Chaim Amalek writes: “What is the idea of “yicchus”, if not a poor man’s attempt at eugenics? Also, every sensible human being practices eugenics to the fullest extent of his abilities (social, economic, etc.) when selecting a mate. And everyone knows this. Here again, the Jews can lead the way in providing goyim with space in which to make the obvious case.”<\/p>\n
John Derbyshire writes<\/a>:<\/p>\n If you are the ethnic majority in a nation, it is natural to wish to maintain the dominance of your ethny; if you belong to a minority ethny, especially one with as sorrowful a history as the Jews, it is just as natural to be hostile to the dominance of any other.<\/p>\n But these simple truths need restating, because the very peculiar cultural history of the Western world through the past few decades, leading to the widespread state of mind among whites that I call ethnomasochism, has made them nonobvious.<\/p>\n Cooper Sterling, writing, three years ago on VDARE.com, described a different, but related, contradiction\u2014he used the word \u201cparadox\u201d\u2014also concerning Jews.<\/p>\n “Since the 1960s, a prominent group of Jewish public intellectuals has been systematically and unscrupulously campaigning to discredit eugenics\u2014but, in a great paradox, other Jewish intellectuals, and Zionists, have been actively interested in eugenic principles, both historically and currently, to secure the posterity\u2014health and wellbeing\u2014of Jews. Collectively, it amounts to a case of Do As I Say\u2014Not As I Do.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Chaim Amalek writes: “What is the idea of “yicchus”, if not a poor man’s attempt at eugenics? Also, every sensible human being practices eugenics to the fullest extent of his abilities (social, economic, etc.) when selecting a mate. And everyone … Continue reading