{"id":66785,"date":"2015-03-31T13:38:54","date_gmt":"2015-03-31T21:38:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=66785"},"modified":"2015-03-31T13:48:08","modified_gmt":"2015-03-31T21:48:08","slug":"gendered-racial-exclusion-by-white-internet-daters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=66785","title":{"rendered":"Gendered Racial Exclusion by White Internet Daters"},"content":{"rendered":"

From a 2008 Princeton paper<\/a>, highlighted by Chateau Heartiste blog<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\nAmong white women, one of the most striking findings is that white women who describe themselves as slim, slender, athletic, fit or average are nearly seven times as likely to exclude black men as dates as women who describe themselves as thick, voluptuous, a few extra pounds, or large<\/strong>. For white men, body type has no effect on their likelihood of excluding blacks or Asians. While political views also have no effect on racial exclusion by white men, white women who describe themselves as liberal or very liberal are less likely to exclude black men as dates than women who are not political, middle of the road, or conservative. Surprisingly, liberal white women appear more likely to exclude Asian men as dates, although this finding only borders on significance. Finally, religion affects black exclusion, and Asian exclusion among white women. Specifically, we see that whites who identified as Jewish were dropped from the analysis of black exclusion because it was a perfect predictor; that is, all white men and women who identified as Jewish excluded blacks as possible dates; all white women who identified as Jewish also excluded Asian men as possible dates<\/strong>. Further, white men who do not state a religion or who state their religion as \u201cother\u201d are far more inclusive of black women as dates than those who describe themselves as not religious. Likewise, white women of \u201cother\u201d religions are more likely to include Asian males as dates.<\/p>\n

\"racisswhitewomen\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"torah\"<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

From the Chateau Heartiste blog<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Now the only question remaining is whether fat white chicks settle for black men because those are the only men who\u2019ll have them, or that black men try but fail to get sexy white chicks and decide to shoot for the easy prey because even a fat white girl is more feminine than the typical black girl? Same difference, I suppose. My limited knowledge of the mating rituals of matricentric cultures is that it\u2019s a bit of both; fat chicks are stuck choosing between a steel-reinforced dildo and a black man, and black men hone in on fat white chicks because they love can tolerate grotesque booties and they learned from experience that sexy white chicks want nothing to do with them.<\/p>\n

These findings are perfectly in line with the CH observation \u2014 heck it\u2019s in line with just about everyone\u2019s observations except that no one wants to bring it up at the company picnic \u2014 that the white women who date black men are often fat, gross, and classless.<\/p>\n

Probably unsurprising to most, the kind of white women willing to dance by the dusky coonlight? Fat liberal white women with sanctimony issues.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m gonna go out on a limb here and say that fat liberal white women are just about the most unappealing dating prospects for any white man with options and a working set of nads. So\u2026 good riddance…<\/p>\n

Racism is natural, evolved, and a part of what makes us human. Racism expands the diversity in the world by creating and sustaining group aesthetics that would otherwise get swamped into oblivion by a one-world fuckfest.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

From a 2008 Princeton paper, highlighted by Chateau Heartiste blog: Among white women, one of the most striking findings is that white women who describe themselves as slim, slender, athletic, fit or average are nearly seven times as likely to … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[34,210,36,29594],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66785","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blacks","category-dating","category-race","category-whites"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66785","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=66785"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66785\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":66799,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66785\/revisions\/66799"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=66785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=66785"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=66785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}