{"id":78810,"date":"2015-11-06T16:14:23","date_gmt":"2015-11-07T00:14:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=78810"},"modified":"2015-11-06T16:14:23","modified_gmt":"2015-11-07T00:14:23","slug":"feminization-of-america-is-bad-for-the-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=78810","title":{"rendered":"Feminization of America Is Bad for the World"},"content":{"rendered":"

Dennis Prager writes<\/a>: Last week the New York Times published an article, \u201cSweeping Away Gender-Specific Toys and Labels,\u201d that contained three sentences that explain one of the most important phenomena in American life.<\/p>\n

In discussing the increasing move to do away with gender-specific toys \u2013 something the New York Times approves of \u2013 the article quoted Tania Missad, the \u201cdirector of global consumer insights\u201d at one of the world\u2019s largest toy manufacturers, Mattel:<\/p>\n

\u201cMattel\u2019s research showed some differences in what girls and boys wanted in their action figures, Ms. Missad said. \u2018For boys it\u2019s very much about telling a story of the good guy killing the villain. . . .\u2019 [Girls] would tell us: \u2018Why does the good girl have to kill the villain? Can\u2019t they be friends in the end?\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

Very little academic research on sex differences is likely to be as accurate as research conducted by businesses and advertising agencies. The reason is simple: Businesses and advertising agencies have no social or political agenda; their agenda is profit. Their assessments must be accurate or they lose money; and those providing wrong assessments are fired. Academics, on the other hand, have nothing on the line. When they publish studies that purport to show that boys and girls want the same types of toys, they lose nothing for asserting something so patently false. In business there is a very big price paid for believing what is untrue. Among academics, there is no price \u2013 certainly not their reputations, because other academics want to believe the same nonsense.<\/p>\n

The Mattel research reveals that male nature wants good guys to kill bad guys (of course, in bad societies the definition of \u201cgood guy\u201d and \u201cvillain\u201d may well be inverted, but that is a values issue, not a male-nature issue); and that female nature wants the good guy and bad guy to \u201cbe friends in the end.\u201d<\/p>\n

This difference may be the most important of all the sex differences. Indeed, it can actually shape the future of America and of the world.<\/p>\n

Of course, there are women who want evil destroyed \u2013 the late Margaret Thatcher, for example. And there are men who oppose confronting evil \u2013 the men who lead the modern Democratic Party, for example. (One such man is the president of the United States, whose has a feminized view of those who do evil \u2013 talk to them, but don’t confront them, label them, or fight them.)<\/p>\n

But these exceptions happen in large numbers under two circumstances: when women get married and when men are feminized.<\/p>\n

When women get married, they are often influenced by their husbands with regard to political and moral issues, just as married men are influenced by their wives on a whole host of micro issues. As a result, married women are more likely than single women to prefer to fight villains than to befriend them.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, more and more American women are single.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dennis Prager writes: Last week the New York Times published an article, \u201cSweeping Away Gender-Specific Toys and Labels,\u201d that contained three sentences that explain one of the most important phenomena in American life. In discussing the increasing move to do … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,142],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-78810","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dennis-prager","category-feminism"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78810","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=78810"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78810\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":78811,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78810\/revisions\/78811"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=78810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=78810"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=78810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}