Jonathan Rosenblum writes: More than twenty years ago, I wrote an op-ed entitled, \u201cAre Gadol Biographies Good for Us?\u201d Little did I dream at the time that I would soon be asked to write the first of many biographies of major Jewish leaders. From that experience, I learned to be careful with my words lest they come back to haunt me.<\/p>\n
At least one person benefits greatly from the writing of a \u201cgadol biography\u201d \u2013 the author himself. The best such biographies require a total immersion in the subject\u2019s life, until one is constantly asking oneself: How would he have approached this subject? Why did he make that choice? Living with a great person for years can only uplift a person, though, as with everything in life, no degree of inspiration lasts unless translated into concrete actions.<\/p>\n
At their best, biographies of gadolim should provide the reader with the experience of living in the presence of the subject. I have witnessed how a maggid shiur with sterling middos can, over a period of years, transform every single person in a shiur. And the same thing should be true of a \u201cgadol biography.\u201d<\/p>\n
At the same time, specific biographies will have a different impact on particular readers, depending on the nature and interests of the reader. Someone who aspires to be an askan (community activist) will get much more out of the biography of Rabbi Moshe Sherer than one who does not. Someone who knows Michtav M\u2019Eliyahu will gain more from a biography of Rabbi Dessler than those not familiar with his works. Rabbi Noach Orlowek does a great deal of counseling, and tells me that he returns to Reb Yaakov for its reminder that gadlus and normalcy can go together whenever he needs cheering up.<\/p>\n
IN ORDER FOR A BIOGRAPHY to have its intended impact, the subject must come through in all his multi-faceted individuality, not as if he is being crammed into some cardboard formula of a \u201cgadol biography.\u201d Providing that full portrait is easier said than done. Rabbi Nisson Wolpin, who was the dorm counselor at Torah Vodaas when Rabbi Yaakov Kamenetsky was Rosh Yeshiva, once told me that many of the incidents I described were accurate as far as they went. But had I known what Reb Yaakov said when the bochur in question left the room, it would have added yet another layer to Reb Yaakov\u2019s pick\u2019hus (sharp insight).<\/p>\n
Biographers must avoid the trap of political correctness. If a certain gadol eschewed, for instance, \u201cthe Brisker derech\u201d in learning, the biographer should not be afraid to say so, even if that is prevailing approach today. If a subject is worthy of a biography, his opinions are worthy of being quoted, even if they are not those held by other figures of comparable stature.<\/p>\n
Read more: http:\/\/www.cross-currents.com\/archives\/2012\/06\/25\/on-writing-gadol-biographies\/#ixzz1z0P9V0ZA
\nUnder Creative Commons License: Attribution<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Jonathan Rosenblum writes: More than twenty years ago, I wrote an op-ed entitled, \u201cAre Gadol Biographies Good for Us?\u201d Little did I dream at the time that I would soon be asked to write the first of many biographies of … Continue reading