Chaim says about Sunday’s NYT article: "Makes perfect sense to me. Long hours, low pay, socially isolating. The perfect setup for a massive coronary."<\/p>\n
In shul, a friend said to me, "If you keep knocking the rabbis down like ten pins, maybe you will end up as the Moral Leader."<\/p>\n
Here’s the report from Matt Richtel<\/a>:<\/p>\n SAN FRANCISCO — They work long hours, often to exhaustion. Many are paid by the piece — not garments, but blog posts. This is the digital-era sweatshop. You may know it by a different name: home.<\/p>\n A growing work force of home-office laborers and entrepreneurs, armed with computers and smartphones and wired to the hilt, are toiling under great physical and emotional stress created by the around-the-clock Internet economy that demands a constant stream of news and comment.<\/p>\n Of course, the bloggers can work elsewhere, and they profess a love of the nonstop action and perhaps the chance to create a global media outlet without a major up-front investment. At the same time, some are starting to wonder if something has gone very wrong. In the last few months, two among their ranks have died suddenly.<\/p>\n Two weeks ago in North Lauderdale, Fla., funeral services were held for Russell Shaw, a prolific blogger on technology subjects who died at 60 of a heart attack. In December, another tech blogger, Marc Orchant, died at 50 of a massive coronary. A third, Om Malik, 41, survived a heart attack in December.<\/p>\n Other bloggers complain of weight loss or gain, sleep disorders, exhaustion and other maladies born of the nonstop strain of producing for a news and information cycle that is as always-on as the Internet.<\/p>\n To be sure, there is no official diagnosis of death by blogging, and the premature demise of two people obviously does not qualify as an epidemic. There is also no certainty that the stress of the work contributed to their deaths. But friends and family of the deceased, and fellow information workers, say those deaths have them thinking about the dangers of their work style.<\/p>\n The pressure even gets to those who work for themselves — and are being well-compensated for it.<\/p>\n “I haven’t died yet,” said Michael Arrington, the founder and co-editor of TechCrunch<\/a>, a popular technology blog. The site has brought in millions in advertising revenue, but there has been a hefty cost. Mr. Arrington says he has gained 30 pounds in the last three years, developed a severe sleeping disorder and turned his home into an office for him and four employees. “At some point, I’ll have a nervous breakdown and be admitted to the hospital, or something else will happen.”<\/p>\n “This is not sustainable,” he said.<\/p>\n It is unclear how many people blog for pay, but there are surely several thousand and maybe even tens of thousands.<\/p>\n The emergence of this class of information worker has paralleled the development of the online economy. Publishing has expanded to the Internet, and advertising has followed.<\/p>\n Even at established companies, the Internet has changed the nature of work, allowing people to set up virtual offices and work from anywhere at any time. That flexibility has a downside, in that workers are always a click away from the burdens of the office. For obsessive information workers, that can mean never leaving the house.<\/p>\n Blogging has been lucrative for some, but those on the lower rungs of the business can earn as little as $10 a post, and in some cases are paid on a sliding bonus scale that rewards success with a demand for even more work.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Chaim says about Sunday’s NYT article: "Makes perfect sense to me. Long hours, low pay, socially isolating. The perfect setup for a massive coronary." In shul, a friend said to me, "If you keep knocking the rabbis down like ten … Continue reading \n