For the past 2600 years (until recently), most Jews have lived as a minority in Gentiles countries. They’ve kept alive their tradition by constantly contrasting what is Jewish with what is goyish. When Jews say something is goyish, that’s never a compliment.<\/p>\n
How does a tiny minority survive and prosper when dealing with a strong and sometimes violent Gentile majority? By many different tactics that by necessity at times will include deception<\/a>.<\/p>\n Last year, F. Roger Devlin wrote an important essay<\/a> about female masochism. It seems to me that if in the below passage you substitute “Jews” for “women” and “Gentiles” for men,” you get useful insights for useful choices at certain times and places.<\/p>\n Now, females in our \u201cenvironment of evolutionary adaptation\u201d were dependent on males for mating, protection, and access to resources. These males were bigger and stronger than females and could easily hurt them if angered or displeased. If our female ancestors had been delicate snowflakes unable to endure life with such brutes, we would not be here today. In other words, women adapted to male brutality, including occasional violence, learning how to get through or around it.<\/p>\n Think for a moment, men, how you would learn to behave if you were dependent for survival on an unpredictable and often violent creature larger and stronger than yourself. You would learn not simply to take what you wanted. You would learn to act when his back is turned, to use indirection, deception, manipulation. You would learn to conceal your true thoughts and keep Big Boy confused as to your true intentions. You would, in short, learn to act like a woman.<\/p>\n The battle of the sexes is a contest of force vs. cunning. Yes, civilized men learn to control their aggressive impulses and not beat women up every time they feel irritation with them. In the modern West, men have largely renounced the use of their natural weapon for controlling women, i.e., force. Have women renounced the use of their own weapons against men? Certainly we cannot expect women to shed millennial evolutionary adaptations automatically the instant men learn to behave.<\/p>\n Women\u2019s basic strategy during courtship is still to keep suitors confused. Their primary method of getting what they want is still the indirect route through influencing their men. When they express aggression, it still usually takes the form of passive aggression. And they are still both more frequent and more effective liars than men.<\/p>\n To judge by self-help literature aimed at women, most conceive the task of finding a mate as one of figuring out \u201chow to flatter, tease, dupe, and otherwise manipulate a man into marriage\u201d (Rhoads, p. 120). Does it never occur to women that if they really were loyal, sincere, and feminine, men might not need to be duped into marrying them?<\/p>\n While I am not holding my breath for feminism to demand an end to feminine wiles, I think it possible for women to overcome the uglier side of their nature just as men learn to control their temper and instinct for aggression. Women who relied on trickery and deception in their dealings with the opposite sex used to be referred to pejoratively as \u201cdesigning women\u201d\u2014an expression which has largely disappeared from our language.<\/p>\n In short, I would be more inclined to sympathize with all the campaigns opposing \u201cviolence against women\u201d if they were coupled with their logical counterpart: opposing \u201cfraud against men.\u201d<\/p>\n Another interesting aspect of campaigns against domestic abuse to consider is: Why now? Are men behaving more violently today than they used to? There seems to be no evidence for this. As early as 2000, Massachusetts District Court Judge Milton H. Raphaelson declared that there exists \u201cnot an epidemic of domestic violence, but an epidemic of hysteria about domestic violence.\u201d Insofar as there is any real problem of women being brutalized in Western countries, it mainly involves recent non-Western immigrant populations, a fact systematically ignored or concealed by feminists.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Think for a moment, goy, how you would learn to behave if you were dependent for survival on an unpredictable and often violent creature larger and stronger than yourself.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" For the past 2600 years (until recently), most Jews have lived as a minority in Gentiles countries. They’ve kept alive their tradition by constantly contrasting what is Jewish with what is goyish. When Jews say something is goyish, that’s never … Continue reading