J.J. Goldberg publishes much of the smartest commentary out there on Jews.<\/p>\n
He writes Sept. 24<\/a>:<\/p>\n You don\u2019t have to be paranoid to sense a new strain of anti-Semitism surfacing in American politics of late. Paranoia helps, but it\u2019s not required. Paranoia helps, but it\u2019s not necessary. All that\u2019s really needed to see this as a wave of anti-Semitism is a very short attention span, or a willful obtuseness about the fast-changing nature of Jewish activism in the American political arena. …The change has a number of causes. One is the growing comfort and affluence of American Jews. It\u2019s easier than previously to throw one\u2019s weight around. There\u2019s less caution. Jewish advocacy is thus a more unabashedly visible political force, prompting more comment \u2014 and pushback. Finally, Netanyahu has tinkered with some long-standing assumptions about Israel-Diaspora relations. Since Israel\u2019s founding, its leaders have sought to avoid actions that might suggest dual loyalty among Jewish citizens of other countries. Netanyahu, reared largely in America, seems to consider that caution anachronistic. From defiant actions like denouncing White House policies before Congress, to subtler signals like appointing to Washington successive ambassadors who are former Americans now loyal to the Jewish state, he\u2019s shown repeatedly that the old diffidence is gone, shame replaced by pride. In his view, there\u2019s no reason to fear sending American Jews into battle against their own government. J.J. Goldberg publishes much of the smartest commentary out there on Jews. He writes Sept. 24: You don\u2019t have to be paranoid to sense a new strain of anti-Semitism surfacing in American politics of late. Paranoia helps, but it\u2019s not … Continue reading
\nWe sense anti-Semitism when a media personality of Ann Coulter\u2019s stature tweets about \u201cf\u2014king Jews\u201d looming too large in Republican thinking. When The New York Times runs lists of Congress members with Jews marked in yellow. When President Obama and his allies speak loosely of big money and foreign influence while debating Middle East policy. When these things start happening almost weekly, it doesn\u2019t require paranoia to sense an ancient prejudice rearing its head.<\/p>\n
\nThe change is tectonic; it affects not only the Jewish community, but also the larger American public square. This past summer, the organized Jewish community \u2014 that is, the major Jewish advocacy organizations, backed by much of the most militant grass-roots \u2014 plunged headlong into an intensely partisan battle against the administration. It landed some punches and drew some blood. That\u2019s changed the rules in several important ways that most of us have barely recognized, much less adapted to.
\nFor anybody keeping score in the Iran debate, how the Jews match up against their political foes is too important an issue to ignore. Unfortunately, it\u2019s an issue nobody knows how to talk about. Tradition and instinct tell us there\u2019s a special name for foes of the Jews: anti-Semites. Individual Jews may be good or bad, but the Jews as a collective are, we insist, on the side of the angels. If the Jews \u2014 the collective \u2014 are in a fight, someone must be picking on them. It can\u2019t be a fair fight.
\nBut what should we call it when the organized Jewish community plunges willingly, en bloc, into a pitched battle \u2014 White House vs. Congress, Washington vs. Jerusalem \u2014 and gives as good as it gets? Observers don\u2019t know how to keep score when all the normal political calculations end up sounding like anti-Semitic tropes: How much money is on the table, What factors are influencing lawmakers\u2019 decisions? What role do other countries play? What\u2019s the likelihood failure will lead to war?<\/p>\n
\nAnother factor is the nature of this fight. Past disputes usually concerned issues of primal urgency to Israel but of only secondary importance to Washington. On Iran, both governments are defending their own fundamental national security. That\u2019s raised the stakes, and the heat.
\nYet another is Washington\u2019s toxic partisan atmosphere. Jewish community advocates used to stay above the partisan fray and maintain good ties with all sides, even when they disagreed. That\u2019s much harder in today\u2019s atmosphere…<\/p>\n
\nThe trouble is, changing the rules of Jewish advocacy, as Netanyahu is doing, brings consequences, and it\u2019s not clear that American Jews understand or welcome those consequences. As the Jewish community\u2019s representative bodies enter the swamp of Washington partisan politics, the Jewish community as a whole comes to be seen as part of that swamp and subject to its rules, including the insults and dirty tricks that other partisan factions are used to.
\nOrdinary Jews, mostly liberals and Democrats, find themselves reviled for positions that they don\u2019t support, and in brawls for which they never signed up. Many will walk away.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"