{"id":66887,"date":"2015-04-01T16:05:34","date_gmt":"2015-04-02T00:05:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=66887"},"modified":"2019-06-17T07:53:15","modified_gmt":"2019-06-17T15:53:15","slug":"lets-talk-about-race","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=66887","title":{"rendered":"Let’s Talk About Race"},"content":{"rendered":"

Robert Weissberg writes<\/a>: Good news: Starbucks customers need not worry that some barista will try to engage you in an honest discussion about American race relations. The whole idea was laughed off the stage and rightly so. One comic suggested that he\u2019d prefer to talk about free will versus determinism with the folks down at Jiffy Lube.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, calls for such honest, forthright and frank dialogues are irrepressible. Recall Attorney General Eric Holder\u2019s 2009 exhortation for a national conversation. Noah C. Rothman recently offered a catalogue of such calls in his February 2015 Commentary essay. The New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristoff suggested \u201ca new commission [that] could jump-start an overdue national conversation.\u201d Similarly, Peniel Joseph of Tufts University called events at Ferguson a \u201cteachable moment that could lead to a National Dialogue on Race Day.\u201d The journalist Troy Singleton opined that \u201cShying away from this difficult conversation will lead only to more incidents like Ferguson and its painful aftermath.\u201d President Obama invited a \u201csustained\u201d conversation on race \u201cto move forward in a constructive fashion.\u201d And on and on and on.<\/p>\n

But, admonitions aside, let me try and finally eradicate this zombie-like idea. Trigger Warning: killing the very idea that a little talk, and yet more chatter can actually solve a deeply rooted problem that has persisted for centuries will not be a pleasant sight to behold. Those made uncomfortable by genuine honesty are advised to leave the room or, if determined to have a \u201cmeaningful dialogue on matters of consequence,\u201d visit Jiffy Lube and seek intellectual enlightenment there.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s start simple. Airing out differences on emotionally laden subjects (and yakking about race guarantees high blood pressure) is not always advisable. Actually, lots of harm can happen from ill-advised frankness. Those in happy marriage know that it would be unwise to turn their 25th wedding anniversary into a two hour t\u00eate-\u00e0-t\u00eate about each other\u2019s annoying personal hygiene habits or spousal sexual ineptitude.<\/p>\n

A frank discussion about race relations would be far worse. I can readily see a white person working himself up into a lather when recounting the sky-high black crime rate, the awful academic performance of blacks despite trillions in government help, the relative level of dependence on government handouts and the absolute lack of any gratitude for this assistance. To which an agitated black would respond with a similarly lengthy catalogue: the legacy of slavery and discrimination, innumerable incidents of police brutality, white denial of their pernicious racism and related sins that undermine black self-respect. And this would be only round one of a 15 round championship fight.<\/p>\n

That every one of these items has been discussed ad nauseam for half a century suggests that the purpose of this dialogue is not to provide new information or to clear the air as one might spit out a spouse\u2019s long annoying faulty hygiene in couples therapy. Nor could it be argued that contemporary Americans need a refresher course on race — almost every item in these prospective conversations spontaneously surfaces with once-a-month regularity thanks to the mass media\u2019s infatuation with racially charged white-on-black violence (but not the reverse).<\/p>\n

Why then the repeated calls and the unwillingness of whites to engage African Americans? Here\u2019s why: nearly all whites (and many Asians, too) know that the invitation is a trap, a disguised ploy to advance the racial egalitarian agenda. An opportunity to advance racial progress is just the bait. Remember Chairman Mao\u2019s a thousand flowers to bloom campaign. This was a 1956 plan to encourage ordinary Chinese to openly criticize the Communist regime so as to promote progress in the arts and sciences. Alas, in 1957 policy was reversed and those who had expressed criticisms were rounded up, sent to prison camps or executed. \u201cFreedom to speak\u201d was a subterfuge from the get-go. Mao called it \u201centicing the snakes out of their caves.\u201d Closer to home, one wag whose name I cannot recall, nailed it perfectly: \u201cWe need an honest conversation so we know who to fire.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Robert Weissberg writes: Good news: Starbucks customers need not worry that some barista will try to engage you in an honest discussion about American race relations. The whole idea was laughed off the stage and rightly so. One comic suggested … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[34,36],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66887","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blacks","category-race"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66887","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=66887"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66887\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":127553,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66887\/revisions\/127553"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=66887"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=66887"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=66887"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}