{"id":87927,"date":"2016-02-16T21:10:45","date_gmt":"2016-02-17T05:10:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=87927"},"modified":"2023-09-06T03:23:21","modified_gmt":"2023-09-06T11:23:21","slug":"twitters-jihad-against-conservatives","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=87927","title":{"rendered":"Twitter&#8217;s Jihad Against Conservatives"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><A HREF=\"http:\/\/www.breitbart.com\/tech\/2016\/02\/16\/exclusive-twitter-shadowbanning-is-real-say-inside-sources\/\">From Breitbart<\/a>: umours that Twitter has begun &#8216;shadowbanning&#8217; politically inconvenient users have been confirmed by a source inside the company, who spoke exclusively to <em>Breitbart Tech. <\/em>His claim was corroborated by a senior editor at a major publisher.<\/h2>\n<p>According to the source, Twitter maintains a &#8216;whitelist&#8217; of favoured Twitter accounts and a &#8216;blacklist&#8217; of unfavoured accounts. Accounts on the whitelist are prioritised in search results, even if they&#8217;re not the most popular among users. Meanwhile, accounts on the blacklist have their posts hidden from both search results and other users&#8217; timelines.<\/p>\n<p>Our source was backed up by a senior editor at a major digital publisher, who told Breitbart that Twitter told him it deliberately whitelists and blacklists users. He added that he was afraid of the site&#8217;s power, noting that his tweets could disappear from users&#8217; timelines if he got on the wrong side of the company.<\/p>\n<p>Shadowbanning, sometimes known as &#8220;Stealth Banning&#8221; or &#8220;Hell Banning,&#8221; is commonly used by online community managers to block content posted by spammers. Instead of banning a user directly (which would alert the spammer to their status, prompting them to create a new account), their content is merely hidden from public view.<\/p>\n<p>For site owners, the ideal shadowban is when a user never realizes he&#8217;s been shadowbanned.<\/p>\n<p>However, Twitter isn&#8217;t merely targeting spammers. For weeks, users have been reporting that tweets from populist conservatives, members of the alternative right, cultural libertarians, and other anti-PC dissidents have disappeared from their timelines.<\/p>\n<p>Among the users complaining of shadowbans are sci-fi author and alt-right figurehead Vox Day, geek culture blogger &#8220;Daddy Warpig,&#8221; and the popular pro-Trump account Ricky Vaughn. League of Gamers founder and former <em>World of Warcraft <\/em>team lead Mark Kern, as well as adult actress and anti-censorship activist Mercedes Carrera, have also reported that their tweets are not appearing on the timelines of their followers.<\/p>\n<p>The pattern of shadowban reports, which skews towards the alt-right, the populist right, and cultural libertarians, follows close on the heels of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.breitbart.com\/tech\/2016\/02\/09\/twitter-unveils-new-trust-and-safety-council-featuring-feminist-frequency\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Twitter&#8217;s establishment of a &#8220;Trust and Safety Council&#8221; packed with left-wing advocacy groups, as well as Islamic research centre the Wahid Institute.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>It also follows <a href=\"http:\/\/www.breitbart.com\/tech\/2016\/02\/12\/twitter-gearing-interfere-election\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">my prediction that Twitter would use its influence to interfere in the 2016 presidential election by muffling conservative voices on the platform.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>For close to a year now, Breitbart has covered Twitter&#8217;s march towards political censorship. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.breitbart.com\/london\/2015\/05\/08\/why-is-twitter-censoring-our-timelines-without-consent\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">In May 2015 Allum Bokhari reported that the site had begun to experiment with shadowbans, ostensibly to protect users from abuse<\/a>. Then, as now, it was suspected that &#8220;protecting users from abuse&#8221; was an excuse to implement a system that would later be used for political censorship.<\/p>\n<p>With shadowbans now confirmed by an inside source, there is little room for doubt that the platform is intent on silencing conservatives. Furthermore, it has demonstrated a complete lack of regard for transparency, concealing its shadowbanning system from users and hiding its political bias behind a veneer of opposition to online abuse. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.breitbart.com\/tech\/2016\/01\/26\/5-ways-to-succeed-on-twitter\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(In reality, the site turns a blind eye to abuse from left-wingers.)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From Breitbart: umours that Twitter has begun &#8216;shadowbanning&#8217; politically inconvenient users have been confirmed by a source inside the company, who spoke exclusively to Breitbart Tech. His claim was corroborated by a senior editor at a major publisher. According to &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=87927\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[29674,201,29656],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-87927","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-censorship","category-conservatives","category-twitter-2"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87927","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=87927"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87927\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":151135,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87927\/revisions\/151135"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=87927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=87927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=87927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}