{"id":53247,"date":"2014-03-31T14:04:20","date_gmt":"2014-03-31T22:04:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=53247"},"modified":"2014-03-31T14:07:19","modified_gmt":"2014-03-31T22:07:19","slug":"the-way-forward-on-marriage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=53247","title":{"rendered":"The Way Forward On Marriage"},"content":{"rendered":"

F. Roger Devlin wrote<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Within the family, the provider must control the allotment of his wealth. The traditional community of property in a marriage, i.e., the wife\u2019s claim to support from her husband, should again be made conditional on her being a wife to him. She may run off with the milkman if she wishes\u2014leaving her children behind, of course (a woman willing to do this is perhaps an unfit mother in any case); but she may not evict her husband from his own house and replace him with the milkman, nor continue to extract resources from the husband she has abandoned. Until sensible reforms are instituted, men must refuse to leave themselves prey to a criminal regime which forces them to subsidize their own cuckolding and the abduction of their children…
\nHarassment accusations should be a matter of public record. This would make it possible to maintain lists of women with a history of making such charges for the benefit of employers and, far more importantly, potential suitors.
\nWomen might eventually reacquaint themselves with the old-fashioned idea that they have a reputation to protect.
\nUniversal coeducation should be abandoned. One problem in relations
\nbetween the sexes today is over familiarity. Young men are wont to assume that being around girls all the time will increase their chances of getting one.
\nBut familiarity is often the enemy of intimacy. When a girl only gets to socialize with young men at a dance once a week, she values the company of young men more highly. It works to the man\u2019s advantage not to be constantly in their company. Men, also, are most likely to marry when they do not understand women too well…
\nTraditionally, a man has been expected to marry. Bachelorhood was positively forbidden in some ancient European societies, including the early Roman Republic. Others offered higher social status for husbands and relative disgrace for bachelors. There seems to have been a fear that the sexual instinct alone was inadequate to insure a sufficient number of offspring. Another seldom mentioned motive for the expectation of marriage was husbands\u2019 envy of bachelors: \u201cWhy should that fellow be free and happy when I am stuck working
\nmy life away to support an ungrateful creature who nags me?\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

F. Roger Devlin wrote: Within the family, the provider must control the allotment of his wealth. The traditional community of property in a marriage, i.e., the wife\u2019s claim to support from her husband, should again be made conditional on her … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[619],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-53247","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-marriage"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t