On his radio show today, Dennis Prager said: “I have not met an ugly person. What they mean is the least attractive.<\/p>\n
“If you are unattractive, you should do everything you can to become more attractive. If society says that there is no price paid for how you look… What about people with bad breath for physiological reasons? I don’t want to hire them as sales people because I smell their breath in the interview. Will that be next? Halitosis is the next protected group?<\/p>\n
“Or does the person who has that issue fights it. He will look into treatment, how many mints he can have in his mouth at a time.<\/p>\n
“What we have now is that you do not have to do anything for you. We will protect you. This infantilization of the human being is disastrous.”<\/p>\n
Daniel S. Hamermesh, a professor of economics at the University of Texas, Austin, is the author of “Beauty Pays,” published this month<\/a>. <\/p>\n \nBEING good-looking is useful in so many ways.<\/p>\n In addition to whatever personal pleasure it gives you, being attractive also helps you earn more money, find a higher-earning spouse (and one who looks better, too!) and get better deals on mortgages. Each of these facts has been demonstrated over the past 20 years by many economists and other researchers. The effects are not small: one study showed that an American worker who was among the bottom one-seventh in looks, as assessed by randomly chosen observers, earned 10 to 15 percent less per year than a similar worker whose looks were assessed in the top one-third \u2014 a lifetime difference, in a typical case, of about $230,000.<\/p>\n Beauty is as much an issue for men as for women. While extensive research shows that women\u2019s looks have bigger impacts in the market for mates, another large group of studies demonstrates that men\u2019s looks have bigger impacts on the job.<\/p>\n Why this disparate treatment of looks in so many areas of life? It\u2019s a matter of simple prejudice. Most of us, regardless of our professed attitudes, prefer as customers to buy from better-looking salespeople, as jurors to listen to better-looking attorneys, as voters to be led by better-looking politicians, as students to learn from better-looking professors. This is not a matter of evil employers\u2019 refusing to hire the ugly: in our roles as workers, customers and potential lovers we are all responsible for these effects. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n Marell emails: I heard Daniel Hamermesh on The Michael Medved show today and the guy should not be taken seriously. The man is a clown trying to sell books using junk science. When a caller asked him why he always mentions Blacks when he talks about legal protection for the ugly and the guy says in so many words they are a group that needs it most. Even Medved as taken aback by some of his statements.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" On his radio show today, Dennis Prager said: “I have not met an ugly person. What they mean is the least attractive. “If you are unattractive, you should do everything you can to become more attractive. If society says that … Continue reading