What does it say about Western weakness that they allow emigres to take over their culture?<\/p>\n
Jews would never allow gentiles to control culture and media in the Jewish state. <\/p>\n
I found the documentary Hollywoodism painful to watch. <\/p>\n
For Orthodox Jews, Hollywood is not a good thing. Orthodox Jews have many of the same complaints as the makers of this documentary, i.e. that Hollywood tears down and mocks things that should be considered sacred. Traditional Orthodox Jews consume very little that Hollywood produces. Traditional Orthodox Jews consider themselves at war with Hollywoodism. <\/p>\n
Fear of anti-Semitism is a major Hollywood theme but the more religious you go in Orthodox life, the less concern there is with fighting anti-Semitism. Orthodox Jews are so busy observing their religion they have no time nor inclination to fixate on anti-Semitism. There is no mitzvah to fight prejudice and bigotry and racism and anti-Semitism. These are preoccupations of some secular Jews such as the ADL crowd. <\/p>\n
Hollywoodism starts with three minutes of clips from the movie, “Jews, Hollywood and the American Dream,” which is based on the Neal Gabler book, “An Empire of Their Own: How Jews Invented Hollywood”.<\/p>\n
Narrator from the Neal Gabler documentary: “Among these immigrants were the future founders of the studios, but they brought with them a new vision of America. Hollywood was a dream dreamt by Jews.”<\/p>\n
Expert: “I’m not sure there was an American dream because the Jews came to Hollywood and invented it. Today we have a popular culture that creates dreams.”<\/p>\n
Narrator: “The moguls created the images, the icons, and the visual forms that we identify with the American way of life.<\/p>\n
Neal Gabler: “They created their own America, an America which is not the real America, but it is their own version of the real America, but ultimately this shadow America becomes so popular that its images and values come to devour the real America. Americans come to define themselves by the shadow America created by Eastern European Jews.”<\/p>\n
“Anyone anywhere could identify with so many of the themes of American movies, one of which was the identity of the outsiders. Jews being outsiders making movies about outsiders.”<\/p>\n
Narrator: “Identification with the little guy, the prize fighters, the loner, and the gangsters.”<\/p>\n
Expert: “Hollywoodism is the ruling ideology of our culture. Hollywood culture is the dominant culture. It is the fantasy structure that we are all living inside.”<\/p>\n
This Hollywoodism documentary concludes: “Hollywoodism is the alien ideology that has infected western culture.”<\/p>\n
“Remember, if you see something, say something! Help to deconstruct the mythology of the new religion. Let others know! Expose the agenda, analyze and point out the propaganda and subliminal messages in Hollywood entertainment.”<\/p>\n
The documentary concludes with a rant by Douglas Rushkoff, author of Nothing Sacred: The Truth About Judaism: “The thing that makes Judaism dangerous to everybody, to every race, to every nation, to every idea, is that we smash things that aren’t true. We don’t believe in the boundaries of nation states, we don’t believe in these ideas of individual gods that protect individual people, these are all artificial constructions and Judaism really teaches us how to see that. In a sense, our detractors have us right in that we are a corrosive force, we’re breaking down the false gods of all nations and all people because they’re not real and that’s very upsetting to people.”<\/p>\n
I interviewed Jewish intellectual Paul Gottfried in 2014<\/a>: <\/p>\n Luke: \u201cI saw how effectively and without any shame how Jews organize in our self-interest. We do not sell our homes to non-Jews in this community.\u201d<\/p>\n Paul: \u201cYou\u2019re talking about a group that does not recognize white Protestants as anything other than the other, as some outside group.\u201d<\/p>\n Luke: \u201cIf we Jews can and should organize in our self-interest, and every other group does except for whites, that makes me think, hey, why aren\u2019t [non-Jewish] whites organizing in their group interest?\u201d<\/p>\n Paul: \u201cThat\u2019s like saying you\u2019re going to become black or Chinese because these are groups that organize in their self-interest. The one indispensable element for Western civilization are the white Christians. Once they go, everything goes. Jews aren\u2019t going to save anything except Jewish self-interest, which is often viewed as incompatible with the preservation of a Western Christian civilization. Jews typically tend to weaken that.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cTo say that Orthodox Jews are less of a threat to civilization does not mean that they are an appealing alternative. They\u2019re not as dangerous as the more assimilated Jews. It doesn\u2019t make them the good guys. It doesn\u2019t make them a model you want to imitate if you are interested in preserving Western civilization.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cWhat we\u2019re looking at is created by white Christians. They\u2019ve created multiculturalism and all those problems, but once they go down, I don\u2019t think much will survive as a recognizable Western society.\u201d<\/p>\n “I don\u2019t think whites have a nationalist sense. I don\u2019t think they\u2019ve had a nationalist sense. My concern is not with the lack of nationalism but with the masochism they are expressing, the self-destructiveness. Nationalism is always organizing against other groups. What whites need to do is to stop beating themselves and treating other groups according to their just deserts.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cMost whites at most times do not buy into this white nationalism. There are other things that have united white people \u2014 ethnicity, religion, being a part of a particular nation. It is rare that whites have seen themselves in terms of racial nationalism.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cI have had this discussion with Jared Taylor on a number of occasions and I have tried to explain to Jared that whites in the past have expressed racial preferences does not mean that white nationalism was the focus of their existence. Groups dislike other groups and try to preserve their own identity. White nationalism says that nothing else really counts in terms of what we are except race. I have a problem with that. I don\u2019t want to take sides with homosexuals against black people. I\u2019m much more concerned about the feminists and homosexuals than I am about people of different races because I am a social conservative.\u201d<\/p>\n Luke: \u201cWhy couldn\u2019t white nationalism mean organizing in your group interest just like all other groups do?\u201d<\/p>\n Paul: \u201cNationalism historically has meant reaction, the friend-enemy distinction. Nationalism in the 19th Century develops against some group that has conquered somebody else. It contributes to the tensions of both sides leading to World War I. Until recently, it was a destructive force. I don\u2019t think it is true anymore. I support nationalist movements in Europe because they are against multiculturalism. They don\u2019t usually hate their neighbors, at least in Western Europe. I don\u2019t think the nationalist paradigm even works here. I don\u2019t think the problem is that whites are beleaguered but that whites behave in a lunatic fashion. They just have to stop being lunatics. They don\u2019t have to hate blacks or exclude them, just don\u2019t be crazy. I worked at a college. I think most of the people I worked with were certifiable. The feminists, the anti-whites, they were just loony tunes. The answer is not to organize them as white nationalists, it is getting them to [stop] behaving in a crazy way.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" What does it say about Western weakness that they allow emigres to take over their culture? Jews would never allow gentiles to control culture and media in the Jewish state. I found the documentary Hollywoodism painful to watch. For Orthodox … Continue reading \n