{"id":2614,"date":"2008-04-01T08:43:00","date_gmt":"2008-04-01T16:43:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=2614"},"modified":"2008-04-01T10:29:57","modified_gmt":"2008-04-01T18:29:57","slug":"another-kosher-lawsuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=2614","title":{"rendered":"Another Kosher Lawsuit"},"content":{"rendered":"

AMERICAN WORLD FOODS INC VS MEHADRIN DAIRY CORPORATION ET AL
\n<\/p>\n

Case Type: Othr Breach Contr\/Warr-not Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
\nCase#: BC388004
\nCASE NAME: AMERICAN WORLD FOODS INC VS MEHADRIN DAIRY CORPORATION ET AL <\/strong><\/font>
\nParties: AMERICAN WORLD FOODS INC. – PL\/PET,CITY GLATT INC. – Def\/Res,DOES 1 THROUGH 20 – Def\/Res,MEHADRIN AND J. & J. DAIRY PRODUCTS INC. – Def\/Res’s DBA,MEHADRIN DAIRY CORPORATION – Def\/Res,SHALOM & SONS – PL\/PET’s DBA
\nAttorneys: KISS BENJAMIN ESQ. – Attorney for PL\/PET
\nDate Filed: 03\/28\/2008<\/div>\n
 <\/div>\n
\n\n\n\n
\n
Case Summary<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Please make a note of the Case Number.<\/p>\n

Click here to access document images for this case.<\/a>  
\n If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.<\/p>\n

<\/a>Case Number: <\/strong>BC388004
\n AMERICAN WORLD FOODS INC VS MEHADRIN DAIRY CORPORATION ET AL<\/p>\n

Filing Date: <\/strong>03\/28\/2008
\n Case Type: <\/strong>Othr Breach Contr\/Warr-not Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
\n Status: <\/strong>Pending<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

Future Hearings <\/strong>
\n None<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

Documents Filed<\/a> | Proceeding Information<\/a><\/center><\/a><\/p>\n

Parties <\/strong><\/p>\n

AMERICAN WORLD FOODS INC. – Plaintiff\/Petitioner<\/p>\n

CITY GLATT INC. – Defendant\/Respondent<\/p>\n

DOES 1 THROUGH 20 – Defendant\/Respondent<\/p>\n

KISS BENJAMIN ESQ. – Attorney for Plaintiff\/Petitioner<\/p>\n

MEHADRIN AND J. & J. DAIRY PRODUCTS INC. – Defendant\/Respondent’s DBA<\/p>\n

MEHADRIN DAIRY CORPORATION – Defendant\/Respondent<\/p>\n

SHALOM & SONS – Plaintiff\/Petitioner’s DBA<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

Case Information<\/a> | Party Information<\/a> | Proceeding Information<\/a><\/center><\/a><\/p>\n

Please make a note of the Case Number.<\/p>\n

Click here to access document images for this case.<\/a>  
\n If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.<\/p>\n

Documents Filed <\/strong>(Filing dates listed in descending order)<\/p>\n

03\/28\/2008<\/strong> Complaint<\/p>\n

03\/28\/2008<\/strong> Ex-Parte Application (for provisional restraining order or tro and osc )
\n Filed by Attorney for Pltf\/Petnr<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

Case Information<\/a> | Party Information<\/a> | Documents Filed<\/a><\/center><\/a><\/p>\n

Proceedings Held <\/strong>(Proceeding dates listed in descending order)<\/p>\n

03\/28\/2008<\/strong> at 08:30 am in Department 85, James C. Chalfant, Presiding
\n Exparte proceeding – Denied<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

Case Information<\/a> | Party Information<\/a> | Documents Filed<\/a> | Proceeding Information<\/a><\/center><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n


\n <\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

AMERICAN WORLD FOODS INC VS MEHADRIN DAIRY CORPORATION ET AL Case Type: Othr Breach Contr\/Warr-not Fraud (General Jurisdiction) Case#: BC388004 CASE NAME: AMERICAN WORLD FOODS INC VS MEHADRIN DAIRY CORPORATION ET AL Parties: AMERICAN WORLD FOODS INC. – PL\/PET,CITY GLATT … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[186],"tags":[3506,1142,3514,3504,3006,3011,3005,3007,3503,3509,3513,3512,3507,3014,3511,3003,3505,3508,702,3510],"class_list":["post-2614","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-kashrut","tag-access-document","tag-amp","tag-breach","tag-case-document","tag-case-name","tag-case-number","tag-case-summary","tag-case-type","tag-dairy-corporation","tag-dairy-products","tag-dba","tag-defendant","tag-document-images","tag-general-jurisdiction","tag-glatt","tag-jurisdiction-case","tag-pet-city","tag-petitioner","tag-plaintiff","tag-respondent"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2614","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2614"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2614\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2614"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2614"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2614"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}