{"id":165556,"date":"2025-12-21T06:57:07","date_gmt":"2025-12-21T14:57:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=165556"},"modified":"2025-12-21T06:57:07","modified_gmt":"2025-12-21T14:57:07","slug":"industrial-policy-the-lost-generation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=165556","title":{"rendered":"Industrial Policy &#038; The Lost Generation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The 2025 book, <A HREF=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Industrial-Policy-United-States-Competition\/dp\/1009243071\/\">Industrial Policy for the United States: Winning the Competition for Good Jobs and High-Value Industries<\/a>, adds a material, economic &#8220;base&#8221; to the cultural &#8220;superstructure&#8221; described in Jacob Savage&#8217;s <A HREF='https:\/\/www.compactmag.com\/article\/the-lost-generation\/\">The Lost Generation<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>If Savage&#8217;s essay explains the psychological and sociological collapse of the Millennial professional class (the shift from &#8220;Buffered&#8221; autonomy to &#8220;Porous&#8221; vulnerability), Fasteau and Fletcher\u2019s book explains the structural economic collapse that made that shift inevitable.<\/p>\n<p>Here is how the book deepens the essay\u2019s argument:<\/p>\n<p>1. It Explains the Scarcity Driving the &#8220;Porous&#8221; War<\/p>\n<p>Savage\u2019s essay describes a generation locking horns in a vicious, zero-sum cultural war for dwindling professional spots in media, academia, and Hollywood.<\/p>\n<p>The Book\u2019s Insight: The book argues that the US deliberately allowed its &#8220;Advantageous Industries&#8221; (high-growth, high-wage manufacturing and tech) to be offshored, believing the country could subsist on services and finance.<\/p>\n<p>The Connection: When the &#8220;productive core&#8221; of the economy leaves, the surplus wealth that supports a large, comfortable &#8220;creative class&#8221; evaporates. The &#8220;Lost Generation&#8221; is fighting so viciously over cultural territory because the economic territory has shrunk. The &#8220;porousness&#8221; (vulnerability) they feel is real: they are living in an economy that literally has fewer &#8220;advantageous&#8221; slots to offer than the one their parents inhabited.<\/p>\n<p>2. The Failure of the &#8220;Knowledge Economy&#8221; Myth<\/p>\n<p>The subjects of Savage\u2019s essay\u2014writers, editors, creative directors\u2014are the archetypal workers of the &#8220;Knowledge Economy.&#8221; They believed that if they just had good ideas and credentials, they would succeed (the Buffered view).<\/p>\n<p>The Book\u2019s Insight: Fasteau and Fletcher dismantle the idea that a nation can just &#8220;invent&#8221; (Knowledge Economy) and let others &#8220;produce.&#8221; They show that &#8220;innovation and production are embedded in an &#8216;industrial commons'&#8221;\u2014if you lose the factory, you eventually lose the R&#038;D and the design jobs too.<\/p>\n<p>The Connection: The &#8220;Lost Generation&#8221; are the victims of this decoupled fallacy. They were trained to be the &#8220;mind&#8221; of an economy that has lost its &#8220;body.&#8221; The book suggests that without a healthy industrial base, the &#8220;knowledge&#8221; sector becomes a precarious, low-productivity service sector\u2014exactly the &#8220;disadvantageous&#8221; trap Savage\u2019s subjects find themselves in.<\/p>\n<p>3. The &#8220;Buffer&#8221; Was Actually Economic Dominance<\/p>\n<p>In the previous turn, we established that the &#8220;Buffered Self&#8221; relies on insulation from outside forces.<\/p>\n<p>The Book\u2019s Insight: The book details how the US post-WWII economy was a historical anomaly of total dominance, allowing for a &#8220;Golden Age&#8221; where high wages and stability were the norm. This abundance created the illusion that individual merit was all that mattered.<\/p>\n<p>The Connection: The &#8220;Buffer&#8221; that protected the Boomers and Gen X wasn&#8217;t just psychological; it was economic monopoly. When the US refused to use industrial policy to defend its industries against mercantilist rivals (China, Japan), that economic buffer dissolved. The &#8220;Lost Generation&#8221; is porous because the national economy itself became porous\u2014open to predation by foreign industrial policies that gutted the domestic middle class.<\/p>\n<p>4. From &#8220;Masters of the Universe&#8221; to &#8220;Service Workers&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Savage\u2019s essay laments the loss of agency among white male elites who thought they would be &#8220;masters of meaning.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The Book\u2019s Insight: The book distinguishes between &#8220;Advantageous&#8221; industries (high barrier to entry, pricing power, oligopoly) and &#8220;Disadvantageous&#8221; ones (perfect competition, low margins, commoditized labor).<\/p>\n<p>The Connection: The &#8220;Lost Generation&#8221; thought they were entering Advantageous careers (Masters of the Universe). Instead, due to the hollowing out of the economy, they found themselves in Disadvantageous labor markets (commoditized freelancers, easily replaced, competing on price\/politics). The book provides the economic theory for why their labor value collapsed: they are trapped in sectors with &#8220;diminishing returns&#8221; rather than &#8220;increasing returns&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The book argues that you cannot have a buffered identity in a porous economy. You cannot maintain a confident, meritocratic professional class in a country that has surrendered the structural economic leverage (manufacturing, supply chains) that creates broad-based wealth. The &#8220;Lost Generation&#8221; is lost because the industrial foundation required to &#8220;find&#8221; them was sold off.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The 2025 book, Industrial Policy for the United States: Winning the Competition for Good Jobs and High-Value Industries, adds a material, economic &#8220;base&#8221; to the cultural &#8220;superstructure&#8221; described in Jacob Savage&#8217;s<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21791],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-165556","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-america"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165556","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=165556"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165556\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":165557,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165556\/revisions\/165557"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=165556"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=165556"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=165556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}