{"id":35371,"date":"2011-07-28T13:19:18","date_gmt":"2011-07-28T21:19:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=35371"},"modified":"2011-07-28T13:19:18","modified_gmt":"2011-07-28T21:19:18","slug":"new-york-times-reader-kills-dozens-in-norway","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=35371","title":{"rendered":"New York Times Reader Kills Dozens in Norway"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ann Coulter writes<\/a>: The New York Times wasted no time in jumping to conclusions about Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian who staged two deadly attacks in Oslo last weekend, claiming in the first two paragraphs of one story that he was a “gun-loving,” “right-wing,” “fundamentalist Christian,” opposed to “multiculturalism.” <\/p>\n

It may as well have thrown in “Fox News-watching” and “global warming skeptic.” <\/p>\n

This was a big departure from the Times’ conclusion-resisting coverage of the Fort Hood shooting suspect, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan. Despite reports that Hasan shouted “Allahu Akbar!” as he gunned down his fellow soldiers at a military medical facility in 2009, only one of seven Times articles on Hasan so much as mentioned that he was a Muslim. <\/p>\n

Of course, that story ran one year after Hasan’s arrest, so by then, I suppose, the cat was out of the bag. <\/p>\n

In fact, however, Americans who jumped to conclusions about Hasan were right and New York Times reporters who jumped to conclusions about Breivik were wrong. <\/p>\n

True, in one lone entry on Breivik’s gaseous 1,500-page manifesto, “2083: A European Declaration of Independence,” he calls himself “Christian.” But unfortunately he also uses a great number of other words to describe himself, and these other words make clear that he does not mean “Christian” as most Americans understand the term. (Incidentally, he also cites The New York Times more than a half-dozen times.) <\/p>\n

Had anyone at the Times actually read Breivik’s manifesto, they would have seen that he uses the word “Christian” as a handy moniker to mean “European, non-Islamic” — not a religious Christian or even a vague monotheist. In fact, at several points in his manifesto, Breivik stresses that he has a beef with Christians for their soft-heartedness. (I suppose that’s why the Times is never worried about a “Christian backlash.”) <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ann Coulter writes: The New York Times wasted no time in jumping to conclusions about Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian who staged two deadly attacks in Oslo last weekend, claiming in the first two paragraphs of one story that he … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[241],"tags":[29943,1515,27259,27257,27258,27260],"class_list":["post-35371","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ann-coulter","tag-ann-coulter","tag-fox-news","tag-jumping-to-conclusions","tag-malik-hasan","tag-military-medical-facility","tag-monotheist"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t