{"id":3536,"date":"2008-07-24T07:35:24","date_gmt":"2008-07-24T15:35:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=3536"},"modified":"2008-07-24T07:35:24","modified_gmt":"2008-07-24T15:35:24","slug":"why-is-the-msm-ignoring-the-john-edwards-love-child-story","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=3536","title":{"rendered":"Why Is The MSM Ignoring The John Edwards Love Child Story?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2195914\/\">Mickey Kaus blogs<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Edwards, <\/strong><a name=\"busted\"><strong>Rielle<\/strong><\/a><strong> Hunter, <\/strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalenquirer.com\/sen_john_edwards_caught_with_mistress_and_love_child_in_la_hotel\/celebrity\/65193\"><strong>Busted:<\/strong><\/a><strong> <\/strong><em>HuffPo<\/em> &#8216;s Sam Stein, who <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2007\/09\/26\/edwards-mystery-innocuou_n_66070.html\">got the story rolling<\/a>, appears to be vindicated. &#8230; <strong>P.S.:<\/strong> Always trust <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2175509\/#whoisrielle\">content<\/a> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2181118\/#undernewsanalysis\">from<\/a> <em><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2175509\/#metinabar\"><em>kausfiles<\/em><\/a><\/em>! Never trust <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.mydd.com\/story\/2007\/10\/11\/161518\/89\">content<\/a> from <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.mydd.com\/story\/2007\/12\/19\/153027\/87\">Jerome Armstrong<\/a>. &#8230; <strong>P.P.S.:<\/strong> Will this be the<strong> first presidential-contender level scandal to occur completely in the undernews, without ever being reported in the cautious, respectable MSM? <\/strong>That&#8217;s always seemed an interesting<em> <\/em>theoretical possibility&#8211;a prominent politician just disappears from the scene, after blogs and tabloids dig up dirt on him, but nobody who relies on the <em>Times<\/em>, <em>Post, <\/em>network news or Mark Halperin has the faintest idea why. If this is that case, it will <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/72.3.228.81\/id\/2180311\/#undernews\">have come along sooner than I would have thought<\/a>. &#8230;<strong> P.P.P.S.:<\/strong> But it&#8217;s hard to believe the MSM can <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2181118\/#undernewsanalysis\">ignore<\/a> the story now. Don&#8217;t think Obama will! &#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>&quot;<a name=\"getitsecond\">Get it first<\/a>, but first get it second.&quot; <\/strong>The old <em>Newsweek<\/em> rule! I hope that&#8217;s the rule the MSM is following. If so, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/opinion.latimes.com\/opinionla\/2008\/07\/john-edwards-af.html\">here&#8217;s an MSM mention<\/a>! And <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/discussion\/2008\/07\/21\/DI2008072101782.html\">here<\/a>. <em>Business Week<\/em> is what, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.businessweek.com\/innovate\/FineOnMedia\/archives\/2008\/07\/the_national_en.html#more\">chopped liver<\/a>? And doesn&#8217;t <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2195869\/\">Jack Shafer<\/a> count? &#8230; <strong>I fear there is a new rule: &quot;We don&#8217;t want to get it at all. Not even just a mention of the &#8216;allegation.&#8217; Not even second.&quot;<\/strong> Why? Jon Fine&#8217;s <em>Business Week<\/em> piece <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.businessweek.com\/innovate\/FineOnMedia\/archives\/2008\/07\/the_national_en.html\">summarizes some likely reasons<\/a>. A couple of points:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8211;Fine notes that &quot;Edwards isn&#8217;t considered a likely vice-presidential candidate by the press.&quot; That&#8217;s true. <strong>But he <em>is<\/em> a likely Obama cabinet official<\/strong>. Many Dems would like to see him as Attorney-General. That&#8217;s what&#8217;s at stake in the love-child coverage. The <em>Enquirer<\/em> has killed him as a VP candidate. But if the MSM goes into full &quot;protect Elizabeth&quot; mode the damage might yet not <em>quite<\/em> be enough to stop his confirmation by a Democratic Senate next year. &quot;Protect Elizabeth&quot; = &quot;protect A.G. John.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<em>If <\/em>the <em>Enquirer<\/em> story is true, Edwards didn&#8217;t just cheat on his sick wife after making a big deal of his loyalty to her in the campaign. He also presided over an<strong> elaborate cover-up<\/strong>, involving lies and duplicitous lobbying of the MSM. What is it the CW says about cover-ups? Eliot Spitzer looks like a Boy Scout in comparison.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>P.S.: <\/strong>If the MSM can discuss the charges in meta form (<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/discussion\/2008\/07\/21\/DI2008072101782.html\">&quot;It&#8217;s so easy to jump to conclusions&#8212;and I admit, this looks bad&quot;<\/a>) in blogs, chat rooms, and in press commentaries, why not on the front page in political commentaries? As things stand, here&#8217;s a rundown of media performance on the John Edwards front:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8211;The <em>New York Times<\/em> doesn&#8217;t tell you what happened yesterday.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;The print edition of the <em>Washington Post<\/em> doesn&#8217;t tell you what happened yesterday.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<em>Newsweek <\/em>doesn&#8217;t tell you what happened yesterday.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<em>Time <\/em>doesn&#8217;t tell you what happened yesterday.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;Katie Couric didn&#8217;t tell you what happened yesterday.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;Brian Williams didn&#8217;t tell you what happened yesterday.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;Charlie Gibson didn&#8217;t tell you what happened yesterday.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<em>RealClearPolitics<\/em> doesn&#8217;t tell you what happened yesterday.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<em><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/search.huffingtonpost.com\/search\/?sp_a=sp100395aa&amp;sp_k=&amp;sp_p=all&amp;sp_f=ISO-8859-1&amp;sp_q=edwards\"><em>HuffingtonPost<\/em><\/a> <\/em>doesn&#8217;t tell you what happened yesterday (and it&#8217;s <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2007\/09\/26\/edwards-mystery-innocuou_n_66070.html\">their story!<\/a>). I blame the commenters.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;Mark Halperin doesn&#8217;t tell you what happened yesterday.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;Mark Ambinder doesn&#8217;t tell you what happened yesterday.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;One Roger Simon <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/pajamasmedia.com\/rogerlsimon\/2008\/07\/22\/john-edwards-in-a-feydeau-farce-at-the-beverly-hilton\/\">tells you what happened<\/a> yesterday&#8211;but the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\/rogersimon\/\">other Roger Simon<\/a> doesn&#8217;t!<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Has the gap between what the MSM lets you know and what happened&#8211;and what you can <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.drudgereport.com\/\">easily find out happened<\/a>&#8211;ever been greater? &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mickey Kaus blogs: Edwards, Rielle Hunter, Busted: HuffPo &#8216;s Sam Stein, who got the story rolling, appears to be vindicated. &#8230; P.S.: Always trust content from kausfiles! Never trust content from Jerome Armstrong. &#8230; P.P.S.: Will this be the first &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=3536\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5859,160,5860],"tags":[10377,10581,29883,10582,1570,10580],"class_list":["post-3536","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-john-edwards","category-mickey-kaus","category-rielle-hunter","tag-jack-shafer","tag-mark-halperin","tag-mickey-kaus","tag-presidential-contender","tag-vp-candidate","tag-what-chopped-liver"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3536","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3536"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3536\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3536"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3536"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3536"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}