{"id":67377,"date":"2015-04-11T19:26:04","date_gmt":"2015-04-12T03:26:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=67377"},"modified":"2015-04-11T19:33:29","modified_gmt":"2015-04-12T03:33:29","slug":"anatoly-karlin-national-wealth-and-iq-at-the-edge-american-exceptionalism-east-asian-mediocrity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=67377","title":{"rendered":"Anatoly Karlin: National Wealth and IQ at the Edge: American Exceptionalism, East Asian Mediocrity"},"content":{"rendered":"

Anatoly Karlin writes<\/a>: Japan has a 5-7 IQ advantage over, say, Italy, but its GDP per capita (PPP) is similar, while its productivity is significantly lower \u2013 even though Japan rates higher on ease of business and perception of corruption indices. There must be other factors that are at play…<\/p>\n

While all the countries of Western Europe hew close to the line of best fit, again there are three major exceptions: The US to the upside, and Japan and South Korea to the downside…<\/p>\n

We know that in recent decades Europe received a lot of immigrants, whose IQs are far lower than those of the natives and show no signs of convergence. The US, meanwhile, is host to two major population groups \u2013 Blacks and Non-White Hispanics \u2013 with consistently subpar IQs that together make up more than 20% of the population. If anything, that should depress productivity, which probably partially explains New Zealand, where ~90 IQ Maoris and Pacific Islanders also make up slightly more than 20% of the population. In contrast, high IQ and ethnically homogenous Japan, Korea, and Finland all underperform, as do Canada and Australia, which are not ethnically homogenous but do make sure to have cognitively elitist immigration policies.<\/p>\n

That said, there are two reasons why this effect might not be all that powerful for both Europe and the US. First of all, in both Europe and the US, these NAMs (Non-Asian Minorities) have a relatively greater demographic preponderance amongst the youngest cohorts, whose members are either not in the workforce at all (infants, schoolchildren, students) or aren\u2019t able to contribute much anyway (they are younger workers with less experience; while they might be quicker on the uptake, older workers often beat them with experience, especially in the more cognitively intense professions). This will likely do Europe and the US no good in the longterm, as they develop ever larger, ethnically distinct cognitive\/economic underclasses that will pull down overall GDP per capita and productivity, but this probably just doesn\u2019t play that big of a role\u2026 for now.<\/p>\n

Moreover, at least in the US, the situation is further improved by the presence of sizable \u201csmart fractions,\u201d which have a disproportionately large positive effect on overall GDP per capita according to many psychometricians like Heiner Rindermann. These smart fractions are both ethnic \u2013 most notably, the 2% of the population that is Jewish \u2013 as well as the result of a global cognitive clustering effect (many of the world\u2019s brightest and most ambitious people are inordinately drawn to US universities and Silicon Valley). It would also explain Israel\u2019s overperformance \u2013 while the national IQ is depressed by Arabs and Sephardic Jews, and the economy is burdened by Haredi welfare bums, the Ashkenazi Jewish cognitive elite still manages to compensate for all that and elevate GDP per capita above the global correlation curve.<\/p>\n

Comments:<\/p>\n

* I\u2019m not aware of any Jews who contributed to the Industrial Revolution. Jewish contributions to science have been almost entirely in theory. Experimental science, discovery through tinkering with physical objects, the sort of stuff that Edison and Tesla did, even the sort of stuff that Korolyov and von Braun did \u2013 I don\u2019t think that Jews have ever done that.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Anatoly Karlin writes: Japan has a 5-7 IQ advantage over, say, Italy, but its GDP per capita (PPP) is similar, while its productivity is significantly lower \u2013 even though Japan rates higher on ease of business and perception of corruption … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[29582],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-67377","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-iq"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t