion than 100 years as a sheep,\u201d and one that a lot of men, especially alpha \u201cdoers\u201d like Trump would agree with, anyway. But somehow, according to the mental dwarf Pareene, it shows Trump\u2019s fascism.<\/p>\n

I suspect that a lot of the old \u201cJournolisters\u201d have decided that they are going to try to undermine Trump with a lot of little \u201cgotcha\u201d moments like this, so we should expect to see more of this BS.<\/p>\n

* Trump should ask the media why they give Clinton a pass on appearing with the BLM bigots.<\/p>\n

* \u201cCondemning David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan at every opportunity should be the easiest thing anyone can do,\u201d said Heidi Beirich of the Southern Poverty Law Center.<\/p>\n

Strictly speaking, you have an opportunity to condemn David Duke every time there\u2019s a pause in the conversation, so that doesn\u2019t seem like the easiest thing to do by a long shot. But I guess until someone does that, the SPLC reserves the right to call anyone a racist.<\/p>\n

* I have to say I\u2019m really impressed with how Trump handles this question. It reminds me of how he handled Ali G \u2014 just no patience for the BS of it. It couldn\u2019t be more obvious that he thinks the whole denouncing thing is as stupid as it gets.<\/p>\n

* Kudos to the commenter here a couple weeks back who joked that Trump was on his way to reconstructing the Know Nothing party. Now, as Jonathan Chait noted today, Trump\u2019s responding to these questions with \u201cI know nothing\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n

* I\u2019d wager David Duke will not have an open-invitation to the Trump White House the way Al Sharpton currently does.<\/p>\n

Is David Duke responsible for getting people killed has is Al Sharpton? Does David Duke have access to the media and seats of power as does Sharpton? Is Duke anywhere near as vile and hateful?<\/p>\n

* I\u2019m always somewhat surprised by otherwise intelligent people who go insane at the thought of climate change. I\u2019m a rational person. The evidence for man made climate change is (IMO) far stronger than the evidence against. I also believe that the evidence for HDB is far stronger than the evidence against. So, until evidence changes, I believe them both. I\u2019d honestly prefer that they both be wrong (it would give me a lot more hope for the future) but I\u2019m not going to let my personal preferences override what I see to be fairly convincing evidence.<\/p>\n

* I hope the Trump movement becomes strong enough to have McCain, McConnell, and Graham recalled from office. Then after that the rest of the cuckservatives will fall in line.<\/p>\n

* I saw him speak at the rally today; his accent is so thick as to be almost incomprehensible and his speech was mediocre at best.<\/p>\n

Compare to the incredible, mesmerizingly-high-energy Trump\/Christie press conference.<\/p>\n

Sessions is great as a Senator or in the cabinet. Not as a running-mate.<\/p>\n

* I think Sessions is the best VP insurance Trump could buy. He\u2019s a hardliner on immigration and has proven it. Therefore, if the TPTB take a shot at Trump, they\u2019re only replacing him with a dude who will follow through on Trump\u2019s plans.<\/p>\n

Christie, however, would be a bad choice, since he would not do anything Trump promises on immigration, so TPTB wouldn\u2019t mind bumping off Trump for him.<\/p>\n

Trump let\u2019s Sessions run the legislative interference on his immigration plans while he does the rest via executive orders.<\/p>\n

All he needs now is a younger, hungrier dude who is proven hardline on immigration to be Homeland Security dude. Then he can get some namby-pamby career pol to be his Secretary of State to go around smoothing over his immigration hardlines to Mexico, Europe, and Central America.<\/p>\n

He can also make Cruz AG, although that\u2019s a bit dangerous, since Cruz may use it to block Trump\u2019s actions and make himself the NY Times favorite \u201cmaverick\u201d Republican.<\/p>\n

Sessions for VP. Who for Homeland Security?<\/p>\n

P.S. Christie might make a good Sec of State; as a former lobbyist, he\u2019s very good at schmoozing. Or he could be AG (he\u2019s a former US Attorney), since, but again, Trump has to weigh the possibility of him turning on him for NY Times points.<\/p>\n

* Sessions ALONE held off Mitch McConnell and his Amnesties. He\u2019s Horatio at the Bridge and a national hero and treasure. [Yes I AM a single issue voter — the border.]<\/p>\n

I love Trump. But he has to complete the sale to White women, and particularly enough Upper Class White women who seemed in the Exit Polls for SC to be really on Hillary!s bandwagon.<\/p>\n

Hopefully he can connect the dots for Upper Class White women \u2014 enough Open Borders and hordes of Muslim men will be pawing or raping them enabled by mass flash mobs via smartphones. As Brenda Walker noted in Germany the other day. Sure Upper Class White women are in an eternal moral outrage over the lower classes not behaving, and needing a good dose of moral lecture, but do they really want to have to have bodyguards to venture out anywhere? Given that retail shopping in person is a big Upper Class White women thing, see Sex and the City, that\u2019s a good selling point for Trump.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Comments to Steve Sailer: * Cruz and Rubio are getting more and more ridiculous as they watch their \u201cpresidential\u201d hopes drain away. As typical cuckservatives notice how they go straight to the Democratic Party playbook of name calling \u2013 racist! … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21791,42685],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-88749","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-america","category-david-duke"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t