{"id":77728,"date":"2015-10-27T06:49:00","date_gmt":"2015-10-27T14:49:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=77728"},"modified":"2015-10-27T16:08:57","modified_gmt":"2015-10-28T00:08:57","slug":"donald-trump-was-a-disaster-on-sean-hannity-last-night","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=77728","title":{"rendered":"Donald Trump Was A Disaster On Sean Hannity Last Night"},"content":{"rendered":"

Comments to Steve Sailer<\/a>:<\/p>\n

* He said that he would \u201cexpedite\u201d the return of the \u201cgood\u201d illegals once they had left the country and re-applied for entry. Said there were a lot of good, hard-working, honest people who had lived here for a long time and that they deserved to have their legal re-entry \u201cexpedited\u201d. But said he would make the \u201ccriminal\u201d illegals leave so fast your head would spin. Also said he never liked the word \u201calien\u201d and preferred \u201cillegal immigrant.\u201d<\/p>\n

If he\u2019s going to let the 80%+ of illegals who are not criminals come right back again after being deported, how is this different than just giving them an amnesty while they\u2019re here? A token requirement that they briefly leave the country before he \u201cexpedites\u201d their return is meaningless.<\/p>\n

I thought he got it: we want America to remain a white majority (a growing white majority) country. That\u2019s why he zoomed into first place in the Republican race. But apparently he doesn\u2019t get it. If he\u2019s going to let all the \u201cgood\u201d illegals back in, what\u2019s the difference between his plan and Obama\u2019s or any other amnesty? They all promise to make the criminals leave. Big deal.<\/p>\n

For the record, here\u2019s my transcript of Trump on Hannity, talking about letting the \u201cgood\u201d illegals back into the country on an expedited basis (starting at minute 10:00 of the third block of the Hannity radio program on 10\/26, from Hannity\u2019s web site):<\/p>\n

\nHannity: \u201cWhy do we as a nation\u2026why do people get outraged at the idea that you\u2019re saying \u2018go back, and if you\u2019ve been a law-abiding citizen, then you can come back legally\u2019\u2026<\/p>\n

Trump: Right.<\/p>\n

Hannity: \u2026and everyone freaks out. Why?<\/p>\n

Trump: Well, if you noticed when I said that this morning in New Hampshire, I got a tremendous ovation. It was one of the biggest ovations I had was when I said, \u2018you have to go out, and we\u2019re gonna come back, and we\u2019re gonna expedite, because you know, that\u2019s fair, they\u2019ve been here for a long time, some of \u2018em have been here for very very long, and they\u2019ve done fine, and some of them great, some of them really good, they\u2019ve been great people to be in the country, and we expedite. But you know Sean, you have tremendous bad ones, you have a lot of the gangs in L.A., you have many many illegal \u2013 you used to say aliens, I\u2019ve never used that word actually, I never liked that word, and I hear now it\u2019s politically correct to do it, so for the first time I\u2019m OK with political correct \u2013 but I call it illegal immigration, illegal immigrants. You have a lot of \u2018em here in gangs and you have a lot of them that are really tough dudes and we gotta get \u2018em out. And we\u2019re gonna get them out so fast your head will spin.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

How is this not essentially an amnesty? What difference does it make to just require them to leave the country for a token period of time?<\/p>\n

I predict that when word of this gets around, Trump will plunge in the polls. All the man had going for him, as far as I\u2019m concerned, was that he was going to make the illegals all leave. We assumed that meant for good.<\/p>\n

* I heard the interview, also. Basically he was proposing one of the plans from the early 2000s, in which illegals leave the country for some period of time but many are let back in. I think it totally depends on the numbers that are let back in. If it\u2019s 80%, yes, that\u2019s way too high. Twenty percent who created viable businesses? I might be able to live with a couple million \u2014 so long as future illegal immigration is well and truly stopped.<\/p>\n

* There will be no plunge in the polls. Trump has been saying it this way all along and has not changed his position one iota.<\/p>\n

* Exactly \u2013 what defines what is a \u201cgood\u201d illegal who deserves to be \u201cexpedited\u201d back into the country? His statement on Hannity sounded like the fact that they were here for a long, long time already ought to weigh in the decision.<\/p>\n

Trump is very big on not giving away concessions in negotiating any sooner than you have to. Here the election is a year away and he\u2019s already massively qualified his statement about \u201cthey all have to go.\u201d What difference does it make if they go, if they\u2019re just coming back again? Hell if they\u2019re coming back again, don\u2019t waste their bus money and make them jump through that pointless hoop. Just amnesty them right here. And you know very well that that is the next \u201ccompromise\u201d that will be offered: \u201cthese really good people, really great people, been here a long, long time \u2013 it\u2019s really unnecessary to make them leave, just to turn around and come back again. And we\u2019re getting rid of the real tough dudes, that\u2019s what matters.\u201d<\/p>\n

Trump never had much credibility with me because of his blowhard statements about how rich he is and how he\u2019s nice to people so they better be nice to him, etc. What he had going for him was adopting Sen. Sessions\u2019 immigration plan and making blunt plain statements about how the illegals have to go. For me, to hear that he\u2019s already, at this early point, stating that the \u201cgood\u201d ones can come back on an \u201cexpedited\u201d basis shows that he doesn\u2019t get it, after all. It\u2019s not about legality or illegality of immigrants. It\u2019s about maintaining a majority white population. And that means at the very least that ALL the illegals have to go, for good. (And if they\u2019re such great people, then they will be nice, hard-working assets for their homelands, which need people like that.)<\/p>\n

I have to say that I\u2019d completely given up on ever voting again but was seriously considering voting if Trump won the Republican nomination, just on the outside chance it might save a white America without a civil war\u2026but with this nonsense about \u201cexpediting\u201d the \u201cgood\u201d illegals\u2019 re-entry, I\u2019m back to saying to hell with voting.<\/p>\n

And yes, there is an alternative to Trump for right-wing voters: not voting at all, and letting the whole s**t-house go up in flames that much faster.<\/p>\n

* Many Somalia were placed in the south, in accord with your reasoning. They were unhappy with the local blacks and the stingy freebies. The community was quite proactive finding a more congenial spot, sending their own to check them out.<\/p>\n

Maine with its 99% white population and decent welfare benefits despite being a poor state, won the competition, or lost depending on your viewpoint. And so it came to pass that Lewiston and portland now host a growing Somali community. In addition, maine is one of the few states that allow asylum applications to be made locally instead of overseas. The governor is trying to change that rule.<\/p>\n

This situation demonstrates the \u201cfree rider\u201d problem in a big way. A high trust white society comprised of french Canadians and the descendants of puritan\u2019s build an adequate social safety net for their own, despite their meager resources. Only to be overwhelmed with alien freeloaders.<\/p>\n

* One positive I can see is that if the illegals are made to leave and then apply for readmission, their numbers should count toward the quota of Mexicans we let in legally every year anyway, right?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Comments to Steve Sailer: * He said that he would \u201cexpedite\u201d the return of the \u201cgood\u201d illegals once they had left the country and re-applied for entry. Said there were a lot of good, hard-working, honest people who had lived … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[29752,161],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-77728","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-donald-trump","category-immigration"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77728","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=77728"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77728\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":77817,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77728\/revisions\/77817"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=77728"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=77728"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=77728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}