A friend says: On the bright side, at least Murdoch’s not a Jew.<\/p>\n
By the way, I’m sure when Bush says “economic benefits” he isn’t talking about cheap labor, because all the neoliberals assure me “everybody wins” with more immigration. So he must be referencing something else entirely, but what?<\/p>\n
From NYTimes.com<\/a>:<\/p>\n Mr. Murdoch was pleased that Mr. Bush, the former governor of Florida, had listed the economic benefits of overhauling the nation\u2019s immigration system, confiding in Ms. Jarrett that Mr. Bush, a likely Republican presidential candidate, had said all the right things on the fraught issue, according to three people with firsthand knowledge of the conversation…<\/p>\n Mr. Murdoch takes special umbrage at Mr. Romney\u2019s handling of immigration in 2012, when the candidate, as an alternative to forced deportation, called for \u201cself-deportation,\u201d in which people in the United States illegally would voluntarily go back to their home countries and apply to emigrate legally.<\/p>\n During a closed-door meeting at the Union League Club in Manhattan that year, Mr. Murdoch called the position foolhardy and asked Mr. Romney to back away from it. Mr. Romney, according to two attendees, replied that he had already softened his language on immigration and that if he abandoned his position he would look like a flip-flopper, a label he loathed. Mr. Murdoch was baffled and dismayed, the attendees said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A friend says: On the bright side, at least Murdoch’s not a Jew. By the way, I’m sure when Bush says “economic benefits” he isn’t talking about cheap labor, because all the neoliberals assure me “everybody wins” with more immigration. … Continue reading