Why would people assume that a beautiful black woman with an ugly white guy is a hooker? Because blacks and whites, in general, occupy opposite parts of the socio-economic spectrum and so people rationally assume that when you have a hot black chick on the arm of an ugly white guy, it’s because he’s buying her for sex. <\/p>\n
People would assume something similar if she was a hot white woman on the arm of an ugly white guy. <\/p>\n
Even though there are plenty of individual exceptions, being black or or Mexican screams “low class” in America today, just like a Cockney accent in England screams “low class.” If an upper-class Brit is seen with a working class girl, it is often assumed she’s a hooker, whatever her color. Why would a guy who graduated from Oxford or MIT hang out with a girl who couldn’t spell “differentiate”?<\/p>\n
WP<\/a>: “Recently, Ebony editor Jamilah Lemieux wrote on Twitter, \u201cRT if you are a Black woman (trans or cis) and have been assumed to be a sex worker by a White man.\u201d It was retweeted more than 150 times.”<\/p>\n Steve Sailer wrote in 1997<\/a>: “The heart of the problem for Asian men and black women is that intermarriage does not treat every sex\/race combination equally: on average, it has offered black men and Asian women new opportunities for finding mates among whites, while exposing Asian men and black women to new competition from whites.”<\/p>\n Nature has color-coded people so we can make smart decisions in a split-second. <\/p>\n I know a married Orthodox woman who has a PhD in Dance. When this fact is mentioned in Orthodox life, it is usually greeted with comments such as, “On a pole?”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Why would people assume that a beautiful black woman with an ugly white guy is a hooker? Because blacks and whites, in general, occupy opposite parts of the socio-economic spectrum and so people rationally assume that when you have a … Continue reading