{"id":3551,"date":"2008-07-25T11:37:22","date_gmt":"2008-07-25T19:37:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=3551"},"modified":"2008-07-25T11:37:51","modified_gmt":"2008-07-25T19:37:51","slug":"the-john-edwards-story-another-black-eye-for-the-latimes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=3551","title":{"rendered":"The John Edwards Story: Another Black Eye For The LA Times"},"content":{"rendered":"

These clowns can’t get out of their own way.<\/p>\n

It’s so satisfying to see this arrogant institution humbled.<\/p>\n

Kevin Roderick reports<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Executive editor Meredith Artley of the Times website follows up in an email to Times bloggers:<\/p>\n

From: Artley, Meredith
\nSent: Friday, July 25, 2008 11:59 AM
\nSubject: Hubbub<\/p>\n

Hi everyone. Many of you have probably seen the Slate item titled “LAT Gags Blogs” citing Tony’s note asking you all to steer clear of the alleged Edwards affair. It’s now linked to from Drudge, and Gawker has an item too.<\/p>\n

In the spirit of transparency I want to give some background on this, and to note how in hindsight we might have done things differently to avoid the discontent that led to yet another public poke in the eye.<\/p>\n

Various colleagues on the 3rd floor have been working on reporting the story. I made the decision that while we are working on verifying if this has any truth to it, we should stay away from joining the fray. We still don’t know that, and national and metro are still pursuing.<\/p>\n

Our message to you (I asked Tony to drop you guys the note) should have been more nuanced. I should have first not encouraged posting on this topic, but if any of you feel that you have a post you really to write, to please discuss it with Tony and myself first since we must always tread carefully on unverified stories. And I should have explained the thinking behind that decision. The idea was not to muzzle any of you and then walk away – that is never a recipe for success.<\/p>\n

Russ, myself, Tony and all the editors you work with trust you guys to engage us in open and frank dialogue on just about anything that’s on your mind, and we’ll do the same. You have our confidence and we expect the same. We have a strong network thanks to all of the thoughts that many of you have shared, creating better blogs, growing the readership, and staying focused on the work and not the drama. Let’s keep that up and settle for nothing less.<\/p>\n

Questions, thoughts, etc? Ask me or Tony.<\/p>\n

Meredith Artley
\nExecutive Editor, LATimes.com<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

These clowns can’t get out of their own way. It’s so satisfying to see this arrogant institution humbled. Kevin Roderick reports: Executive editor Meredith Artley of the Times website follows up in an email to Times bloggers: From: Artley, Meredith … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[76],"tags":[10636,10634,31005,3420,10635,750],"class_list":["post-3551","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-los-angeles-times","tag-artley","tag-frank-dialogue","tag-john-edwards","tag-kevin-roderick","tag-latimes","tag-rsquo"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t